8
Jul
2004

Another Attack on the Arctic

by BRUCE BABBITT

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/opinion/08BABB.html

BARROW, Alaska -- Thwarted by the public in its efforts to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, the Bush administration and the oil companies are now quietly turning their attention to the balance of the Arctic region of Alaska, all the way west to the Chukchi Sea, within sight of Siberia. In advance of its efforts, the administration has jettisoned environmental safeguards and is now threatening the traditional-use rights of the Alaska Natives who have hunted caribou and waterfowl along the Arctic slope for thousands of years.

This plan was announced in Anchorage just as Congress recessed for the Reagan funeral. Outside Alaska it has received little notice, not even for its centerpiece -- a proposal to lease rights for oil and gas development in Teshekpuk Lake, a body of water that is vital to the region. This shallow lake, which is about 30 miles across, is the biological heart of the western Arctic, the summer nesting and breeding ground for hundreds of thousands of black brant, spectacled eider, yellow-billed loons, white-fronted geese and other migratory birds that arrive here each year from 32 of the lower 48 states as well as countries as far south as Argentina.

The lake, however, isn't just for the birds. It is also a critically important subsistence area for the indigenous Inupiat communities on the Arctic slope. They go there to hunt and fish for food to sustain them through the long, dark winters.

Teshekpuk Lake lies within the western region of what is known as the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. In 1976 Congress transferred the management of the petroleum reserve to the Bureau of Land Management. But Congress also mandated protections for the wildlife and native peoples, making it clear that America's Arctic should not be transformed into another West Texas oilfield.

In 1998 the Clinton administration took the first steps to open the reserve with a two-year study involving hundreds of scientists and representatives of the Inupiat communities. Two years later the scientific teams returned with a recommendation to begin oil leasing, with stipulations for setting aside approximately 13 percent of the study area, mostly rivers and lakes, including Teshekpuk, as protected areas. They also recommended a ban on permanent roads across the fragile tundra, based upon assurances from the oil companies that they could operate with temporary winter "ice roads" that would simply melt away as summer approached and waterfowl and migratory caribou began congregating at the lake.

The Bush administration now proposes to eliminate these safeguards intended to protect the lake, the wildlife and the Inupiat who depend on it. The decision is not yet final. During the summer there will be
hearings in Anchorage and Washington. Then, Interior Secretary Gale Norton is expected to make a decision. In this land of endless summer days, there are bound to be a lot of sleepless nights.

Bruce Babbitt was secretary of the interior from 1993 to 2001.


Informant: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/opinion/08BABB.html

Weyerhaeuser logs in endangered forests regions

Wake up Weyerhaeuser Campaign News, Updates, Action!
Greetings Old Growth friends!

1) Trader Joe's update

Saturday, June 19th was our second in a series of days of action focused on getting Trader Joe's to sever business ties with Weyerhaeuser for paper bags. Weyerhaeuser logs in endangered forests regions in order to supply its customers like Trader Joe's with pulp and paper.

Dozens of events were held in 8 states, in cities stretching from San Francisco to Boston. Many events were at Trader Joe's locations; many others were educational events in communities throughout America to raise awareness about Weyerhaeuser and its customers, and to gather petition signatures.

More than 1,100 emails were sent to CEO Dan Bane, and hundreds of calls poured in during the week of the day of action to Trader Joe's headquarters in Monrovia. In fact, the Trader Joe's office has assigned a customer service representative to address individuals concerns on this issue!

Trader Joe's still hasn't cancelled its Weyerhaeuser contract. We're ready to turn up the heat. Our next step is taking this message straight to the company headquarters, in Monrovia, California (a suburb just 30 minutes away from Los Angeles). If you'd like to help us plan an event there, email us today at grassroots@ran.org.

2) Give Trader Joe's a piece of your mind

If you haven't already done so, take a few minutes today to make a call or send an email to Trader Joe's. Tell them to sever business ties with Weyerhaeuser. Click here to send your email letter:
http://action.ran.org/ctt.asp?u=2844473&l=43820.

If you want to make a phone call, here's the 411: Trader Joe's headquarters: 781-433-0234

A short message should suffice: "I shop at Trader Joe's and I am upset that my grocery store buys its paper bags from Weyerhaeuser - the #1 destroyer of old growth forests in North America. Please cancel your paper bag contract with Weyerhaeuser."

You can also help by coordinating an action at your local Trader Joe's. Pick a local store, and have a chat with the manager! Or distribute flyers to customers. Or paint some placards and organize a demonstration. Whatever you do, have fun, and be sure that the manager of the branch knows that the public demands strong environmental standards and will not tolerate more procrastination from Trader Joe's! Request an action toolkit at grassroots@ran.org

3) New Online Calendar at ran.org

RAN is committed to giving activists the tools they need to organize, agitate, and have fun while bringing about radical social change. One tool we're excited about is a new online calendar that allows members, activists, and people like YOU to spread the word about events you're coordinating in your local community.

By posting your events online, you can give others the opportunity to get involved in efforts to transform the global economy, curb climate chaos, and protect endangered forests around the world.

Click here to check out the calendar today! Our event calendar is located at: http://action.ran.org/ctt.asp?u=2844473&l=44283

4) Stop the Biscuit Timber Sale in Oregon

In Oregon, the fight to protect the Siskiyou Mountains from logging has begun. The Forest Service is currently proposing to log 372 million board feet of timber from this post-fire landscape in the Siskiyou Mountains, one of the most diverse temperate forests in the world, which makes this timber sale one of the largest in the modern times. About 25,948-acres, or over 30 square miles, would be clearcut (the entire city of Medford is 20 square miles).

Environmental organizations, including RAN, and activists from around Oregon and beyond, are working to protect these forests from the bite of chainsaws. If you would like to get involved in the on-the-ground forest defense campaign please contact http://www.kswild.org, and Lesley Adams at lesley@kswild.org, 541.488.5789.


For the Earth and for Justice!
Sharon and Jess

Mast row heads for appeal court

A battle over plans for a 25-metre mobile phone mast near three North Yorkshire schools is heading for the Court of Appeal, the BBC has learned.

Deputy prime minister John Prescott has decided to appeal against a High Court ruling allowing the mast in Harrogate.

Although an inspector rejected plans for the mast near St Robert's, Granby High and Woodfield schools, phone firms overturned this in the High Court.

The Appeal Court will be asked to give a landmark ruling on such plans.

Government challenge

Last month, Sir Richard Tucker ruled in the High Court that the proposals - by T-Mobile, Orange and Hutchinson 3G - met current safety guidelines.

The judge said the plans did not give rise to "actual danger", even though there was a "perception of risk" amongst the public.

Sir Richard quashed a previous planning inspectorate decision, saying that current government guidelines were concerned with "actual rather than perceived health risk".

But the government is challenging this interpretation of the guidelines, giving rise to a potentially landmark ruling.

Local anger

In a statement, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister said: "The Secretary of State has decided to appeal the judgment in the case of T Mobile v First Secretary of State and Harrogate Borough Council.

"The judgment is inconsistent with case law authority, (and) previous judgments clearly recognise that both actual and perceived health concerns are relevant considerations."

Campaigners had feared the earlier High Court decision would allow companies to ignore health fears and erect masts on sensitive sites in the future.

This ruling provoked anger from parents, teachers, Harrogate Borough Council and the town's MP, Phil Willis, who described it as "extraordinary".

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/england/north_yorkshire/3874463.stm

Published: 2004/07/07 15:48:44 GMT

© BBC MMIV


Informant: Robert Riedlinger

Bush signs Shoshone distribution

http://www.elkodaily.com/articles/2004/07/07/news/local/news2.txt


Informant: Carrie Dann

Bush Coordinating War on Terror With Election

http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1288388&l=44435

Get Truth Out on Intelligence Blunders

As early as tomorrow, the Senate will release a report that finds fault with the way the U.S. intelligence community gathered evidence on Iraq’s weapons and its links to Al Qaeda before the war. Unfortunately, the Senate doesn’t look at the role of one important actor: The White House.

If Fahrenheit 9/11 taught us one thing about the Bush administration, it’s that Bush has been keeping Americans in the dark on the war in Iraq. We shouldn’t lay the intelligence failure solely at the feet of the intelligence community. We need to create an independent commission to investigate the role of the White House. Take Action Today!
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=440882&url_num=2&url=http://www.demaction.org/dia/organizations/2020vision/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=74

Americans have the right to know how our intelligence community got it wrong on Iraq’s weapons and links to terrorists—two major justifications for this war! Tell the White House to step in and order the CIA to release as much of the Senate Intelligence Committee report as possible. Contact the White House Today!
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=440882&url_num=3&url=http://www.demaction.org/dia/organizations/2020vision/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=74

We’d also like to give you the chance to hear more about what we’ve been doing to educate people on the local level. Our Executive Director, Tom Collina has spoken on several radio shows about why we need to investigate the role of the White House in the Iraq intelligence failure.Click here to find out more!
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=440882&url_num=4&url=http://www.demaction.org/dia/organizations/2020vision/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=74


Best,

Tom and Rebecca

Your online team at

20/20 Vision

EDEKA steigt aus dem Geschäft mit Raubbau-Möbeln aus

Robin Wood Initiative zeigt Erfolg

08.07.04

Auf Druck der Umweltschutzorganisation Robin Wood hat EDEKA Tropenholzmöbel aus Vietnam und Indonesien aus dem Sortiment genommen. Robin Wood hatte Kontakt mit EDEKA aufgenommen, nachdem Aktivisten in diesem Frühjahr in Filialen des Unternehmens Merantiholz-Gartenmöbel aus Vietnam gefunden hatten. Jedem Möbelstück lag ein so genanntes "ITTO-Zertifikat" bei. Das Kürzel steht für International Tropical Timber Organisation. Diese Organisation wurde zur Förderung des Tropenholzhandels gegründet und zertifiziert gar keine Produkte...

Die ganze Nachricht im Internet:
http://www.ngo-online.de/ganze_nachricht.php4?Nr=8858

Omega-News Collection 8. July 2004

Attention, Shoppers: You Can Now Speed Straight Through Checkout Lines
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259998/

NIH Scientists Take Big Pharma Money
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260586/

European Environmental Rules Propel Change in U.S.
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260723/

Bush Signs Western Shoshone Bill
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260301/

The Western Shoshone Claims Distribution Act
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260331/

Bush Team Pushes Huge Timber Sale Under Guise of Fire Protection
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260007/

War x 4
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260112/

Religious groups support global warming bill
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260020/

Stop Global Warming
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260707/

‘Water for the World’ Resolution
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260700/

GALAPAGOS UNDER SIEGE
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260338/

UN Urges Action After Gorilla Habitat Destroyed
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260535/

Request to help stop bill that would allow massive bird slaughter
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260566/

GM WHEAT DESTROYED IN SPAIN
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260337/

Verified Voting
http://omega.twoday.net/

Activist: E-Voting to Be a 'Train Wreck'
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259094/

DNC's Voting Rights Institute to Teach 'Mechanics of Casting A Vote'
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259981/

Support Your Freedom to Read
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259323/

What's At Stake
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259076/

US Soldiers Laughed At Drowning
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260597/

Abu Ghraib hits home
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/verified_voting.html

BUSH & CHENEY MISLEAD ON TORT REFORM
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259267/

D'Amato to Bush: Dump Cheney
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260729/

Presidential morality
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260744/

Computer experts warn of e-voting problems
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260737/

Hijacking Catastrophe
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259965/

9/11 panel repeats: Iraq-Osama tie weak
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259968/

Degrees of Fahrenheit
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260084/

Foreign detainees are few in Iraq
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260073/

Iraq magnet to militants in Europe
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260068/

Blair says WMD may never be found in Iraq
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259977/

CIA knew there were no WMDs
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260065/

God Is With Us
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260919/

The irrationality of patriotism
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/259987/

The American Revolution and Iraq
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260041/

Morning in Iraq?
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260054/

A callous call-up
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260902/

The Republican Road Not Taken: The Foreign-Policy Vision of Robert A. Taft
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260059/

The Grim Balance Sheet Of The Iraq War
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260080/

The true human cost of the war in Iraq
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260884/

Pre-emptive War; Pre-emptive Arrests
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260088/

The Whole Truth About The Iraq War
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260090/

The United States Army in Operation Iraqi Freedom
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260313/

No more lawless interventions
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260075/

Bush Tries to Keep Half Million Vets In the Dark
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260703/

Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260926/

Defeats in Iraq and Afghanistan
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260595/

U.S. Response to Insurgency Called a Failure
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260896/

LAWSUIT OF FBI WHISTLEBLOWER SIBEL EDMONDS DISMISSED
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260311/

The neocons and the global order
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260877/

It's not always about you
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260909/

Norway reacts to alleged American child abuse in Iraq
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260891/

Disappearing Prisoners
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260905/

The Despoiling of America
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260914/

Restore the Constitution
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260327/

Vote To Impeach
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/261127/

Straw Fears Iraq War May Be Ruled Illegal
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260888/

Saudis freed Britons in a secret swap of prisoners
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260093/

Vote To Impeach

http://www.votetoimpeach.org/


From Information Clearing House

Hartz IV gegen internationale Menschenrechte

Die Habitat International Coalition (HIC) hat gegenüber Minister Clement ihre Besorgnis wegen der Hartz IV Reform ausgedrückt. Die weltweite Organisation befürchtet eine Zunahme von Obdachlosigkeit als Folge der Reform. Sie sieht in der Reform eine Verletzung des Rechts auf Wohnen, wie es im Internationalen Pakt über soziale, wirtschaftliche und kulturelle Rechte vereinbart wurde. Diese internationale Menschenrechtsvereinbarung wurde von der Bundesrepublik 1973 unterzeichnet. HIC bittet die Bundesregierung die Reformen zu überprüfen.

Grüße Knut Unger, MieterInnenverein Witten, 02302-276171


Hartz IV reform

Federal Minister
Wolfgang Clement
(Federal Ministry of Economics and Labour)
E-mail: info@bmwa.bund.de <mailto:info@bmwa.bund.de>

Mexico City, 7 of July 2004

Excellency,

Having received from social organizations based in Germany, fellow members of Habitat International Coalition (HIC), some alarming news about the recent reform of labour market, we would like to take the opportunity to underline some aspects of the newly implemented Hartz IV reform which can turn out to be a thread to the fulfilment of fundamental housing rights.

With the future housing costs support cut, a large number of the 5 million unemployed people in your country may be unable to cope with their rents, especially in urban areas where houses and flat prices are far too expensive. As a consequence, soon many of these citizens will fall in debt regarding their rent obligations and they may face eviction if the dept is over two months rent. Thus there is a real risk for homelessness to increase as a consequence of this process or, at least, of developing a new type of segregation with the concentration of the unemployed population in the cheapest suburbs. This critical situation deserves our greatest concern.

Our Coalition, which is made up by nearly 500 organisations from 80 countries and counts with a consultative status at the United Nations, works for the recognition, the defence and the fulfilment of housing rights. Basing our opinion on the international legal sources of human rights, we consider the Hartz IV reform as a violation of the human right to an adequate housing recognised on article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) ratified by Germany in 1973. The ICESCR also obliges States not to take regressive measures (article 2) as the Hartz IV reform is in terms of housing rights.

In this perspective and with all respect, we send you this letter to bring to your consideration the need to revise the Hartz IV reform on the perspective of international housing rights and to preserve the high quality of the German social welfare.

Respectfully,

Enrique Ortiz Flores
President of Habitat International Coalition

Coalición Internacional para el Hábitat
Oficina Regional para América Latina (HIC-AL)
Habitat International Coalition
Latin America Regional Office (HIC-AL)
Tacuba # 53, 1er piso, Col. Centro
06000 Mexico D.F.
MEXICO
Tel: +52 55 55 12 15 86
Tel: + 52 55 55 12 67 26
Fax: +52 55 55 12 38 42
E-mail: chm@laneta.apc.org
Web: http://www.hic-al.org

Environmental Health News

Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush

American Dynasty: Video

Phillips shows how spying, dishonesty about one's background and business dealings, multiple loyalties, and preoccupation with profits and oil go deep into the Bush family roots, and he likens their search for power to royal European dynasties and restorations of the 18th and 19th centuries...

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6440.htm

God Is With Us

Flash prensentation...

http://tinyurl.com/384tj


From Information Clearing House

The Despoiling of America

How George W. Bush became the head of the new American Dominionist Church/State...

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5646.htm

It's not always about you

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6439.htm

Disappearing Prisoners

Are they dead? Are they alive? Where is the media? Does anybody out there care?...

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0427/hentoff.php


From Information Clearing House

A callous call-up

The Pentagon's decision to press 5,600 discharged soldiers back into service, mainly for Iraq and Afghanistan, is the latest example of President George W. Bush's refusal to face the true costs of pre-emptive war...

http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?file=528167.html


From Information Clearing House

U.S. Response to Insurgency Called a Failure

Some top Bush officials and military experts say the Pentagon has no coherent strategy. Little change is expected with Iraq's new sovereignty...

http://tinyurl.com/3c89v

Norway reacts to alleged American child abuse in Iraq

The Norwegian Government and individual politicians have reacted strongly to the alleged abuse of children in Iraqi prisons by American soldiers, as reported in a German TV documentary on Monday evening...

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6442.htm

Straw Fears Iraq War May Be Ruled Illegal

Foreign Secretary Jack Straw is locked in a dramatic battle to stop a court branding the Iraq war illegal...

http://tinyurl.com/ywrw3


From Information Clearing House

The true human cost of the war in Iraq

Are we getting the whole story from the Pentagon?: The number of casualties from Operation Iraqi Freedom are, thousands and thousands of soldiers higher than the Pentagon seems to say...

http://www.pbs.org/now/printable/transcript325_full_print.html


From Information Clearing House

The neocons and the global order

http://www.antiwar.com/utley/?articleid=2951


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Kritik an Ausweitung von Großem Lauschangriff hält auch bei Grünen an

Bütikofer: "Darüber werden wir gegebenenfalls streiten müssen"

Berlin - Die Kritik an der geplanten Ausweitung des so genannten Großen Lauschangriffs hält an. Die schleswig-holsteinische Justizministerin Anne Lütkes (Grüne) warf Bundesjustizministerin Brigitte Zypries (SPD) im NDR vor, die vom Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVG) geforderten Beschränkungen beim Abhören von Wohnungen unterlaufen zu wollen. Auch Grünen-Chef Reinhard Bütikofer meldete Bedenken an. "Darüber werden wir gegebenenfalls streiten müssen", sagte Bütikofer der "Berliner Zeitung" vom Donnerstag. Kritik kam auch vom Deutschen Anwalt-Verein und der Ärztevereinigung NAV-Virchow-Bund. (AFP)

08.07.04, 13:32 Uhr

http://www.netscape.de/index.jsp?sg=News_Newsticker&cid=1950034628

Presidential morality

http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/19165/


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Computer experts warn of e-voting problems

Detroit Free Press

07/08/04

Just four months before November's elections, vulnerabilities persist in electronic voting machines used nationwide, a group of computer experts told House lawmakers Wednesday. The experts are concerned the elections may be plagued by hackers, fraud and computer malfunctions. Some argue for the return of the paper ballot as a backup to verify voters' intentions. ... Nearly 50 million Americans are expected to vote using touch screen machines this fall."...

http://www.freep.com/news/politics/voting8_20040708.htm


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

D'Amato to Bush: Dump Cheney

Las Vegas Review-Journal

07/07/04

President Bush should consider dumping Vice President Dick Cheney from the Republican ticket this year, an influential former GOP senator said Wednesday. Alfonse D'Amato said Bush should consider putting Secretary of State Colin Powell or Sen. John McCain of Arizona on the GOP ticket."...

http://tinyurl.com/ywlav


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

European Environmental Rules Propel Change in U.S.

by OTTO POHL

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/06/science/earth/06euro.html

BRUSSELS - When Darcy White of Raytown, Mo., chose to breast-feed her baby daughter two years ago, she had never heard of brominated flame retardants. But after randomly participating in a study, she learned that her breast milk carried unusually high levels of the chemicals.

Since then, the Environmental Protection Agency has announced an agreement with chemical manufacturers to phase out the worst of these toxic compounds, which are present in a wide variety of consumer goods like furniture and computer monitors, and Congress is considering legislation to make the ban permanent.

But it was only after the chemicals had been banned here in Europe that sufficient political pressure built for a phaseout in the United States.

That cycle was no accident. Globalization has often been condemned as encouraging a race to the bottom as multinationals seek the cheapest and least regulated place to do business. But increasingly, American environmental and public health advocates see globalization as a way to start a race to the top. They are taking their issues to the European Union, hoping to use regulations there as a lever for regulations in the United States.

"We are putting more resources into Europe than we otherwise would have done," says Charlotte Brody, coordinator of Health Care Without Harm, a Washington-based group attempting to reduce harmful substances in hospital supplies. "We desperately need the E.U. to be raising the bar and show what is possible."

Environmental groups, too, are working more closely with European lawmakers.

"We feel that Europe is a real opportuni ty," says Ned Helme, executive director for the Center for Clean Air Policy in Washington. Once Europe moves ahead on programs to curb the gases believed to cause global warming, Mr. Helme believes, it will promote change in the United States. "We're pushing where the opportunity for innovation is greatest," he said.

The regulations affect a broad range of American chemical, energy and electronics companies, and industry groups say bureaucrats they did not elect are wielding unprecedented power over them, based on insufficient evidence of harm.

"The E.U. is going where no man has gone before," says James Lovegrove, managing director of the European division of the American Electronics Association, a United States industry lobby. "The moment the ink hits the paper in Europe it becomes a global piece of legislation.''

The generally stricter European laws reflect a different philosophical approach to regulation, says Dr. Indra Spiecker, a lawyer specialized in comparative law and assistant professor for American law at the
University of Osnabrück in Germany. American lawmakers primarily look to cost-benefit analysis, which holds that the benefit of imposing regulation should outweigh its cost. European nations have more readily embraced what is called the precautionary principle. Essentially, Europeans emphasize the cost of inaction, while Americans tend to focus on the cost of action.

"Fifteen years ago consumer issues would start in the United States and sweep over to Europe," says Ursula Schliessner, a product safety lawyer at McKenna Long & Aldridge in Brussels. "Now when there are consumer issues in the E.U. they trigger reactions in the United States."

In the case of the flame retardants, scientists from the Environmental Working Group, researching the prevalence of the chemicals in American mothers, discovered that Ms. White, an outwardly healthy 31-year-old practicing nurse, had some of the highest levels ever recorded. Studies have shown that, in laboratory animals, the chemicals can cause severe damage to the brain, especially in the first months of life. No one has proved that the substances are dangerous to humans, and Ms. White's daughter, Katelyn, is thriving.

Although concerned, Ms. White does not warn expectant mothers who come to her maternity ward to be tested for the chemicals. "You don't want to freak out mothers more than they already are," she says.

But Dr. Linda Birnbaum, director of the experimental toxicology division at the E.P.A., says the risk identified in the European studies, which then triggered additional research in America, was high enough to warrant action.

A co-author of the current legislation in Congress, Representative Diana DeGette, Democrat of Colorado, also says the European action against the substance was important to raise the issue in the United States. "The fact that the E.U. is taking steps really helps give us an argument" to ban the substances, she said.

European legislation can have an even more immediate impact in an area like consumer electronics. Because of the global nature of the electronics business, a multinational that redesigns its product to eliminate a substance banned in the E.U. often finds it cheaper to sell that product worldwide.

One such law that came into force last year limits or eliminates metals used in electronics considered particularly noxious when they leach into the environment.

The E.U. is now considering sweeping new regulation of its chemical industry that has unleashed what analysts here say is the biggest lobbying effort in Brussels ever mounted by American industry.

The new law, known as Reach, would place the burden of proof of safety on the producers before its sale, rather than waiting for problems to spur regulation later. It would force American chemical companies to comply with the legislation in order to continue exporting to Europe - and raises the fear of similar legislation in the United States.

The chemical industry points out that few if any of the unregulated chemicals are causing obvious health crises and says the legislation is overly bureaucratic and expensive. The American Chemical Council has marshaled its members to alter or derail the legislation.

But American environmental groups are eagerly supporting the law. "This is the place where the action is," says Tony Long, director of the World Wildlife Fund European policy office. He sees the potential effects of Reach broader than its technical jurisdiction. "This will have results around the world," he says.


Informant: Teresa Binstock

Stop Global Warming

The film “Day After Tomorrow” may not be the most realistic depiction of how global warming could wreak havoc upon our environment, but it couldn’t have been more timely.

As early as TODAY, Congress will be voting on historic legislation that could help protect our planet from global warming. Please contact your Senators TODAY and ask them to support the McCain-Lieberman bill!
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=418696&url_num=2&url=http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/2020vision/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=69

Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and Joseph Lieberman’s (D-CT) bill would control 75% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming. Better yet, it’s a pragmatic approach supported by industry, environmentalists, scientists, farm groups, and economists, and it wouldn’t hurt smaller businesses.



We have a unique opportunity to pass a consensus-based policy that will reduce air pollution and make our planet more secure in the long run. Last year we were only eight votes shy of winning.Please tell your Senators to support this bill today!
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=418696&url_num=3&url=http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/2020vision/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=69

After you’ve emailed your Senators, please sign this petition sponsored by Environmental Defense that has already generated hundreds of thousands of signatures in support of combating global warming.

http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=418696&url_num=4&url=http://iw.rtm.com/ed/undoit_petition_1.asp?sitecode=uhp

Bush Tries to Keep Half Million Vets In the Dark

http://www.misleader.org/daily_mislead/Read.asp?fn=df07072004.html

‘Water for the World’ Resolution

June 25, 2004

Public Citizen Urges Congress to Adopt ‘Water for the World’ Resolution

Statement of Wenonah Hauter, Director of Public Citizen’s Water for All Campaign

In light of the growing shortage of clean water in the developing world and the international trend toward the privatization of water systems, Public Citizen applauds U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) and 29 co-sponsors of the Water for the World Resolution, which was introduced late Thursday and calls for water to be regarded as a public good and fundamental human right.

It is essential that Congress support this measure. More than a billion of the world’s inhabitants lack adequate access to safe drinking water, and 2.5 billion have no proper sanitation. Thousands, mostly children, die each day from preventable waterborne diseases. Because of increasing pollution and a rate of global water consumption that doubles every 20 years, by 2025, 48 nations will face severe water shortages, according to the World Health Organization.

The Water for the World Resolution affirms that water is a global public good and should not be treated as a private commodity. It recognizes that government policies should ensure that all individuals have equitable access to water to meet basic human needs and that no one is cut off from water due to economic constraints.

Unfortunately, these principles have not always been upheld. In Detroit, Mich., more than 50,000 people had their water shut off during the past two years because they couldn’t pay. In South Africa, pre-paid meters force poor residents in townships to provide payment before they can drink. Unable to pay, families use contaminated water sources, such as polluted rivers, and as a result, waterborne illnesses are common. In fact, pre-paid meters were linked to a massive cholera outbreak in KwaZulu-Natal in 2000.

In the United States, there exists a funding gap for water and wastewater systems, which is leading governments to turn systems over to private companies. By some estimates, it will cost $20 billion annually for the next 20 years to build, repair and maintain water systems in this country. Around the world, millions of dollars in World Bank and International Monetary Fund loans prop up water privatization schemes that are corrupt and do little to help those who need access to clean water. But giving control to private companies is not wise; private companies care foremost about profits, not about repairing the infrastructure or keeping water rates affordable.

There is an international consensus – enshrined in the United Nation’s General Comment on the right to water and in the UN Millennium Development Goals – that water is a fundamental human right, and that access to water can mean the difference between sickness and health, cyclical poverty and economic development.

Congress should support the Water for the World Resolution.

To view the resolution, click here:
http://www.citizen.org/documents/SCHAKO_045_xml_2.PDF

Note: Schakowsky is hosting a congressional briefing on the resolution from 2 p.m.-3:30 p.m. on June 29 in the Cannon Office Building, Room 121.

http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=1738


Informant: Let's Make Change

Klassenkampf von oben gegen Gewerkschaften und Arbeitnehmerrechte

Neoliberales Trommelfeuer

Was kaum noch anders genannt werden kann: die massive Demontage der Gewerkschaften und der Arbeitnehmerrechte erreicht eine neue Intensität. Offensichtlich sollen hier die entscheidenden Schlage geführt werden, bevor die Partei in der Lage ist, sich anders zu besinnen.

Wir haben es selten erlebt, dass die Gewerkschaften derart massiv in die Zange genommen wurden von der SPD-Parteiführung einerseits und den Medien andererseits.

Jedes Massenblatt und jede "Qualitätszeitung" verfügt neuerdings über Dutzende von Wirtschaftsexperten und deren anscheinend kalt-objektive Analysen, dass Gewerkschaften, Linke und die Rechte der Beschäftigten eine Bedrohung für die Wirtschaft und unsere Zukunft insgesamt seien, und lässt sie mit dergleichen Statements Überstunden machen.

Dasselbe gilt für die Gefahr der Gründung einer neuen Linkspartei, die bereits eine regelrechte Hysterie ausgelöst hat unter den Mainstream-Medien, die sich nun im Verbund darum bemühen, dies Problem im Keim zu ersticken: die Frequenz, mit der negative Voraussagen und Einschätzungen abgegeben werden widerspricht deutlich der ansonsten zur Schau getragenen Gelassenheit, dass eine solche Parteigründung die bestehende Ordnung des Systems in keiner Weise gefährde.


Software-Patente

Die Bundesregierung/Schröder geben überdeutlich zu erkennen, dass sie sich als Agentur der großen Konzerne verstehen. Während die Patentierung von Software bereits im EU-Parlament mit deutlicher Mehrheit abgelehnt wurde, formiert u.a. die deutsche Regierungsspitze zusammen mit der Industrie eine Front zu ihrer rücksichtslosen Durchsetzung. Auch hier wieder die Medien mit im Boot: das ZDF-heute-Journal rückte gestern die Gegner der Softwarepatente in die Nähe von kriminellen Vereinigungen und Terroristen, die keine Rücksicht verdient haben.


Gesundheits"Reform"

Die Bundesregierung diskutiert nicht etwa die Rücknahme der Praxisgebühr, sondern beschließt, "Nachteilige" Auswirkungen auf die Pharmaindustrie zu minimieren. Die Deckelung der Medikamentenpreise soll wieder aufgehoben werden.

Das ganze Vorgehen derzeit nimmt die Gestalt einer Revolution von oben an, einer immer offeneren Diktatur der neoliberalen Konzerne.

Gerhard Wendebourg

US Soldiers Laughed At Drowning

Jul 07, 2004

Source; AP

The 19-year-old Iraqi's swimming skills were no match for the Tigris. "Marwan, save me!" Zaidoun Fadel Hassoun screamed to his cousin, himself struggling to stay afloat. The teenager drowned; his cousin made it to shore. "I could hear them laughing," Marwan Fadel Hassoun said, recalling how U.S. soldiers pushed the young men into the river. "They were behaving like they were watching a comedy on stage."

The U.S. military said last week that three soldiers, now back in their base at Fort Carson, Colo., have been charged with involuntary manslaughter in the Jan. 3 drowning of an Iraqi detainee. A fourth soldier faces charges of pushing a second man, who survived, into the same river.

The military identified the victims only as Mr. Fadel and Mr. Fadhil. The four soldiers face between 5 1/2 years and 26 1/2 years in prison if convicted on all charges.

Thousands of Iraqi civilians have died since the Iraq war began in March 2003. Some of them perished in the U.S.-led air and ground campaign. In the 15 months since the fall of Baghdad, many more have died in car bombings, or when caught in the crossfire as American troops battled insurgents or were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.

With every such death, Iraqis point to what they see as the heavy-handedness of the U.S. military. The resentment is deeper when the victims are relatives, friends or neighbors.

Zaidoun Hassoun was to have finished high school this year. Three weeks before his death, he got engaged to a cousin, and he hoped to start a family in Samarra, a trade and agriculture center whose name means "pleasant to those who see it."

For Marwan Hassoun, a bearded and burly 23-year-old who attends a teachers' college, the death robbed him of a companion and a childhood friend. Zaidoun's voice pleading for help still echoes in his ears.

"Every time I see an American soldier, a Humvee or a tank I become agitated. Many emotions rush into my mind: confusion, fear and rage. I am constantly thinking of how I could have helped Zaidoun. I feel so much guilt, but prayers and reading the Quran keep me going," he said.

Sometime between Jan. 3 and the discovery of Zaidoun's body on the river bank 13 days later, Zaidoun's mother wrote an open letter addressed to President Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

"Any measure you take will not return my son to life. But I, with an overwhelming sense of bereavement, expect you to end the agony of mothers in my country," Widad Mahmoud Nadeem, 40, wrote in the two-page letter.

"We are harvesting misery and unhappiness because of the actions of American soldiers who pay no heed to human life, dignity and the values and traditions of our society," she wrote.

Trouble for Zaidoun and Marwan began about 10:45 p.m., 15 minutes before curfew came into force in Samarra and only 200 yards from their home at the end of a 100-mile journey.

The trip, which should have been routine in a pickup truck loaded with Italian-made bathroom fixtures from Baghdad, was made longer because of a recurring engine problem that Marwan had to fix along the way.

They were stopped and searched at an Iraqi checkpoint on Samarra's outskirts and allowed to enter town. Minutes later, a U.S. patrol - Marwan believes it was made up of four Bradley fighting vehicles - crossed the median and blocked their path.

They quickly searched the cargo and checked their identity documents, he said at the family's store that sells Chinese-made appliances, stationery and books.

He remembered one soldier happily greeting them with Arabic phrases.

The soldiers told them they were free to go, but just after they got back into the truck, the soldiers ordered them to step out. This time, they handcuffed them and took them into one of the Bradleys.

"What's happening?" a terrified Zaidoun whispered to his cousin. The Bradley drove for a few minutes before the two were ordered out at a bridge across the Tigris that also serves as a dam, several miles north of Samarra.

The soldiers - Marwan remembers four or five of them - removed their handcuffs and led them to a concrete ledge. Ordered to jump into the water, Marwan begged for mercy.

"Why? why?" he pleaded. "Shut up, shut up!" yelled the soldier who spoke some Arabic.

Zaidoun was pushed first. He held on to a soldier, who managed to free himself. Other soldiers joined in and pushed Zaidoun away. When Marwan turned to look at his cousin, he was pushed from behind.

"We are not great swimmers, but we knew enough not to drown," he said. Marwan swam to Zaidoun and grabbed his hand, but they slipped apart. "I lost him. He went under and then resurfaced near an open dam gate. Water was rushing and not even a good swimmer could resist that current."

"He was shouting 'Marwan, save me,' and I yelled back 'Try to swim, try to swim,' but he went under again and that was it. I could hear them (the soldiers) laughing. They were behaving like they were watching a comedy on stage," he said.

Standing at the scene Tuesday, he pointed to a cluster of bamboo at the water's edge.

"These are the plants that I held onto to save my life," he said. "I climbed back up to the shore, but they pointed a gun at me, so I went back down and waited."

His tormentors drove off, but he continued to huddle in fear. Only when he reached an Iraqi checkpoint, more than two hours after his ordeal began, did he feel safe.

http://www.jihadunspun.com/intheatre_internal.php?article=9032&list=/home.php&


Informant: MySubscriptions

Defeats in Iraq and Afghanistan

http://g0lem.net/vortal/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=14


Informant: ARISTOTLE

NIH Scientists Take Big Pharma Money

IT IS BAD ENOUGH THAT GOVERNMENT HEALTH AGENCY OFFICIALS ARE GETTING WEALTHY AT OUR EXPENSE...BUT, DO THEY HAVE TO DO IT BY PUTTING OUR NATION'S CHILDREN AT RISK?

IT WILL BE TRULY UNCONSCIONABLE NOT YO MAKE THE TIME TO VIEW AND/OR LISTEN TO A FEW OF THE VIDEO AND AUDIO CLIPS I'M PROVIDING BELOW. IF WE HAVE GOTTEN TO THE POINT THAT WE ARE JUST TOO BUSY TO LEARN TO WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IN THIS AND OTHER AREAS, THEN WE DESERVE WHAT WE ARE GOING TO GET IN THE UP COMING ELECTIONS... BOTH PARTIES!

HOW COME NEITHER OF THE LEADING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES HAVE ADDRESSED THIS EPIDEMIC "DOUBLE DIPPING" ISSUE AND, WORST, HOW IT IS IMPACTING THE HEALTH AND WELL BEING OF OUR CHILDREN... TALK ABOUT TERRORISM! WHAT YOU'LL LEARN BELOW, WILL PALE BY COMPARISON!


NIH Scientists Take Big Pharma Money

E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER
http://www.nvic.org

UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN
"Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982."


BL Fisher Note:

No scientist, doctor or other employee working for a government health agency should be allowed to take money from pharmaceutical companies for any reason. Government health agencies research, develop, license, regulate, make policy for and promote mass use of drugs and vaccines manufactured and sold by drug companies. In the case of vaccines, this function extends to encouraging and giving financial incentives to states to mandate use of product by every citizen. It is a gross conflict of interest for these public servants to have their hand in the deep pockets of an industry whose products they license, regulate and promote for public use.


Double Dipping at NIH
Monday, July 5, 2004; Page A16

THE WASHINGTON POST
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A28128-2004Jul4?language=printer

And, if one thinks the NIH is the only government health agency that "double dips" take a look at the following short CBS News video clip (MAY NEED TO CLICK THE "PLAY" BUTTON ONCE OR TWICE)
CBS Evening News report "Mercury Rising" (June 12, 2004)
http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/videoplayer/newVid/framesource2.html?clip=/media/2004/06/12/video622792.wmv&sec=500251&vidId=50025

VACCINES, AUTISM and ANTI-DEPRESSANTS ISSUES
Following link contains 2 more video clip reports on Mercury & Autism
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/12/eveningnews/main532886.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/06/22/eveningnews/main625458.shtml

Dr. Leonard Horowitz - RENSE Radio - CBS News - Rep. Dan Burton R-Ind.

http://PlayAudioMessage.com/play.asp?m=27130&f=SLKJET&ps=7&p=1 (10 min)

Mercury dangers, loss of rights through CODEX, a video about mercury
http://www.iaomt.org/merc_release.swf

Rep. Dan Burton - Joyce Railey (Gulf War Vets) - Dr. Ann Blake Tracy
http://PlayAudioMessage.com/play.asp?m=27134&f=FSNHAO&ps=7&p=1 (10 min)

CHARGES OF CDC THIMEROSAL COVER UP
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/local/news-article.aspx?storyid=19491

STUNNING VIDEO CLIPS FROM "PBS TELEVISION" ON THE FDA
(click on each of 6 pictures to view)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/prescription/view/

CDC VACCINE COVER UP
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/12/283084.html

THE COVER UP ON PAXIL
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Glaxo-Lawsuit.html?ex=1086840000
http://www.guardian.co.uk/italy/story/0,12576,1225576,00.html
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8209-1135320,00.html

Mercury dangers, loss of rights through CODEX, a video about mercury
http://www.iaomt.org/merc_release.swf

Dr . Doreen Virtue - "INDIGO & CRYSTAL CHILDREN
I present this as the only explanations I can come up with as to why our children are being placed at risk by certain groups. Most may not accept or understand this...yet
http://PlayAudioMessage.com/play.asp?m=27135&f=LSRPBE&ps=7&p=1 (9 min)


Informant: Jack Topel

MISUSING SCIENCE AND CANCER DEATHS

MISUSING SCIENCE AND CANCER DEATHS

1. depleted uranium (DU) weapons

2. microwave weapons

2.1. Mobile Phone weapons

2.2. Wireless DECT weapons

2.3. Wi-Fi weapons

3. THE INVERTION OF SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY

3.1. FIRST ERROR
POLLUTE DAY AND NIGHT (168 HS/WEEK) WITH “HIGH POWER OF...”.

3.2. SECOND ERROR
REPEAT CONSTANTLY "INNOCUOUS" (with no proof at all).

3.3. THIRD ERROR

SOLEMN AND PERMANENT WAIT FOR "PUBLISHED-RESULTS": YEAR..?

* there was no proof that radiation from the tests .... made them sick.

Comments from Dr Miguel Muntané concerning
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/260549/

Request to help stop bill that would allow massive bird slaughter

Dear Best Friends Network Members,

Right now, there is in both the US Senate and the US House of Representatives, concurrently, a bill (S2547) and (HR4114) that would deprive 94 species of non-native birds of the protection of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, including species of cranes, cardinals, and swans.

This bill is moving rapidly through both houses, with little opposition, and has the potential to allow the mass slaughter, especially all along the East Coast, of tens of thousands of Mute Swans.

There has long been a plan for government agencies to slaughter Mute Swans, on the Chesapeake Bay and on many lakes. This nearly took place a few years ago, but it was prevented by a court ruling, in 2001, that found that Mute Swans were protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

The bill now in congress, called the Migratory Bird Treaty Reform Act would exempt Mute Swans and 93 other species from federal protection.

If this bill were to be passed, then the Mute Swans will be in danger all over again of mass slaughter, and the other 93 species of non-native birds will no longer have federal protection either.

If you would like more information about this, please go to http://www.api4animals.org
http://www.fund.org
http://www.sort.org

Please either call, send a letter to, and/or e-mail your two state senators and your representative in the House of Representatives, and ask them to vote against this bill.

Their names and contact information may be found at
http://www.action.fund.org/directory

A sample letter follows; you may use this, or send a letter in your own words.

Thank you so very much for caring about these birds and for taking the time to help them!

Sincerely,

Sharon
(Sharon St. Joan)
Bird and Wildlife Consultant
Best Friends Animal Society
http://www.bestfriends.org
sharonsj@bestfriends.org


Sample Letter

Dear

I am writing to urge you to oppose S2547 (to your two senators) (or to oppose HR4114- to your representative in the House).

S 2547 (or HR4114) will destroy the protection afforded by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to 94 species of migratory birds, considered non-native, and will allow them to be shot, trapped, poisoned, or otherwise killed. These birds include cranes, cardinals, swans, and many others.

Overall bird populations are dwindling year by year in this country and globally. Birds need more protection, not less.

The mass slaughter of beautiful, magnificent Mute Swans along the East Coast by government agencies, had been planned and was about to take place, until it was halted by a Washington D.C. court ruling, in 2001, that found that Mute Swans were protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Passing S2547 (or HR4114) would remove this protection and would allow the long-planned slaughter of tens of thousands of Mute Swans. This seems to be the primary reason for the introduction of this bill.

Concerning the Chesapeake Bay, one of the areas targeted for the slaughter of swans, The Chesapeake Bay Foundation has determined that harm to the bay is caused by industry and farming, not by Mute Swans.

Mute Swans, and most birds, mate for life, take wonderful care of their young, are intelligent, graceful, beautiful, contribute positively to the environment, and cause no harm to human beings. They are a
source of joy to many human beings, in a world often short of joy.

Thank you very much for considering voting against S2547 (or HR 4114), thereby retaining federal protection for these beloved birds.

Sincerely,
(your name)

Thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,
Troy Lea
Network Coordinator
Best Friends Animal Society
5001 Angel Canyon Road
Kanab, Utah 84741
435-644-2001 ext.123
troy@bestfriends.org
http://www.bestfriends.org


Informant: Angostura1819

Radiation risk "underplayed" to avoid compensation payouts

by Rob Edwards

Governments have deliberately downplayed the dangers of radiation so that they can avoid paying compensation to veterans of nuclear tests and carry on deploying depleted uranium (DU) weapons.

Dr Keith Baverstock, who was the World Health Organisation’s senior radiation adviser in Europe, says that science has been “perverted for political ends” by government agencies which should be protecting public health.

“Politics, aided and abetted by some in the scientific community, has poisoned the well which sustains democratic decision-making,” he told a conference on low-level radiation in Edinburgh yesterday.

Baverstock, now advising the UK government as a member of the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management, delivered a fierce attack on government scientists. He accused the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) of “misusing” science in their studies of nuclear test veterans.

Over 21,000 members of the British armed services watched 46 nuclear tests in Australia and the Pacific between 1952 and 1962. Many have since become ill, and campaigned for compensation from the Ministry of Defence.

The MoD has rejected their claims on the grounds that there was no proof that radiation from the tests made them sick. The ministry is backed by three major studies carried out by the NRPB over the past 20 years, most recently in 2002.

Yesterday, Baverstock alleged that there was a “serious flaw” in the NRPB’s methodology because as many as 15% of the veterans could be missing from the studies. This could conceal an excess in cancer deaths, he said.

He pointed out that there was a lack of information on how much radiation people had been exposed to. A statistical excess of leukaemia among the veterans had also been dismissed as a “chance” finding.

“The conclusion is that the NRPB survey is deficient,” he said. “Further work needs to be done. It is sad that the NRPB, which should be an independent body, was complicit .”

The NRPB, based at Didcot in Oxfordshire, strongly denied the accusation. “We used standard methods for finding deaths and cases of cancer. These have been used in hundreds of studies,” said Gerry Kendal, head of population exposure at the NRPB.

He maintained that to have introduced additional cases in an ad hoc way would have produced “biased” results. The independent committee that oversaw the research was happy with the approach that was taken, he added.

The 2002 NRPB study was originally challenged by Sue Roff, a senior research fellow at Dundee University Medical School. She contended that up to 30% of multiple myeloma cancer cases among veterans had been overlooked by the NRPB.

“I’m not sure if this was a political or a scientific decision by the NRPB. But it was certainly more of a comfort to the MoD than to veterans,” she said.

Baverstock also accused the World Health Organisation of having “suppressed” a report he wrote in 2001 highlighting the dangers of DU in Iraq. The Sunday Herald revealed in February that the report predicted that DU from US and UK weapons would increase cancer rates among adults and children in the country.

By downplaying the risks from radiation, government agencies had undermined public trust in science and technology, he concluded. This was going to make it much more difficult to find an acceptable solution to the problem of how to dispose of radioactive waste from nuclear power stations.

04 July 2004

http://www.sundayherald.com/43149


Informant: Don Maisch

UN Urges Action After Gorilla Habitat Destroyed

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/25905/story.htm

Wertzuwachs/Wertminderung durch Mobilfunk-Antennen in der Nachbarschaft

HLV INFO 7-07-2004/AT

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/wertminderung_immobilien_schoeller.pdf

Wertminderung durch Sendemasten
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/319414/

Immobilien und Mobilfunk
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/475821/

Report on TETRA

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/report_on_tetra.doc

Useful TETRA links
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/406434/

GALAPAGOS UNDER SIEGE

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/galapagos_under_siege.html

GM WHEAT DESTROYED IN SPAIN

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/gm_wheat_destroyed_in_spain.html

OLD FAITHFUL CELL TOWER MAY BE SHORTENED AND CAMOUFLAGED

For Immediate Release: Tuesday, June 29, 2004

Contact: Chas Offutt (202) 265-7337

Park Resists Calls for Removal

Washington, DC — Yellowstone National Park has informed state and federal historic preservation agencies that it is considering shortening and camouflaging the controversial cell phone tower overlooking the Old Faithful Historic District, according to a letter released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

In a letter dated June 18, 2004, Yellowstone Superintendent Suzanne Lewis informed the federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation that the park was considering “removing an additional 20 feet of the tower” as well as “whether or not to camouflage the tower to improve the visual quality of the site.” The federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has opened an investigation on the legality of the cell tower for its “adverse effect” on the Old Faithful Historic District. The Wyoming State Historic Preservation Office has lodged a similar complaint against the park for erecting a structure far different than what it described in the very limited public notices it circulated.

“Shortening the tower at Old Faithful by 20 feet will not make it any less ugly, less inappropriate or less illegal,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, whose organization has been faulting the National Park Service for allowing the telecommunication industry to determine the size and location of cell towers spreading throughout the national park system. “The superintendent is stepping around the central issue—should there be a cell tower at Old Faithful in the first place?”

By way of explanation, Superintendent Lewis writes, “the conditions that exist today at the location are different than those that existed [when the tower was built].” Apparently, the park did not anticipate that “burned tree snags” on the site would eventually fall over or be blown down. In addition, the park itself removed some of the visual cover “during maintenance work.”

Superintendent Lewis also announced a review of “the health and safety service levels for the public and the park.” The park has other cell towers and cannot isolate the calls enabled by the Old Faithful tower. Nor has the park examined alternative means of communications for visitors and staff or determined whether cell phones are needed for public safety. “The most disturbing part of this after-the-fact public safety justification is that it implies that Yellowstone is willing to provide cell coverage throughout the entire park and especially in the backcountry,” Ruch commented.

PEER is also targeting the exclusion of the public from decisions concerning the park. “After failing to post required notices for the tower when it was built, Yellowstone is repeating the error by doing its damage control in secret,” added Ruch, who obtained Lewis’s letter through a Freedom of Information Act request.

http://www.peer.org/press/475.html

The Western Shoshone Claims Distribution Act

July 7, 2004

Bush Lets Freedom Reign

Steven Newcomb

On July 7th, Bush signed into law H.R. 884, "The Western Shoshone Claims Distribution Act." By doing so, he clearly demonstrated the "freedom of imperial power," despite the fact that the Western Shoshone National Council and a majority of Western Shoshone IRA governments (6 out of 9) opposed the bill.

Bush used his pen as a "scepter of imperial freedom" to violate the fundamental and ancestral rights of the Western Shoshone Nation. "Imperial freedom" refers to the American empire's claim of "freedom" to do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, even against the will of those damaged by the action done.

President Bush recently made the remark, "Let freedom reign," to which New York Times Columnist Maureen Dowd responded with the rhetorical question: "Couldn't Karl Rove and his minions at least get that "ad-lib" right about freedom ringing?"

Although the idea of freedom "ringing" matches the iconic image of the Liberty Bell, Bush's comment about freedom reigning contains a deeper and little known truth about the word "freedom" in the context of feudalism, that helps explain the situation in which the Western Shoshones now find themselves.

According to the nineteenth century political philosopher Francis Lieber, the word "Freithum (literally freedom) means, in some portions of Germany, as estate of a Freiherr (baron)." In other words, according to this meaning, "a freedom" is, "a baron's estate." Just as the king reigned as Lord and dread sovereign of the entire kingdom, the baron reigned as lord and sovereign of a free domain.

Although a baron is a "lord," he is also a feudal vassal who holds his lands under a direct grant from the king. As a noble, the baron is "free" on his estate, beneath the monarch. For example, Lord Thomas Fairfax, a friend of George Washington and Chief Justice John Marshall, was a baron with an estate of more than 5 million acres of (Indian) lands in Virginia.

Importantly, the landless poor people were not "free" in the same sense as the noble landed class. As feudal tenants, the landless people were obligated to pay rents and homage (obedience and a percentage of their crops as taxes) to the landholding baron class. If they were to live at all, the landless serfs had to eek out a living by working for the aristocratic land owning class.

The English lords who came to North America were offended by the Indians' "haughty" and independent attitude. According to historian James Axtell, the English nobles that came to North America were also deeply offended by the vast amount of land the Indians possessed. It greatly offended the English nobles to see obviously "inferior" and "uncivilized heathen" Indians possessed of sufficient lands to live a privileged life of leisure that only those of noble birth were supposed to live, and engaged in such pleasurable experiences as hunting and fishing. From the viewpoint of the English nobles, it was only "natural" and destined by "God" that the Indians should be reduced to a position of "civilized" humility in keeping with their "inferiority," and that Indian lands ought to end up in English hands.

A rare publication titled, "Documents and Proceedings Relating to the Formation of a Board in the City of New York, for the Emigration, Preservation, and Improvement of the Aborigines of America, July 22, 1829," provides further insight. In an anonymous "Address" the unnamed commentator says that certain obstacles stood in the way of the Indians being reduced to "civilization" along European lines.

What were these obstacles? For one thing, the Indians had remained "uncivilized" because they possessed too much land. They held "an almost boundless extent of the forest" that "furnished the Indians with an easy means of subsistence, such as the plentiful game that abounded there." They had an understanding of their own power and independence. Their vast land holdings gave them the wealth and the power to remain free in the manner of their ancestors before them. So long as the Indians remained free and independent the Europeans would not consider them to have been reduced to "civilization and Christianity."

The unnamed commentator celebrated the process of these "obstacles" to Indian "civilization" being gradually removed: "The forests...and their game are gone. The Indian can no longer bury himself in the one, nor subsist in the other. He has now become a creature of necessity-he must labour, or starve. But not only are the forests and the game gone, but with these has disappeared also, that feeling of independence which made the native as uncontrollable, as he was invincible. Long and nobly did he struggle to maintain this."

True, as a charismatic leader, the Shawnee leader Tecumseh (1868?-1813) tried to maintain the spirit of independence by uniting all Indian nations against the invading United States. Of Tecumseh's death the commentator said: "His life paid the forfeit of the gallant enterprise [to unify the Indian nations]; and with it vanished all hope of all allied to him, of ever again becoming lords of their domain." Tecumseh's death near the River Thames was characterized by the commentator as movement along the path toward "Indian improvement."

Of the forefathers of his own race the commentator remarked: "They doubtless said...when this empire shall have become established, and the scepter of freedom be swayed over its teeming population, then surely, will that which is now literally a wilderness to [for] the Indian, be made to blossom as the rose...No longer able to bury himself in his forests, or subsist on their game, or measure strength with the white man, he [the Indian] will yield to necessity, resort to the [cultivation of the] earth for his support, and practice gladly, those lessons which are at present lost upon him."

President Bush's remark, "Let freedom reign," relates perfectly to the commentator's phrase, "scepter of freedom." A scepter is a rod or wand symbolic of "a royal or imperial power or authority, sovereignty." Hence, Bush using his pen as a "scepter of imperial freedom" to sign H.R. 884 is an example of him "letting freedom reign."

Like the colonizing English nobles of the past, Senator Harry Reid and Congressman Jim Gibbons of Nevada were no doubt offended by and jealous of the amount of Western Shoshone land pursuant to the Treaty of Ruby Valley. The traditional Western Shoshone in particular have an deep and spiritual understanding of their own power and rightful independence, which undoubtedly further offends Rep. Gibbons and Sen. Reid.

It is ironic in the extreme that at the same time Congress unanimously passed H.R. 884 between June 21-24, Senator Brownback's resolution to "apologize" to American Indians was being considered for passage. Sen. Brownback's resolution ought to include an apology for the United States' reprehensible, dishonorable, and disrespectful treatment of the Western Shoshones.

In the "apology resolution," Martin Luther King, Jr. is quoted as once having said, "The end is reconciliation, the end is redemption, the end is the creation of the beloved community." Very moving words I'm sure, but as Tecumseh once said, "they come to us with lips smoother than oil, and words sweeter than honey, but beware of them! The venomous wasp is in their heart!" Congress's passage of and President Bush's signature on H.R. 884, simply underscores Tecumseh's insightful words of defiance.


Informant: Carrie Dann

Restore the Constitution of the United States

An informed citizen is freedom's best friend and a controlled citizen is our worst enemy!

WE WILL NOT STOP!!!

Focus on subjects that inform and educate people every day to the real challenges that face this country. Help us restore the Constitution to its rightful place of importance in the United States.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/news_info.htm


Informant: ROSE KING

Vorsorgewert von 0,001 MilliWatt/m²

Biologische Wirkungen (athermische Wirkungen) bei lebenden Organismen treten bereits bei Strahlungsstärken auf, die ein Zehnmillionstel der bei uns geltenden (rein technischen =) thermischen Grenzwerte betragen.

Aus der Erfahrungsmedizin ist bekannt, dass viele Menschen inzwischen schon ab 10 Mikrowatt/m² erkranken.

Es gibt wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen, die z.B. schon nach 50 Minuten Bestrahlung bei 1000 Mikrowatt/m² eine signifikante Reduzierung der Gedächtnisleistung belegen. (Dr. Maier, Uni Mainz)

Außerdem gibt seriöse Studien, die sogar schon innerhalb weniger Minuten Bestrahlung mit 1 MilliWatt/m² (=1000 MikroWatt/m²) negative körperliche Reaktionen nachweisen.

Durch Mobilfunk-Feldstudien zeigte die Uni Wien auf, dass es sehr weit unterhalb von 1 MilliWatt (=1000 Mikrowatt/m²) zu Herz-Kreislauf-Problemen und Gedächtnisleistungsstörungen kommen kann.

Aufgrund des aktuellen Wissensstandes dürfte die Bevölkerung maximal nur mit 0,001 Milliwatt/m² (=1 MikroWatt/m²) bestrahlt werden. Dieser Wert wurde bereits im Oktober 1999 anlässlich des Elektrosmog-Forums in Bonn durch medizinische Ärzteverbände, Wissenschaftlern usw. von Umweltminister Trittin gefordert.

Dass bei dem Vorsorgewert von 0,001 MilliWatt/m² (=1 MikroWatt/m²) das Mobilfunk-Netz nicht mehr nach den Wünschen der Betreiber funktioniert ist bekannt. Wenn jemand konsequent die Sache zu Ende denkt, dann heißt es nicht, die Strahlenbelastung ist so weit zu reduzieren, dass die Technologie noch nach den Wünschen der Betreiber funktioniert, sondern richtig ist: wir müssen die Strahlenbelastung so weit senken, dass wir einen vernünftigen Gesundheitsschutz haben. Dann können wir sehen, ob bei diesen Werten die jetzige Technik noch nach den Wünschen der Betreiber funktioniert. Wenn nicht, dann muss eine ungefährliche Technik her. Erst die Gesundheit, dann das Geschäft.

Mobilfunk und Grenzwerte

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/242821/

7
Jul
2004

The United States Army in Operation Iraqi Freedom

Secrecy News -- 07/07/04

ARMY STUDY OF IRAQ WAR SUPPRESSED, RELEASED ON WEB

Despite extraordinary steps by the Army to limit online public access to a new report on the Iraq war, the study has nevertheless been published without the Army's cooperation.

The Army recently completed a book-length study of Operation Iraqi Freedom entitled "On Point." It is a revealing and fairly critical account of lessons learned from the war.

Last month, the Center for Army Lessons Learned posted the study here:

http://onpoint.leavenworth.army.mil/

Incredibly, however, the web version of the Army document is coded in such a way that it cannot be downloaded, or copied, or printed out. It must be read online at the Army site, or not at all.

This may be unprecedented for a government web site. The very notion of a document that cannot be downloaded is antithetical to the web and seems like an artifact from an alternate universe. If the Axis powers had won World War II, the whole internet might look like this.

But in a marvelous feat of textual engineering, the intrepid Francois Boo of GlobalSecurity.org managed to overcome the Army's restrictive coding of the document and to make it publicly available.

It can now be found -- and downloaded or printed -- here:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2004/onpoint/

Among the highlights of the report is the disclosure that the toppling of the statue of Saddam Hussein in Baghdad was not a spontaneous act of an Iraqi crowd, but was instigated by a U.S. Marine colonel backed by a psychological operations unit (reported in the LA Times July 3).

LAWSUIT OF FBI WHISTLEBLOWER SIBEL EDMONDS DISMISSED

Secrecy News -- 07/07/04

The judicial process was trumped by the "state secrets privilege" as a whistleblower lawsuit brought by former FBI linguist Sibel Edmonds alleging misconduct at the FBI was dismissed yesterday by a federal court on the unusual grounds that it could not be litigated without compromising sensitive classified information.

"Because the Court finds that the plaintiff is unable to establish her First Amendment, Fifth Amendment and Privacy Act claims without the disclosure of privileged information, nor would the defendants be able to defend against these claims without the same disclosures, the plaintiff's case must be dismissed, albeit with great consternation, in the interests of national security," wrote Judge Reggie B. Walton.

The Court acknowledged that "dismissal of a suit, and the consequent denial of a forum without giving the plaintiff her day in court ... is indeed draconian."

"Denial of the forum provided under the Constitution for the resolution of disputes...is a drastic remedy that has rarely been invoked," the Judge wrote, quoting from prior case law.

Still, "Mindful of the need for virtual unfettered access to the judicial process in a governmental system integrally linked to the rule of law, the Court nonetheless concludes that the government has properly invoked the state secrets privilege" in this case and that the case must be dismissed.

Among other interesting features, the Court's ruling includes a summary history of the origins of the "state secrets privilege," dating back to the treason trial of Aaron Burr in 1807.

Explaining why he dismissed the case rather than staying it temporarily, Judge Walton opined that "the imminent threat of terrorism will not be eliminated anytime in the foreseeable future, but is an endeavor that will consume our nation's attention indefinitely."

A copy of the July 6 ruling dismissing the case Sibel Edmonds v. U.S. Department of Justice is available here:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/edmonds070604.pdf

Ms. Edmonds's attorney, Mark S. Zaid, said the decision would be appealed.

Wurde die Bush-Regierung ein Opfer der CIA?

Der Senats-Geheimdienstausschuss entlastet den amerikanischen
Präsidenten, sein Mitstreiter Blair glaubt nicht mehr an die Entdeckung
von Massenvernichtungswaffen...

http://www.telepolis.de/tp/deutsch/special/irak/17823/1.html

Mediale Entlastungsmanöver für die Bush-Regierung

Die CIA wird zum Sündenbock stilisiert, andere lancierte Informationen sollen für das drängende Guantanamo-Problem Abhilfe schaffen...

http://www.telepolis.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/co/17824/1.html

Bush Signs Western Shoshone Bill

Statement by Carrie Dann on George W. Bush signing into “law” HR 884

July 7, 2004

Today the United States government has officially attempted to complete the largest theft of land in United States history. In violation of United States law, including the Constitution, George W. Bush, signed into law HR 884, an attempted payoff of the Western Shoshone land. However, this bill does not change the fact that title of the land still exists with the Western Shoshone. Fraud is fraud, and no matter what the U.S. does to us we will never give up our struggle to protect our Sacred Newe Sogobia – the Earth Mother.

The United States government signed the Treaty of Ruby Valley with the Western Shoshone Nation in 1863. According to Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution, the treaty is the supreme law of the land. But the United States government does not view the treaty this way. If they do not want to follow their own laws, that the constitution is the supreme law of the land, then this country is not a democracy. A democracy would be following the laws of the land.

I have said this a thousand times, I am not taking money for this land. This land has no value, there is no price for it. In Western Shoshone culture, the earth is our mother. We can not sell it. Taking our land is a not only a cultural genocide, it is also a spiritual genocide. The United States is attempting to steal our religion and our cultur.

I ask the United States today to show me how they received title to the land. The sole legal theory stated by the Indian Claims Commission (ICC) was that the Western Shoshone land title was extinguished through “gradual encroachment” by non-indigenous miners and settlers. However, such legal theory is no where found in American law. The only issue decided by the Supreme Court was whether the Western Shoshone had been paid, not who has title to the land. We have never had a court hear the issue of who has title to the land. The ICC was not a court. The United States did not give us the land, nor did they sell us the land. The land is ours. The United States can not show how they obtained title to the land.

The government continues to steal our cattle and horses. But I ask them, if they have clear title to the land, why do they come in the night like a thief to take my horses and cattle – why do they make sneak attacks – why do they attempt to take my livestock with no media attention? If the land title is clearly theirs – why do they act like thieves?

Why does the United States want this land? So they can sell it to large inter-national corporate interests, including mining companies, so they can test more nuclear weapons, so they can write the Indians off? The United States should not be allowed to steal the land so they can test more weapons that kill people. In fact, weapons that kill all life, including the plants and the animals. The United States also should not be allowed to steal the land so they can sell it to companies in order to obtain more gold and in the process ruin the water and kill the plant and animal life. This should not be allowed.

Today, the government has attempted to steal our mother earth – but this will not stop our fight to keep our land. We will not stand by to watch the United States steal our religion. We will not stand for the United States to commit spiritual genocide. For today what happens to us, tomorrow will happen to you. Although George W. Bush, Sen. Reid, and Rep. Gibbons believe that they can now sell this land to private interests, we will fight to stop it. This bill changes nothing. We are here to protect our mother earth. That is our responsibility. Our obligation will not be deterred by thieves.

Carrie Dann

Due to earlier grammatical error in the title, please use slightly revised press release below.

Western Shoshone Defense Project, 775-468-0230,
http://www.wsdp.org

Press Release – For Immediate Release

George Bush, President of the United States, Signs Western Shoshone “Distribution” Bill – Evidencing Ongoing Historical Atrocities Aginst Indigenous Peoples in the U.S.

July 7, 2004. Crescent Valley, NV. In spite of heavy opposition from the Western Shoshone Nation, this morning, the Western Shoshone Distribution Bill was signed into “law” by George W. Bush, President of the United States. The bill would authorize an alleged payoff of approximately 15 cents an acres for tens of millions of acres of disputed lands in Nevada, Idaho, Utah and California. A majority of tribal councils, representing approximately 80% of the population, the Western Shoshone National Council and all the traditional people strongly oppose the bill, they are supported by the National Congress of American Indians and Amnesty International. This formal opposition was apparently ignored however and an undocumented, unverified straw poll was used instead by the Bush Administration and Nevada legislators to justify the legislation.

White House staffer Jennifer Farley, Deputy Associate Director of the White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs, informed one Shoshone Tribal Chairman that the bill was “red hot”. The significance of the issue to the White House is apparent: Copies of Assistant Secretary of Interior Stephen J. Griles’ calendars reflect meetings with Interior Department legal staff, including Bush’s Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals nominee, William Myers, regarding “Western Shoshone Trespass (Dann Sisters)” just six months before the Department of Interior started military-style seizures of livestock owned by Western Shoshone traditionalists, including grandmothers Mary and Carrie Dann.

The land base at issue is the third largest gold producing area in the world and cited by a 1999 Interior report as the number one investment opportunity for extraction companies. It is also the site where the nation’s nuclear waste repository would be located, Yucca Mountain, and the home to the Nevada Test Site and Federal Counterterrorism Facility where the Bush Administration has talked of reopening nuclear testing. Both Bush and his political advisor Karl Rove, have made personal visits to Nevada in the last thirty days.

“I am utterly disappointed. It’s unbelievable that the U.S. body that makes the laws has acted in this manner. The fight is not over. A fraud is a fraud - Individuals cannot sell out a nation and the bill, although a threat politically, does nothing to change our inherent rights or our Treaty rights. Congress and the President were informed of all the facts that touch upon this issue. We will use the Treaty of Ruby Valley to stop Yucca Mountain and to protect our lands. Our title is still intact.” Stated Raymond Yowell, Western Shoshone National Council.

“The self-described, private group who pushed for this money are not members of any federally-recognized council and have no authority to speak on behalf of our Tribe or the Western Shoshone Nation. The Nevada legislators and the Bush Administration have been well-advised of this fact. The way this legislation was handled makes an absolute sham of the stated government to government relationship and responsibility of the U.S. government.” Stated Hugh Stevens, Chairman of the Te-Moak Tribe of the Western Shoshone Nation. “Senator Reid has made numerous public commitments regarding resolving land issues for our communities. We will be looking for him to stand by that commitment in an expeditious fashion. We demand that our land issues be resolved in good faith in the same “hot line” fashion as the distribution.” He added.

Mary Gibson, Western Shoshone states: “It’s not over, we still exist and we still have our rights to our land. It makes me sad and angry that myths continue to cloud the Truth in this country. This struggle isn’t a Shoshone v. Shoshone battle, the underlying issue here is the U.S. responsibility and accountability for a Treaty with the Western Shoshone Nation. As long as the people in the U.S. allow this to happen it will continue to happen.”

For additional info, contact the Western Shoshone Defense Project at 775-468-0230.

Western Shoshone Defense Project
P.O. Box 211308
Crescent Valley, NV 89821
(775) 468-0230
Fax: (775) 468-0237
http://www.wsdp.org

Dieser Funkmast muss weg

Die europaweit vertriebene Zeitschrift "Mach mal Pause" berichtet in der Ausgabe vom 07.07.04 über eine Sendeanlage im Wohngebiet und die damit verbundenen schwerwiegenden gesundheitlichen Folgen für die Anwohner.

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/mach_mal_pause.jpg

Nachricht von Christine Kind

Electromagnetic Fields: Killing Fields

http://www.mindfully.org/Technology/2004/Electromagnetic-Fields-EMF1jun04.htm


Informant: Alfonso Balmori

War x 4

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/July2004/Monbiot0707.htm

Who Is Running America?

http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html
Informant: Grinn Barrett

and

http://tinyurl.com/3lv23

Saudis freed Britons in a secret swap of prisoners

We shall never surrender

Click at first on the link below to watch Eric Blumrich's marvellous animation and then to go through the articles....

M.B.H.S.

URL- http://www.ericblumrich.com/liberation.html
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=537972

Legality of Iraq occupation 'flawed'By Marie Woolf, Chief Political Correspondent
05 July 2004

The senior Foreign Office lawyer who resigned after ministers ignored her advice that the war in Iraq was illegal has issued a damning legal critique of the occupation, claiming that the alleged abuse of prisoners "could amount to war crimes".

In her first newspaper interview since her resignation, Elizabeth Wilmshurst, the former deputy legal adviser to the Foreign Office, said that the basis for going to war should always be based on "facts" rather than an "assertion" about an "imminent threat". Ms Wilmshurst said "it could be alleged that the use of force in Iraq was aggression" while "the kinds of abusive treatment of Iraqi prisoners that have been alleged could amount to war crimes".

Her comments came as Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain's former envoy to Iraq, made the clearest admission yet that intelligence that Saddam Hussein had stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons was wrong. He said: "We were wrong on the stockpiles, we were right about the intention."

Ms Wilmshurst expressed concern about the size of the US civilian presence in Iraq. She also said she was worried about the lack of legal protection for Iraqis if they were harmed by allied troops or civilian contractors, including private security guards. She said it was "worrying" that the occupying powers had given immunity to US and British civilians which was "very, very wide" and "not what you would expect". They would be protected from prosecution even if they seriously injured Iraqi women and children.

She said the Bush administration's "war on terror" was legal "nonsense" - conferring no more powers on the US to detain prisoners than "the war against obesity" - and President Bush's policy of pre-emptive self-defence was illegal under international law.

Ms Wilmshurst, who is now head of the international law programme at the think-tank Chatham House, also raised questions about the powers of detention the Americans have in Iraq and Guantanamo Bay. She said it violated the Geneva Conventions to deny inmates in Guantanamo Bay a formal assessment of their status.

Although she said she would not discuss the advice she gave to ministers, she is understood to have told them that British participation in the invasion of Iraq would flout international law. She said there were deep concerns among international lawyers about the implications of the war on terror, which may be used as an excuse to hold prisoners indefinitely. "This rather extraordinary war against terror, which is a phrase that all lawyers hate ... is not really a 'war', a conflict against terror, any more than the war against obesity means that you can detain people," she said.

In a further side-swipe at American foreign policy she said President Bush's policy of pre-emptive self-defence, which would allow the US to invade any country it thought was a threat, was illegal under international law. "What people are worried about is just assertions that there is an imminent threat," she said.

The Butler inquiry report into intelligence on Iraq is to be published on 14 July, and reports suggest it will be critical of the intelligence services.

Sir Jeremy said on BBC's Breakfast with Frost: "There is no doubt that the stockpiles that we feared might be there are not there. We didn't know they were there, but we thought that there was a considerable danger that they were there, because the intelligence, not just in the American and British systems but in the French, German and Russian systems, also was quite compelling at the time." He said Washington was influenced by the Iraqi exile Ahmed Chalabi and underestimated the potential problems of post-war security.


Saudis freed Britons in a secret swap of prisoners
by Andrew Buncombe and Kim Sengupta
05 July 2004

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=537952

Six Britons convicted on terrorism charges in Saudi Arabia were released last year as part of a secret three-way deal in which the US set free a number of Saudi prisoners being held at Guantanamo Bay. The deal was brokered to obtain Saudi support for the invasion of Iraq.

Diplomatic and intelligence sources have confirmed to The Independent that the Britons, convicted of a fatal car-bombing, were released last August after the US returned five Saudi prisoners, at least two of whom were believed to have trained in al-Qa'ida camps.

At the time, the release of the Saudis was opposed by the Pentagon and the CIA. But the joint releases were subsequently presented as diplomatic triumphs by both the British and Saudi governments.

A senior British source said yesterday: "Of course there were government-to-government talks. We were all anxious to solve the problem. But one must bear in mind that it was the Americans who held the aces with the Saudi detainees, the British government did not have that kind of leverage. So the term 'negotiations' should really be applied to the American-Saudi dialogue. But it was a particularly difficult time with Iraq, and a solution was in everyone's interest."

The Britons - Sandy Mitchell, James Cottle, Les Walker, James Lee, Glenn Ballard and Peter Brandon, and a Canadian, William Sampson - said they were subjected to beating while incarcerated for two years. They had been convicted of a car-bombing in which another Briton, Christopher Rodway, was killed. Many have subsequently said their confessions were forced and are suing the Saudi authorities.

Mr Mitchell, 48, originally from Kirkintilloch, near Glasgow, said last night: "We were definitely pawns in a game. I was sentenced to crucifixion and beheading for a crime the Saudis knew I did not commit.

"They had to tell us during the torture sessions what to confess to. It was a set-up from the very beginning."

The initiative to release the five Saudis from Guantanamo Bay began in July 2002 when Saudi officials visited the camp. According to a report in The New York Times, the proposal was discussed at the highest levels of the US and British governments, both eager to keep the support of the Saudi authorities for the invasion of Iraq. One US official said: "This was something that the Saudis desperately wanted, as a way to show their people that they could get something from the Americans and that it was not just a one-way street."

The following month, a recommendation by the US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Robert Johnson, outlined a "swap" as a way to keep the Saudis' support. While the Saudi authorities were technically opposed to the invasion of Iraq they allowed the US to use air bases in the kingdom.

The deal that was negotiated deliberately ensured there was a time gap between the release of the Saudis and the subsequent release of the Westerners in order to allow officials to deny there had been a "swap". "We did not want to make it a clear quid pro quo," said a US official. "We did obviously say that we expected [the release of the Westerners] to be resolved."

In March 2003, just days before the American-led coalition invaded Iraq, King Fahd granted clemency to the Western prisoners, though they were not released immediately. On 14 May, the five Saudis were flown to Riyadh. There are contradictory reports as to whether these men have been released by the Saudi authorities or charged with any crime.

Finally, in early August, the Westerners were flown home.

Informed of the secret deal Mr Rodway's widow, Jane, said last night she was shocked by the news and had not been informed of any such swap. "I didn't even know they were coming home until they were on the plane," she said.

A Foreign Office spokeswoman refused to confirm or deny that a deal was done.

The Whole Truth About The Iraq War

An impressive roster of experts is assembled to provide a generally withering commentary on the quality of evidence and possible motivations of the Neo-conservatives who provided the momentum and muscle behind America's venture into preemptive war...

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6423.htm

Pre-emptive War; Pre-emptive Arrests

Bush's Police State and Independence Day: Even though you are not a "terrorist," you may be detained, imprisoned, charged, arrested, and tried as one...

http://www.counterpunch.org/cassel07042004.html

Degrees of Fahrenheit

The movie should have focused on how the neocons conned America...

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Toronto/Eric_Margolis/2004/07/04/524524.html


From Information Clearing House

The Grim Balance Sheet Of The Iraq War

The 2003 Iraq war did not come out of the blue: it was the culmination of a long process, dating back to the First World War, aimed at protecting 'Western' oil supplies...

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6436.htm

No more lawless interventions

After Iraq, we need a new set of United Nations rules to govern international action against rogue states...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1254766,00.html


From Information Clearing House

Foreign detainees are few in Iraq

Suspected foreign fighters account for less than 2% of the 5,700 captives being held as security threats in Iraq, a strong indication that Iraqis are largely responsible for the stubborn insurgency...

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-07-05-detainees-usat_x.htm


From Information Clearing House

Iraq magnet to militants in Europe

THE US-led occupation of Iraq had boosted recruitment to Islamist groups in Europe and was a "black hole" pulling in militants from across the Middle East, France's top anti-terrorist judge warned yesterday...

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,10053681^2703,00.html


From Information Clearing House

CIA knew there were no WMDs

Some damning evidence has been uncovered by the U.S. government committee looking into Washington's pre-war intelligence on Iraq...

http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=38ead92b-c455-42d7-9a5c-643a6f8a3762
http://tinyurl.com/2tkrh


From Information Clearing House

The Republican Road Not Taken: The Foreign-Policy Vision of Robert A. Taft

http://www.independent.org/tii/content/pubs/review/tir84_hayes.html


Informant: David J. Theroux

Morning in Iraq?

http://www.independent.org/tii/news/040706Eland.html


Informant: David J. Theroux

The American Revolution and Iraq

http://www.independent.org/tii/news/040702Marina.html


Informant: David J. Theroux

Religious groups support global warming bill

http://www.usatoday.com/weather/resources/climate/2004-07-02-warming-bill_x.htm


Informant: NHNE

Bush Team Pushes Huge Timber Sale Under Guise of Fire Protection

July 07, 2004

Under the guise of preventing forest fires, the Bush administration is planning the biggest timber sale on public lands in modern history. The Biscuit Project would allow logging of 372 million board feet of timber across 30 square miles of southwest Oregon's Siskiyou National Forest—enough timber to fill 70,000 logging trucks. The logging would be done on wildlands of uncommon beauty and ecological diversity, far from any community that could be damaged in a fire.

"It's the biggest logging sale since World War II," says Steve Holmer, communications director with the Unified Forest Defense Campaign, a coalition of national and regional conservation organizations. "Timber companies have made huge contributions to the Bush campaign. This project is political payback."

Holmer tells BushGreenwatch that the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) initially proposed a much smaller project. "When the Forest Service first started looking at the area, they planned maybe a 100 million board feet sale." That changed once Mark Rey, formerly a top lobbyist for the timber industry who is now the administration's undersecretary for natural resources and environment in the Department of Agriculture, began to work on the sale.

Conservationists will "fight tooth and nail" against sales in roadless areas and old-growth reserves, but may support some careful logging in the areas in between, called "matrix lands," says Holmer.

The Biscuit Logging Project may violate federal forest protection rules. Some areas are protected under the Clinton-era Roadless Area Conservation Rule, while the huge size of the project may violate the Northwest Forest Plan, also adopted during the Clinton administration. [1] Moreover, logging will disqualify 48,000 acres of the Siskiyou from consideration as federal wilderness area.

In an unusual step, the USFS has granted "emergency exemptions" to 11 sales included in the project. These exemptions enable the USFS to allow logging to begin immediately after issuing its final plan for each sale, even though there is usually a waiting period required for public appeal.

Holmer sees politics in this rush to cut. "This is an election year. Oregon was a close state in the last election. The Bush administration is using the Biscuit Project to show they've come up with a solution to the fire issue." There is also an economic factor. "If the trees aren't cut soon, they'll rot to the point of losing economic value. If they're not logged this summer, [the timber companies] will pretty much lose their chance."

The areas encompassed by the Biscuit Project were burned in the 2002 "Biscuit Fire," the largest forest fire in Oregon's history. Fire is an intrinsic part of the ecology of western forests, and the Siskiyou has already begun to regenerate. [2] The burned trees are ecologically essential to the area's recovery, and sit on some of the Siskiyou's wildest and most fragile acres--including old-growth reserves, steep streambanks and riverbanks, and salmon spawning grounds.

In addition to being one of the largest public lands logging sales in history, the Biscuit Logging Project may be one of the most expensive to taxpayers, ultimately costing the public over $34 million.

"There are costs to preparing a sale," says Holmer. "The Forest Service has to build roads. Or if it's logging with helicopters, you've got to create landing pads, 2-acre clearcuts. Also, salvage timber sells at 25-percent of green timber. It's the same wood, same volume, at fire sale prices. The timber industry gets a huge windfall because it's a salvage project."

Holmer emphasizes the survival of the forest—a shelter for wildlife and wild rivers—is at stake.

"Under the Clinton administration, the Siskiyou was almost made a national monument. It's an area of unparalleled biological diversity, home to rare species that exist only in this region, clean water for salmon, and very important to the local tourism and recreation industry. If there was going to be a new national park on the west coast, the Siskiyou would be a prime candidate."



TAKE ACTION
You can call your US Senators at 202-224-3121 and let them know what you think of this timber sale. To find out who your Senators are you can go to: http://www.senate.gov



SOURCES:
[1] "Biscuit Salvage: Biggest Timber Sale in History," The Wilderness Society:
http://www.wilderness.org/WhereWeWork/Oregon/BiscuitSalvage.cfm
[2] Ibid.

http://www.bushgreenwatch.org/mt_archives/000150.php

Attention, Shoppers: You Can Now Speed Straight Through Checkout Lines

By Josh McHugh

I'm in a supermarket called the Extra Future Store in Rheinberg, Germany, 40 kilometers north of Düsseldorf, jonesing for a bit of Philadelphia cream cheese. I feed my request into the touchscreen console on my shopping cart, and up pops a map showing the optimal path to the dairy section. I steer over and grab a box - regular in name but far smarter than the average cream cheese. The package carries a computer chip that talks to a 2-millimeter-thin pad lining the shelf under the box. When I pick up the cheese, sensors in the pad notify the store's database that the box has been removed. I exchange the plain for the mit Kräuter (with herbs) then, wracked with indecision, snag the low-fat version. It turns out it's not really all that low-fat anyhow, so I put it back down. My waffling will produce a flurry of data back at Kraft Foods headquarters. The company, which gets this information in return for subsidizing the smart shelf and the microchips attached to the packages, will use the data to analyze my behavior. The marketing department will likely draw some kind of conclusion from my skittishness - a hint that maybe "low-fatness" is too Spartan a theme for a hedonistic schmear anyway. Of course, they'll also have serious insight into my personal shopping habits.

.....The star of the show is the radio frequency identification chip - a piece of circuitry about the size of a grain of sand. Thanks to the coordinated efforts of the world's biggest retailers and manufacturers, not to mention the persistence of former lipstick marketer Kevin Ashton, these little tags are about to infiltrate the world of commerce.

Depending who you ask, RFID tags constitute

1. the best thing to happen to manufacturing since the cog.

2. the biggest threat to personal privacy since the crowbar.

3. the near-exact fulfillment of the Book of Revelation's description of the mark of the beast.

There's a compelling argument for each of these perspectives - including number three.

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.07/shoppers.html?tw=wn_tophead_6


Peace - Anna

The irrationality of patriotism

by Andrew Young

LewRockwell.Com

07/07/04

[W]henever we step away from patriotism and rationally analyze these arguments, they make no sense. Saying that we must stay in Iraq to preserve national credibility is saying that we should continue to waste the lives of our young people in a war that, even according to military experts, is already lost. To say that we must not allow those who have already died to have lost their lives in vain is to say that, to prevent them from having lost their lives in vain, more people should die in vain. How rational is that?...

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig5/young-andrew1.html


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

DNC's Voting Rights Institute to Teach 'Mechanics of Casting A Vote'

07/06/04

The Democratic National Committee is recruiting volunteers to join their Voting Rights Institute to 'ensure that every single vote counts' in the November election. Established following the 2000 presidential election, the Voting Rights Institute was created so votes 'would be protected and counted in future elections.' 'Americans deserve an election free of errors, intimidation, voter disenfranchisement, chads, and butterfly ballots on November 2,' the Voting Rights Institute stated in an e-mail to supporters on Monday. The Voting Rights Institute hopes to accomplish its goals through education, turnout, and voter protection on Election Day...

http://www.talonnews.com/news/2004/july/0706_dnc_explains_voting.shtml


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Blair says WMD may never be found in Iraq

Dodge City Daily Globe

07/06/04

Facing hostile questioning in parliament, Prime Minister Tony Blair acknowledged on Tuesday some friction in his close relationship with President Bush and the political problems the friendship causes at home. Blair used his sharpest language yet in the long-standing disagreement over the Bush administration's detentions at the U.S. Navy base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, saying they 'must end.' And the British leader said it was likely weapons of mass destruction may never be found in Iraq...

http://ap.dodgeglobe.com/stories/20040706/2285100.shtml

9/11 panel repeats: Iraq-Osama tie weak

Indianapolis Star

07/06/04

The Sept. 11 commission is standing by its finding that al-Qaida had only limited contact with Iraq before the terrorist attacks. The 10-member, bipartisan panel issued a one-sentence statement Tuesday saying it had access to the same information as Vice President Dick Cheney, who suggested strong ties between ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida...

http://tinyurl.com/34o3t


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Hijacking Catastrophe

http://www.mediaed.org/videos/CommercialismPoliticsAndMedia/HijackingCatastrophe


Informant: kevcross5

USA lassen Kinder foltern

Folter an Kindern durch US-Spezialisten

Drei Berichte: Kulturzeit (3Sat), Report Mainz (ARD/SWR) und junge Welt (Zeitung). Der Bericht von report kann auf der dortigen Seite eingesehen werden. Die Berichte sind mit "###" getrennt.

Wer ueber eine Digital-Schuessel verfügt - Der Beitrag der ARD wird noch eimal wiederholt:

MI 070704 14:15 Uhr EinsExtra Report aus Mainz Magazin

###

3Sat:

Folter an den Schwächsten
Halten US-Soldaten Kinder gefangen und wenden Gewalt an?

Schreckensmeldungen erreichen uns täglich aus dem Irak. Anschläge und Folter, entführte Soldaten und geköpfte Zivilisten. Ein scheinbar kaum an Tragik zu übertreffendes Szenario. Und doch kann es noch schlimmer kommen: Selbst Kinder werden offenbar von US-Soldaten misshandelt.

Darüber berichtet ein Sergeant der US-Armee. Samuel Provance war ein halbes Jahr im Gefängnis von Abu Ghraib stationiert, mittlerweile lebt er in Heidelberg. Obwohl ihm vom Geheimdienst streng untersagt wurde, mit Journalisten zu reden, hat Provance jetzt doch über seine Erfahrungen gesprochen. Zum Beispiel berichtete er von der Festnahme eines 16-jährigen Jungens: "Die Verhörspezialisten haben ihn mit Wasser übergossen und in einen Wagen gesteckt. Dann sind sie mit ihm durch die Nacht gefahren, und zu der Zeit war es sehr, sehr kalt. Danach haben sie ihn mit Schlamm beschmiert und zeigten ihm seinen ebenfalls gefangenen Vater. An ihm hatten sie andere Verhörmethoden ausprobiert." Nachdem der Vater seinen Sohn in diesem Zustand gesehen habe, sei er bereit gewesen, über alles zu sprechen. Provance weiß außerdem von einem geheimen Kindertrakt in Abu Ghraib.

Schreie und Weinen

Verletzte irakische Kinder

Von dieser Kinder-Abteilung weiß auch der irakische Journalist Suhaib Badr-Addin Al-Baz, der selbst 74 Tage in Abu Ghraib verhaftet war. "Dort sah ich ein Camp für Kinder. Jung, unter dem Pubertätsalter. In diesem Lager waren sicherlich Hunderte von Kindern. Einige sind freigelassen, andere sind bestimmt noch drin." Schreie und Weinen seien an der Tagesordnung gewesen, erinnert sich Suhaib. Er erzählt auch von einem kranken 15-jährigen Jungen, den die Wärter mit schweren Wasserkanistern den Gang rauf und runter gehetzt hätten. So lange, bis er vor Erschöpfung zusammengebrochen sei.

Das Kinderhilfswerk Unicef berichtet ebenso von Kindern, die von Amerikanern gefangen genommen und wie Kriegsgefangene interniert wurden. Das Internationale Komitee des Roten Kreuzes kann solche Berichte bestätigen. "Wir haben zwischen Januar und Mai diesen Jahres insgesamt 107 Kinder registriert", sagt Florian Westphal. "Und zwar während 19 Besuchen in sechs verschiedenen Haftorten. Dazu muss man betonen, das sind Haftorte, die wirklich von den Koalitionstruppen kontrolliert werden."

Auch im Internierungslager Um Qasr sowie in Abu Ghraib registrierte das Rote Kreuz minderjährige Gefangene. Alarmierende Entdeckungen, die auch die Menschenrechtsorganisation Amnesty International empört. Barbara Lochbihler, Generalsekretärin von Amnesty International Deutschland, fordert Konsequenzen: "Die
US-Regierung muss sich natürlich zu diesem Bericht äußern, sie muss konkrete Informationen geben, wie alt die Kinder sind, was die Haftgründe sind, unter welchen Umständen sie inhaftiert wurden. Und ob Kinder eben Folter und Misshandlung ausgesetzt wurden. Und hier wissen wir nicht mal, wie die Kinder heißen, wie viele Kinder dort sind. Unabhängige Inspektionen sind nicht erwünscht. Das ist skandalös."

http://www.3sat.de/3sat.php?http://www.3sat.de/kulturzeit/themen/68032/index.html

###

Report Mainz vom 5. Juli 2004

Sündenfall Irak: Berichte über misshandelte Kinder im Folter-Gefängnis

Moderation Fritz Frey:

Nachrichten aus dem Irak. Der tägliche Anschlag, Saddam vor Gericht, entführte Soldaten, jede neue Meldung überdeckt die vorherige. Der Skandal um das Foltergefängnis Abu Ghraib, ach ja, da war doch was.

REPORT ist am Thema drangeblieben und ist dabei auf einen ganz unglaublichen Verdacht gestoßen. In Abu Ghraib und anderswo seien auch Kinder und Jugendliche inhaftiert und misshandelt worden. Thomas Reutter mit einer schwierigen Spurensuche.

Bericht:

Mit dem Panzerwagen durch die Tür. US-Soldaten stürmen ein Wohnhaus, suchen nach Terroristen. Manchmal verhaften die Soldaten bei solchen Razzien auch Kinder. Was geschieht mit diesen Kindern? Darüber macht das Militär keine Angaben. Wir recherchieren, treffen uns mit Informanten.

Einer, der darüber etwas weiß, ist Sergeant Samuel Provance vom Geheimdienst der US-Armee. Ein halbes Jahr lang war er im berüchtigten Foltergefängnis Abu Ghraib stationiert. Heute, fünf Monate danach, treffen wir Sergeant Provance in Heidelberg.

Seine Vorgesetzten haben ihm streng verboten Journalisten davon zu berichten, was er in Abu Ghraib erlebt hat. Doch Provance will trotzdem darüber sprechen. Ihn plagen Gewissensbisse. Er erzählt uns von einem 16-jährigen Jungen, den er selbst abführen musste.

O-Ton, Samuel Provance, US-Sergeant:

»Er war voller Angst, sehr alleine. Er hatte die dünnsten Ärmchen, die ich je gesehen habe. Er zitterte am ganzen Leib. Seine Handgelenke waren so dünn, dass wir ihm nicht mal Handschellen anlegen konnten. Gleich als ich ihn zum ersten mal sah und zum Verhör führte, tat er mir Leid. Die Verhörspezialisten haben ihn mit Wasser übergossen und in einen Wagen gesteckt. Dann sind sie mit ihm durch die Nacht gefahren, und zu der Zeit war es sehr, sehr kalt. Danach haben sie ihn mit Schlamm beschmiert und zeigten ihm seinen ebenfalls gefangenen Vater. An ihm hatten sie andere Verhörmethoden ausprobiert. Er war aber nicht zum Sprechen zu bringen. Die Verhörspezialisten sagten mir, nachdem der Vater dann seinen Sohn in diesem Zustand gesehen hatte, brach ihm das Herz. Er weinte und versprach ihnen alles zu sagen, was sie wissen wollten.«

Der Sohn aber blieb trotzdem in Haft. Als 16-Jähriger kam der Junge zu den Erwachsenen. Doch Provance berichtet auch von einer speziellen Abteilung, eigens für Kinder. Ein geheimgehaltener Kindertrakt im Horrorgefängnis Abu Ghraib.

Einer, der den Kindertrakt mit eigenen Augen gesehen hat, ist der Journalist Suhaib Badr-Addin Al-Baz. Unser Korrespondent traf ihn vergangene Woche in Bagdad. Der irakische Fernsehreporter berichtet wie er selbst von den Amerikanern bei Dreharbeiten willkürlich verhaftet wurde und 74 Tage in Abu Ghraib saß.

O-Ton, Suhaib Badr-Addin Al-Baz, Fernsehreporter:

»Dort sah ich ein Camp für Kinder. Jung, unter dem Pubertätsalter. In diesem Lager waren sicherlich Hunderte von Kindern. Einige sind freigelassen, andere sind bestimmt noch drin.«

Von seiner Einzelzelle aus im Erwachsenentrakt hört Suhaib ein vielleicht 12-jähriges Mädchen weinen. Später erfuhr er, dass ihr Bruder im zweiten Stock des Gefängnisses einsaß. Ein, zwei Mal, sagt Suhaib, habe er sie selbst gesehen.

In der Nacht seien sie bei ihr in der Zelle gewesen. Das Mädchen habe zu den anderen Häftlingen geschrieen und den Namen ihres Bruders gerufen.

Ein Zeichner hat die Szene für den britischen Fernsehsender ITN gemalt.

O-Ton, Suhaib Badr-Addin Al-Baz, Fernsehreporter:

»Sie wurde geschlagen. Ich hörte sie rufen: Sie haben mich ausgezogen. Sie haben Wasser über mich geschüttet.«

Täglich, sagt Suhaib, habe man ihre Schreie und ihr Wimmern gehört. Manche der Häftlinge hätten deshalb geweint. Suhaib berichtet auch von einem kranken 15-jährigen Jungen. Den hätten sie mit schweren Wasserkanistern den Gang rauf und runter gehetzt. So lange, bis er vor Erschöpfung zusammenbrach, sagt Suhaib. Dann hätten sie seinen Vater gebracht, gefangen. Mit Kapuze über dem Kopf. Vor Schock sei der Junge noch mal zusammengebrochen.

Im sogenannten Kampf gegen den Terror, stürmen die Amerikaner irakische Wohnungen. Laut Suhaib nehmen sie dabei manchmal ganze Familien, die ihnen verdächtig erscheinen, fest. Einzelne Zeugenaussagen, schwer zu überprüfen.

Wir recherchieren nach weiteren Belegen für die Gefangennahme von Kindern. Und tatsächlich. UNICEF in Genf, das Kinderhilfswerk der Vereinten Nationen. Wir finden einen brisanten Bericht. Erst wenige Tage alt.

Darin heißt es:

Zitat:

»Kinder, die in Basra und Kerbala (..) festgenommen worden waren, wurden routinemäßig in eine Internierungseinrichtung in Um Qasr überstellt.«

Das Internierungslager Um Qasr. Aufnahmen aus 2003. Heute ist es für Reporter zu gefährlich, nach Um Qasr zu fahren. Das Camp, ein Gefangenenlager für Terroristen und Kriminelle. Ausgerechnet hier sollen die Amerikaner also Kinder wie Kriegsgefangene interniert halten. UNICEF schreibt:

Zitat:

»Die Einstufung dieser Kinder als Internierte ist besorgniserregend, da sie unbestimmte Haftzeit, ohne Kontakt mit der Familie, Erwartung eines Verfahrens oder Prozess beinhaltet.«

Über den bislang unveröffentlichten Bericht hinaus will sich UNICEF noch nicht äußern. Die eigenen Mitarbeiter im Irak sollen nicht gefährdet werden. Wir suchen nach weiteren Informationen, wenden uns ans Internationale Komitee vom Roten Kreuz. Deren Helfer inspizieren Um Qasr, Abu Ghraib und andere Haftorte. Und nach intensiven Gesprächen dann eine weitere Bestätigung und sogar Zahlen.

O-Ton, Florian Westphal, Internationales Komitee vom Roten Kreuz:

»Wir haben zwischen Januar und Mai dieses Jahres insgesamt 107 Kinder registriert. Und zwar während 19 Besuchen in sechs verschiedenen Haftorten. Dazu muss man betonen, das sind Haftorte, die wirklich von den Koalitionstruppen kontrolliert werden.«

Im Internierungslager Um Qasr und auch in Abu Ghraib registrierte das Rote Kreuz minderjährige Gefangene. Zwei internationale Organisationen bestätigen uns damit unabhängig voneinander, dass die Besatzungstruppen irakische Kinder gefangen halten. Doch an Informationen direkt aus den Gefängnissen kommen wir nicht heran. Den Kinderknast in Bagdad durfte nicht einmal UNICEF besuchen.

Zitat:

»Im Juli 2003 beantragte UNICEF einen Besuch in dieser Haftanstalt, aber der Zugang wurde verweigert.«

Seit Dezember seien im Kinderknast laut UNICEF überhaupt keine unabhängigen Beobachter mehr gewesen. Zwar öffnete die US-Armee das Skandalgefängnis Abu Ghraib für einen Journalistenrundgang. Doch den Reportern wurde eine Vorzeigehaftanstalt präsentiert. Gefangene Kinder bekam die Presse nicht gezeigt.

Wir halten fest: Vier Quellen bestätigen unabhängig voneinander, die Besatzungstruppen halten Kinder als Gefangene fest. Zwei Zeugen berichten sogar über Misshandlungen. Die Menschenrechtsorganisation amnesty international ist empört über die Berichte zu irakischen Kindergefangenen. Barbara Lochbihler von amnesty international Deutschland fordert Konsequenzen.

O-Ton, Barbara Lochbihler, Generalsekretärin amnesty international:

»Die US-Regierung muss sich natürlich zu diesem Bericht äußern, sie muss konkrete Informationen geben, wie alt die Kinder sind, was die Haftgründe sind, unter welchen Umständen sie inhaftiert wurden. Und ob Kinder eben Folter und Misshandlung ausgesetzt wurden. Und hier wissen wir nicht mai, wie die Kinder heißen, wie viele Kinder dort sind. Unabhängige Inspektionen sind nicht erwünscht. Das ist skandalös.«

Abmoderation Fritz Frey:

Selbstverständlich haben wir die Verantwortlichen mit unseren Recherchen konfrontiert. Das britische Verteidigungsministerium ließ mitteilen: Kinder und Jugendliche werden von britischen Truppen nicht gefangen gehalten. Auf eine Antwort vom amerikanischen Pentagon warten wir noch immer.

Links:

Berichte der Menschenrechtsorganisation Amnesty International zu Irak
http://www.amnesty.de

Internationales Komitee vom Roten Kreuz
http://www.icrc.org

Das Kinderhilfswerk der Vereinten Nationen UNICEF
http://www.unicef.de

http://www.swr.de/report/archiv/sendungen/040705/02/frames.html

###

06.07.2004, jW-Bericht

Kinder in US-Lagern

TV-Magazin: Hunderte Minderjährige von US-Besatzern gefangengehalten. Mißhandlungen durch Verhörspezialisten

Der Abu-Ghraib-Skandal erreicht eine neue erschütternde Dimension: Im Irak werden von den US-Besatzern Kinder gefangengehalten und mißhandelt. Das berichtete das ARD-Magazin »Report Mainz« in einer Vorabmitteilung zu seiner Sendung am gestrigen Montag abend. Der Beitrag beruft sich auf zwei Zeugen, die unabhängig voneinander die unmenschliche Behandlung gefangener Minderjähriger im Skandalgefängnis Abu Ghraib beschrieben hatten. Ob wie bei den Folterungen erwachsener Häftlinge durch US-Bewacher auch Fotos von den Quälereien gemacht wurden, ist bisher nicht bekannt. Auch lagen am Montag (bei jW-Redaktionsschluß) trotz Anfrage noch keine Reaktionen von US-offizieller Seite vor. Das britische Verteidigungsministerium teilte mit, derzeit keine Kinder im Irak in Haft zu halten.

Die bisherigen Aussagen betreffen bereits Hunderte Fälle, in denen Kinder nach ihrer Verhaftung bei Razzien vornehmlich seitens der US-Armee gefangengenommen und danach in Haft gehalten wurden. Dort kam es zu speziellen »Behandlungen« in Zuge von »Verhören«. Dem Zeugen Samuel Provance zufolge haben dementsprechende US-Spezialisten ein Mädchen in ihrer Zelle bedrängt. Militärpolizei sei erst eingeschritten, so der ehemals in Abu Ghraib stationierte Unteroffizier des US-Militärgeheimdienstes, als die 15- oder 16jährige zum Teil entkleidet war. Ein 16jähriger Junge sei laut Provance mit Wasser überschüttet und durch die Kälte gefahren worden. Danach hätten Vernehmungsspezialisten den Jungen »mit Schlamm beschmiert« und seinem ebenfalls inhaftierten Vater vorgeführt. »Nachdem er dann seinen Sohn in diesem Zustand gesehen hatte, brach es ihm das Herz«, so Provance. »Er weinte und versprach alles zu sagen, was er wußte.«

Ein weiterer Zeuge, der Reporter Suhaib Badr-Addin Al-Bazdes vom arabischen Fernsehsender Al Dschasira, der 74 Tage in Abu Ghraib inhaftiert war, beschrieb, wie ein etwa zwölf Jahre altes Mädchen von US-Soldaten verprügelt wurde. Der Journalist berichtete erstmals von einem Gefangenenlager für Kinder. »Als sie mich von der Zelle ins Camp gebracht hatten, gab es dort ein eigenes Camp für Kinder, jung, unter dem Pubertätsalter. Sicherlich gab es in diesem Camp Hunderte von Kindern.«

Unterdessen bestätigte das Kinderhilfswerk der Vereinten Nationen (UNICEF) die Gefangennahme von irakischen Kindern durch Besatzungstruppen. Laut »Report Mainz« geht aus einem internen UNICEF-Bericht hervor, daß die Militärs irakische Kinder wie Kriegsgefangene in Internierungshaft festhalten. Wörtlich heißt es in dem bislang unveröffentlichten Dokument vom Juni 2004: »Kinder, die in Basra und Kerbala für angebliche gegen die Besatzungsmächte gerichtete Aktivitäten festgenommen worden waren, wurden Berichten zufolge routinemäßig in eine Internierungseinrichtung in Um Quasr überstellt. Die Einstufung dieser Kinder als "Internierte" ist besorgniserregend, da sie unbestimmten Gewahrsam ohne Kontakt mit der Familie, Erwartung eines Verfahrens oder Prozesses beinhaltet.« Zudem erwähnt das UNICEF-Dokument eine neue, von Koalitionstruppen in Bagdad errichtete Haftanstalt für Kinder. Im Juli 2003 beantragte UNICEF einen Besuch dieser Anlage. Der Zugang wurde jedoch verweigert.

Auch das Internationale Komitee vom Roten Kreuz (IKRK) bestätigte die Inhaftierung von Kindern und Jugendlichen durch Besatzungstruppen, unter anderem im berüchtigten Foltergefängnis Abu Ghraib. Florian Westphal, Sprecher des IKRK in Genf: »Wir haben zwischen Januar und Mai dieses Jahres insgesamt 107 Kinder registriert und zwar während 19 Besuchen in sechs verschiedenen Haftorten. Dazu muß man betonen, das sind Haftorte, die wirklich von den Koalitionstruppen kontrolliert werden.« Die Zahl der gefangen gehaltenen Kinder könne auch höher sein.

Die Menschenrechtsorganisation Amnesty International forderte Aufklärung über die Gefangennahme von Kindern. Barbara Lochbihler, Generalsekretärin der Sektion Deutschland, erklärte: »Die US-Regierung muß sich natürlich zu diesem Bericht äußern. Sie muß konkrete Informationen geben: Wie alt die Kinder sind, was die Haftgründe sind, unter welchen Umständen sie inhaftiert wurden und ob Kinder eben Folter und Mißhandlung ausgesetzt wurden.«

Lochbihler erklärte weiter, dass ihre Organisation nicht einmal wisse, »wie die Kinder heißen, wie viele Kinder dort sind. Unabhängige Inspektionen sind nicht erwünscht. Das ist skandalös.«
logo

Omega-News

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Archiv

Mai 2024
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
 
 
 
 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Wenn das Telefon krank...
http://groups.google.com/g roup/mobilfunk_newsletter/ t/6f73cb93cafc5207   htt p://omega.twoday.net/searc h?q=elektromagnetische+Str ahlen http://omega.twoday. net/search?q=Strahlenschut z https://omega.twoday.net/ search?q=elektrosensibel h ttp://omega.twoday.net/sea rch?q=Funkloch https://omeg a.twoday.net/search?q=Alzh eimer http://freepage.twod ay.net/search?q=Alzheimer https://omega.twoday.net/se arch?q=Joachim+Mutter
Starmail - 8. Apr, 08:39
Familie Lange aus Bonn...
http://twitter.com/WILABon n/status/97313783480574361 6
Starmail - 15. Mär, 14:10
Dänische Studie findet...
https://omega.twoday.net/st ories/3035537/ -------- HLV...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:48
Schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen ...
Bitte schenken Sie uns Beachtung: Interessengemeinschaft...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:01
Effects of cellular phone...
http://www.buergerwelle.de /pdf/effects_of_cellular_p hone_emissions_on_sperm_mo tility_in_rats.htm [...
Starmail - 27. Nov, 11:08

Status

Online seit 7385 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 8. Apr, 08:39

Credits