A 50-year-old agreement with the IAEA has effectively gagged the WHO from telling the truth about the health risks of [ionizing] radiation...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/28/who-nuclear-power-chernobyl


Informant: Mark G.

--------

Article on 50th anniversary of nuclear gag on WHO
http://groups.google.com/group/omeganews/t/59e4a99df5eaada8?hl=de


Informant: Richard Brambell

--------

Why downplayed Repacholi Chernobyl?

This is what's behind Michael Repacholi's interview to the New Scientist downplaying Chernobyl disaster results. Why would the world be under the illusion the same is not happening with the cellular and powerline industries? A contract is just a piece of paper for him, and people are just pieces of flesh and blood - is there a difference for him between the two kinds of the above substances? And words are just words: sentences like "If science doesn't suit you it's not my problem" (like he wrote to Robert Riedlinger) cannot be simply used as a paste - as long as The Guardian and Microwave News publish the root of the problems, that cannot be cured as disturbing symptoms to get rid of with a word-paste, or with lines that are full with the word "science" as many times as possible, as if it impresses someone.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/28/who-nuclear-power-chernobyl


Iris Atzmon



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=health+risk
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=World+Health+Organization
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Chernobyl
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Chernobyl