Dangers of Psychiatric Drugs - A bill to strengthen and protect America in the war on terror
Internet /radio interview with Sen RON PAUL ...TONITE! Re: Nat. Mental Health Screening
THERE IS MORE AT STAKE HERE THAN ONE CAN IMAGINE!!!
Tonight's Show March 24, 2005:
AAL Series - Dangers of Psychiatric Drugs Part 10
Featured Guest: CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL
YOU DEFINITELY DON'T WANT TO MISS THIS SHOW!
http://www.anniearmenlive.org/psychiatric_drugs.htm
AAL Press Release:
http://www.anniearmenlive.org/AALPressRelease032105.htm
For details, please visit
http://www.anniearmenlive.org/psychiatric_drugs.htm
URGENT: SUPPORT H.R. 181 - Parental Consent Act of 2005
introduced in the House by Congressman Ron Paul and Tom Feeney.
http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/pcapetition.htm
H.R. 181 would prohibit the use of federal funds for any universal or mandatory mental-health screening program. For those of you with websites, please post this petition on your sites and have valued members of your networks sign the petition in support of H.R. 181. You will also find this petition on my "linx" page at http://www.anniearmenlive.org/annie_linx.htm
So that you have a greater sense of what is at stake, below are two related items:
NOW, EVEN PARENTS LOST RIGHTS!!! Children's Mental Health in the 108th Congress
This is just ONE example that illustrates our current state of affairs...MAINLY, THAT THIS IS NO LONGER a government of the people for the people - DESPITE tireless efforts by so many...including most in Congress!
THE BAD - Sadly, despite media coverage by Dr. Laura, G. Gordon Liddy, World Net Daily, News Max, (my note: ALL REPUBLICANS!) many talk radio interviews across the country, and thousands of calls and emails to Congress, grants to fund the New Freedom Commission (NFC) recommendations, which include universal mental health screening and treatment with ineffective and dangerous medications, were not stopped. $20 million was appropriated for state grants to implement the NFC recommendations. Physician and Congressman Paul’s excellent language that required parental consent for screening before these programs were funded was not included. Dr. Paul wrote a letter signed by more than twenty Members urging the parental consent language. House leadership, including Speaker Hastert, Majority Leader DeLay, and Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Regula accepted the Paul language. All of these House Members and those that voted for the original amendment in September deserve our thanks. Sadly, that language protecting the basic right of parental consent was dropped in the Senate.
The Department of Education is spending $5 million on “Mental Health Integration in Schools” that we are still investigating, as well as $1 million for Senator Kennedy’s disastrous early childhood mental health program called Foundations for Learning. (See our update.)
The stand-alone bill passed the US House 425-1, but was stalled in the Senate by Senator Edward Kennedy.
And some though that the Democratic Party were our saviors!
The second item, is that Pharmaceutical companies got their bases covered with Senate Bill S - 3 in case there is any harm brought about to our children because of prescription drugs, such as antidepressants, prescribed during this Mental Health Screening debacle!
S.3
Title: A bill to strengthen and protect America in the war on terror. Sponsor: Sen Gregg, Judd [NH] (introduced 1/24/2005) Cosponsors (8)
Latest Major Action: 1/24/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
What is further hypocritical is how a hidden intent for this bill is camouflaged in its title:
" A bill to strengthen and protect America in the war on terror".
With this bill, in essence, Pharmaceutical companies or government agencies are no longer required to disclose harmful effects on things such as vaccinations and drugs NOR may the public be awarded punitive damages!!!
In the audio clip excerpt below, I will provide the portion of the interview that is pertinent to this Senate Bill. The complete interview can be heard at the following link to learn on whose behalf portions of this bill aims to protect....NOT THE PUBLIC'S!!! http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2005/03/21.html
PLEASE TURN YOUR COMPUTER VOLUME UP AND CLICK ON THE LINK TO LISTEN
http://PlayAudio-123.com/play.asp?m=160164&f=CVXGXG&ps=13&p=1 (1 minute)
Senate Bill S- 3 (portions highlighted):
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c109:2:./temp/~c109TyIkZ7:e45042:
(If link above does not work, go to http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.html and enter "Bioshield" in the Search Box.
`SEC. 762. WARNING UNIFORMITY.
`(a) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in this section, no State or political subdivision of a State may, directly or indirectly, establish or continue in effect under any authority any notification requirement for a drug, vaccine, or other biological product intended for use by humans that provides for a warning concerning the safety of the drug, vaccine, or biological product or any component or package thereof, unless such notification requirement has been prescribed under the authority of this Act and the State or political subdivision notificatio n requirement is identical to the notification requirement prescribed under the authority of this Act.
`(b) DEFINITIONS- In this section:
`(1) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT- The term `notification requirement' includes any mandatory disclosure requirement relating to the dissemination of information about a drug, vaccine, or biological product in any manner, such as labels, labeling, posters, public notices, advertising, or any other means of communication.
`(2) WARNING- The term `warning' with respect to a drug, vaccine, or other biological product means any statement, vignette, or other representation which indicates, directly or by implication, that the drug, vaccine or biological product presents or may present a hazard to human health or safety.
IT GETS WORST!!!
`SEC. 319F-3. LIABILITY PROTECTIONS FOR PANDEMICS, EPIDEMICS, AND COUNTERMEASURES.
`(2) SPECIAL RULES- In an action brought under this section for damages the following provisions shall apply:
`(A) PUNITIVE DAMAGES- No punitive damages intended to punish or deter, exemplary damages, or other damages not intended to compensate a plaintiff for actual losses may be awarded , nor shall any party be liable for interest prior to the judgment.
`(B) NONECONOMIC DAMAGES-
`(i) IN GENERAL- Noneconomic damages may be awarded in an amount not to exceed $250,000 against a defendant only in an amount directly proportional to the percentage of responsibility of such defendant for the harm to the plaintiff, and no plaintiff may recover noneconomic damages unless the plaintiff suffered physical harm.
`(ii) DEFINITION- For purposes of clause (i), the term `noneconomic damages' means damages for losses for physical and emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, mental anguish, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of society and companionship, loss of consortium, hedonic damages, injury to reputation, and any other nonpecuniary losses.
`(3) COLLATERAL SOURCES- Any recovery by a plaintiff in an action under this section shall be reduced by the amount of collateral source compensation, if any, that the plaintiff has received or is entitled to receive that result or may result in loss to the manufacturer, distributor, or health care provider.
Jack Topel
THERE IS MORE AT STAKE HERE THAN ONE CAN IMAGINE!!!
Tonight's Show March 24, 2005:
AAL Series - Dangers of Psychiatric Drugs Part 10
Featured Guest: CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL
YOU DEFINITELY DON'T WANT TO MISS THIS SHOW!
http://www.anniearmenlive.org/psychiatric_drugs.htm
AAL Press Release:
http://www.anniearmenlive.org/AALPressRelease032105.htm
For details, please visit
http://www.anniearmenlive.org/psychiatric_drugs.htm
URGENT: SUPPORT H.R. 181 - Parental Consent Act of 2005
introduced in the House by Congressman Ron Paul and Tom Feeney.
http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/pcapetition.htm
H.R. 181 would prohibit the use of federal funds for any universal or mandatory mental-health screening program. For those of you with websites, please post this petition on your sites and have valued members of your networks sign the petition in support of H.R. 181. You will also find this petition on my "linx" page at http://www.anniearmenlive.org/annie_linx.htm
So that you have a greater sense of what is at stake, below are two related items:
NOW, EVEN PARENTS LOST RIGHTS!!! Children's Mental Health in the 108th Congress
This is just ONE example that illustrates our current state of affairs...MAINLY, THAT THIS IS NO LONGER a government of the people for the people - DESPITE tireless efforts by so many...including most in Congress!
THE BAD - Sadly, despite media coverage by Dr. Laura, G. Gordon Liddy, World Net Daily, News Max, (my note: ALL REPUBLICANS!) many talk radio interviews across the country, and thousands of calls and emails to Congress, grants to fund the New Freedom Commission (NFC) recommendations, which include universal mental health screening and treatment with ineffective and dangerous medications, were not stopped. $20 million was appropriated for state grants to implement the NFC recommendations. Physician and Congressman Paul’s excellent language that required parental consent for screening before these programs were funded was not included. Dr. Paul wrote a letter signed by more than twenty Members urging the parental consent language. House leadership, including Speaker Hastert, Majority Leader DeLay, and Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Regula accepted the Paul language. All of these House Members and those that voted for the original amendment in September deserve our thanks. Sadly, that language protecting the basic right of parental consent was dropped in the Senate.
The Department of Education is spending $5 million on “Mental Health Integration in Schools” that we are still investigating, as well as $1 million for Senator Kennedy’s disastrous early childhood mental health program called Foundations for Learning. (See our update.)
The stand-alone bill passed the US House 425-1, but was stalled in the Senate by Senator Edward Kennedy.
And some though that the Democratic Party were our saviors!
The second item, is that Pharmaceutical companies got their bases covered with Senate Bill S - 3 in case there is any harm brought about to our children because of prescription drugs, such as antidepressants, prescribed during this Mental Health Screening debacle!
S.3
Title: A bill to strengthen and protect America in the war on terror. Sponsor: Sen Gregg, Judd [NH] (introduced 1/24/2005) Cosponsors (8)
Latest Major Action: 1/24/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
What is further hypocritical is how a hidden intent for this bill is camouflaged in its title:
" A bill to strengthen and protect America in the war on terror".
With this bill, in essence, Pharmaceutical companies or government agencies are no longer required to disclose harmful effects on things such as vaccinations and drugs NOR may the public be awarded punitive damages!!!
In the audio clip excerpt below, I will provide the portion of the interview that is pertinent to this Senate Bill. The complete interview can be heard at the following link to learn on whose behalf portions of this bill aims to protect....NOT THE PUBLIC'S!!! http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2005/03/21.html
PLEASE TURN YOUR COMPUTER VOLUME UP AND CLICK ON THE LINK TO LISTEN
http://PlayAudio-123.com/play.asp?m=160164&f=CVXGXG&ps=13&p=1 (1 minute)
Senate Bill S- 3 (portions highlighted):
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c109:2:./temp/~c109TyIkZ7:e45042:
(If link above does not work, go to http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.html and enter "Bioshield" in the Search Box.
`SEC. 762. WARNING UNIFORMITY.
`(a) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in this section, no State or political subdivision of a State may, directly or indirectly, establish or continue in effect under any authority any notification requirement for a drug, vaccine, or other biological product intended for use by humans that provides for a warning concerning the safety of the drug, vaccine, or biological product or any component or package thereof, unless such notification requirement has been prescribed under the authority of this Act and the State or political subdivision notificatio n requirement is identical to the notification requirement prescribed under the authority of this Act.
`(b) DEFINITIONS- In this section:
`(1) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT- The term `notification requirement' includes any mandatory disclosure requirement relating to the dissemination of information about a drug, vaccine, or biological product in any manner, such as labels, labeling, posters, public notices, advertising, or any other means of communication.
`(2) WARNING- The term `warning' with respect to a drug, vaccine, or other biological product means any statement, vignette, or other representation which indicates, directly or by implication, that the drug, vaccine or biological product presents or may present a hazard to human health or safety.
IT GETS WORST!!!
`SEC. 319F-3. LIABILITY PROTECTIONS FOR PANDEMICS, EPIDEMICS, AND COUNTERMEASURES.
`(2) SPECIAL RULES- In an action brought under this section for damages the following provisions shall apply:
`(A) PUNITIVE DAMAGES- No punitive damages intended to punish or deter, exemplary damages, or other damages not intended to compensate a plaintiff for actual losses may be awarded , nor shall any party be liable for interest prior to the judgment.
`(B) NONECONOMIC DAMAGES-
`(i) IN GENERAL- Noneconomic damages may be awarded in an amount not to exceed $250,000 against a defendant only in an amount directly proportional to the percentage of responsibility of such defendant for the harm to the plaintiff, and no plaintiff may recover noneconomic damages unless the plaintiff suffered physical harm.
`(ii) DEFINITION- For purposes of clause (i), the term `noneconomic damages' means damages for losses for physical and emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, mental anguish, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of society and companionship, loss of consortium, hedonic damages, injury to reputation, and any other nonpecuniary losses.
`(3) COLLATERAL SOURCES- Any recovery by a plaintiff in an action under this section shall be reduced by the amount of collateral source compensation, if any, that the plaintiff has received or is entitled to receive that result or may result in loss to the manufacturer, distributor, or health care provider.
Jack Topel
Starmail - 25. Mär, 14:18
