Churches and Cell Towers
http://members.aol.com/gotemf/emf/churches.htm
Churches and Phone masts
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/4940498/
Churches and Phone masts
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/4940498/
Starmail - 18. Dez, 22:57
Mobilfunk Archiv (Englisch)
18
Dez
2005
17
Dez
2005
Chernobyl, WHO and Utteridge's mice: Is there a connection?
Part I
A new UN study that is defined as "the most authoritive study to date of the effects of the explosions that ripped apart Chernobyl reactor number 4 on 26 april 1986. It was compiled by the Chernobyl Forum, which involves more than 100 scientists, eight UN agencies and the governments of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine". According to the study, the number who will die from long-term cancers caused by radiation will be 3490. The deaths will be among almost 600,000 most contaminated by the accident 50 workers died from acute radiation poisoning or linked causes. 9 of 4000 children who have contracted thyroid cancer since the disaster have also died. The precise number of death is "unlikely ever to be known". The study suggests that alongside radiation, mental illness has been the biggest public health problem caused by the accident. According to Michael Repacholi, radiation manager for the WHO, a "high proportion" of the people most contaminated have suffered from stress. Sometimes this has led to reckless behaviour, such as eating highly contaminated food, overindulgence in alcohol and tobacco and "unprotected promiscuous sexual activity". Repacholi nevertheless insists that the study's overall health message was "reassuring". Only 3% of those contaminated by Chernobyl would die from cancer as a result of the accident, on top of the 25% who would be expected to die from cancer anyway. "Most people will be surprised that there are so few deaths" he says. New Scientist 10.9.05
Part II
"An express agreement between the UN World Health Organization (WHO) and the UN International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA) states: "Whenever either organization proposes to initiate a programme or activity on a subject in which the other organization has or may have a substantial interest, the first party shall consult the other with a view to adjusting the matter". In effects, the WHO, which is responsible for the world health, does no research on radiation unless the project is approved by the IAEA, which promotes nuclear power and is dominated by the nuclear industry. And once the WHO has compiled the report the results of its findings have also to be cleared by the IAEA." The ecologist October 2002 Dr. Janette Sherman's 2000 book Life's Delicate Balance: causes and prevention of breast cancer, which includes chapters titled "The breast cancer epidemic on Long Island and "Radiation- Bikini Island to Long Island.
Part III
Kuchel- Utterige's mice study - the "replication" of Repacholi's mice study [a study which was presented to the public as a replication that "cancelled" Repacholi's lymphoma results, although it was done differently from Repacholi's and indeed didn't find adverse effect]. T. Utteridge was the head of this study and she is a member in the ARPS - a lobbist industrial organization with very good connection to the nuclear industry. On their website they write "THE MYTHS OF CHERNOBYL One of the most widespread myths of recent times is that the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident in 1986 caused many thousands of extra cancer deaths in neighbouring regions, and that public health has been severely affected by exposure to radiation." (Utteridge is a member also of the electronic engineering school). It is surely not a coincidence that Utteridge was chosen to "replicate" Repacholi's study.
http://www.arps.org.au/Chernobyl.htm
http://www.arps.org.au/Dirty_Bombs.htm
http://www.arps.org.au/SA.HTM
Informant: Iris Atzmon
--------
PLAYING DOWN THE EFFECTS OF CHERNOBYL
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1253880/
WHO, EMF, Electromagnetic Radiation and Mobile Phones
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1194586/
A new UN study that is defined as "the most authoritive study to date of the effects of the explosions that ripped apart Chernobyl reactor number 4 on 26 april 1986. It was compiled by the Chernobyl Forum, which involves more than 100 scientists, eight UN agencies and the governments of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine". According to the study, the number who will die from long-term cancers caused by radiation will be 3490. The deaths will be among almost 600,000 most contaminated by the accident 50 workers died from acute radiation poisoning or linked causes. 9 of 4000 children who have contracted thyroid cancer since the disaster have also died. The precise number of death is "unlikely ever to be known". The study suggests that alongside radiation, mental illness has been the biggest public health problem caused by the accident. According to Michael Repacholi, radiation manager for the WHO, a "high proportion" of the people most contaminated have suffered from stress. Sometimes this has led to reckless behaviour, such as eating highly contaminated food, overindulgence in alcohol and tobacco and "unprotected promiscuous sexual activity". Repacholi nevertheless insists that the study's overall health message was "reassuring". Only 3% of those contaminated by Chernobyl would die from cancer as a result of the accident, on top of the 25% who would be expected to die from cancer anyway. "Most people will be surprised that there are so few deaths" he says. New Scientist 10.9.05
Part II
"An express agreement between the UN World Health Organization (WHO) and the UN International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA) states: "Whenever either organization proposes to initiate a programme or activity on a subject in which the other organization has or may have a substantial interest, the first party shall consult the other with a view to adjusting the matter". In effects, the WHO, which is responsible for the world health, does no research on radiation unless the project is approved by the IAEA, which promotes nuclear power and is dominated by the nuclear industry. And once the WHO has compiled the report the results of its findings have also to be cleared by the IAEA." The ecologist October 2002 Dr. Janette Sherman's 2000 book Life's Delicate Balance: causes and prevention of breast cancer, which includes chapters titled "The breast cancer epidemic on Long Island and "Radiation- Bikini Island to Long Island.
Part III
Kuchel- Utterige's mice study - the "replication" of Repacholi's mice study [a study which was presented to the public as a replication that "cancelled" Repacholi's lymphoma results, although it was done differently from Repacholi's and indeed didn't find adverse effect]. T. Utteridge was the head of this study and she is a member in the ARPS - a lobbist industrial organization with very good connection to the nuclear industry. On their website they write "THE MYTHS OF CHERNOBYL One of the most widespread myths of recent times is that the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident in 1986 caused many thousands of extra cancer deaths in neighbouring regions, and that public health has been severely affected by exposure to radiation." (Utteridge is a member also of the electronic engineering school). It is surely not a coincidence that Utteridge was chosen to "replicate" Repacholi's study.
http://www.arps.org.au/Chernobyl.htm
http://www.arps.org.au/Dirty_Bombs.htm
http://www.arps.org.au/SA.HTM
Informant: Iris Atzmon
--------
PLAYING DOWN THE EFFECTS OF CHERNOBYL
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1253880/
WHO, EMF, Electromagnetic Radiation and Mobile Phones
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1194586/
Starmail - 17. Dez, 23:11
16
Dez
2005
People power triumphs over mast plan for Kenilworth
Residents are celebrating a unanimous decision by councillors to reject an application to erect a 15m phone mast in Kenilworth.
Members of Warwick District Council planning committee threw out the application by communications giant Vodafone to build a mast in Scott Road following a huge protest.
There was a demonstration last month by residents who sent a 292-signature petition to the committee. A further 136 letters of objection were received including one from the chair of governors and the headteacher of Clinton School and Kenilworth MP Jeremy Wright.
Following a recommendation by the council's head of planning to approve the application, residents took their fight to the planning committee meeting on Wednesday.
As the mast is only 15m high, it does not need full planning permission, just approval. Under government guidelines, authorities are not obliged to take health concerns into consideration as long as emissions from proposed masts meet international guidelines.
But residents enjoyed strong support with district councillors Ann Blacklock and Jose Compton and town mayor Coun Norman Vincett objecting to the mast.
Councillors called into question Warwick District Council's blanket refusal to have mobile phone masts on its own property. Coun Compton thought that Castle Farm Leisure Centre should at least be considered as a possible site
She said she understood guidance in reports about planning guides on masts but added: "However, this does not take away the anxiety for the people in the area who view this with alarm"
Coun Vincett said there were concerns about the health effects and said the town was "sprouting these telecommunication masts like mushrooms."
His main concern was the position in the cemetery.
He said: "Its presence would be noted by those visiting the last resting place of their loved ones. Let us show some respect and dignity."
Planning committee member Bill Evans said after being on the site visit he was concerned about how close the mast would be to people's homes.
Coun Jane Knight added: "We would not want this in our back garden, so why should we do it to them?"
They refused to give it approval to a round of applause from the packed public gallery.
Campaigner Joe Rukin, of Beauchamp Road, said: "It was clearly the weight of response from people in the area that swayed it and we all deserve a big pat on the back. I thank everyone who heeded our call.
"It shows that, despite having a massive corporation as our adversary, people power can win the day. But we cannot be complacent because I am sure Vodafone will appeal."
16 December 2005
http://www.kenilworthtoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=698&ArticleID=1288167
Members of Warwick District Council planning committee threw out the application by communications giant Vodafone to build a mast in Scott Road following a huge protest.
There was a demonstration last month by residents who sent a 292-signature petition to the committee. A further 136 letters of objection were received including one from the chair of governors and the headteacher of Clinton School and Kenilworth MP Jeremy Wright.
Following a recommendation by the council's head of planning to approve the application, residents took their fight to the planning committee meeting on Wednesday.
As the mast is only 15m high, it does not need full planning permission, just approval. Under government guidelines, authorities are not obliged to take health concerns into consideration as long as emissions from proposed masts meet international guidelines.
But residents enjoyed strong support with district councillors Ann Blacklock and Jose Compton and town mayor Coun Norman Vincett objecting to the mast.
Councillors called into question Warwick District Council's blanket refusal to have mobile phone masts on its own property. Coun Compton thought that Castle Farm Leisure Centre should at least be considered as a possible site
She said she understood guidance in reports about planning guides on masts but added: "However, this does not take away the anxiety for the people in the area who view this with alarm"
Coun Vincett said there were concerns about the health effects and said the town was "sprouting these telecommunication masts like mushrooms."
His main concern was the position in the cemetery.
He said: "Its presence would be noted by those visiting the last resting place of their loved ones. Let us show some respect and dignity."
Planning committee member Bill Evans said after being on the site visit he was concerned about how close the mast would be to people's homes.
Coun Jane Knight added: "We would not want this in our back garden, so why should we do it to them?"
They refused to give it approval to a round of applause from the packed public gallery.
Campaigner Joe Rukin, of Beauchamp Road, said: "It was clearly the weight of response from people in the area that swayed it and we all deserve a big pat on the back. I thank everyone who heeded our call.
"It shows that, despite having a massive corporation as our adversary, people power can win the day. But we cannot be complacent because I am sure Vodafone will appeal."
16 December 2005
http://www.kenilworthtoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=698&ArticleID=1288167
Starmail - 16. Dez, 11:55
Mobile phone mast is felled
Dec 16, 2005
An 80ft phone mast has been chopped down by "professional" saboteurs in the middle of the night, causing damage running into thousands.
Specialist cutting equipment was used to topple the mast - as high as three double-decker buses - which narrowly missed a road as it collapsed.
Phone giant Orange, which was planning to use the mast near Sedgley, said it was lucky no one was injured as the metal structure crashed down.
It was the second attack on the former NTL mast, now owned by Arqiva. An arson attack caused £150,000 damage in 2003.
Residents in Gospel End, on the Dudley-Staffordshire border, had battled to stop the mast going up in 2001 without success.
Orange had been planning to use it but as it had been out of action since the arson attack its demolition will not affect phone users.
Arqiva's Bruce Randle was in no doubt that the mast had been brought down deliberately. Mr Randle said it would not have taken people who knew what they were doing long to fell the mast.
He said:"It has been chopped down basically, someone has cut the four corners and felled it.
"I think it has been done very deliberately and very professionally by someone who knew what they were doing.
"They must have had the right tools and must have known where to cut - you cannot bring down one of these things with a hacksaw.
"Fortunately no-one was hurt and no services have been affected."
Orange spokeswoman Sue Hammett said the company had been aiming to get the network live before the latest incident.
She added:"We do understand that people may have concerns about mobile phone masts and the perception of risk to health.
"However we wish to reiterate that any concerns should be directed via the appropriate channels and not through direct action."
Ward councillor Michael Evans said feelings were still running high in the area after a proposal to extend the mast by 3ft was pushed through this year despite further objections from residents.
Police in South Staffordshire are investigating.
Anyone with any information is urged to call 08453 302010.
http://www.expressandstar.com/articles/news/es/article_84450.php
An 80ft phone mast has been chopped down by "professional" saboteurs in the middle of the night, causing damage running into thousands.
Specialist cutting equipment was used to topple the mast - as high as three double-decker buses - which narrowly missed a road as it collapsed.
Phone giant Orange, which was planning to use the mast near Sedgley, said it was lucky no one was injured as the metal structure crashed down.
It was the second attack on the former NTL mast, now owned by Arqiva. An arson attack caused £150,000 damage in 2003.
Residents in Gospel End, on the Dudley-Staffordshire border, had battled to stop the mast going up in 2001 without success.
Orange had been planning to use it but as it had been out of action since the arson attack its demolition will not affect phone users.
Arqiva's Bruce Randle was in no doubt that the mast had been brought down deliberately. Mr Randle said it would not have taken people who knew what they were doing long to fell the mast.
He said:"It has been chopped down basically, someone has cut the four corners and felled it.
"I think it has been done very deliberately and very professionally by someone who knew what they were doing.
"They must have had the right tools and must have known where to cut - you cannot bring down one of these things with a hacksaw.
"Fortunately no-one was hurt and no services have been affected."
Orange spokeswoman Sue Hammett said the company had been aiming to get the network live before the latest incident.
She added:"We do understand that people may have concerns about mobile phone masts and the perception of risk to health.
"However we wish to reiterate that any concerns should be directed via the appropriate channels and not through direct action."
Ward councillor Michael Evans said feelings were still running high in the area after a proposal to extend the mast by 3ft was pushed through this year despite further objections from residents.
Police in South Staffordshire are investigating.
Anyone with any information is urged to call 08453 302010.
http://www.expressandstar.com/articles/news/es/article_84450.php
Starmail - 16. Dez, 11:40
Time To Stop the WHO Charade
http://archives.openflows.org/electronetwork-l/msg00912.html
Open letter to the WHO
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/841288/
WHO: a lot of people report symptoms of electromagnetic radiation sickness http://omega.twoday.net/stories/958459/
WHO writes off electrosmog victims
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1142664/
WHO and Electric Utilities: A Partnership on EMFs
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1176061/
The cozy relationship between the WHO and the electric utility industry http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1023935/
The WHO EMF Charade Continues - Time To Stop the WHO Charade
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/819270/
Time To Stop the WHO Charade
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1283940/
WHO will not accept smokers to work, will cell phones users be next?
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1229599/
A Danger from within the house: Radiation was found in the Israeli Prime Minister Office http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1178309/
Testimony of Michael Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1031477/
Repacholi and industry money
http://www.omega-news.info/repacholi_and_industry_money.htm
Petition to remove Dr. Mike Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/877606/
Dr Mike Repacholi: Industry consultant and ex leader for WHO???
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3381391/
Das zwielichtige Spiel des Dr. Michael Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1257501/
Bestechungsvorwurf gegen Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1257776/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi
Open letter to the WHO
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/841288/
WHO: a lot of people report symptoms of electromagnetic radiation sickness http://omega.twoday.net/stories/958459/
WHO writes off electrosmog victims
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1142664/
WHO and Electric Utilities: A Partnership on EMFs
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1176061/
The cozy relationship between the WHO and the electric utility industry http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1023935/
The WHO EMF Charade Continues - Time To Stop the WHO Charade
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/819270/
Time To Stop the WHO Charade
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1283940/
WHO will not accept smokers to work, will cell phones users be next?
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1229599/
A Danger from within the house: Radiation was found in the Israeli Prime Minister Office http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1178309/
Testimony of Michael Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1031477/
Repacholi and industry money
http://www.omega-news.info/repacholi_and_industry_money.htm
Petition to remove Dr. Mike Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/877606/
Dr Mike Repacholi: Industry consultant and ex leader for WHO???
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3381391/
Das zwielichtige Spiel des Dr. Michael Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1257501/
Bestechungsvorwurf gegen Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1257776/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi
Starmail - 16. Dez, 00:02
15
Dez
2005
Mobile phone company loses appeal against 12m mast
Dec 15 2005
A MOBILE phone company which is trying to erect a 40ft high telecommunications mast in the Mole Valley countryside has had its appeal refused.
A planning inspector told T-Mobile UK that the proposed mast would be "a prominent and unsym-pathetic feature" and that she would not uphold the appeal against the original decision to refuse planning permission.
The phone company wanted to erect the mast on the grass verge to the north of the Clarks Green roundabout on the A24, to give coverage to customers in that area.
Permission had been refused by Mole Valley District Council on May 31, prompting T-Mobile to appeal against the decision.
But planning inspector Sue Turner was concerned by the "harmful effect" the mast would have on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside.
She observed that the 12 metre-high mast "would be clearly visible projecting above the tree line", where most of the trees in the area are "in the range eight to 10 metres".
The inspector thought that not enough careful consideration had been given to alternative sites, and refused the appeal.
Gordon Simmons of T-Mobile said: "There are something like 60 million mobile phones in use (in the country) today and we are using them more and more.
"As such, we need to continue with development of the network to ensure that customers get the coverage they expect.
"We work pretty hard to come up with solutions and designs that blend in with the landscape.
"There is an urgent need for coverage in the area and this refusal will be under review."
http://icsurreyonline.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0500dorkingleatherhead/tm_objectid=16485187&method=full&siteid=50101&headline=mobile-phone-company-loses-appeal-against-12m-mast-name_page.html
A MOBILE phone company which is trying to erect a 40ft high telecommunications mast in the Mole Valley countryside has had its appeal refused.
A planning inspector told T-Mobile UK that the proposed mast would be "a prominent and unsym-pathetic feature" and that she would not uphold the appeal against the original decision to refuse planning permission.
The phone company wanted to erect the mast on the grass verge to the north of the Clarks Green roundabout on the A24, to give coverage to customers in that area.
Permission had been refused by Mole Valley District Council on May 31, prompting T-Mobile to appeal against the decision.
But planning inspector Sue Turner was concerned by the "harmful effect" the mast would have on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside.
She observed that the 12 metre-high mast "would be clearly visible projecting above the tree line", where most of the trees in the area are "in the range eight to 10 metres".
The inspector thought that not enough careful consideration had been given to alternative sites, and refused the appeal.
Gordon Simmons of T-Mobile said: "There are something like 60 million mobile phones in use (in the country) today and we are using them more and more.
"As such, we need to continue with development of the network to ensure that customers get the coverage they expect.
"We work pretty hard to come up with solutions and designs that blend in with the landscape.
"There is an urgent need for coverage in the area and this refusal will be under review."
http://icsurreyonline.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0500dorkingleatherhead/tm_objectid=16485187&method=full&siteid=50101&headline=mobile-phone-company-loses-appeal-against-12m-mast-name_page.html
Starmail - 15. Dez, 22:47
PHONE mast fight boost
By Victoria Hoe
Dec 15, 2005
Controversial plans by a mobile phone giant to install a 50ft mast in Lichfield are set to be rejected after objections from residents.
Vodafone wants to put a mast on land at Shires Industrial Estate, off Essington Close. A 362-signature petition and 38 letters of objection were sent to Lichfield District Council.
Residents said the mast would be visually intrusive and have a detrimental effect on the character of the area.
They are worried about health risks and say the mast would be within 10 yards of some homes
Objectors added that there were already 19 masts within one mile of the city centre and said they did not believe other possible sites had been fully explored.
The parish authority, Lichfield City Council, has also objected amid concerns the planned mast was too close to residential properties and was too high.
Lichfield District Council's planning committee is set to refuse the scheme when it meets on Monday evening.
Planning officers said the mast would form a highly intrusive feature of excessive height.
Planning officer Stephen Hill said: "I am not satisfied the applicant has given full consideration to the siting of this mast and consider its location will have a harmful impact on the character of the immediate surrounding area and on the amenity of nearby residents."
He said the mast could not be refused on health grounds.
County councillor Terry Finn backed residents in their fight against the mast.
He said the plans were unacceptable because the mast would be too close to Chesterfield Road and Redlock Field.
Vodafone spokeswoman Jane Frapwell said the firm needed masts near homes because that was where mobile reception was required.
She said there was no limit on how close the masts could be to houses and that exposure was lower when people were close to masts.
Omega this is not true. See under:
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Wissenschaft+zu+Mobilfunk/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cancer+Cluster
http://www.buergerwelle.de/body_science.html
http://www.expressandstar.com/articles/news/es/article_84425.php
Dec 15, 2005
Controversial plans by a mobile phone giant to install a 50ft mast in Lichfield are set to be rejected after objections from residents.
Vodafone wants to put a mast on land at Shires Industrial Estate, off Essington Close. A 362-signature petition and 38 letters of objection were sent to Lichfield District Council.
Residents said the mast would be visually intrusive and have a detrimental effect on the character of the area.
They are worried about health risks and say the mast would be within 10 yards of some homes
Objectors added that there were already 19 masts within one mile of the city centre and said they did not believe other possible sites had been fully explored.
The parish authority, Lichfield City Council, has also objected amid concerns the planned mast was too close to residential properties and was too high.
Lichfield District Council's planning committee is set to refuse the scheme when it meets on Monday evening.
Planning officers said the mast would form a highly intrusive feature of excessive height.
Planning officer Stephen Hill said: "I am not satisfied the applicant has given full consideration to the siting of this mast and consider its location will have a harmful impact on the character of the immediate surrounding area and on the amenity of nearby residents."
He said the mast could not be refused on health grounds.
County councillor Terry Finn backed residents in their fight against the mast.
He said the plans were unacceptable because the mast would be too close to Chesterfield Road and Redlock Field.
Vodafone spokeswoman Jane Frapwell said the firm needed masts near homes because that was where mobile reception was required.
She said there was no limit on how close the masts could be to houses and that exposure was lower when people were close to masts.
Omega this is not true. See under:
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Wissenschaft+zu+Mobilfunk/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cancer+Cluster
http://www.buergerwelle.de/body_science.html
http://www.expressandstar.com/articles/news/es/article_84425.php
Starmail - 15. Dez, 19:53
