HEALTH V UNSUITABLY SITED MASTS
Please see enclosed statement from Dr John Walker.
Best wishes
Eileen O’Connor
HEALTH V UNSUITABLY SITED MASTS
ICNIRP (International Committee on Non Ionizing Radiation Protection) took a decision about 10 years ago on guidelines.
Western world governments legally allowed the installation of many mobile telephone base station masts based on the guidelines.
Mean while science has moved on.
Many scientists throughout the world have taken an interest in this subject and discovered much data, despite lack of funding.
As a result of this data which is becoming more abundant on the net
We can deduce that:-
ICNIRP thought that what they did not know was unimportant, in fact they were high prestige experts on many subjects except the one they were considering.
They grossly misled the governments who in reality opened up a silent microwave civil war on some of their inhabitants.
People whose houses are in a field gradient strength of 1.5 to 3 volts/metre will get their immune system reduced by nearly 90% after 6 months and many will have nightmare lives with headaches, rashes, forgetfulness and perhaps electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and after 5 years the cancer rate increases by about 2 per mast per year of exposure. If you add up the total registered as EHS in Sweden and California it is nearly 1 million. English hospitals are fairly devoid of treatments for this!
Who wants a silent killer near their house and become a victim of "Progress?"
It is only the randomness of Post code areas relative to masts that makes epidemiologists think that mast induced cancer is random, high resolution results show this to be untrue. Epidemiologists have had a knee-jerk reaction to the Data Protection Act and hence only issue very low resolution results which smear out what is happening and hide the true results.
We have heard many data-less ungrounded generalisations from the authorities to support the combined vested interests of mobile telephone industry and Government.
The Mobile telephone Industry is still grooming political parties that fiction is reality and reality is fiction(scare stories)! This is the only defence they have, they have no technical defence
Taiwan has removed 9000 masts last year and is removing another 9000 masts again this year out of the 27,000 complained about.
Sweden is sanitising houses and providing houses well away from masts if this is neccessary.
When is our Government going to start?
Dr J.C. Walker
Chartered Physicist- Sept 2006
Best wishes
Eileen O’Connor
HEALTH V UNSUITABLY SITED MASTS
ICNIRP (International Committee on Non Ionizing Radiation Protection) took a decision about 10 years ago on guidelines.
Western world governments legally allowed the installation of many mobile telephone base station masts based on the guidelines.
Mean while science has moved on.
Many scientists throughout the world have taken an interest in this subject and discovered much data, despite lack of funding.
As a result of this data which is becoming more abundant on the net
We can deduce that:-
ICNIRP thought that what they did not know was unimportant, in fact they were high prestige experts on many subjects except the one they were considering.
They grossly misled the governments who in reality opened up a silent microwave civil war on some of their inhabitants.
People whose houses are in a field gradient strength of 1.5 to 3 volts/metre will get their immune system reduced by nearly 90% after 6 months and many will have nightmare lives with headaches, rashes, forgetfulness and perhaps electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and after 5 years the cancer rate increases by about 2 per mast per year of exposure. If you add up the total registered as EHS in Sweden and California it is nearly 1 million. English hospitals are fairly devoid of treatments for this!
Who wants a silent killer near their house and become a victim of "Progress?"
It is only the randomness of Post code areas relative to masts that makes epidemiologists think that mast induced cancer is random, high resolution results show this to be untrue. Epidemiologists have had a knee-jerk reaction to the Data Protection Act and hence only issue very low resolution results which smear out what is happening and hide the true results.
We have heard many data-less ungrounded generalisations from the authorities to support the combined vested interests of mobile telephone industry and Government.
The Mobile telephone Industry is still grooming political parties that fiction is reality and reality is fiction(scare stories)! This is the only defence they have, they have no technical defence
Taiwan has removed 9000 masts last year and is removing another 9000 masts again this year out of the 27,000 complained about.
Sweden is sanitising houses and providing houses well away from masts if this is neccessary.
When is our Government going to start?
Dr J.C. Walker
Chartered Physicist- Sept 2006
Starmail - 30. Sep, 19:16
