Ashcroft: al-kay-duh's gonna get you
Wednesday, May 26, 2004
(excerpt)
It is sincerely puzzling. How does Ashcroft know al-Qaeda's "plans for an attack on America were 90 percent complete" and yet he cannot hunt 'em down and smoke 'em out? "The intelligence does not contain specifics such as timing, method or place of an attack. But officials say it is backed with greater corroboration than usual, including information that operatives may already be in the United States," reports the usual suspect, the Associated Bush Ministry of Propaganda Press.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040526/D82QGFJO7.html
"The ominous warning returns the nation's attention to terrorism, the issue that President Bush has highlighted as a central theme of his re-election campaign, after intense focus on other subjects like prisoner abuses in Iraq. Bush has lost ground in the polls, falling in approval ratings to the lowest point of his presidency."
Indeed, our attention has wandered to subjects the Bushites don't want us to think about -- the Geneva Convention, mass murder on a grand scale, the fact 9/11 will be paved over with a few tons of white paint, and the rampant criminality of government and corporations.
"Ashcroft said the withdrawal of Spanish troops from Iraq due to the political repercussions of the train bombings could lead al-Qaida to attempt to influence U.S. politics."
In other words, because the Spanish people are outraged and sickened by what Bush is doing in Iraq Americans may have to suffer terrorist attacks.
"After the March 11 attack in Madrid, an al Qaida spokesman announced that 90% of the arrangements for an attack on the United States were complete," said Ashcroft.
I'd like to know where this so-called "al Qaida spokesman" made his announcement. If Ashcroft identified an al-kay-duh spokesman, why didn't the FBI or the CIA arrest or kill him? Is it because there was no "spokesman" per se, just more "chatter," maybe in a Yahoo! chat room? How is it Ashcroft knows "that 90% of the arrangements for an attack on the United States were complete"? Did al-kay-duh send Ashcroft a Powerpoint presentation? If Bush and Ashcroft know so much, why can't they arrest them?
These may sound like silly questions. And yet we are told this with absolutely no evidence, as if we are children who are expected to take Bush's word for it.
"Al Qaida may perceive that a large scale attack in the United States this summer or fall (autumn) would lead to similar consequences."
Just in time for the election, naturally.
Is Ashcroft saying that if al-kay-duh manages to pull off a terrorist attack the American will vote in a socialist government like they did in Spain? In Spain, at least, they are allowed to vote for socialists.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-4108657,00.html
Ashcroft trotted out an old al-kay-duh wanted poster.
http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2981709
In other words, attempt to round up the same old suspects -- or don't round them up because if they did there'd be nobody left to scare the American people with.
Of course, after Bush is re-appointed, there will be no need to scare people. Bush won't have the time because he will be busy attacking Syria and Iran, maybe Saudi Arabia.
and
Credible threat: Bush's plan to steal or postpone the election"
http://kurtnimmo.com/archives/00000134.html
Informant: VInce Bradley
(excerpt)
It is sincerely puzzling. How does Ashcroft know al-Qaeda's "plans for an attack on America were 90 percent complete" and yet he cannot hunt 'em down and smoke 'em out? "The intelligence does not contain specifics such as timing, method or place of an attack. But officials say it is backed with greater corroboration than usual, including information that operatives may already be in the United States," reports the usual suspect, the Associated Bush Ministry of Propaganda Press.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040526/D82QGFJO7.html
"The ominous warning returns the nation's attention to terrorism, the issue that President Bush has highlighted as a central theme of his re-election campaign, after intense focus on other subjects like prisoner abuses in Iraq. Bush has lost ground in the polls, falling in approval ratings to the lowest point of his presidency."
Indeed, our attention has wandered to subjects the Bushites don't want us to think about -- the Geneva Convention, mass murder on a grand scale, the fact 9/11 will be paved over with a few tons of white paint, and the rampant criminality of government and corporations.
"Ashcroft said the withdrawal of Spanish troops from Iraq due to the political repercussions of the train bombings could lead al-Qaida to attempt to influence U.S. politics."
In other words, because the Spanish people are outraged and sickened by what Bush is doing in Iraq Americans may have to suffer terrorist attacks.
"After the March 11 attack in Madrid, an al Qaida spokesman announced that 90% of the arrangements for an attack on the United States were complete," said Ashcroft.
I'd like to know where this so-called "al Qaida spokesman" made his announcement. If Ashcroft identified an al-kay-duh spokesman, why didn't the FBI or the CIA arrest or kill him? Is it because there was no "spokesman" per se, just more "chatter," maybe in a Yahoo! chat room? How is it Ashcroft knows "that 90% of the arrangements for an attack on the United States were complete"? Did al-kay-duh send Ashcroft a Powerpoint presentation? If Bush and Ashcroft know so much, why can't they arrest them?
These may sound like silly questions. And yet we are told this with absolutely no evidence, as if we are children who are expected to take Bush's word for it.
"Al Qaida may perceive that a large scale attack in the United States this summer or fall (autumn) would lead to similar consequences."
Just in time for the election, naturally.
Is Ashcroft saying that if al-kay-duh manages to pull off a terrorist attack the American will vote in a socialist government like they did in Spain? In Spain, at least, they are allowed to vote for socialists.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-4108657,00.html
Ashcroft trotted out an old al-kay-duh wanted poster.
http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2981709
In other words, attempt to round up the same old suspects -- or don't round them up because if they did there'd be nobody left to scare the American people with.
Of course, after Bush is re-appointed, there will be no need to scare people. Bush won't have the time because he will be busy attacking Syria and Iran, maybe Saudi Arabia.
and
Credible threat: Bush's plan to steal or postpone the election"
http://kurtnimmo.com/archives/00000134.html
Informant: VInce Bradley
Starmail - 27. Mai, 08:25
