Radiation from antennas - But still WHO reigns supreme
Here: http://www.telenor.com/csr/radiation/antennas/ I read this:
"Telenor has decided that the maximum signal strength indoors in residential areas should not exceed 1 per cent of the WHO's limit value."
Question:
Why?
I will ask them and tell you if I get an answer.
Frans
But still WHO reigns supreme:
"The WHO has nevertheless chosen to introduce very high safety margins before fixing a maximum exposure effect on people. This is done to take into account any possible biological effects that so far, in spite of extensive research, have failed to materialise. The WHO's limit values were subject to revision in the latter part of the 1990s but no cause for stricter limit values could be found. In the EU, and in most other countries, the WHO's recommended limit values will be adopted as national guidelines."
The health effects have failed to materialise?? In what sense? In the laboratory.
Andy
"Telenor has decided that the maximum signal strength indoors in residential areas should not exceed 1 per cent of the WHO's limit value."
Question:
Why?
I will ask them and tell you if I get an answer.
Frans
But still WHO reigns supreme:
"The WHO has nevertheless chosen to introduce very high safety margins before fixing a maximum exposure effect on people. This is done to take into account any possible biological effects that so far, in spite of extensive research, have failed to materialise. The WHO's limit values were subject to revision in the latter part of the 1990s but no cause for stricter limit values could be found. In the EU, and in most other countries, the WHO's recommended limit values will be adopted as national guidelines."
The health effects have failed to materialise?? In what sense? In the laboratory.
Andy
Starmail - 23. Aug, 13:08
