Hier sehen Sie ein wissenschaftliches Projekt einer jungen Dame, die eine schädliche Wirkung von mit Mikrowellen bestrahltem Wasser auf Pflanzen angemessen darstellen wollte. In diesem Projekt nahm sie gefiltertes Wasser und behandelte Trinkwasser auf zwei verschiedene Arten:

Die eine Hälfte des Wassers wurde in einem Topf zu erhitzt und schließlich zum Kochen gebracht. Die andere Hälfte des Wassers wurde mit Hilfe einer Mikrowelle zum Kochen gebracht. Mit diesen beiden behandelten, aber abgekühlten Wässern goss sie die Blumen.

Mit diesem Versuch wollte sie überprüfen, wie und ob die identischen Pflanzen unterschiedlich auf das behandelte Wasser bezüglich des Wachstums reagieren würden.

Bei diesem erschütternden Ergebnis muss man sich die Frage stellen, ob die Mikrowelle nicht als gefährliches Instrument einzuordnen ist, das extrem gesundheitsschädlich ist.

Hier geht es weiter:
http://www.zentrum-der-gesundheit.de/zentrum/wirkung-der-mikrowelle.html

Quelle: http://www.oekonews.de/id/5211/zentrum-der-gesundheit-die-wirkung-von-mit-mikrowellen/

--------

Mikrowelle macht Putzlappen keimfrei
http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/0,1518,461602,00.html

For those of you that can read and understand Swedish, or get automatic translations, please note the following brand new article:

Johansson O, "Livsfarliga mobiltelefonen" (="The highly dangerous mobile phone", in Swedish), Västerbottens-Kuriren 2006-10-14
http://www.vk.se/Article.jsp?article=83313

N.B. My recent article, Johansson O, "Livsfarliga mobiltelefonen" (="The highly dangerous mobile phone", in Swedish), i.a. dealing with the Benevento-resolution, has now also been published in the Swedish weekly newspaper "Miljömagasinet" [2006, no. 44, p. 14].



Yet another Swedish newspaper has published my commentary about i.a. the Benevento-resolution:

Johansson O, "Varför finns inga resurser till forskning om cancer och alla apparater?" (="Why are no money given to research about the connection between cancer and all our modern gadgets?", in Swedish), Barometern/Oskarshamns-Tidningen, 2006-11-09 http://www.barometern.se/article/1153578_126-0-0-0

[N.B. My name is incorrectly given as "Olle Andersson" above the text, but is correctly spellt below it.]


Olle Johansson, assoc. prof.
The Experimental Dermatology Unit
Department of Neuroscience
Karolinska Institute
171 77 Stockholm
Sweden

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/rocky_mt_marrow_transplant_program_re_emfs.htm

--------

Dear Olle: I found this interesting information regarding the MTHFR C677T gene in regard to Leukemia.

http://rockymountainbmt.com/news/The-risk-of-childhood-acute-lymphoblastic-leukemia-ALL-was-linked-to-methyletetrahydrofolate-reductase-MTHFR-C677T-polymorphism-in-Greek-patients-5315.html

This may be a duplicate of what I recently sent. In any case, not necessary to respond, etc.

The mutation (homogenous thermolabile form - MTHFR C677T) was identified in Bud when we both went for the methacholine challenge at the University of Minnesota Oncology Lab (saw a Hematologist) in order to determine our homocysteine levels. Indications for both of us are that the levels were considered to be normal primarily because were were both taking B-vitamins and folic acid.

I called the University geneticist and he told me it wasn't necessary to have our children be checked for the mutation. I was very surprised!! He basically acted like "no big deal -- forget about it.......!!!!

Now, I know that he knew EMF's were probably the explanation (the mutation appears to be linked to chemotherapy -- or "toxic exposures) and he didn't want to get involved in the EMF issue. I naturally brought up the subject of the two high voltage powerlines only 50 ft. from the front of our house.

I really knew better at the time this happened but didn't know what to do about it. Now I am thinking of writing to the National Institute of Health to at least get this documented from my end and to also send copies to the geneticist himself as well as an administrator of the University.

Take care - Joanne


Joanne C. Mueller Guinea Pigs R Us
731 - 123rd Avenue N.W. Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55448-2127
USA Phone: 763-755-6114
Email: jcmpelican@aol.com
(10-18-06)


"No substance is a poison by itself. It is the dose that makes a substance a poison..." Paracelsus (1493-1541)

Unlängst hatte ich hier in Stuttgart die Gelegenheit, eine der vom IZMF im Auftrag der Ärztekammer veranstaltete Fortbildung zum Thema Mobilfunk und Gesundheit zu besuchen. Dies hat mich verlanlasst das angehängte Protestschreiben an das IZMF zu richten mit Kopie an meine zuständige Bezirksärztekammer. Ich bitte um Veröffentlichung.

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/izmf_antwort_20_9_06.doc


Viele Grüße

Dietrich Grün



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=fortbildung

http://news.scotsman.com/health.cfm?id=1515312006

Google News Alert for: electromagnetic

Scotsman - United Kingdom ... warned yesterday. Exposure to chemicals, radiation and electromagnetic fields is thought by many to increase the risk in workers. Now ...

Informant: Eileen O'Connor/Milt Bowling



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=breast+cancer

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/ioniz&nonioniz_exp_induce_terminal_diff_in_cells.htm

--------

NOTES TO LEUKEMIA FILE (jcm 10-24-06)

This study regarding nuclear radiation exposure indicates there are other mechanisms involved re development of cancer.

http://tinyurl.com/ubpuw

Even as late as 1995, "more studies" are indicated....... the fact that low levels of EMF/EMR have designated as Class 2B carcinogens (possible cancer promoters), combined with uncertainties regarding "ionizing radiation" links to Leukemia, breast cancer, etc. -- many years after nuclear bomb exposures, paints a grim picture of "todays' experimentation re chronic, prolonged EMF/EMR exposures.

"Other mechanisms" (other than early ionizing radiation exposure) may well be workplace EMF/EMR exposures as well as nighttime EMF/EMR exposures. In other words, one might have in-utero exposure to ionizing radiation (or early childhood ionizing radiation exposure) but that a trigger such as low level, chronic, prolonged EMF/EMR exposure or other toxic agent prolonged exposure, are likely "the actual trigger(s)" that result in development of Leukemia, breast cancer, other cancers and additionally, serious and life-threatening diseases such as M.S., Parkinsons, Lou Gehrig's Disease, Alzheimers, Type II Diabetes and more.

A lot of other important information on this site (including charts) regarding ionizing radiation exposure that gives insight into difficulties establishing scientific links.


Joanne C. Mueller Guinea Pigs R Us
731 - 123rd Avenue N.W. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55448-2127 USA Phone: 763-755-6114 Email: jcmpelican@aol.com (10-24-06)


"No substance is a poison by itself. It is the dose that makes a substance a poison..." Paracelsus (1493-1541



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=fibroblasts
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=leukemia
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=carcinogen
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=breast+cancer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Parkinson
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Lou+Gehrig
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Alzheimer

Please read the important observation and comment from Dr Goldberg with regards to breast cancer and also take a look at his book.

Eileen O'Connor



Gerald Goldberg, MD
http://www.naturalcures4microwaveradillness.com

80 % increase over twenty five years, cases rocked by 10% in 2004.

“The steep and uniform the increase has been in the last 5 to 10 years when mobile phones and increased emf traffic was introduced. This seems critical to make that association. To overlook the obvious connection is to again mislead the public.”

Dr. Gerald Goldberg



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=breast+cancer

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/leukemia_ref_to_electromagnetic_radiation_neutropenia_2006.htm

--------

I found this an interesting article; it adds another piece of the jigsaw to the puzzle.

When I was diagnosed with breast cancer, my white blood cells suffered while living 100m from the phone mast. I was only able to take only one dose of chemotherapy before I turned neutropenic, it was a tremendous struggle to get through the chemotherapy which had to be extended as a result. The only way they could boost my white blood cells was to give me a course of neutropen injections which forced the white blood cells out of the bone marrow. Interestingly on three occasions I visited my sister in Liverpool to celebrate family events, on return to the hospital for blood check tests I was shocked to discover that my white blood cells had shot up without needing any neutropen injections, after just two long weekends away my blood had recovered enough to cope with the chemo and after 6 days away my white bloods cells went through the roof. I discovered that my sister's home was completely free from radiation.

It just goes to show how quickly your blood suffers and how quickly it can recover.


Eileen O'Connor

--------

I am sure that there is a lot more to be learnt from blood samples; actually, me and my collaborators would like to do a lot e.g. regarding microwave exposure from base stations and/or cellular phones, magnetic fields from power lines, EMFs from computer screens, etc. + a screening of blood (as well as various connective tissue-based) cells and their respective markers.

When we have applied to funding organizations about it, we have (funny enough!) been turned down?! Why?? What are they trying to hide??


Olle Johansson,
assoc. prof.
The Experimental Dermatology Unit Department of Neuroscience Karolinska Institute
171 77 Stockholm
Sweden



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=breast+cancer

http://www.next-up.org/pages/NewsoftheWorld75TenoreFrancoItaliano.php


"To date, the only health effect from RF fields identified in scientific reviews has been related to an increase in body temperature (> 1 °C) from exposure at very high field intensity found only in certain industrial facilities, such as RF heaters"

"the reported cancers in these clusters are often a collection of different types of cancer with no common characteristics and hence unlikely to have a common cause"

"Over the past 15 years, studies examining a potential relationship between RF transmitters and cancer have been published. These studies have not provided evidence that RF exposure from the transmitters increases the risk of cancer. Likewise, long-term animal studies have not established an increased risk of cancer from exposure to RF fields, even at levels that are much higher than produced by base stations and wireless networks".

Human and animal studies examining brain wave patterns, cognition and behaviour after exposure to RF fields, such as those generated by mobile phones, have not identified adverse effects.

Omega this is not true. See under:
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Wissenschaft+zu+Mobilfunk/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cancer+Cluster
http://www.buergerwelle.de/body_science.html

"Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity", EMF has not been shown to cause such symptoms."

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs304/en/index.html


Informant: Iris Atzmon

--------

WHO, EMF, Electromagnetic Radiation and Mobile Phones
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1194586/

--------

Dear Iris: There ought to be an opera titled "The Answer is in the Blood...."

As you know, "blood" is the main focus of my work for many years.

Interestingly, I tried to do a different search (other than PubMed) the other day at the University of Minnesota's BioMed Lab and input "white blood cell changes and electromagnetic radiation."

I am unable to locate any such studies since the 1990's!!!

When I asked at an RF meeting in 2001 (International Bioelectromagnetic Conference - St. Paul, Minnesota) whether or not blood studies would be part of the then proposed RF study, the NIEHS representative (have name in file) responded, "no -- the studies are designed for completion in six weeks (or six months -- forgot specifics).

I replied that "drastic blood changes occurred in my guinea pigs in less than 30 days...."

There is a deliberate effort to not conduct the very studies that are well-known to be related to "markers for irradiation." We need to ask why studies that are known to confirm exposure to ionizing radiation are not the first studies to be done in regard to nonionizing radiation exposures........ Take care - Joanne

Joanne C. Mueller
Guinea Pigs R Us
731 - 123rd Avenue N.W.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55448-2127 USA
Phone: 763-755-6114
Email: jcmpelican@aol.com (10-12-06)


"When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest!" - Author Unknown


Leukemia...ALL....see ref to electromagnetic radiation...neutropenia....2006
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/2796514/

--------

Iris

Dr Henry Lai found the route cause of this garbage coming from The WHO Health Canada and the likes. He discovered that exposure to EMR caused RATS to have learning difficulty. We are seeing a lot of that, are we not??

Best to you LOL

Robert