ANTENNAS, STATIONS BASE and the POWER OF INFORMATION
We sent one second delivery of the born series this year "Electromagnetic Memory", that tries to avoid the forgetfulness of truths of commonplace and warnings that have not been formulated yesterday nor before yesterday, but which go back at least to 2001 or to 2002.
Let us give death to the ignorance that can kill to us in silence.
Health AVECORN Association of Neighbors Against Injurious Radiations of L'Escala (Girona)
Electromagnetic memory - 2/2005
ANTENNAS, STATIONS BASE and the POWER OF the INFORMATION
Remember somebody of the Ministry of Health which we have taxed in our Memory: Informative note Nº 05/2001 to the European Parliament elaborated by the Main directorate of Investigation - STOA - Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Options, whose author was Federico BRUCCIANI, under the supervision of Gras CHAMBERS, Director of STOA, and responds description "to the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS and HEALTH":
"7. - The power of the information supposes for a moment that it was demonstrated that the radiation of the telephony without cable originates, without no doubt, cancer. The mere delay during 6 months of this news would imply much money. Like what it happens with the tobacco, the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or commonly mad cow disease) and the global debates of warning, the companies are not inclined to accept the scientific findings passively if these damage their final balance. What is good for the balance leaf not always is good for the public health. ... when knowing the industry the results the investigation in advance increased its power to define what it would happen in the future. This as well affected to the political decisions on the guidelines and the bottoms of investigation.
The inevitable consequence is that the journalists and the public do not know when they can trust the declarations of a company. A report of the conflicts of interests that exist in this field would not be complete if the function of the prestige expert were not mentioned. The magazine to which the mentioned study was sent previously is Radiation Research, one of the main magazines on the sanitary studies of the RF/OM and the expert is also the director associated with direct responsibility on the ionizing radiations. In addition, the expert also receives a pay of the industry of radiotelephony in several different countries. It is doubtless that a conflict of interests exists. It is already sufficiently bad that the consultant receives money of the industry of movable telephony while acts like a guardian of the scientific information.
In addition, the companies of cellular telephony and their advisers must not have known the results in advance experimental. We must have a space of diverse levels in which one talks about to the access the information. Meanwhile, the private interests will continue having little advisable advantage. The public think that it has the right of knowing as there are the proposals and planning with respect to the construction of facilities of CEM that can affect their health. It wishes to have some type of control and to participate in the process of decision making. The new technologies of CEM will generate distrust and fear, unless it settles down an effective system of information to the citizenship and communications adapted between the scientists, the governments the industry and the public."
Author: Federico BRUCCIANI under the supervision of Gras CHAMBERS, Director of STOA. Can the affected by antennas, stations base of mobile telephony and other sources of electropolution trust the Administration and the CAO (Official Academic Science)? Really the Ministry of Health has as much naivete as is conceited? Remembers somebody what they are the GEP? We want to insist on that we have good electromagnetic memory: "FALSE INVESTIGATION and" GOOD YOU PRACTICE EPIDEMIOLOGISTS "(GEP). THE COUNTRY. (17.1.2002).
"Microwave News keeps awake in a study that" some people contracted by the tobacco growers have also worked to protect the interests of the sector of the mobile telephony ". The report of Elisa Ong and Stanton Glantz was published in the November number of 2001 of American Journal of Public Health. The industry of the good tobacco promoted the concept practical epidemiologists (GEP), "who fix standards for the scientific tests, which prevent to demonstrate that the smoke of the tobacco is harmful". "Ong and Glanz warn: "the movement pro GEP, besides to look for the quality of the scientific speech, mounts complex campaigns of public relations, taken by executives and lawyers, who manipulate the scientific standards to protect the corporative interests of their clients".
"THEY EXIST MULTITUDE OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCES OF The DAMAGES PRODUCED BY The PROXIMITY OF The STATIONS BASES And IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO CONTINUE INVESTIGATING TO KNOW THAT OUR HEALTH IS IN SERIOUS DANGER!
Diffusion by AVECORN initiative avecorn@hotmail.com
Translation Spanish in English: Omega
How Industry Manipulates Science
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/350582/
The Great Betrayal: Fraud in Science
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/394532/
Let us give death to the ignorance that can kill to us in silence.
Health AVECORN Association of Neighbors Against Injurious Radiations of L'Escala (Girona)
Electromagnetic memory - 2/2005
ANTENNAS, STATIONS BASE and the POWER OF the INFORMATION
Remember somebody of the Ministry of Health which we have taxed in our Memory: Informative note Nº 05/2001 to the European Parliament elaborated by the Main directorate of Investigation - STOA - Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Options, whose author was Federico BRUCCIANI, under the supervision of Gras CHAMBERS, Director of STOA, and responds description "to the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS and HEALTH":
"7. - The power of the information supposes for a moment that it was demonstrated that the radiation of the telephony without cable originates, without no doubt, cancer. The mere delay during 6 months of this news would imply much money. Like what it happens with the tobacco, the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or commonly mad cow disease) and the global debates of warning, the companies are not inclined to accept the scientific findings passively if these damage their final balance. What is good for the balance leaf not always is good for the public health. ... when knowing the industry the results the investigation in advance increased its power to define what it would happen in the future. This as well affected to the political decisions on the guidelines and the bottoms of investigation.
The inevitable consequence is that the journalists and the public do not know when they can trust the declarations of a company. A report of the conflicts of interests that exist in this field would not be complete if the function of the prestige expert were not mentioned. The magazine to which the mentioned study was sent previously is Radiation Research, one of the main magazines on the sanitary studies of the RF/OM and the expert is also the director associated with direct responsibility on the ionizing radiations. In addition, the expert also receives a pay of the industry of radiotelephony in several different countries. It is doubtless that a conflict of interests exists. It is already sufficiently bad that the consultant receives money of the industry of movable telephony while acts like a guardian of the scientific information.
In addition, the companies of cellular telephony and their advisers must not have known the results in advance experimental. We must have a space of diverse levels in which one talks about to the access the information. Meanwhile, the private interests will continue having little advisable advantage. The public think that it has the right of knowing as there are the proposals and planning with respect to the construction of facilities of CEM that can affect their health. It wishes to have some type of control and to participate in the process of decision making. The new technologies of CEM will generate distrust and fear, unless it settles down an effective system of information to the citizenship and communications adapted between the scientists, the governments the industry and the public."
Author: Federico BRUCCIANI under the supervision of Gras CHAMBERS, Director of STOA. Can the affected by antennas, stations base of mobile telephony and other sources of electropolution trust the Administration and the CAO (Official Academic Science)? Really the Ministry of Health has as much naivete as is conceited? Remembers somebody what they are the GEP? We want to insist on that we have good electromagnetic memory: "FALSE INVESTIGATION and" GOOD YOU PRACTICE EPIDEMIOLOGISTS "(GEP). THE COUNTRY. (17.1.2002).
"Microwave News keeps awake in a study that" some people contracted by the tobacco growers have also worked to protect the interests of the sector of the mobile telephony ". The report of Elisa Ong and Stanton Glantz was published in the November number of 2001 of American Journal of Public Health. The industry of the good tobacco promoted the concept practical epidemiologists (GEP), "who fix standards for the scientific tests, which prevent to demonstrate that the smoke of the tobacco is harmful". "Ong and Glanz warn: "the movement pro GEP, besides to look for the quality of the scientific speech, mounts complex campaigns of public relations, taken by executives and lawyers, who manipulate the scientific standards to protect the corporative interests of their clients".
"THEY EXIST MULTITUDE OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCES OF The DAMAGES PRODUCED BY The PROXIMITY OF The STATIONS BASES And IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO CONTINUE INVESTIGATING TO KNOW THAT OUR HEALTH IS IN SERIOUS DANGER!
Diffusion by AVECORN initiative avecorn@hotmail.com
Translation Spanish in English: Omega
How Industry Manipulates Science
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/350582/
The Great Betrayal: Fraud in Science
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/394532/
Starmail - 3. Mär, 17:28
