It is misleading nonsense to write that only heating effects from RF exposure have been established as a health risk. The peer-reviewed scientific literature is full of papers showing, often replicated, biological effects that are likely to have serious health consequences (e.g. heat-shock-protein cellular stress responses) occurring at levels far below those that cause heating. The current MTHR research programme is mainly funding further investigations in this area. The UK Government (in the "Maastricht Treaty" and "Our Common Future" and other papers) is pledged to apply a precautionary approach when the science suggests problems that are not yet proven; this is the case with TETRA. Plenty of concerning evidence about the biological effects of RF carriers modulated with low frequency pulsing has been published, some of it decades ago.

http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/micrwave/pito_amp.asp

--------

Mobile Telephony: Standards more than insufficient
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/618857/

Measure people, not masts
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/561516/

ICNIRP Guideline Critique
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/619583/

The Inadequacy of the ICNIRP Guidelines
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/571130/

Trust Us, We're Experts: How Industry Manipulates Science
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/618577/



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=ICNIRP+guideline+critique