The WHO's 2006 RF research agenda
The WHO's 2006 RF research agenda is posted at
www.who.int/peh-emf/research/rf_research_agenda_final_Jan2006.pdf
It must be said that the lack of support we have received to date from the WHO on our EHS issue--and especially its outrageous conclusion at the Prague 2004 workshop on EMF hypersensitivity that there is "no substantial evidence" to support the existence of a causal relationship between EMF and EHS, when there is a body of published evidence but it was conveniently omitted from the final report--has grieviously undermined our trust in the integrity of the WHO. But do we have any other choice right now if we wish to continue our struggle for full recognition of EHS and the central role non-ionising radiation plays in the development of this physical impairment other than engage with the WHO?
And so I am sending along to you for posting its 2006 Research Agenda for Radio Freqency Fields. It would be good to get feedback on this document--its shortcomings, other observations et al. I found its "High Priority Research Needs" in the Dosimetry section (page 8) particularly interesting.
Best, Imelda, Cork.
--------
WHO, EMF, Electromagnetic Radiation and Mobile Phones
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1194586/
Dr. Chiyoji Ohkubo answers an EHS person
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1414514/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=EHS
www.who.int/peh-emf/research/rf_research_agenda_final_Jan2006.pdf
It must be said that the lack of support we have received to date from the WHO on our EHS issue--and especially its outrageous conclusion at the Prague 2004 workshop on EMF hypersensitivity that there is "no substantial evidence" to support the existence of a causal relationship between EMF and EHS, when there is a body of published evidence but it was conveniently omitted from the final report--has grieviously undermined our trust in the integrity of the WHO. But do we have any other choice right now if we wish to continue our struggle for full recognition of EHS and the central role non-ionising radiation plays in the development of this physical impairment other than engage with the WHO?
And so I am sending along to you for posting its 2006 Research Agenda for Radio Freqency Fields. It would be good to get feedback on this document--its shortcomings, other observations et al. I found its "High Priority Research Needs" in the Dosimetry section (page 8) particularly interesting.
Best, Imelda, Cork.
--------
WHO, EMF, Electromagnetic Radiation and Mobile Phones
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1194586/
Dr. Chiyoji Ohkubo answers an EHS person
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1414514/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=EHS
Starmail - 28. Jan, 17:10
