http://openpr.de/news/78780
http://www.news4press.com/1/MeldungDetail.asp?Mitteilungs_ID=111453
http://at-de.i-newswire.com/pr15653.html

Lieber Herr Dr.Hingst,

hier ein Zitat von Elektrosmognews zum Artikel über die Schweizer Grenzwerte von Herrn Jakob:

"Kommentar der Elektrosmognews: Herr Jakob hat mit diesem Artikel alles zu den Schweizer Grenzwerten gesagt, was es dazu zu sagen gibt. Diese Werte sind erstens eine Mogelpackung und zweitens viel zu hoch, denn wenn Menschen und vor allem Kinder bereits bei viel niedrigeren Werten an Krebs erkranken und sterben, führen sich solche "Vorsorgewerte" von selbst ad absurdum (siehe zahlreiche epidemiologische Studien
http://www.elektrosmognews.de/Studien/senderstudien.html
bei "Anwohnern" von Rundfunksendern sowie viele aktuelle Krebshäufungen bei "Anwohnern" von Mobilfunk-, Rundfunk- und TV-Sendern). http://www.elektrosmognews.de/news/verdachtsfaelle.htm

An die Adresse all derer, die glauben, Mobilfunkkritiker kämpften für Schweizer Werte oder für irrelevante Grenzwertabsenkungen um den Faktor 10 oder ähnliche immer wieder gern verbreitete Märchen:

Die Grenzwertabsenkungen müssen drastisch sein, um den Gesundheitsschutz der Bevölkerung zu garantieren. Hierzu sind Krebshäufungen um Mobilfunksender zu berücksichtigen und SOFORT epidemiologisch zu untersuchen. Die Ergebnisse bereits in grosser Zahl vorliegender epidemiologischer Studien bei Anwohnern von Rundfunk- und TV-Sendern sind zu berücksichtigen,
http://www.elektrosmognews.de/Studien/senderstudien.html
ebenso wissenschaftliche Studien,
http://www.elektrosmognews.de/Studien/studien.html
die bei Werten weit unter den ICNIRP-Grenzwerten schädliche Wirkungen gefunden haben, wie z.B. Studien von Salford, Kwee und anderen.

Außerdem ist ähnlich wie bei Pestiziden und anderen umweltschädigenden Substanzen ein großzügiger und angemessener Sicherheitsfaktor zu berücksichtigen. Wir fordern deshalb einen Vorsorgewert von maximal 0,1 Mikrowatt pro Quadratmeter (Summenleistungsflußdichte). Dies entspricht auch der Forderung von Baubiologen, Bürgerverbänden, der ödp (in etwa) und Umweltschutzorganisationen." Dieser Forderung kann man sich nur anschließen wenn man den Brief der Ärzteinitiative Bamberger Appell vom 7. Februar 2006 gelesen hat:
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/aerzteinitiative_bamberger_appell.doc


Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Univ.-Doz. Dr. Ferdinand Ruzicka
Habilitiert für „Medizinische Physik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Zytophysik“ (cytophysics) an der Medizinischen Universität Wien
http://www.mikrowellensmog.info

--------

Re: Vorsorgewert

Sehr geehrter Hr. Dr. Ruzicka!

Es scheint, daß auch "zig" weitere Studien, wie Reflex, TNO, ect. ect. seitens der Regierung (mit ihrem verästelten Kompetenzkreislauf) keine anderen Antworten bringen werden, als die im attachment wiedergegebene (Stellungnahme des Herrn "V"izekanzlers an den Präsidenten des Nationalrates, vom 6. Feber 2005 - richtig allerdings 2006 - aber ein Jahr Toleranz liegt dort sicher innerhalb der zeitlichen Grenzwerte).

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/imfname_056676.pdf

Und wie paßt diese Stellungnahme auf die abgeschwächte Alibiwarnung (sh. Ärztekammer) der Frau Kollegin Gesundheitsminister ??? Es dürfte ein bewußtes Katz- und Mausspiel ohne Ende sein.

Vielleicht bedarf es deutlicherer Maßnahmen seitens der Betroffenen bzw. Vorsorgeinteressierten - sofern sich diese nicht zu Tode "papierln" lassen wollen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

M. Lauber

--------

Krebshäufung in der Nähe von Mobilfunksendeanlagen
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/580235/

Ärzte und Mobilfunk
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/408385/

The area of Ground Wave Digital TV Broadcasting is extending from 2004, in Japan. Some Electro Hypersensitivity (EHS) patients complaints that health problem increased markedly after digitized.

For example, I have EHS and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS). My house is 10km far from broadcasting institution in Sapporo city. The broadcasting began from Feb. 1st 2006. It uses UHF frequency, 470-550MHz. Then I felt headache, tingling, and ache of eye. My symptom got worth day by day, and I also suffereing sleeping disorder, memory loss, concentration difficulties, tiredness, and heart palpitation now. Electric field in my house increased about 10times.

Maki who lives in next town, also felt headache, tingling, and ache of eye. Takako and her daughters who lives in Morioka City, is suffering headache, deterioration of eyesight, and hives. All of them have EHS and MCS.

I am afraid Ground Wave Digital TV Broadcasting makes a lot of patients in future. But, I could not found a information about a risk of it. Could you tell me any information related to digital broadcasting?

Sincerely,

Yasuko Kato
yas-kato et syd.odn.ne.jp

(From Mona Nilsson)

For some it is more than a minor irritant. When a TETRA mast went live just a few hundred yards from Littlehamptom Primary School in Sussex in 2004, 11 children were sent home with headaches and nosebleeds.

According to Mr Morrison, all the Thornwood sufferers began reporting microwave symptoms at the same time as two masts, 3G and TETRA, were put up in the area. “There are now 15 masts in the Partick area,” he added. “The worst affected are those who live in the cross-lines between the 3G and TETRA masts.

“People here are getting angry because they feel they are being ignored. Everyone wants to know why the authorities won’t recognise what’s going on — why are they covering this up?”

http://www.whfp.com/1765/top2.html


Informant: Iris Atzmon

This was posted in Mast-victims Forum 010306.

Can anyone help Emilio with advice please let me know, or write direct to Emilio.

His E-mail address is below.


Quote:

Schools with Wi-fi.

Does anybody know any school where fathers/mothers fought (and won) against the pc-wifi-net installed?

We are planning to fight too, and we want experience.

emilio

mail: molinodehydra#hotmail.com

Emilios plea is posted here:
http://www.mast-victims.org/forum/index.php?action=vthread&forum=1&topic=76


Best regards.

Agnes

--------

WLAN, DECT in Schools and Kindergardens
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1579030/

School sued for installing a wireless computer network
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1121957/

HLV INFO 30/AT

2-03-2006

Regress-Avis

An die

Baugenossenschaft XXX

Auch zur Weitergabe an die Betreiber der Antennenanlage

Evtl. Spätfolgen durch Mobilfunkantennen


Sehr geehrte Damen & Herren,

als ehemaliger Mieter der Liegenschaft xxxxxxxxx möchten wir Ihnen mitteilen, dass mein Mann Herr XX an „Parkinson“ erkrankt ist. Da mein Mann erst 46 Jahre alt ist, und schon unsere Tochter nach dem Aufstellen der Antennen an Epilepsie erkrankte, haben wir den Verdacht, dass bei der Erkrankung meines Mannes und den Mobilfunkantennen ein Zusammenhang besteht. Sollte sich in Zukunft dieser Verdacht nachweislich bestätigen, werden wir uns vorbehalten, gegen Sie rechtliche Schritte auf Schadenersatz einzuleiten, sowie bei evtl. Frühverrentung Rentenansprüche geltend zu machen.


Mit freundlichen Grüßen


HLV Kommentar:

Der Fall ist uns in Details bekannt, die Anonymisierung erfolgte durch die Redaktion.

Abgesehen von den schwerwiegenden vorliegenden Erkrankungen sind die darüber hinaus existierten Schlafstörungen, Schwindel- und Kopfschmerzbeschwerden u.a. nach einem Wohnsitzwechsel verschwunden!

Siehe auch unter: http://www.iddd.de/umtsno/recht.htm

--------

Kanzlei für Mobilfunkopfer verfolgt für Geschädigte durch elektromagnetische Strahlung deren Ansprüche
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/5632559/

From: Hans Karow

This Is Vital to Public Health

Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 5:50 AM
Subject: Repacholi petition...a reminder!!!!!!!!!!

The EMR mess we are in is thanks also- if not mainly – to Michael Repacholi, head of WHO’s EMF department and also member of ICNIRP:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/409444403?ltl=1123880420

Please, if you have not signed the petition yet, then do so, and send to all people you are related and befriended and acquainted!

You can be choose to have your name hidden on the list…. I however did not, I have nothing to hide and I don’t fear anything!

I signed back in last year, # 155….you will find names that you recognize, including EMF experts!

When writing to other people, write some personal notes as well!

Thanks, cheers,

Hans.


Informant: Robert Riedlinger

--------

Hans has some good ideas that we need to act on. Rewording the petition so that it is easily understood by anyone who reads it is necessary so that even WHO will understand what the real issue is. A petition can be a powerful tool and unless there is momentum (the will of the people) behind this issue nothing will ever be done because the corporate muscle behind this technology is awesome. We can imagine that a few of us can have an effect, but let’s face the reality that this issue has been around for a really long time and the technology just keeps advancing with no end in sight. There is literally nowhere that we or our children can be safe anymore.

I am a teacher, and I have been examining the statistics within my own school. In my own Junior Grade 4 class of 8/9 year olds, 30% have a learning disability or are functioning at or below a D level. In the Grade 5 class of 9/10 year olds, 50% of the children have a learning disability and are working at or below a D level, and in the Grade 6 class of 11/12 years olds 50% of the children as well have learning disabilities. The Primary division has similar statistics. This represents a decade of digital TV, cell/remote phones, computer/video games, microwave ovens, wireless notebooks/classrooms, WAN and WLAN. The teachers in my school are alarmed as we examine the extent of the learning exceptionalities and the lack of resources to deal with it. I have been teaching for over 20 years and it seems that there are more and more children who simply cannot function within the expectations of a normal curriculum. The number of children who are MID (Mildly Intellectually Delayed), dyslexic, autistic, ADHD etc. continues to grow each year. And now despite my valiant efforts, we have a wireless communication tower complete with parabolic dishes (with more to be added) attached right to our school building sanctioned by our School Board (the profits to be made are just too seductive to consider what is happening to our children. The Board’s argument is that there is no conclusive proof that there is causation for any deleterious effects so wireless technology must be safe).

The general population must be educated as to what electromagnetic energies are before the people/parents can make a decision that they need to distance themselves from it, or use it for less time each day, or to use protective screens/clothing or not use it at all. Gaussmeters need to be universally available at the local hardware store. You all realize the reason why meters are difficult (close to impossible) to find….because then the people will have “the knowledge” and knowledge is POWER and corporations do not want people to have this power because then they will have to be ACCOUNTABLE for their actions. Corporate profit margins may go down or they may have to spend more money in design and production to make technology that is actually people-friendly. It may even mean that technology that we already have and are presently using should no longer be used because the risk is too high.

What will become of the children of this generation who at the first decade marker of their lives have not a hope of a bright and prosperous future because they are already damaged beyond repair?I see how they struggle with simple concepts, their inability to process information, their inability for creative innovation, their inability to even focus and remain at task to complete an assignment. Years ago, children like this were an anomaly; now they are making up a larger and larger part of our classes (at least where I live). These are the children who are supposed to grow up and take up where we left off. What if a large part of the present working population becomes prematurely senile from RF/MW which can cause toxins to pass the blood brain barrier into the brain causing Alzheimer’s disease? Will our society/economy have to go into such a downward spiral towards destruction in the loss of our intellectual resources before anyone/everyone takes a stand to say enough is enough (Will we even be able to remember that this is what we must do?) At the very least, we must protect the children now! If we do nothing, we are just as culpable as Dr. Repacholi in our own inaction. We must look at this petition as another opportunity to make a statement of our concern.

Dr. Repacholi MUST be held accountable, NOW. Waiting for him to “self-destruct” (Larry) just wastes precious time when our children are destructing before our very eyes. I do not believe that the children of this generation have the luxury of several years wait until “the situation change[s]…in such a way that the concerns of the informed members of the public (us) will become much more influential.” (Marjorie) FOR STARTERS, we need a statement from the WHO, clear and unequivocal, that children/students with developing brains (the newest evidence from U. of Pennsylvania is that the brain does not complete development until age 25!) should not be using cell phones at all, except in dire emergencies. If you watch TV with your children, you will of course be apprised of the intense advertising to children/teenagers to have the newest technology such as downloading favourite music right to his/her cell.

Statements such as the following, hidden in the back of the “Motomanual” (2005) for a Motorola cell phone, serve only as a means to nullify corporate liability: “Present scientific information does not indicate the need for any special precautions for the use of mobile phones. If you are concerned, you may want to limit your own or your children’s RF exposure by limiting the length of calls or by using handsfree devices to keep mobile phones away from your head and body - Source WHO Fact Sheet 193.” Which kid reads the back pages anyway?- certainly not the one who is excited about choosing ringtones and learning how to text-message. And which kid is concerned about limiting the length of calls – certainly not the one with a girlfriend or boyfriend. And where is the cell phone carried – the front pocket of the jeans or jacket. And most of the time, the cell is turned ON.

In my opinion, we all should sign the WHO petition to put our mark in the sand, then rewrite it as Hans suggested so that laypeople understand what the issues are and sign it again! If the trend in learning difficulties in my own school is representative of what is happening in other communities, within ten years we are going to have a people problem that will be impossible to solve.

Best regards,

Janice

--------

Omega see also: http://omega.twoday.net/stories/877606/