Antennas relay of Orange of CREST historical Drôme Lawsuit of mass against Orange in Summary procedure in the Court of Valence this Wednesday August 3, 2005 at 9h. In public sitting to the attention of Mr Herve MARITON Député-Maire from CREST des Témoignages (basiques) Residents. . . its managed. http://www.sauvonsleon.fr/main.php?param=statscom (put in line in progress)



ASL : Antennes relais d'Orange de CREST Drôme

Procès historique de masse contre Orange en Référé au Tribunal de Valence

Ce Mercredi 3 Août 2005 à 9h. en audience publique

A l'attention de Monsieur Hervé MARITON Député-Maire de CREST des Témoignages (basiques) de Riverains, . . . ses Administrés.

http://www.sauvonsleon.fr/main.php?param=statscom

( mis en ligne en cours )

http://www.omega-news.info/sciences_et_avenir_les_champs_magnetiques.JPG

----- Original Message ----- From: Butler, Kate Kate.Butler@sunday-times.ie
To: oconnell@esatclear.ie
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 5:12 PM Subject: The Sunday Times, Property

Hi Colette, Many thanks for all your help. See below for an electronic version of the article. All the best, Kate The Sunday Times - Property

July 17, 2005

Tough call on phone masts Fears over the effects on health of living near a phone mast invariably drag house prices down but, as KATE BUTLER reports, there could be some masts near your home that you’re unaware of

A country mansion comprising 15 rooms, with bucolic charm and excellent mobile phone reception . . .” Living next door to a mobile phone mast may offer you the best communications, but it’s not exactly a selling point.

One estate agent says he would halve the value of houses if a mast was nearby. The true impact of mobile phone masts on health is still unknown. Controversy was stirred again last month by an Oireachtas committee that called for stricter planning guidelines for masts.

Omega the true impact of mobile phone masts on health is not still unknown. See under:
http://www.buergerwelle.de/body_science.html

But the debate is already affecting the value of property.“If a mast is near a property, I’d drop the price by half because you eliminate half the customers,” says Pat O’Donovan, of O’Donovan and Associates in Co Limerick.

“A couple of months ago one person actually pulled out of a sale because of an application for the erection of a mast on a site nearby.”

There are now 5,181 mobile phone masts across the republic, a threefold increase since 1999. The Office of Public Works has agreed to allow 32 masts on public buildings.

Yet Ireland only has 94% mobile phone penetration, under the EU average of 98%: there are more masts to come. The public has remained distrustful of phone company and government assurances that masts are safe. Staff at the Department of Social and Family Affairs office in Sligo are opposing the siting of a mast on their building. They say it will affect children attending a creche inside.

Prompted by such fears, the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Communications investigated. It criticised the role of the Commission for Communications Regulation (ComReg) in monitoring masts and recommended strict planning guidelines.

One is that masts should not be erected close to sensitive sites such as schools, health centres and playgrounds. “We have to take a cautionary approach, even though there is no scientific evidence that the masts are injurious to people’s health,” says Noel O’Flynn, the TD and chairman of the Oireachtas committee. “We also recommended that we need a scientific advisory body — we’re not experts.”

Caution is one thing that the government has not yet exercised in relation to masts. Since 2000, masts have been exempt from planning permission if they are erected on a commercial building or on a telephone or flagpole.

In 1999, Karen Heneghan of Griffith Avenue, north Dublin, proved in High Court that the erection of a phone mast next to her property was in breach of planning guidelines and had devalued her property. “People thought I was fighting it on the grounds of health, but I fought it on visual impact and devaluation of property,” she says. “It was a monstrosity.”

Eircom took the mast down, but when the law changed it was able to erect another one on the telecommunications exchange next to her home. Heneghan found the smaller, unobtrusive mast didn’t affect the sale of her house last year.

Don MacAuley, of Mast Action in Meath, believes there is little to prevent phone companies putting up masts wherever they want. Using their own detection equipment, the group has found a mast hidden in a chimney opposite a residential estate.

“Since the exemptions, a mast under 15m doesn’t need planning permission,” he says. “We reckon there are 180-plus — but Meath county council only knows of about 55.”

However, Patrick Tehan, an auctioneer, believes that masts do not always have a negative effect on house sales. “Phone masts are a strange entity. Some people would be annoyed by them, others wouldn’t give a damn,” he says. “When an auctioneer is valuing a property, they might warn the client that this could be a negative factor.”

While it might not prevent a sale, the proximity of a mast will always be a consideration for buyers, according to Karen Mulvaney of the Buyer’s Agent. “So much is unknown about mobile phone masts that it does scare people,” she said.

“I’ve never come across anyone who has said ‘no big deal’. There are two big concerns: health and resale.” There seems to be a relatively simple solution to curbing masts’ proliferation. “We have recommended that mobile virtual operators should be able to access the infrastructure that’s already in place,” says ComReg. “There would be less need for masts.”

But this may be bad news for those already living with masts close to their homes. It means that future masts will be restricted to existing sites.

So far, however, there has been no co-operation between the phone companies. Meanwhile, some are not willing to hang about. “I once spoke to a land registry man in Waterford,” says O’Donovan. “He said whenever he sees an application come in for a mast near his property, the first thing he does is see an estate agent and move out.”

http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20050729_repacholi.asp


Informant: Avoiding Ridicule



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200507/s1426521.htm


Informant: Avoiding Ridicule

Sunday July 31st 2005, 6:38 pm

From Tower Sanity in Sydney Australia:

Concerned parents and citizens

Please find attached today’s online ABC News “Govt urged to ban mobile phone towers near schools” and motion/action item (that was slightly amended at the conference yesterday) that was presented and wonderfully debated for a good 30 minutes and supported almost unanimously.

Well done and thanks to St George Girls’ High school parent, Kim!

Regards

Anne

ABC News:

Govt urged to ban mobile phone towers near schools

The Parents and Citizens Federation of New South Wales (PCF) says mobile phone towers pose a possible threat to the health of school children and should be located at least 300 metres away from schools.

The PCF is holding its annual general meeting this weekend and wants the Federal Government to intervene on the issue.

PCF spokesman David Giblin says no new towers should be built near schools and existing ones should also be removed.

“What we’re trying to do with mobile phone towers is to avoid any potential harm to school students by the siting of those towers close to schools,” he said.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200507/s1426425.htm

AND:

Motion to NSW Federation of P&C Associations 2005 annual conference

That Federation requests the NSW Department of Education and Training to:

1\ adopt a policy regarding the siting of mobile phone towers/mobile base stations/telecommunications facilities within school grounds and close to schools, and that policy is to:
a\ oppose the siting of such facilities within the school grounds;
b\ oppose the siting of such facilities within 300m of the school to ensure that the peak intensity of electromagnetic radiation does not fall anywhere on the school grounds;
c\ be advised to all schools;
d\ be publicised on the DET website.

2\ advise principals:
a\ to pass on information to the school community (teaching staff, administration staff, parents and carers of pupils, and school education director) when the principal is notified by a carrier of a proposal for a mobile phone tower/mobile base station/telecommunications facility within or close to the school.
b\ to expect that such letters of notification to principals will appear to be junk mail. Eg
i\ The letter will be in a plain envelope
ii\ The envelope may have the words “To the resident” and/or “Important Information: Proposed telecommunications facility in your local area”
iii\ The letter may be addressed “To the Householders”
c\ to not rely on carriers to adequately notify the school community (because they are under no obligation to do so)
d\ to be aware of and support the school community’s opinion when participating in the consultation process.

3\ create and publish an electronic database of schools close to (within 300m of) mobile phone towers/mobile base stations/telecommunications facilities.

Motion submitted by St George Girls High School P&C Association

http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/index.php?p=160

http://www.omega-news.info/asl_120b_couverture_revue_sciences_avenir_et_traduction_en_anglais.JPG

ASL: Antennas relay of Orange of CREST historical Drôme

Lawsuit of mass against Orange in Summary procedure with the Court of Valence Wednesday August 3, 2005 with 9H in public sitting (come many in support) After two preceding references, this lawsuit of mass in Summary procedure which constitutes a first in France becomes the lawsuit of the hope for 42 plaintiffs representing more than 150 Residents federated within ASL. If the instruction took place today, it there would have more than 100 plaintiffs, that is to say more half of the population which feels biological or medical symptoms in the zone close irradiated directly in the lobes to the powerful antennas relay of the Orange macro-station. Extremely rare case, these antennas relay is located in the point low (IGN) of the urban zone of CREST! Its beams thus irradiate directly the Residents, this with the contempt of the POS in force. During this lawsuit and for the first time in France, it will be requested from the multiple sources of the right the implementation of the Principle of Precaution which has constitutional value now bus recently registered in the French Charter of the Environment. This under the terms of what the potentiality of a risk and not its demonstration must involve measurements likely to it protection of the populations which are exposed there. Moreover, the Operator never brought the proof of the harmlessness of the CEM of his antennas relay. In this respect, it is also necessary to recall that concerning the application of the Principle of Precaution by the Courts: "the Judge will have to take into account the risks pled by the parts, apart from any official consultation and to thus forge his own conviction on the probability, by taking account of the main part of the poured parts with the file" (C.Cons, RFD adm.) http://www.sauvonsleon.fr/pdf/07_Texte_de_la_Charte_de_l_Environnement.pdf Beyond the elements presented at the debates concerned with the deterioration of health and the sudden biological effects by Residents, the put question is as follows: Can the man live (normally) while being directly exposed to the irradiations of the lobes of the antennas relay of mobile telephony? The answer to this fundamental question is known, it is "NON".Et so today at Crest this" NOT "posted 100 times on orange bottom is attacked and disturbs much, eh well, it is that ASL will have succeeded in contributing its share to the defense of our natural environment. ASL will never repeat it enough, the radiation of Electromagnetic Fields (radiations), called CEM, emitted by the antennas mobile relay of telephony, are of pulsated the microwaves type. They are not frightening pain-killers but for the human one. With the instar of the microwawe oven, our cells subjected to these radiations have their disturbed natural oscillatory balance. The harmfulness of the CEM all the more requires vigilance according to the age of the exposed populations or of their state of brittleness (patients) and, moreover, it is recommended to redouble vigilance for the children. In all the cases, even the adults subjected to a direct and permanent exposure of radiations 24 H out of 24 are not saved and develop in their turn of pathologies prejudicial to their health, these last having been clearly noted by the bond of causality which was highlighted everywhere in the world thanks to the many independent scientific studies: State of tiredness general, headaches, nauseas, giddinesses, sleep disorder, eczema, various disturbances... The debate does not go back to today but the current problem is as follows, as for any pollution vis-a-vis the often anarchistic proliferation of the sites of antennas relay: "All is poison, nothing is not poison, all is a function of the amount?. Moreover, nobody is equal vis-a-vis the radiations. Indeed, each individual develops or does not develop pathology. These invisible radiations cross all, the walls, our skin, and, especially, penetrate in our brain (for young people, they cross it right through, because their wavelength!), and in certain cases end up injuring the cellular ADN, which will ineluctably give cancerous tumours or other medical effects. In addition, it is advisable to recall that the Residents are not rats of laboratories and that their testimonys certified on their pathologies are, as for them, quite real. Journalists carried out reports besides on the Crestois Residents of which it will be soon possible to take note in the national media. Vis-a-vis the multiple problems generated by the deployment of mobile telephony, one obviously had to expect that several new specific national structures (non-profit-making) are in the course of creation or of study to apprehend, under a more adequate angle, the problems of company, justice or environment. In a few days, ASL will present a very new first independent organization to you.

Translation: machine-made


ASL : Antennes relais d’Orange de CREST Drôme

Procès historique de masse contre Orange en Référé au Tribunal de Valence

le Mercredi 3 Août 2005 à 9H en audience publique (venez nombreux en soutien)

Après deux précédents renvois, ce procès de masse en Référé qui constitue une première en France devient le procès de l’espoir pour 42 plaignants représentant plus de 150 Riverains fédérés au sein d’ASL.

Si l’instruction avait lieu aujourd’hui, il y aurait plus de 100 plaignants, soit plus de la moitié de la population qui ressent des symptômes biologiques ou sanitaires dans la zone proche irradiée directement dans les lobes des puissantes antennes relais de la macro-station d’Orange.

Cas rarissime, ces antennes relais sont situées dans le point le plus bas (IGN) de la zone urbaine de CREST !

Ses faisceaux irradient donc directement les Riverains, ceci au mépris du POS en vigueur.

Au cours de ce procès et pour la première fois en France, il va être demandé aux multiples sources du droit la mise en œuvre du Principe de Précaution qui a maintenant valeur constitutionnelle car récemment inscrit dans la Charte Française de l’Environnement. Ceci en vertu de quoi la potentialité d’un risque et non pas sa démonstration doit entraîner des mesures de nature à la protection des populations qui s’y trouvent exposées.

Au demeurant, l’Opérateur n’a jamais amené la preuve de l’innocuité des CEM de ses antennes relais.

A cet égard, il est également nécessaire de rappeler que concernant l’application du Principe de Précaution par les Tribunaux : « le Juge devra prendre en considération les risques allégués par les parties, en dehors de toute consultation officielle et forger ainsi sa propre conviction sur la probabilité, en tenant compte de l’essentiel des pièces versées au dossier » (C.Cons, RFD adm.)

http://www.sauvonsleon.fr/pdf/07_Texte_de_la_Charte_de_l_Environnement.pdf

Au-delà des éléments présentés aux débats relevant de la détérioration de la santé et des effets biologiques subits par des Riverains, la question posée est la suivante : L’homme peut-il vivre (normalement) en étant directement exposé aux irradiations des lobes des antennes relais de la téléphonie mobile ? La réponse à cette question fondamentale est connue, c’est "NON".Et si aujourd’hui à Crest ce "NON" affiché 100 fois sur fond orange est attaqué et dérange beaucoup, eh bien, c’est qu’ASL aura réussi à apporter sa contribution à la défense de notre environnement naturel.

ASL ne le répétera jamais assez, le rayonnement des Champs ÉlectroMagnétiques (radiations), appelés CEM, émis par les antennes relais de téléphonie mobile, sont du type micro-ondes pulsées. Ils ne sont pas anodins mais redoutables pour l’humain. A l’instar du four à micro-ondes, nos cellules soumises à ces rayonnements ont leur équilibre oscillatoire naturel perturbé. La nocivité des CEM requiert d’autant plus de vigilance en fonction de l’âge des populations exposées ou de leur état de fragilité (malades) et, de plus, il est recommandé de redoubler de vigilance pour les enfants. Dans tous les cas, même les adultes soumis à une exposition directe et permanente de rayonnements 24 h sur 24 ne sont pas épargnés et développent à leur tour des pathologies préjudiciables à leur santé, ces dernières ayant été clairement constatées par le lien de causalité qui a été mis en évidence partout dans le monde grâce aux nombreuses études scientifiques indépendantes : Etat de fatigue général, maux de tête, nausées, vertiges, troubles du sommeil, eczéma, perturbations diverses, …

Le débat ne date pas d’aujourd’hui mais le problème actuel est le suivant, comme pour toute pollution face à la prolifération souvent anarchique des sites d’antennes relais : "Tout est poison, rien n’est poison, tout est fonction de la dose ?. De plus, personne n’est égal face aux rayonnements. En effet, chaque individu développe ou ne développe pas de pathologie. Ces radiations invisibles traversent tout, les murs, notre peau, et, surtout, pénètrent dans notre cerveau (pour les plus jeunes, elles le traversent de part en part, à cause de leur longueur d’onde !), et dans certains cas finissent par léser l’ADN cellulaire, ce qui donnera inéluctablement des tumeurs cancéreuses ou autres effets sanitaires. D’autre part, il convient de rappeler que les Riverains ne sont pas des rats de laboratoires et que leurs témoignages certifiés sur leurs pathologies sont, quant à eux, bien réels.

Des journalistes ont d’ailleurs réalisé des reportages sur les Riverains Crestois dont il sera prochainement possible de prendre connaissance dans les médias nationaux.

Face aux multiples problèmes engendrés par le déploiement de la téléphonie mobile, il fallait évidemment s’attendre à ce que plusieurs nouvelles structures nationales spécifiques (sans but lucratif) soient en cours de création ou d’étude pour appréhender, sous un angle plus adéquat, les problèmes de société, de justice ou d’environnement. Dans quelques jours, ASL vous présentera une toute nouvelle première organisation indépendante.