Wi-Fi has a negative impact on our health
On
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina112f.html
I have placed 4 studies. They are all in german, but nevertheless, the figures speak for themselves.
In the practice, I regard, in upgoing order regarding radiation levels and inside the house, or coming from neighbours:
1. mobile phone masts
2. DECT cordless phones
3. wireless internet
Greetings,
Charles Claessens
WLan or Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi can reach much higher speeds, but has also a negative impact on our health.
Wireless conneting of several computer elements (WLan) is is of course a nice feature because most cables around are not needed anymore. But WLan or Wi-Fi is also pulsed, and the signals cause much electrosmog.
An example: A Notebook on your lap and wireless on the internet. The contact with the body is direct: 100.000 uW/m2. And such in the vicinity of prostate, testicles, intestines, overies, womb, bladder.
There is obviously no end in the pollution with microwaves over the air.
Below some german reports about WLan.
Rapport Virnich (summary of a number of cases)
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Rapporten/wlan-virnich.pdf
Bremen (report university Bremen)
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Rapporten/wlan-emvu-gutachten-bremen.pdf
New Ecologstudy WLan (new study about Wlan by the Ecolog Institute)
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Rapporten/Neue_Ecolog-Studie_zu_WLAN_6-2004.pdf
Bericht Maes (summary of a number of cases)
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Rapporten/WLAN.pdf
This report by Maes on Wlan closes with Wimax, the successor of WLan. And Wimax will be succeeded by TeraHertz, still better, still faster, still higher frequencies and still more radiation. Pulsed? Of course.
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina112f.html
I have placed 4 studies. They are all in german, but nevertheless, the figures speak for themselves.
In the practice, I regard, in upgoing order regarding radiation levels and inside the house, or coming from neighbours:
1. mobile phone masts
2. DECT cordless phones
3. wireless internet
Greetings,
Charles Claessens
WLan or Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi can reach much higher speeds, but has also a negative impact on our health.
Wireless conneting of several computer elements (WLan) is is of course a nice feature because most cables around are not needed anymore. But WLan or Wi-Fi is also pulsed, and the signals cause much electrosmog.
An example: A Notebook on your lap and wireless on the internet. The contact with the body is direct: 100.000 uW/m2. And such in the vicinity of prostate, testicles, intestines, overies, womb, bladder.
There is obviously no end in the pollution with microwaves over the air.
Below some german reports about WLan.
Rapport Virnich (summary of a number of cases)
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Rapporten/wlan-virnich.pdf
Bremen (report university Bremen)
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Rapporten/wlan-emvu-gutachten-bremen.pdf
New Ecologstudy WLan (new study about Wlan by the Ecolog Institute)
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Rapporten/Neue_Ecolog-Studie_zu_WLAN_6-2004.pdf
Bericht Maes (summary of a number of cases)
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Rapporten/WLAN.pdf
This report by Maes on Wlan closes with Wimax, the successor of WLan. And Wimax will be succeeded by TeraHertz, still better, still faster, still higher frequencies and still more radiation. Pulsed? Of course.
Starmail - 5. Nov, 09:54