Flawed Essex EHS study
Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals
http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/d8cf6a5c1d468737
The PDF file is fine [ http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/ehp116pa62pdf.pdf ], but the HTML version on the EHP journal website has Essex's nonsensical new graph in twice - including in our letter instead of our Tension graph from their Table 2 data.
We are contacting EHP today. So, the print version and the PDF are fine, but the HTML one that you come to first makes us look very silly. Probably just a web error by EHP staff, but very frustrating.
Alasdair
--------
EHP publish Powerwatch response to the Essex Study
http://tinyurl.com/295un6
Essex Study Examined: The Publicised Conclusions are NOT Supported by the Results
http://www.mastsanity.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=160&Itemid=70
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Essex+study
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Essex+study
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=EHS
http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/d8cf6a5c1d468737
The PDF file is fine [ http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/ehp116pa62pdf.pdf ], but the HTML version on the EHP journal website has Essex's nonsensical new graph in twice - including in our letter instead of our Tension graph from their Table 2 data.
We are contacting EHP today. So, the print version and the PDF are fine, but the HTML one that you come to first makes us look very silly. Probably just a web error by EHP staff, but very frustrating.
Alasdair
--------
EHP publish Powerwatch response to the Essex Study
http://tinyurl.com/295un6
Essex Study Examined: The Publicised Conclusions are NOT Supported by the Results
http://www.mastsanity.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=160&Itemid=70
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Essex+study
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Essex+study
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=EHS
Starmail - 26. Jan, 10:17
