06/19/05

Repeatedly, those contending President Bush lied us into the war in Iraq have had to face contrary evidence, stacks and stacks of it. And how have they handled this refutation of their fantasies? By ignoring it. But give them something all but irrelevant, some itsy, bitsy thing they can misinterpret as demonstrating the rightness of their view, and notice how some of them behave. Why, they say, the final proof is here at last. I speak of the so-called Downing Street memo, the disclosed minutes of a 2002 meeting between British Prime Minister Tony Blair and others in his government on a possible war in Iraq, then still eight months in the future. To anti-Bush critics such as Mark Danner, a magazine journalist and college professor, ... the document is one more 'revelation' in the WMD 'scandal' that should lead to judicial proceedings against top officials, to sentences against them, and to punishment...

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20050618-115930-8313r.htm

from Washington Times, by Jay Ambrose


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=impeach
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Downing+Street+Memo