The Danish Health Council has now announced that the country's cancer registry has not been updated since 2001. This was the year that J. Chr. Gøttrik became director for the Health Council, appointed by A. Rolighed, who is the director of the Society for Prevention af Cancer and was minister of health at that time. So Rolighed, Gøttrik, Chr. Johansen were all employed by the same Society. After Gøttrik became the director of the Health Council, he appointed Chr. Johansen as a consultant for the council, so he held two positions. Gøttrik was the one who officially chose to disregard all the the research that established harmful effects of RF. The official reason was that the public should not be worried, but he meant that the mobile phone industry who be very cross with the Health Council, if they came out with the message that RF was dangerous. Now we can understand, why the Cancer registry has not been updated. This was done on purpose to serve the interest of certain groups. Gøttrik was fired earlier this year as the director, but I do not know if he still holds his positions in WHO.

Sianette Kwee
Denmark



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Danish+Cancer+registry
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=World+Health+Organization
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Sianette+Kwee

Sandi Lawrence's excellent letter - post editing - appeared in todays Sussex Argus as below

Gary


Invisible danger

I have been reading the exchanges between Graham Chainey, M Boyask and Ashley Simmons in The Argus on the subject of wi-fi radiation and keeping my thoughts to myself.

However, after reading Mr Simmons' comment that “the alleged electromagnetic hypersensitivity has never been shown to exist” (letters, May 12) I realised that the time had come to enlighten him.

Why? Because I suffer electro-hypersensitivity and I am sensitive to Tetra, 3G masts and phones, Wi-Fi and more. I know many more people who are sensitised by these newer technologies or have become unwell around them.

I have put up with indifference, disbelief and abuse for three years now, but it has to stop because there are too many of us being affected. We EHS sufferers do exist.

We are here in the communities of West Sussex and across the UK. We have been ignored by the Government and doctors due to lack of scientific evidence but we are here.

How can anyone just say that hundreds, maybe thousands, of people are not unwell or experiencing distressing symptoms and situations? Who has the right to state that these electro-hypersensitive people simply do not exist?

The actual status of scientific “evidence” as it stands is that the “jury is out.” This means no one can be sure either way – with the exception of those who suffer from its effects. We need no science to prove it.

This condition means no mobile phones, WI-Fi; cordless phones; wireless music players or games, microwaves, digital TV or radio, baby alarms, broadband internet access, laptops and other modern devices and gadgets.

It means some means of transportation and visiting most towns and cities, leisure facilities, pubs and clubs are out. It means you may not be able to work in many environments or even drive a car.

Please just be thankful that you are not an EHS sufferer and maybe spare a thought for those who are.


S Lawrence


From Mast Sanity/Mast Network



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=hypersensitivity
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Victims/

"Wenn Länder kein Vertrauen in die technische Kompetenz der WHO haben, dann steht ihre eigentliche Existenz in Frage", sagte Horton, der Herausgeber der Zeitschrift. "Diese Studie zeigt, dass innerhalb dieser...

http://www.diagnose-funk.ch/politik/033ea29935078f601/033ea299350794904.html

--------

Journalismus im Dienst der Herrschenden
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3774824/



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=World+Health+Organization