http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/grave_cell_phone_dangers_revealed.htm
http://www.campaignfortruth.com/Eclub/210305/CTM%20-%20phone%20dangers%20revealed.htm
http://www.thehealthcrusader.com/pgs/excalibur/article_2005_02_19_2200.shtml

Informant: Iris Atzmon and Gerald Hernesmaa


There's some very old and incorrect info in this rehashed article. Note that Peter French (not Franch) has since "recanted" and his last public appearance on national TV saw Peter saying that he now thought that mobile phones were safe. The statement that "In New Zealand, cellphone towers are prohibited on school property because of possible health effects" is not true. One unfortunate legacy of Cherry's good work is an urban legend that New Zealand has restrictive cell phone standards. Not true - The standard setters in NZ sold out to ICNIRP and the cell phone industry's "Darth Vader", David Black who has unfortunately had far more impact on NZ RF standards than Cherry.

Don Maisch

--------

I also noticed errors and, more worryingly, this at the end of the article: "On Jan. 1, 2001 I cancelled my cellphone service... GOOD REASON to get your cell phone protection chip here now..."

Get your WHAT????!!!!!!!

This can be Googled through to:
http://www.21stcenturyhealth.co.uk/phoneshield.asp

(via a top of page link on www.wifi-forum.com/wf/archive/index.php/t-39768.html )

So this article seems to have been written to promote another snake-oil scam.

I can find no scientific or technical evidence that any of the so-called "protection chips" actually protect you from anything, certainly not pulsing microwaves.

Alasdair Philips