http://observer.guardian.co.uk/foodmonthly/futureoffood/story/0,,1971266,00.html


Informant: binstock

December 12, 2004

By CLIVE THOMPSON

Three years ago, the nanotechnology expert James Gimzewski realized something startling about human cells: since they have many tiny moving parts, they might be producing tiny vibrations. And since all vibrations produce noise, it would be theoretically possible to listen to the sound of a cell. Gimzewski set about adapting an extremely small device to measure these vibrations and then with another device proceeded to amplify them loud enough for human ears. He discovered that a yeast cell produced about 1,000 vibrations a second. When he amplified the signal, a musical hum filled the room. ''It wasn't at all what I expected,'' he recalls. ''It sounded beautiful.''

Beautiful, and also potentially revolutionary. Gimzewski says that his technique could become a unique tool in the war against cancer: to figure out if a cell is malignant, doctors could simply listen to it.

When a cell turns cancerous, its internal machinery alters: it might divide more rapidly, and its walls could take a new shape. Those changes, Gimzewski surmises, would produce distinctive rates of vibration and thus distinctive noises. He has already measured the acoustics of some cells going through death cycles. When he measured an inert yeast cell, its lack of movement produced a dead-sounding hiss. And when he immersed a bunch of yeast in alcohol, the cells emitted a creepy ''screaming'' sound as they suddenly perished. Even minute changes -- like getting warmer -- make the cells sing differently. Gimzewski calls his technique sonocytology, and in August he published the first paper on this field in the journal Science.

Gimzewski's work has attracted some unusual enthusiasts. Representatives of the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi contacted him (''they apparently thought I'd discovered 'the language of life,''' he says), and a horror-movie director asked if he could use the sound of screaming cells in his soundtrack. But cancer specialists are seriously interested, and Gimzewski is now trying to adapt his device to listen to human cells.

Copyright 2004
The New York Times Company http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/magazine/12LISTENING.html


Visible proof of chemtrails existance, DVTB tower radiation, star structure visualised by chemtrails

on

http://iddd.de/umtsno/hass7fotodowodyEN.htm

Proof for existence of magnetic properties of pictured clouds as described in Welsbach's patent.

Welsbach's patent (288,5KB) is an invention purchased and patented by Hughes Aerospace of Los Angeles from two Chinese scientists I-Fu Shih and David Chang.

Station of digital television in Hamburg*** shows star structure of its electromagnetic radiation through chemtrails which are mixture of barite with aluminium microdust sprayed in the atmosphere by army aircrafts allover the world according to secret plans.

Propaganda ridicules these theories providing explanations like airplanes exhaust fumes or signal gases.

Picture #1 for the first time in the world we can see magnetic features of so called "exhaust fumes". These features are clearly arriving from Welsbach's patent about chemtrails: aluminium dust reflects UV radiation and creates electromagnetic field with barite.

Picture #1 is the first proof of chemtrails existence. This picture shows that electromagnetic field intensity changed structure of this cloud to star shaped regardless strong wind (5°).

This proofs that clouds are electromagnetic sensitive and considering that vapour does not have this sensitiveness it proofs that these are not exhaust fumes or steam but chemtrails made of aluminium dust sensitive to electromagnetic radiation.

***DVTB station in Hamburg has strengthen its power in order to provide better reception of TV programmed. Influence of human health has not yet been analyzed neither studied. This is potential source of health hazard for citizens of large cities like Hamburg or Munich

Additional photo taken at 6 PM. Check for more at Streifen am Himmel

Best wishes from Hamburg, Germany

Krzysztof Puzyna


Informant: Iris Atzmon

13.10.06

Der Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND) hat die Verbraucher vor dem Kauf der Waschmaschine "Silver Nano Health System" gewarnt. Zudem forderte der Umweltverband Samsung und Media Markt dazu auf, das von ihnen seit dieser Woche stark beworbene Produkt umgehend vom Markt zu nehmen. Die in der Maschine enthaltenen Silber-Nanopartikel seien noch nicht auf ihre Umwelt- und Gesundheitsverträglichkeit hin getestet worden. Tierversuche hätten jedoch ergeben, dass Silber in Nanogröße die Entwicklung von Nervenzellen stören und giftig auf Leber- und Geschlechtszellen wirken kann. "Ungeachtet der Wissenslücken bewerben Samsung und Media Markt die neue Waschmaschine als besonders gesundheitsfreundlich und für Allergiker und Schwangere geeignet", kritisiert der Umweltverband.

Die ganze Nachricht im Internet:
http://www.ngo-online.de/ganze_nachricht.php?Nr=14521

http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_3112.cfm


Informant: Teresa Binstock

http://tinyurl.com/zrzma



http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Chemtrails/

Report Says

By Rick Weiss
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 26, 2006; A12

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/25/AR2006092501138.html

The United States is the world leader in nanotechnology -- the newly blossoming science of making incredibly small materials and devices -- but is not paying enough attention to the environmental, health and safety risks posed by nanoscale products, says a report released yesterday by the independent National Research Council.

If federal officials, business leaders and others do not devise a plan to fill the gaps in their knowledge of nanotech safety, the report warns, the field's great promise could evaporate in a cloud of public mistrust.

"There is some evidence that engineered nanoparticles can have adverse effects on the health of laboratory animals," the congressionally mandated report said, echoing concerns raised by others at a House hearing last week. Until the risks are better understood, "it is prudent to employ some precautionary measures to protect the health and safety of workers, the public, and the environment."

The 176-page report, "A Matter of Size," was prepared under the auspices of the National Academies, chartered to advise Congress on matters of science. It focuses on the National Nanotechnology Initiative, which coordinates and prioritizes federal research in nanotechnology -- the fledgling but potentially revolutionary science that deals with materials as small as a billionth of a meter.

At that size, even conventional substances behave in unconventional ways. Some materials that do not conduct electricity or are fragile, for example, are excellent conductors and are extremely strong when made small enough. But nanoparticles can also enter human cells and trigger chemical reactions in soil, interfering with biological and ecological processes.

The report concludes that the U.S. research effort is vibrant and almost certainly the strongest in the world, though a few other countries are close behind. Among the more important unmet needs, it says, is stronger collaboration with the departments of Education and Labor to boost the supply of scientists and technicians with the skills the sector needs.

The report's concerns about the lack of a federal focus on nanotech health and safety were foreshadowed at a House Science Committee hearing Thursday at which Republicans and Democrats alike took the Bush administration to task over the lack of a plan to learn more about nanotech's risks.

Committee Chairman Sherwood L. Boehlert http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/b000586/ (R-N.Y.) accused the administration of "sauntering" toward solutions "at a time when a sense of urgency is required."

Ranking Democrat Bart Gordon http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/g000309/
(Tenn.) went further, calling the administration's latest summary of nanotech research needs, released at the hearing, "a very juvenile piece of work."

Andrew Maynard, chief science adviser for the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, funded in part by the Smithsonian Institution, said the government is spending about $11 million a year on nanotechnology's potential harms when industry and environmental groups have jointly called for at least $50 million to $100 million a year.

Equally important, Maynard said, is the need for a coordinated strategy to spend that money wisely.

About 300 consumer products already contain nanoscale ingredients, Maynard said, including several foods and many cosmetics, with little or no research to document their safety.

The industry is expected to be worth about $2 trillion by 2014.

Norris Alderson, associate commissioner for science at the Food and Drug Administration and chairman of the working group that created the administration's summary research plan presented to Congress last week, said the document -- which was supposed to be delivered six months ago -- was meant as "a first step."

Asked by Boehlert if he understood that much more is expected of him and his working group, Alderson responded: "I think your message is loud and clear."

© 2006 The Washington Post Company


Informant: Teresa Binstock

Despite a lack of federal oversight and no requirements for labeling, nanoparticles have been placed into countless consumer products, including food, food packaging, nutritional supplements, and body care products. Nanoproducts contain extremely small particles, roughly one-billionth of a meter in size. Laboratory studies already warn that nanoparticles can cause inflammation, damage brain cells, and cause pre-cancerous lesions. The Food and Drug Administration has scheduled its first-ever Public Meeting on October 10, 2006 to address the emergence of nanotechnology. Learn more about nanotechnology and contact the FDA to call for a moratorium on untested and unlabeled nanoproducts until adequate testing and federal oversight is in place:

http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/oca/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=5232