Mobilfunk Archiv (Englisch)

10
Jan
2006

Your cell phone records are for sale

CHICAGO SUN TIMES

January 5, 2006

BY FRANK MAIN Crime Reporter

The Chicago Police Department is warning officers their cell phone records are available to anyone -- for a price. Dozens of online services are selling lists of cell phone calls, raising security concerns among law enforcement and privacy experts.

Criminals can use such records to expose a government informant who regularly calls a law enforcement official.

Suspicious spouses can see if their husband or wife is calling a certain someone a bit too often.

And employers can check whether a worker is regularly calling a psychologist -- or a competing company.

Some online services might be skirting the law to obtain these phone lists, according to Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who has called for legislation to criminalize phone record theft and use.

In some cases, telephone company insiders secretly sell customers' phone-call lists to online brokers, despite strict telephone company rules against such deals, according to Schumer.

And some online brokers have used deception to get the lists from the phone companies, he said.

"Though this problem is all too common, federal law is too narrow to include this type of crime," Schumer said last year in a prepared statement.

The Chicago Police Department is looking into the sale of phone records, a source said.

Late last month, the department sent a warning to officers about Locatecell.com, which sells lists of calls made on cell phones and land lines.

"Officers should be aware of this information when giving out their personal cell phone numbers to the general public," the bulletin said. "Undercover officers should also be aware of this information if they occasionally call personal numbers such as home or the office, from their [undercover] ones."

Test got FBI's calls in 3 hours

To test the service, the FBI paid Locatecell.com $160 to buy the records for an agent's cell phone and received the list within three hours, the police bulletin said.

Representatives of Data Find Solutions Inc., the Tennessee-based operator of Locatecell.com, could not be reached for comment.

Frank Bochte, a spokesman for the FBI in Chicago, said he was aware of the Web site.

"Not only in Chicago, but nationwide, the FBI notified its field offices of this potential threat to the security of our agents, and especially our undercover agents," Bochte said. "We need to educate our personnel about the dangers posed by individuals using this site and others like it. We are stressing that they should be careful in their cellular use."

How well do the services work? The Chicago Sun-Times paid $110 to Locatecell.com to purchase a one-month record of calls for this reporter's company cell phone. It was as simple as e-mailing the telephone number to the service along with a credit card number. The request was made Friday after the service was closed for the New Year's holiday.

'Most powerful investigative tool'

On Tuesday, when it reopened, Locatecell.com e-mailed a list of 78 telephone numbers this reporter called on his cell phone between Nov. 19 and Dec. 17. The list included calls to law enforcement sources, story subjects and other Sun-Times reporters and editors.

Ernie Rizzo, a Chicago private investigator, said he uses a similar cell phone record service to conduct research for his clients. On Friday, for instance, Rizzo said he ordered the cell phone records of a suburban police chief whose wife suspects he is cheating on her.

"I would say the most powerful investigative tool right now is cell records," Rizzo said. "I use it a couple times a week. A few hundred bucks a week is well worth the money."

Only financial info protected?

In July, the Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a petition with the Federal Communications Commission seeking an end to the sale of telephone records.

"We're very concerned about Locatecell," said Chris Jay Hoofnagle, senior counsel for the center. "This is the company that sold the phone records of a Canadian official to a reporter 'no questions asked.' "

Schumer has called for legislation to criminalize the "stealing and selling" of cell phone logs. He also urged the Federal Trade Commission to set up a unit to stop it.

He said a common method for obtaining cell phone records is "pretexting," involving a data broker pretending to be a phone's owner and duping the phone company into providing the information.

"Pretexting for financial data is illegal, but it does not include phone records," Schumer said. "We already have protections for our financial information. We ought to have it for the very personal information that can be gleaned from telephone records."

fmain suntimes com
http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html


Informant: Scott Munson

Next-up News 1-7/01/2006

http://www.livelogcity.com/users/omega/8815.html

Repacholi was asked by Next up about the money he receives

http://www.livelogcity.com/users/omega/17939.html

Repacholi responds but not to NEXT UP
http://www.omega-news.info/repacholi_responds_but_not_to_next_up.htm

--------

For those who don't know, Blake wrote the book:

Electromagnetic Fields: A Consumer's Guide to the Issues and How to Protect Ourselves by B. Blake Levitt, Blake B. Levitt (Paperback - October 1995)

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0156281007/qid=1136914335/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-0227714-3495137?v=glance&s=books

and edited the book: Cell Towers: Wireless Convenience? or Environmental Hazard? by B. Blake Levitt (Editor) (Paperback - November 1, 2001)

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/188482062X/qid=1136914335/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/104-0227714-3495137?v=glance&s=books


----- Original Message -----
From: Blakelevit@cs.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 7:19 PM Subject: Re: FYI

Henry,

This WHO "Fact Sheet" on EHS is very unfortunate and a direct slap at the work of Olle Johansson and others. I had great hope that this WHO committee would produce some balanced work but it just seems to be getting more rigid according to the individual bias/politics of the heads of the committee. Such a shame. I am increasingly convinced that this is a rogue committee within WHO whose work is so exemplary in so many other areas. Certainly their funding decisions in taking money for travel expenses from the industry goes against all WHO parameters. Not sure what will right this situation now. Once these fact sheets are produced, they can take on a patina of credibility that outlives rewrites. The baseline opinion contained in this is the same as 10 years ago -- as if no new work had been done. Worse, it utterly dismisses the increasing reports of EHS coming from all over the world. It's not likely that everyone is having the same transcultural psychotic hallucination.

Much of the basis for dismissal rests on the fact that those with EHS cannot distinguish between frequencies, cannot tell when exposures are on or off, and appear to have an emotional overlay. Therefore the syndrome must be imagined because it doesn't respond to our normal way of capturing data. The fact that a different nonlinear model might be needed doesn't even get mentioned. Olle's work in changes in skin mast cells appears to be one possibility. I often quote a line from Hippocrates in my speeches. Hippocrates his students, "Listen to your patients... They are handing you the diagnosis." Indeed, that's what often leads to further research. How come not with WHO?

Blake

See:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs296/en/print.html


Informant: Iris Atzmon

--------

New information was accepted from the organization Next Up: Repacholi responded to them, according to the (yet not full) information I received, not only did Repacholi deny the accusation, but he also tried to scare/ threaten them, and he said: "“Could you please explain where you received this totally false information…”

This is a good sign. It's the first time something moved him seriously - Now he finally doesn't tell us anymore how scientific he is, but he starts to talk to the point- about the money issues. Since I am not familiar with the european institutions, who the strong people are (preferably people with some moral/conscience) I would thank for any adresses/emails of important key people who you think might have interest in advancing an investigation of a suspicion for bribe of Repacholi, and misleading the world by ignoring or doing bias of scientific studies and cooperating with industry. There is a need to involve people who are strong in the politics but the ones who care about this issue. Important judges, etc. If you know how to get to a unit of investigations in the European Union, let me know the adress, there should be a demand for investigation, since Lee Jong conveniently ignored the lettter that was sent to him. Please let us involve more people and we will try to advance it more.

Iris

----- Original Message -----
From: Next-up: Infos
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:44 AM
Subject: Re: Repacholi's industry benefits

Cher Ami,

Merci de vos premiers renseignements concernant Repacholi.

Actuellement Repacholi, nous avons suspendu provisoirement son dossier et il nous dit avec des menaces qui ne nous font pas peur, notamment que :

“Could you please explain where you received this totally false information…” etc . . .

“Pourriez vous svp expliquer où vous avez reçu cette information totalement fausse... ” etc . . .

Dr Mike H Repacholi Coordinator, Radiation & Environmental Health Protection of the Human Environment World Health Organization
20 Avenue Appia CH-1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland

Tel +41 22 791 34 27
Fax +41 22 791 41 23
Email: repacholim@who.int

Il est nécessaire pour pouvoir instruire son dossier d’avoir les éléments et le maximum de preuves de tout ce qu’il a fait qui est contraire à la déontologie au sein de l’OMS.

Tous ensemble nous devons gagner ce combat, mais il faut que nous nous aidions mutuellement.

Pouvez-vous intervenir auprès du Groupe d’Action des Résidants de Waiatarua, car il faudrait qu’il nous transmette tous les documents concernant les sommes d’argent qu’aurait touché Repacholi.

Vous pouvez leur garantir l’anonymat.

Il y a quelques mois, nous avions mis en demeure le Pr Denis Zmirou, Directeur Scientifique de l’AFSSE concernant le rapport qui porte son nom en France et qui fait force de loi actuellement. Nous lui avions demandé de s’expliquer sur ses incohérences que nous considérions comme une grave faute sur les établissements sensibles, école, hôpitaux, etc . . . Denis Zmirou avait dit qu’il ne fallait pas mettre ces établissements dans les faisceaux des antennes relais. Donc les enfants étaient protégés pendant les 8 heures de classes, et après pendant les 16 heures restantes ils pouvaient se faire irradier cher eux ! Courageusement il a préféré démissionner de son poste en écrivant une longue lettre qui est un modèle du genre sur l’état de mensonges de certaines institutions officielles de santé gouvernementale. Cette lettre est souvent reprise dans les émissions de télévision et les débats. " . . . Nous payons et nos enfants paieront demain le prix de nos aveuglements." . . . Vous pouvez traduire cette lettre qui est hallucinante pour une personne qui a dirigé pendant des années les études concernant les CEM (EMF) en France !

Reste malheureusement encore en poste Veyret, de Séze, Dixiaut et . . . Repacholi.

Hier nous avons publié en France ce texte de présentation :

L’OMS s’est réunie le 17 novembre 2005 à Melbourne (Australie), pour étudier l’avancement des travaux

relatifs aux études sur les CEM. En présence des deux figures emblématiques et dans des débats houleux,

révélateurs de grandes tensions..

Le compte rendu de Rowan Campbell est révélateur d’un état de crise qui ne peut perdurer. Face aux

réalités de la physique et aux évidences des effets biologiques et sanitaires des CEM sur l’homme, il serait

salutaire pour l’humanité qu’une page sombre de la “recherche scientifique orientée” se tourne au plus vite.

En 2005, au plus haut niveau, les problèmes de conscience ont déjà été explicitement évoqués, médiatisés

avec les conséquences que l’on connaient. Néanmoins reste encore aux commandes un quarteron qui veut

encore faire bonne figure. S’ils ne sont pas imbus de leur personne, nous pensons qu’ils comprendront . . .

Nous n’avons qu’un conseil a leur prodiguer : Qu’ils s’effacent discrètement, . . . sans autre forme de procès.


Informant: Iris Atzmon

9
Jan
2006

EHS Factsheet 296

This letter that I have just received from Martin Weatherall in Canada might be of interest to all.

Martin complained to the Director General of the WHO, like we did, but got an answer from Repacholi.

We, Canadians, Brits, Israelis, Germans etc also complained, but have as yet had no answers.

Omega see also "Petition to remove Dr. Mike Repacholi" under:
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/877606/


We chased it, still no answers.

Attached are: Martins letter, WHO EHS factsheet, and WHO hypersensitivity.

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/world_health_org_complaint.doc
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/ehs_factsheet_296_english.pdf
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/who_hypersensitivity_mistake.pdf

Below Martin explains.

Best regards.

Agnes


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Weatherall
Sent: 08 January 2006 19:00
To: Dr. David Fancy
Subject: EHS_Factsheet_296_English


Hi

I have recently received a reply letter from Dr. M. Repacholi, Coordinator, Radiation and Environmental Health, World Health Organization. This was in response to the letter of complaint that I sent dated November 10, 2005.

The letter stated - Dear Sir

Your letter to the Director-General of WHO has been passed on to me for reply.

WHO does not make any decisions on its own; this is done through the formation of expert groups on the topics under discussion, and they conduct a thorough review of scientific literature to reach their conclusions and recommendations.

This was the process used to reach conclusions about EMF hypersensitivity. The results of the workshop held in Prague in October 2004 are now reflected in the enclosed WHO Fact Sheet.

Yours sincerely

Dr Mike H. Repacholi


I have attached the WHO Fact Sheet to this E mail. I have also attached the WHO working document and the original complaint that I sent to the WHO.

The only good part of the document that I can find is the part under 'Physicians', where it states: "This requires - an assessment of the workplace and home for factors that might contribute to the presented symptoms." This seems to be quite a change from the working document and it may be worth finding out the reason for that change. Of course we all know that physicians are highly unlikely to ever assess the home or the workplace of a EHS sufferer. Doctors are simply to busy and do not have the knowledge and equipment to search for the true cause of electro hypersensitivity. This change would have been more appropriate if it had appeared under 'Governments' and if they then provided realistic electromagnetic dangers to search for, and details of the equipment and knowledge required for that search.

It is obvious from the document that the WHO are 'barking up the wrong tree'. With the exception of Prof Olle Johansson, it seems that the 'experts' either do not realize what is really harming EHS sufferers, or they are deliberately protecting the financial interests of the telecommunications industry, the wireless industry and the electrical industry. They are failing to look for the real reasons why people are getting sick and developing cancer near to cell phone towers, near to transformers, near to transmission lines, from defective wireless equipment and from the effects of electricity polluted by high frequencies. In short, the World Health Organization is failing in its duties to the world population.

Regards

Martin Weatherall

--------

Electromagnetic fields and public health
Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs296/en/

The Definition, Epidemiology and Management of Electrosensitivity
http://www.radiationresearch.org/newsletter22-12-05.htm

HPA Report on Electrical Hypersensitivity
http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20051102_electrosensitivity.asp

WHO, EMF, Electromagnetic Radiation and Mobile Phones
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1194586/

8
Jan
2006

Telecommunications Masts (Planning Control) Bill

Here is attached the New Telecommunications Bill (proposal) which is due to get a second hearing in the British Parliament on the 24th of February 2006: http://tinyurl.com/co3cw

Please publish and distribute.


Best regards.

Agnes

http://www.mast-victims.org

--------

Telecoms Bill: the next stage
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1378745/

Know your Repacholi

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/grn/omega190.htm

7
Jan
2006

Zoran Protest - Zoran on TV

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/grn/omega189.htm

Dirty phones - Coltan controversy: Phone component illegally mined, hurts environment, people

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/grn/omega188.htm

A tangled web
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1400540/

--------

The RED phone

Well, we wondered at the way O2 capitalised on the Make Poverty History, didn't we?

Did anyone else spot the Independent RED issue today? Seems we are often in a battle against one man-made harm by hitting it with another. Imagine the environmental impact of throwing away old phones for new, and OK money goes to Aids, but encourages more phone use (ironically containing exploitative Coltan from the Congo), and injuring the mainly western users instead. And you can be sure it will do operators and manufacturers no harm at all to be selling these!

Andy

read on:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/article485048.ece


From Mast Sanity/Mast Network



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=coltan

France School removes Antenna

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/grn/omega185.htm

MEGA TOWER SEEMS UN-NOTICED

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/grn/omega185.htm
logo

Omega-News

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Archiv

April 2026
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
 
 
 
 
 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Wenn das Telefon krank...
http://groups.google.com/g roup/mobilfunk_newsletter/ t/6f73cb93cafc5207   htt p://omega.twoday.net/searc h?q=elektromagnetische+Str ahlen http://omega.twoday. net/search?q=Strahlenschut z https://omega.twoday.net/ search?q=elektrosensibel h ttp://omega.twoday.net/sea rch?q=Funkloch https://omeg a.twoday.net/search?q=Alzh eimer http://freepage.twod ay.net/search?q=Alzheimer https://omega.twoday.net/se arch?q=Joachim+Mutter
Starmail - 8. Apr, 08:39
Familie Lange aus Bonn...
http://twitter.com/WILABon n/status/97313783480574361 6
Starmail - 15. Mär, 14:10
Dänische Studie findet...
https://omega.twoday.net/st ories/3035537/ -------- HLV...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:48
Schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen ...
Bitte schenken Sie uns Beachtung: Interessengemeinschaft...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:01
Effects of cellular phone...
http://www.buergerwelle.de /pdf/effects_of_cellular_p hone_emissions_on_sperm_mo tility_in_rats.htm [...
Starmail - 27. Nov, 11:08

Status

Online seit 8083 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 8. Apr, 08:39

Credits