The last man standing
Sierra Times
by Larry A. Jones
09/13/05
Okay, let me see if I understand this report. Under this 'plan' we get to use our weapons of mass destruction before you get to use your weapons of mass destruction, which you will want to use before we use our weapons of mass destruction, which we will want to use before you use your weapons of mass destruction, which you will want to use before we use our weapons of mass destruction, which we will want to use before you use your weapons of mass destruction, which you will want to use ... So, if Saddam had actually possessed WMD and had used them on us before we got to attack him to keep him from using his WMD (which he didn't have), his preemptive attack would have been justified under the terms of our own 'plan' -- right? And when the dust settled, the last man standing (if there is a last man standing) would get to decide who was 'right' -- right?
http://www.sierratimes.com/05/09/13/65_71_189_66_65659.htm
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
by Larry A. Jones
09/13/05
Okay, let me see if I understand this report. Under this 'plan' we get to use our weapons of mass destruction before you get to use your weapons of mass destruction, which you will want to use before we use our weapons of mass destruction, which we will want to use before you use your weapons of mass destruction, which you will want to use before we use our weapons of mass destruction, which we will want to use before you use your weapons of mass destruction, which you will want to use ... So, if Saddam had actually possessed WMD and had used them on us before we got to attack him to keep him from using his WMD (which he didn't have), his preemptive attack would have been justified under the terms of our own 'plan' -- right? And when the dust settled, the last man standing (if there is a last man standing) would get to decide who was 'right' -- right?
http://www.sierratimes.com/05/09/13/65_71_189_66_65659.htm
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
Starmail - 14. Sep, 11:42
