The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy
Odds of Exit Poll anomalies 250 million to one----more votefraud news
http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/ale04090.html
The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
BuzzFlash was forwarded a copy of a new research paper (271k PDF) on the exit polls from the 2004 election.
THE UNEXPLAINED EXIT POLL DISCREPENCY---Steven F. Freeman PhD
http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/The_unexplained_exit_poll_discrepancy_v00k.pdf
In "The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Dr. Steven F. Freeman says: "As much as we can say in social science that something is impossible, it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote counts in the three critical battleground states [Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania] of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error."
The odds of those exit poll statistical anomalies occurring by chance are 250,000,000 to one. 250 MILLION to ONE.
He concludes the paper with this: "Systematic fraud or mistabulation is a premature conclusion, but the election's unexplained exit poll discrepancies make it an unavoidable hypothesis, one that is the responsibility of the media, academia, polling agencies, and the public to investigate."
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
FOCUS: MSNBC Vote Fraud Video (Must See)
http://www.truthout.org/multimedia.htm
Computer Researchers Find Critical Flaws in Popular Software Produced for U.S. Elections
http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/informationstechnologie/bericht-2\0184.html
Dr. Avi Rubin is currently Professor of Computer Science at John Hopkins University. He "accidently"got his hands on a copy of the Diebold software program--Diebold's source code--which runs their e- voting machines.
Dr. Rubin's students pored over 48,609 lines of code that make up this software. One line in partictular stood out over all the rest: #defineDESKEY((des_KEY8F2654hd4"
All commercial programs have provisions to be encrypted so as to protect them from having their contents read or changed by anyone not having the key..The line that staggered the Hopkin's team was that the method used to encrypt the Diebold machines was a method called Digital Encryption Standard (DES), a code that was broken in 1997 and is NO LONGER USED by anyone to secure prograns. F2654hd4 was the key to the encryption. Moreover, because the KEY was IN the source code, all Diebold machines would respond to the same key. Unlock one, you have then ALL unlocked.
I can't believe there is a person alive who wouldn't understand the reason this was allowed to happen. This wasen't a mistake by any stretch of the imagination. This was a fixed election, plain and simple.
This second coup d'etat is either stopped now or America ceases to be.
See more links at http://www.senderberl.com/111004.htm
Informant: S.T.Ill Freeman
http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/ale04090.html
The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
BuzzFlash was forwarded a copy of a new research paper (271k PDF) on the exit polls from the 2004 election.
THE UNEXPLAINED EXIT POLL DISCREPENCY---Steven F. Freeman PhD
http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/The_unexplained_exit_poll_discrepancy_v00k.pdf
In "The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Dr. Steven F. Freeman says: "As much as we can say in social science that something is impossible, it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote counts in the three critical battleground states [Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania] of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error."
The odds of those exit poll statistical anomalies occurring by chance are 250,000,000 to one. 250 MILLION to ONE.
He concludes the paper with this: "Systematic fraud or mistabulation is a premature conclusion, but the election's unexplained exit poll discrepancies make it an unavoidable hypothesis, one that is the responsibility of the media, academia, polling agencies, and the public to investigate."
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
FOCUS: MSNBC Vote Fraud Video (Must See)
http://www.truthout.org/multimedia.htm
Computer Researchers Find Critical Flaws in Popular Software Produced for U.S. Elections
http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/informationstechnologie/bericht-2\0184.html
Dr. Avi Rubin is currently Professor of Computer Science at John Hopkins University. He "accidently"got his hands on a copy of the Diebold software program--Diebold's source code--which runs their e- voting machines.
Dr. Rubin's students pored over 48,609 lines of code that make up this software. One line in partictular stood out over all the rest: #defineDESKEY((des_KEY8F2654hd4"
All commercial programs have provisions to be encrypted so as to protect them from having their contents read or changed by anyone not having the key..The line that staggered the Hopkin's team was that the method used to encrypt the Diebold machines was a method called Digital Encryption Standard (DES), a code that was broken in 1997 and is NO LONGER USED by anyone to secure prograns. F2654hd4 was the key to the encryption. Moreover, because the KEY was IN the source code, all Diebold machines would respond to the same key. Unlock one, you have then ALL unlocked.
I can't believe there is a person alive who wouldn't understand the reason this was allowed to happen. This wasen't a mistake by any stretch of the imagination. This was a fixed election, plain and simple.
This second coup d'etat is either stopped now or America ceases to be.
See more links at http://www.senderberl.com/111004.htm
Informant: S.T.Ill Freeman
Starmail - 13. Nov, 19:04
