Verschiedene Studien haben bis heute belegt, dass Mobilfunk (dazu zählen auch die schnurlosen DECT-Telefone) für eine ganze Reihe von Symptomen verantwortlich sein kann.

Zu diesen Symptomen können u.a. zählen:

* Kopfschmerzen
* Schlafstörungen
* Gedächtnisstörungen
* Lernstörungen
* Antriebslosigkeit
* Müdigkeit
* Hyperaktivität
* Nervosität
* Innere Unruhe
* Depressionen
* Schilddrüsenfunktionsstörungen
* Autoimmunerkrankungen
* die Bildung bösartiger Tumore

Fast jede Erkrankung kann durch Mobilfunk verursacht oder vestärkt werden.

Zuerst erkranken im Organismus immer die Körperbereiche, die genetisch bedingte Schwachstellen darstellen.

Mobilfunk schwächt den gesamten Zellstoffwechsel. Alle Enzymaktivitäten werden deutlich herabgesetzt. Aufgrund dieser Tatsache ist es den Zellen nicht mehr möglich, die Stoffwechselendprodukte ordnungsgemäß aus dem Zellinneren abzutransportieren. Das heisst, der Organismus verschlackt zunehmend. Diese primäre Verschlackung wird durch die Problematik der Umweltgifte, die täglich in stetig zunehmender Weise auf unseren Organismus einwirken, sekundär verstärkt.

Neben der nachlassenden Enzymaktivität wird auch die Hormonproduktion beeinträchtigt. Am Beispiel der Hormonproduktion des Pankreas (Bauchspeicheldrüse) heisst dies, dass man an Diabetes mellitus erkrankt.

Sämtliche Drüsenfunktionen werden im Organismus durch Mobilfunk geschwächt. Dies betrifft vor allem die Thymusdrüse, die Hirnanhangdrüse (Hypophyse) und die Zirbeldrüse (Epiphyse). Dies hat weitreichende Folgen, nämlich die Schwächung des gesamten Hormon- und Immunsytems. Mobilfunk ist u.a. ein großer Faktor für die deutliche Zunahme von Allergien.

An dieser Stelle möchten wir das Thema "Mobilfunk" jedoch nicht weiter erörtern und auf den Verein Bürgerwelle e.V. verweisen. Dieser Verein beschäfftigt sich ausführlich und sehr intensiv mit dem brisanten und umstrittenem Thema "Schädlichkeit des Mobilfunks": http://www.buergerwelle.de

http://www.widrat.net/start.php?subID=2&pageID=215


Mobilfunk und Gesundheit
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/303598/

Übersäuerung des Blutes. Durch magnetische Felder entsteht eine Übersäuerung des Blutes, was wiederum eine Freisetzung von stresserzeugenden Stickoxiden bewirkt. Zugleich werden diese für die Leistungsfähigkeit wichtigen Stoffe verbraucht und stehen dann nicht mehr zu Verfügung, wenn sie benötigt werden. In Verbindung mit Melatoninmangel entsteht eine ständige Stresssituation, die schließlich die Betroffenen immer sensibler selbst für sehr schwache elektromagnetische Felder werden lässt.

http://www.elektrosmog.com/servlets/sfs;jsessionid=FFF5036A42AB2D2328F8A9619C7CFB25?s=08EECg5h2jC8wKH7G&t=/contentManager/onStory&i=1075375582041&b=1075375582041&l=1&active=no&ParentID=0&StoryID=1077726564797



Geldrollenphänomen: Wenn das Blut verklebt, drohen Herzinfarkt und Schlaganfall
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/363208/

http://www.sonnenseite.com/fp/archiv/Art-Umweltpolitik/mobilfunkpublikforum.php

ForumMobil diffamiert Schwedischen Top-Wissenschafter
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/509687/

Forscher und Forschungsergebnisse von der Industrie bezahlt
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/281056/

As for the big fight against Israel radio and the cellphone companies, the whole 'army' fighting them is 2 people: A doctor in Jerusalem: Eli Richter MD, and a medical microbiologist, that is me Zamir Shalita Ph.D. We collaborate with each other and with the comittee for interior affairs & environment of the Israeli parliament, against those irradiating our citizens. I will update you soon about these fights. I collaborated in the past with my friend the late Prof. Neil Cherry in Japan, in lectures, measurements in a cancer cluster near a power line, and testified at a comittee of the Japanese parliament (May 13, 2002).

The attachment contains contents my manuscript:

Keep Healthy with Pollution Computer and Cellphone
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/427212/

The files contain the suffix "jap" for this manuscript was used for translation to Japanese. The book was published in Japan in May 2004. I will have to update some of them, for new information comes everyday.

Please be advised that I tried to combine the electromagnetic and chemical hazards, with some brief advice to the reader how to keep healthy, in one volume.

The details revealed in studies, that are in the text, are important to well inform the reader with best research available, in simple terms, against the wicked disinformation, the public is exposed to, such as "not revealed any damage" or "no research has been done so far" and such nonesense of this sort. The experimental proof is sometimes has to be combined like a puzzle, in order to get the message how electromagnetic radiations injure the body cells.


Dr. Zamir Shalita

http://www.e-smog.ch/gsm_oesterreich/nachrichten/aug2000/cherry.htm
Folgenden Bericht haben wir als E-Mail von Eva Marsalek am 20.08.2000 zur Veröffentlichung erhalten:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 10:01:49 +1200
From: "Cherry, Neil J" <CHERRY@kea.lincoln.ac.nz>
To: rbeavers@llion.org


Subject: Safe level of EMR is ZERO

Dear Roy,

I am about to leave for Europe where I am presenting the results of my latest research into low level health effects of EMR as requested by representatives at the European Parliament and our very good friends in Salzburg City Council.

The conclusion of my research is that:
Electromagnetic Radiation is damaging to Brains, Hearts, Embryos, Hormones and Cells. It is therefore a threat to Intellegent Hearty Life. Electromagnetic radiation resonantly interacts with bodies and cells, Interfering with cell-to-cell communication, cell growth and regulation, and is damaging the genetic basis of life.

Like other toxic substances that damage cells, EMR has a safe exposure level of ZERO. (through many dose response relationships from exposures from ELF, RF and MW)

Hence my recommended Target Public Exposure for significant risk reduction is 10 nanoWatt/sq cm. This can be accomplished by setting amaximum outdoor exposure at the boundary of properties of 0.1 microWatt/sq cm.

--------

This will not be liked nor accepted by cell phone companies and many
government and international authorities, such as ICNIRP and WHO (Dr. Michael Repacholi for example). However, it is based on a large set of internationally published, peer-reviewed papers from a wide range of indepentent universities and research institutes. It also includes the results of studies funded by industry, e.g. Repacholi et al. (1997), Phillips et al. (1998).

--------

Another important conclusion: Cell phone radiation mimics the effects that we have found for EMR across the spectrum, in over 45 published studies showing adverse biological and human health effects specifically from cell phone radiation.

A cell phone against the head exposes the premier organ of the human body to serious interference with its processes and serious damage to its tissues and cells. The exposure levels on average are higher than military personnel who show highly significiant cancer, cardiac and neurological effects for radio and radar exposures (Robinette et al. (1980) and Szmigielski (1996)).

Cell phones and cell sites are producing significant health effects right now but few direct studies are attempting to identify them. You only see what you look for. If nobody is looking then nobody will see anything.

I had a call from a resident yesterday who had developed severe arthritis in the period immediately following the installation of a cell site 50 m from his house. He is in a high exposure regime over 2
microwatt/sq cm. Burch et al. (1998) have shown that cell phone usage reduces melatonin. There are 14 studies showing that EMR reduced melatonin in people. I looked up Dr Russell Reiter's book (Reiter and Robinson (1995)) on melatonin. It lists several illnesses that result from reduced melatonin. The first (p8) is arthritis, then
diabetes, cancer .....

A great deal of illness and death currently occurring in developed countries, can be associated with the progressively increased exposures to EMR, especially in the RF/MW range because this is much more biologically active and damaging than ELF fields, Bawin and Adey (1976), Vignati and Guiliani (1997). This is going to increase very significantly with the use of cell phones and the installation of cell sites.

---------

My problem is that there is so much research that shows adverse biological and health effects, but there is a conserted campaign to ignore,discredit or attack the messengers.

The studies are not generally known by authorities who trust bodies that ppear to be reliable but who deliberately mis-quote and mis-represent the published research. This continues to delay measures to protect public health by retaining the strongly misproven assumption of tissue heating being the only effect.

Warm Regards to you and all on the list.


Neil Cherry


Informant: Ora James

--------

Copied below is a submission (permission granted to use) to the TETRAWATCH site. It shows how wrong people can be (all psychosomatic), but how inadvertently right. More to the point, it raises a fundamental issue about what we are trying to achieve... First my commentary, then the message:

Even our 50Hz mains electricity is bad news, and its advent in each country and continent tracks the increases in leukaemias and cancers since the 1920s. The Swedish study on the melanoma jump tracked the onset of FM radio in each Swedish county. Cancer clusters in microwave corridors between TV, military and telecoms link sites say the same thing. Clusters around TV transmitters the same. Now mobile phone masts, the world over. Reducing emissions per mast to ten per cent means nothing if we have ten times as many masts as when the problem was first defined (ten divided by ten, times ten!). A hundred times more masts (pico cells) at one hundredth power, simply means a more even spread and fewer places at current high intensity. I wonder if there is any emission level safe enough, when there are so many RF devices? Some scientists say there is not.

Which takes us back to political statements and policies, such as the Conservative leaflet on choice about where masts go: this is why politicians and scientists do not want to act. It is actually too big. Any reduction would be an admission of inadequate safety. Fewer masts means higher emissions, or an uncompetitive industry. Announced this week: Ofcom is intending to delegate spectrum management in favour of a market-led trade in frequencies, so less control.

This takes us to the WHO precautionary framework on EM radiation, paper draft, http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/reports/en/precautionary_framework_october2004.pdf - 37 pages, if you're ready to download this, which encourages freedom to increase restrictions on emissions whilst explicitly absolving anyone of blame for past incaution and harm caused.

In just 80 years we have got almost to a point of no return, so dependent have we become on electromagnetism and alternating fields. We are now obliged to accept the consequences, but must fight to have this recognised openly so we can respond, as a global civilisation, together. So, masties all, is this man right? And what are we going to do about it? (Oh, about the microwaves; the European 1998 definition says microwaves start at 300MHz. But who cares? The research on 300MHz and up says the same, whatever colour you call it.)

Andy

From Mast Network

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/362455/
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3025496/
http://tinyurl.com/bxlv9
http://www.mapcruzin.com/review_cell_phones.htm
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Invisible+Hazards+in+the+Wireless+Age

Scientists survey people in Essex and Suffolk as part of a study on electromagnetic fields and human health.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/1/hi/england/essex/4049181.stm

Mast Sanity and TETRAWATCH will be represented on Monday at the grand opening of the Essex lab by Sir William Stewart. I have severe reservations on methodology and will be trying to get under the skin of this study, which is simply an extension to an existing study -- by psychologists.

Andy

From Mast Network

Lundquist: Krebs bei minimaler Strahlung
http://www.buergerwelle.de/d/doc/dindex-2274.htm

Säugetiere bereits bei 0,02 nW/cm² gefährdet
http://www.elektrosmognews.de/news/lundquist0403.htm

Laboratory study on humans shows bioeffects at/below picowatts/cm2
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/284808/

Köln (dpa) - Dermatologen sehen eine Hautkrebsepidemie in Deutschland mit einem Nord-Süd-Gefälle. Der Hautkrebs sei unter allen Krebsarten die Erkrankung mit den deutlichsten Steigerungsraten, sagte Prof. Percy Lehmann am Mittwoch in Köln im Vorfeld eines dreitägigen Fachkongresses. Allein der bösartige schwarze Hautkrebs (malignes Melanom) werde inzwischen bei mehr als 11 400 Menschen im Jahr festgestellt. Fast 15 von 100 000 Frauen seien davon betroffen, bei den Männern seien es 13 von 100 000. Insgesamt habe sich die Zahl aller Hautkrebserkrankungen in den vergangenen zwei Jahrzehnten versechsfacht, sagte Prof. Rudolf Stadler, der Vorsitzende der veranstaltenden Rheinisch-Westfälischen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft.

http://www.netdoktor.de/nachrichten/index.asp?y=2004&m=11&d=25&id=116546
(Auszug)

dazu

Signifikante biologische Wirkungen auf menschliche Hautfibroblasten (Bindegewebszellen) gefunden

Quelle: Oncology Research (Zeitschrift für Krebsforschung) 2002; 13(1):19-24, PubMed

Wissenschaftler der Fakultät für Humananatomie, Histologie und Gerichtsmedizin der Universität Florenz haben menschliche Hautfibroblasten (Bindegewebszellen) 1 Stunde lang der Strahlung der heutigen GSM-Mobilfunk-Technologie ausgesetzt. Im Ergebnis fanden sich danach Modifizierungen der Zellmorphologie und verschiedene genetische Veränderungen. Die Wissenschaftler hoben hervor, dass diese Ergebnisse zeigen, dass vom Mobilfunk ausgehende elektromagnetische Felder signifikante biologische Effekte auf menschliche Hautfibroblasten haben.

Eine erst im August 2002 veröffentlichte schwedische Studie (Hallberg & Johansson vom renommierten schwedischen Karolinska-Institut) hatte einen deutlichen statistischen Zusammenhang zwischen Hautkrebs und Radiosendern in der Umgebung ermittelt. Die Autoren der schwedischen Studie wiesen dabei darauf hin, dass selbst Leistungsflussdichten von 30 Mikrowatt/Quadratmeter nicht als sicher angesehen werden könnten. Diese werden noch in kilometerweitem Umfeld von Mobilfunk- sowie Rundfunk- und Fernsehsendern erreicht.

http://www.oekosmos.de/article/articleview/113/1/20/



Hautkrebs in der Nähe von Radiosendern deutlich erhöht
http://www.buergerwelle.de/d/doc/gesund/hautkrebs-durch-sender.htm
http://www.buerger-gegen-esmog.de/content/infocontent/informationen3.html
http://www.klimaforschung.net/hautkrebs.htm
http://www.buergerwelle.de/d/doc/dindex-2391.htm

Schwarzer Hautkrebs: Radio- und Fernsehsender unter Verdacht
http://www.izgmf.de/Aktionen/Meldungen/Archiv_04/Hautkrebs/hautkrebs.html

Mobilfunk und Krebs
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/284796/



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Hautkrebs

21 nov 2004

MOBILE phone users were last night advised to cut their use of handsets - particularly in areas with poor reception - after new research found evidence they can cause cell damage. The new study, to be published next month, adds to the already heated debate over mobile phone safety. It found that the risk was increased in areas with a poor signal because the mobile phone used higher-powered radiation to maintain contact with the network. The team, based in Germany, is now seeking funds to see if their findings are repeated on living cells within the human body.

Last night, some experts and the mobile industry itself urged consumers not to panic, pointing out that previous studies had failed to prove mobile phones caused illnesses.

The four-year study was conducted by the Verum Foundation, based in Munich, and funded by the EU at a cost of £2.2m.

Read article:
http://news.scotsman.com/health.cfm?id=1338832004&20041121123830


Informant: feb.nu