Cancer 'to become bigger burden'
Starmail - 7. Feb, 14:19
7
Feb
2007
The dangers of electropollution
By JOY CARLSON Tuesday, February 6, 2007 6:07 AM PST
It is an invisible danger that has no sound or smell but is creating chaos with all of our cells. In less than two decades, one third of the global village has embraced this new technology, spawning the multi-million dollar wireless communications industry. From cell phones to hot spots to entire wireless cities, rarely has a technology so rapidly and so profoundly transformed the world. The explosion of wireless technology has brought with it a totally new form of dangerous radiation called electropollution. Humanity is now exposed to more than 100 million times more radiation than just two decades ago.
The 100 trillion cells of the body communicate with each other by subtle low electromagnetic signals as well as through chemical reactions. Continuous exposure to electromagnetic radiation can drastically distort and disrupt these cellular communications pathways, resulting in abnormal cellular metabolism and eventually disease. Electropollution profoundly compromises the normal intercellular communication of the body. Cell function deteriorates, cell membranes harden, causing a shutdown of the cells. Now nutrients cannot get in and toxins cannot get out. Over time this leads to toxin and free radical buildup, genetic mutation, premature aging, illness and disease.
So picture this... it’s a typical morning in a Starbucks equipped with wireless Internet. You see three people involved in cell phone conversations, one sending a text message from a PDA and two surfing the Internet on laptops. Each device is transmitting to the antenna installed in the back of the store, which in turn is transmitting out. At each point the signal gets an electronic push from the device to get it going. This push, like a boat being accelerated through water, creates a wake called a near-field plume. This plume is sending out lots of radiation. Homes, wireless offices, schools, hospitals and most every workplace are now filled with cell phones, laptops, wireless networks, game stations, iPods. With the increasing world of wireless technology our world is now being blanketed with a dense fog of plumes and beams. As we work, learn, sleep and play in these environments and whether we personally use these gadgets or not, our cells are being bombarded and our cellular function is being compromised.
The most vulnerable are the children. Their cells are still growing and are filled with more fluid, thus the radiation can penetrate much faster into their cells. Disney got in the game big time recently with offers of family plans and a kid starter plans targeted to 8-to-12 year-olds. An 8-year-old child who gets a cell phone will by age 28 have used a cell phone for longer than anyone to date. Consider this: In 1970, one out of 10,000 children were diagnosed with autism. Last year, one in 166 children were diagnosed with autism. Many scientists and some doctors are now trying to get the word out that we are now starting to see genetic damage that is weakening our children’s cells, thus causing many more health challenges such as autism.
The health challenges coming from our continual exposure to electrical pollution is becoming a worldwide concern. In Europe in May, a movie is coming out showing the public about the health problems that are increasing every day with the increasing use of the electronic and wireless age, and will be here in the U.S. at the end of summer. The good news is science and medicine have experience with toxic exposure and have developed a “gold standard” for dealing with these types of problems called the public health paradigm. The paradigm always encompasses primary, secondary and tertiary interventions. Primary addresses the cause of the problem and is best accomplished by reducing or canceling out exposure. Secondary deals with the symptoms of the problem, of which the most significant is disrupted intercellular communication. Tertiary deals with stopping the problem and keeping the symptoms from coming back.
There will be a talk about this enormous problem that is affecting everyone on planet earth on Feb. 8 at the Elks Lodge at 7 p.m. Please join us and bring your questions.
(Carlson lives in Napa.)
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/02/06/opinion/commentary/doc45c88cf3f0611207096701.txt
Informant: Martin Weatherall
--------
Perhaps we can add some more comments to this?
Mark G.
--------
Auroville apparently has an article in their Newsletter under # News & Notes No. 181 of March 3rd, 2007
http://www.auroville.org/ on p. 9 titled "The Dangers of electropollution."
The dangers of electropollution (February 6, 2007)- By JOY CARLSON (Submitted by Ricardo)
From: http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/sharebook/927015523?share_type=blog
It is an invisible danger that has no sound or smell but is creating chaos with all of our cells. In less than two decades, one third of the global village has embraced this new technology, spawning the multi-million dollar wireless communications industry. From cell phones to hot spots to entire wireless cities, rarely has a technology so rapidly and so profoundly transformed the world. The explosion of wireless technology has brought with it a totally new form of dangerous radia- tion called electropollution. Humanity is now exposed to more than 100 million times more radiation than just two dec- ades ago.
The 100 trillion cells of the body communicate with each other by subtle low electromagnetic signals as well as through chemical reactions. Continuous exposure to electromagnetic radiation can drastically distort and disrupt these cellular communications pathways, resulting in abnormal cellular metabolism and eventually disease. Electropollution profoundly compromises the normal intercellular communication of the body. Cell function deteriorates, cell membranes harden, causing a shutdown of the cells. Now nutrients cannot get in and toxins cannot get out. Over time this leads to toxin and free radical build-up, genetic mutation, premature aging, illness and disease.
So picture this... it's a typical morning in a Starbucks equipped with wireless Internet. You see three people involved in cell phone conversations, one sending a text message from a PDA and two surfing the Internet on laptops. Each device is transmitting to the antenna installed in the back of the store, which in turn is transmitting out. At each point the signal gets an electronic push from the device to get it going. This push, like a boat being accelerated through water, creates a wake called a near-field plume. This plume is sending out lots of radiation. Homes, wireless offices, schools, hospitals and almost every workplace are now filled with cell phones, laptops, wireless networks, game stations, iPods. With the increasing world of wireless technology our world is now being blanketed with a dense fog of plumes and beams. As we work, learn, sleep and play in these environments and whether we personally use these gadgets or not, our cells are being bombarded and our cellular function is being compromised.
The most vulnerable are the children. Their cells are still growing and are filled with more fluid, thus the radiation can penetrate much faster into their cells. Disney got in the game big time recently with offers of family plans and a kid starter plans targeted to 8-to-12 year-olds. An 8-year-old child who gets a cell phone will by age 28 have used a cell phone for longer than anyone to date. Consider this: In 1970, one out of 10,000 children was diagnosed with autism. Last year, one in 166 children was diagnosed with autism. Many scientists and some doctors are now trying to get the word out that we are now starting to see genetic damage that is weakening our children's cells, thus causing many more health challenges such as autism.
The health challenges coming from our continual exposure to electrical pollution is becoming a worldwide concern. In Europe in May, a movie is coming out showing the public about the health problems that are increasing every day with the increasing use of the electronic and wireless age, and will be here in the U.S. at the end of summer. The good news is science and medicine have experience with toxic exposure and have developed a "gold standard" for dealing with these types of problems called the public health paradigm. The paradigm always encompasses primary, secondary and tertiary interventions. Primary addresses the cause of the problem and is best accomplished by reducing or cancelling out exposure. Secondary deals with the symptoms of the problem, of which the most significant is disrupted intercellular communication. Tertiary deals with stopping the problem and keeping the symptoms from coming back.
kind regards,
Art Kab
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electropollution
It is an invisible danger that has no sound or smell but is creating chaos with all of our cells. In less than two decades, one third of the global village has embraced this new technology, spawning the multi-million dollar wireless communications industry. From cell phones to hot spots to entire wireless cities, rarely has a technology so rapidly and so profoundly transformed the world. The explosion of wireless technology has brought with it a totally new form of dangerous radiation called electropollution. Humanity is now exposed to more than 100 million times more radiation than just two decades ago.
The 100 trillion cells of the body communicate with each other by subtle low electromagnetic signals as well as through chemical reactions. Continuous exposure to electromagnetic radiation can drastically distort and disrupt these cellular communications pathways, resulting in abnormal cellular metabolism and eventually disease. Electropollution profoundly compromises the normal intercellular communication of the body. Cell function deteriorates, cell membranes harden, causing a shutdown of the cells. Now nutrients cannot get in and toxins cannot get out. Over time this leads to toxin and free radical buildup, genetic mutation, premature aging, illness and disease.
So picture this... it’s a typical morning in a Starbucks equipped with wireless Internet. You see three people involved in cell phone conversations, one sending a text message from a PDA and two surfing the Internet on laptops. Each device is transmitting to the antenna installed in the back of the store, which in turn is transmitting out. At each point the signal gets an electronic push from the device to get it going. This push, like a boat being accelerated through water, creates a wake called a near-field plume. This plume is sending out lots of radiation. Homes, wireless offices, schools, hospitals and most every workplace are now filled with cell phones, laptops, wireless networks, game stations, iPods. With the increasing world of wireless technology our world is now being blanketed with a dense fog of plumes and beams. As we work, learn, sleep and play in these environments and whether we personally use these gadgets or not, our cells are being bombarded and our cellular function is being compromised.
The most vulnerable are the children. Their cells are still growing and are filled with more fluid, thus the radiation can penetrate much faster into their cells. Disney got in the game big time recently with offers of family plans and a kid starter plans targeted to 8-to-12 year-olds. An 8-year-old child who gets a cell phone will by age 28 have used a cell phone for longer than anyone to date. Consider this: In 1970, one out of 10,000 children were diagnosed with autism. Last year, one in 166 children were diagnosed with autism. Many scientists and some doctors are now trying to get the word out that we are now starting to see genetic damage that is weakening our children’s cells, thus causing many more health challenges such as autism.
The health challenges coming from our continual exposure to electrical pollution is becoming a worldwide concern. In Europe in May, a movie is coming out showing the public about the health problems that are increasing every day with the increasing use of the electronic and wireless age, and will be here in the U.S. at the end of summer. The good news is science and medicine have experience with toxic exposure and have developed a “gold standard” for dealing with these types of problems called the public health paradigm. The paradigm always encompasses primary, secondary and tertiary interventions. Primary addresses the cause of the problem and is best accomplished by reducing or canceling out exposure. Secondary deals with the symptoms of the problem, of which the most significant is disrupted intercellular communication. Tertiary deals with stopping the problem and keeping the symptoms from coming back.
There will be a talk about this enormous problem that is affecting everyone on planet earth on Feb. 8 at the Elks Lodge at 7 p.m. Please join us and bring your questions.
(Carlson lives in Napa.)
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2007/02/06/opinion/commentary/doc45c88cf3f0611207096701.txt
Informant: Martin Weatherall
--------
Perhaps we can add some more comments to this?
Mark G.
--------
Auroville apparently has an article in their Newsletter under # News & Notes No. 181 of March 3rd, 2007
http://www.auroville.org/ on p. 9 titled "The Dangers of electropollution."
The dangers of electropollution (February 6, 2007)- By JOY CARLSON (Submitted by Ricardo)
From: http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/sharebook/927015523?share_type=blog
It is an invisible danger that has no sound or smell but is creating chaos with all of our cells. In less than two decades, one third of the global village has embraced this new technology, spawning the multi-million dollar wireless communications industry. From cell phones to hot spots to entire wireless cities, rarely has a technology so rapidly and so profoundly transformed the world. The explosion of wireless technology has brought with it a totally new form of dangerous radia- tion called electropollution. Humanity is now exposed to more than 100 million times more radiation than just two dec- ades ago.
The 100 trillion cells of the body communicate with each other by subtle low electromagnetic signals as well as through chemical reactions. Continuous exposure to electromagnetic radiation can drastically distort and disrupt these cellular communications pathways, resulting in abnormal cellular metabolism and eventually disease. Electropollution profoundly compromises the normal intercellular communication of the body. Cell function deteriorates, cell membranes harden, causing a shutdown of the cells. Now nutrients cannot get in and toxins cannot get out. Over time this leads to toxin and free radical build-up, genetic mutation, premature aging, illness and disease.
So picture this... it's a typical morning in a Starbucks equipped with wireless Internet. You see three people involved in cell phone conversations, one sending a text message from a PDA and two surfing the Internet on laptops. Each device is transmitting to the antenna installed in the back of the store, which in turn is transmitting out. At each point the signal gets an electronic push from the device to get it going. This push, like a boat being accelerated through water, creates a wake called a near-field plume. This plume is sending out lots of radiation. Homes, wireless offices, schools, hospitals and almost every workplace are now filled with cell phones, laptops, wireless networks, game stations, iPods. With the increasing world of wireless technology our world is now being blanketed with a dense fog of plumes and beams. As we work, learn, sleep and play in these environments and whether we personally use these gadgets or not, our cells are being bombarded and our cellular function is being compromised.
The most vulnerable are the children. Their cells are still growing and are filled with more fluid, thus the radiation can penetrate much faster into their cells. Disney got in the game big time recently with offers of family plans and a kid starter plans targeted to 8-to-12 year-olds. An 8-year-old child who gets a cell phone will by age 28 have used a cell phone for longer than anyone to date. Consider this: In 1970, one out of 10,000 children was diagnosed with autism. Last year, one in 166 children was diagnosed with autism. Many scientists and some doctors are now trying to get the word out that we are now starting to see genetic damage that is weakening our children's cells, thus causing many more health challenges such as autism.
The health challenges coming from our continual exposure to electrical pollution is becoming a worldwide concern. In Europe in May, a movie is coming out showing the public about the health problems that are increasing every day with the increasing use of the electronic and wireless age, and will be here in the U.S. at the end of summer. The good news is science and medicine have experience with toxic exposure and have developed a "gold standard" for dealing with these types of problems called the public health paradigm. The paradigm always encompasses primary, secondary and tertiary interventions. Primary addresses the cause of the problem and is best accomplished by reducing or cancelling out exposure. Secondary deals with the symptoms of the problem, of which the most significant is disrupted intercellular communication. Tertiary deals with stopping the problem and keeping the symptoms from coming back.
kind regards,
Art Kab
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electropollution
Starmail - 7. Feb, 08:06
6
Feb
2007
Krebsrisiko durch Handys: Mediziner und Techniker geben strikte Entwarnung
lt. "Standard"
Dr. Erwin Tripes
Oberdörfl 47
9072 Ludmannsdorf
Leserbrief
Haben die beiden Redakteure ungenau recherchiert oder sind sie nur der Mobilfunklobby auf den Leim gegangen?
Zu ihrem im Betreff erwähnten Zeitungsartikel:
1) Ein Handy im Stand-By-betrieb strahlt nicht. (angebl. Zitat v. Univ.Prof.i.R. Dr. Bonek). Die Aussage ist falsch. Befindet sich der Benützer statisch in einer Funkzelle, dann sendet (strahlt) das Handy in regelmäßigen Intervallen, um sich beim optimalsten Sender zu melden. Die Sende(Strahlungs)häufigkeit richtet sich dabei je nach Betreiber/Provider und technischer Unterstützung . Bewegt sich hingegen der Benützer mit dem Handy etwa auf einer Autobahn dann sendet (strahlt) es jedes Mal bei der Ortung eines als sendeoptimal festgestellten Mobilfunksenders, also besonders häufig. Diese Strahlung wird obendrein im Auto, sofern keine Außenantenne für das Handy vorhanden ist, wegen des Faradaykäfigeffektes des Autos besonders stark, weil eine Metallkarosserie gegen äußere elektrische Felder abschirmt und dieses Hindernis überwunden werden muß.
Man kann die jeweilige Strahlungshäufigkeit ganz einfach selbst messen, wenn sich das Handy neben einem eingeschalteten Radio befindet, weil dann jeweils der Empfang je nach Sendehäufigkeit beeinträchtigt wird. (Einschlägige Fachinformation eines Assistenten /Name bekannt/ an der TU Wien v. 6. 2. 2007;).
2) Mobilfunkstrahlung löse keine Krebsgefahr aus. (angebl. Aussagen von Univ. Prof. Dr. Ludwig und Univ. Prof. Dr. Grisold). Diese Beschwichtigungsaussagen sind schlicht unverantwortlich.
2004 hat Prof. Dr. Ludwig jedenfalls noch in einem vom sogen. Wissenschaftlichen Beirat Funk geschalteten PR-Artikel ausgeführt, daß aufgrund der bis 1995 durchgeführten Studien (wie aktuell!) ein möglicher Zusammenhang erhöhter Tumor(Krebs)inzidenz nicht auszuschließen ist ("Die Presse" v. 6.11.2004).
Die einschlägigen Warnungen der Österr. Ärztekammer, deren Protest gegen die einseitige Verabschiedung der Önorm betr. zulässige Strahlungsbelastung durch das Normeninstitut, die Warnung des Gesundheitsministeriums sowie die einschlägigen fachkompetenten Aussagen des Umweltarztes und Spezialisten der Österr. Ärztekammer, Dr. Gerd Oberfeld, bleiben daher konsequent unerwähnt und/oder sind den Redakteuren nicht bekannt.
Allen der immer zahlreicher werdenden Studien, die nicht von der Mobilfunklobby beauftragt wurden, oder die zu für sie unerwünschten Ergebnissen führen, wird regelmäßig die wissenschaftlich abgesprochen.
3) Ein kurzer Blick auf die erwähnten Persönlichkeiten:
3.1. Univ. Prof. Dr. Ludwig´s zitierter angeblichen Aussage wurde bereits oben seine szt. Warnaussage gegenübergestellt.
3.2. Univ. Prof. i.R. Dr. Bonek arbeitet beim "Forschungszentrum Telekommunikation Wien" (FTW). Hier haben sich drei Institute der TU Wien und insgesamt 15 österreichische Unternehmen zu einer gemeinsamen Initiative zusammengefunden. und wollen vorhandene Kompetenzen in der Schlüsseltechnologie Telekommunikation bündeln und weiter ausbauen (s. die einschl. Website).
Es darf geraten werden, ob darunter auch Mobilfunkfirmen aufscheinen.
Könnte man also insgesamt davon ausgehen, daß Prof. i. R. Dr. Bonek gegenüber der Mobilfunklobby eher freundlich eingestellt ist?
3.2. Univ. Prof. Dr. Grisold argumentiert nahezu wortgleich wie die "Experten " des Forums Mobilkommunikation, der Interessengemeinschaft der Mobilfunkbetreiber, wonach alle dieser Lobby nicht genehmen Studien ganz einfach als nicht wissenschaftlich abgetan werden und obendrein schon gar kein erhöhtes Tumorrisiko bestehe. Freilich setzt er sich dabei nicht nur in Widerspruch zu seinem ersterwähnten Kollegen und kennt offensichtlich nicht die zahlreichen epidemiologischen Studien, die ein Gesundheitsgefährdungspotential nachweisen, von den diversen Warnungen, wie oben erwähnt, ganz zu schweigen.
Auf eigene einschlägige Forschungsarbeiten zur nichtionisierenden Strahlung kann dieser Nervenarzt offenbar nicht verweisen.
Für die Redakteure wäre es auch ganz interessant gewesen, über den Tellerrand Österreichs hinauszuschauen, wie etwa andere Länder, z.B. Israel, Spanien etc. mit diesem Gefahrenpotential umgehen.
Dr. Erwin Tripes
--------
Ärzte und Mobilfunk
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/408385/
Ärzteappelle gegen Mobilfunk
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1064751/
Ärztekammern und Mobilfunk
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1104181/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Krebsrisiko+durch+Handys
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Oberfeld
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Inzidenz
Dr. Erwin Tripes
Oberdörfl 47
9072 Ludmannsdorf
Leserbrief
Haben die beiden Redakteure ungenau recherchiert oder sind sie nur der Mobilfunklobby auf den Leim gegangen?
Zu ihrem im Betreff erwähnten Zeitungsartikel:
1) Ein Handy im Stand-By-betrieb strahlt nicht. (angebl. Zitat v. Univ.Prof.i.R. Dr. Bonek). Die Aussage ist falsch. Befindet sich der Benützer statisch in einer Funkzelle, dann sendet (strahlt) das Handy in regelmäßigen Intervallen, um sich beim optimalsten Sender zu melden. Die Sende(Strahlungs)häufigkeit richtet sich dabei je nach Betreiber/Provider und technischer Unterstützung . Bewegt sich hingegen der Benützer mit dem Handy etwa auf einer Autobahn dann sendet (strahlt) es jedes Mal bei der Ortung eines als sendeoptimal festgestellten Mobilfunksenders, also besonders häufig. Diese Strahlung wird obendrein im Auto, sofern keine Außenantenne für das Handy vorhanden ist, wegen des Faradaykäfigeffektes des Autos besonders stark, weil eine Metallkarosserie gegen äußere elektrische Felder abschirmt und dieses Hindernis überwunden werden muß.
Man kann die jeweilige Strahlungshäufigkeit ganz einfach selbst messen, wenn sich das Handy neben einem eingeschalteten Radio befindet, weil dann jeweils der Empfang je nach Sendehäufigkeit beeinträchtigt wird. (Einschlägige Fachinformation eines Assistenten /Name bekannt/ an der TU Wien v. 6. 2. 2007;).
2) Mobilfunkstrahlung löse keine Krebsgefahr aus. (angebl. Aussagen von Univ. Prof. Dr. Ludwig und Univ. Prof. Dr. Grisold). Diese Beschwichtigungsaussagen sind schlicht unverantwortlich.
2004 hat Prof. Dr. Ludwig jedenfalls noch in einem vom sogen. Wissenschaftlichen Beirat Funk geschalteten PR-Artikel ausgeführt, daß aufgrund der bis 1995 durchgeführten Studien (wie aktuell!) ein möglicher Zusammenhang erhöhter Tumor(Krebs)inzidenz nicht auszuschließen ist ("Die Presse" v. 6.11.2004).
Die einschlägigen Warnungen der Österr. Ärztekammer, deren Protest gegen die einseitige Verabschiedung der Önorm betr. zulässige Strahlungsbelastung durch das Normeninstitut, die Warnung des Gesundheitsministeriums sowie die einschlägigen fachkompetenten Aussagen des Umweltarztes und Spezialisten der Österr. Ärztekammer, Dr. Gerd Oberfeld, bleiben daher konsequent unerwähnt und/oder sind den Redakteuren nicht bekannt.
Allen der immer zahlreicher werdenden Studien, die nicht von der Mobilfunklobby beauftragt wurden, oder die zu für sie unerwünschten Ergebnissen führen, wird regelmäßig die wissenschaftlich abgesprochen.
3) Ein kurzer Blick auf die erwähnten Persönlichkeiten:
3.1. Univ. Prof. Dr. Ludwig´s zitierter angeblichen Aussage wurde bereits oben seine szt. Warnaussage gegenübergestellt.
3.2. Univ. Prof. i.R. Dr. Bonek arbeitet beim "Forschungszentrum Telekommunikation Wien" (FTW). Hier haben sich drei Institute der TU Wien und insgesamt 15 österreichische Unternehmen zu einer gemeinsamen Initiative zusammengefunden. und wollen vorhandene Kompetenzen in der Schlüsseltechnologie Telekommunikation bündeln und weiter ausbauen (s. die einschl. Website).
Es darf geraten werden, ob darunter auch Mobilfunkfirmen aufscheinen.
Könnte man also insgesamt davon ausgehen, daß Prof. i. R. Dr. Bonek gegenüber der Mobilfunklobby eher freundlich eingestellt ist?
3.2. Univ. Prof. Dr. Grisold argumentiert nahezu wortgleich wie die "Experten " des Forums Mobilkommunikation, der Interessengemeinschaft der Mobilfunkbetreiber, wonach alle dieser Lobby nicht genehmen Studien ganz einfach als nicht wissenschaftlich abgetan werden und obendrein schon gar kein erhöhtes Tumorrisiko bestehe. Freilich setzt er sich dabei nicht nur in Widerspruch zu seinem ersterwähnten Kollegen und kennt offensichtlich nicht die zahlreichen epidemiologischen Studien, die ein Gesundheitsgefährdungspotential nachweisen, von den diversen Warnungen, wie oben erwähnt, ganz zu schweigen.
Auf eigene einschlägige Forschungsarbeiten zur nichtionisierenden Strahlung kann dieser Nervenarzt offenbar nicht verweisen.
Für die Redakteure wäre es auch ganz interessant gewesen, über den Tellerrand Österreichs hinauszuschauen, wie etwa andere Länder, z.B. Israel, Spanien etc. mit diesem Gefahrenpotential umgehen.
Dr. Erwin Tripes
--------
Ärzte und Mobilfunk
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/408385/
Ärzteappelle gegen Mobilfunk
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1064751/
Ärztekammern und Mobilfunk
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1104181/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Krebsrisiko+durch+Handys
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Oberfeld
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Inzidenz
Starmail - 6. Feb, 18:58
Importance of an intact pineal gland and melatonin in cancer prevention
I have included another scientific study which shows the importance of having an intact pineal gland and adequate levels of pineally derived hormones in order to fight cancer.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/importance_of_pineal_gland_and_melatonin_in_cancer_prevention.doc
This article should be usefull to demonstrate, again the link between emf damage and the inability to fight off infections, and the need for supplimentation. Thank you for publishing my other coments.
G. Goldberg, MD
--------
Would you put your head in a Microwave Oven
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1604071/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Goldberg
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Melatonin
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=emf+damage
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/importance_of_pineal_gland_and_melatonin_in_cancer_prevention.doc
This article should be usefull to demonstrate, again the link between emf damage and the inability to fight off infections, and the need for supplimentation. Thank you for publishing my other coments.
G. Goldberg, MD
--------
Would you put your head in a Microwave Oven
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1604071/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Goldberg
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Melatonin
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=emf+damage
Starmail - 6. Feb, 09:40
