True globalists (should) reject empire
by David Gordon
Ludwig von Mises Institute
01/31/05
Deepak Lal writes as a convinced advocate of American Empire. But in the course of the book, he undermines his own reasons for defending imperialism and offers a devastating criticism of democratic imperialism and of Woodrow Wilson's Utopianism. Lal's basic argument for empire is straightforward: International trade is essential to prosperity. But given a high degree of disorder, large scale trade cannot occur, or at least will be greatly impeded...
http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?Id=1733
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
Ludwig von Mises Institute
01/31/05
Deepak Lal writes as a convinced advocate of American Empire. But in the course of the book, he undermines his own reasons for defending imperialism and offers a devastating criticism of democratic imperialism and of Woodrow Wilson's Utopianism. Lal's basic argument for empire is straightforward: International trade is essential to prosperity. But given a high degree of disorder, large scale trade cannot occur, or at least will be greatly impeded...
http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?Id=1733
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
Starmail - 1. Feb, 12:03