The 30,000 killed since 9/11 is more than the number of people killed in terrorist acts in the last 35 years - studies show 22,000 people have been killed in terrorist incidents since 1968.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow/851152.cms
http://tinyurl.com/5veao


From Information Clearing House

Global opinion: World is not a safer place

Christian Science Monitor

09/13/04

Three years after the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001, a look over the weekend at global opinion on the war on terror shows that most of the world considers it a largely unsuccessful effort. Even within countries whose governments are allied with the US in the war on terror, and who have sent troops to Iraq, there is a sense that US policies have not made the world a safer place. Writing in Australia's Sydney Morning Herald, Washington correspondent Paul McGeough says that the there is much 'confusion and sadness' on the third anniversary of 9/11, and if you asked Western leaders how the war on terror was going, most would say 'they don't know.' McGeough argues that the administration of US President George W. Bush has invited 'double blowback from the litany of policy decisions' that have allowed the war in Iraq to 'smother the war on terror...

http://tinyurl.com/62zqw


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Are we safer after invading Iraq? No. Would we be safer if we'd spent the hundreds of billions the war has cost on improving our own security at home? Yes.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6900.htm

by Seymour Hersh

The Guardian

An excerpt from Sy Hersh's new book shows that Rumsfeld and Rice both knew of the abuses in Guantanamo...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/guantanamo/story/0,13743,1303294,00.html

Source: http://www.tompaine.com/opinion/#001834

U.S.: Three Years On, War on Terrorism Looks Like a Loser
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/091204A.shtml

Wie sich die Argumente gleichen: So wie George W. Bush über Terroristen argumentiert ("vernichten"), so argumentiert auch Wladimir Putin: "Wir werden siegen. Die Terroristen werden vernichtet. Wir werden siegen. Russland ist stark. Russland ist stark." Wie stark ist jemand, der im Angesicht von über 350 Toten in Beslan glaubt, so argumentieren zu müssen?

http://www.sonnenseite.com/fp/archiv/Akt-News/5308.php

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO409D.html


From Information Clearing House

What you are about to read and hear below will be stunning, in light of The Bush Administration's claim that they are fighting terrorism.

If the Republicans wanted to impeach Clinton because of lies and cover ups about a sexual escapade, then impeaching Bush and bringing charges to those in his Administration who are accountable for the security of our country would be the least they could expect, based on the disclosures you are about to learn.

Pictured below, is not "just a submarine" but a very special submarine. Two are already constructed and the third is in the process of being built. What you will learn here is: Which countries and "group" are behind this effort, what are their capabilities and what are their intended missions, which could be considered the biggest threat to our national security - ABOVE ALL OTHERS!

The inescapable question one is left with, after going over the information below, is: "Why did the Bush Administration spent funds, resources and manpower (including lives) invading Iraq when there was a graver threat to go after instead? Further, where has our press been with regards to this issue?

Below, are links and audio clip excerpts of an interview that took place on the Coast to Coast radio show with Art Bell and Howard Bloom on August 21, 2004.

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2004/08/21.html
Howard Bloom: http://www.howardbloom.net/


Informant: Jack Topel