12
Mai
2004

Hilfsorganisation: Kindern in Irak droht humanitäre Katastrophe

London - Kindern in Irak droht nach Ansicht der Hilfsorganisation Child Victims of War eine humanitäre Katastrophe. Die Lage sei "weit schlimmer" als zu Zeiten der internationalen Sanktionen gegen Irak vor dem Krieg, sagte die Leiterin der Hilfsorganisation, Jo Baker, am Mittwoch in London. "Wenn es schlimmer ist als Sanktionen und Saddam, dann sprechen wir wirklich von einer humanitären Katastrophe". Jedes Kind sei auf irgendeine Weise traumatisiert. Seit Beginn der Besatzung durch die Koalitionstruppen sei mit Ausnahme von Lieferungen durch regierungsunabhängige Organisationen nicht die geringste Menge an Medikamenten in irakischen Krankenhäusern angekommen. (AFP)

12.05.04, 21:22 Uhr


Quelle:
http://www.netscape.de/index.jsp?sg=News_Newsticker&cid=1226491

GLOBAL WARMING IGNITES TEMPERS, EVEN IN A MOVIE

By Sharon Waxman
New York Times
May 12, 2004

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/12/movies/12AFTE.html

LOS ANGELES - Any studio that makes a $125 million movie about global warming is courting controversy. But 20th Century Fox does not seem to have fully anticipated the political firestorm being whipped up by its film "The Day After Tomorrow http://www.thedayaftertomorrow.com/."

Environmental advocates are using the film's release, scheduled for May 28, as an opening to slam the Bush administration, whose global warming policies they oppose. Industry groups in Washington are lobbying on Capitol Hill to make sure the film does not help passage of a bill limiting carbon-dioxide emissions, which many scientists say contribute to global warming.

Meanwhile on Tuesday Fox sparred with celebrity advocates who complained that they had been disinvited to the movie's premiere, only to be reinvited later in the day.

All this is occurring as the entertainment industry is on the defensive, with television networks acknowledging they are censoring themselves to avoid being accused of promoting indecency and the Walt Disney Company distancing itself from a film critical of the administration's foreign policy.

In a telephone news conference on Tuesday former Vice President Al Gore compared the exaggeration of the film's premise to the approach of the Bush administration to global warming.

"There are two sets of fiction to deal with," Mr. Gore said. "One is the movie, the other is the Bush administration's presentation of global warming." He accused the White House of "trying to convince people there's no real problem, no degree of certainty from scientists about the issue."

The news conference was organized by moveon.org, an Internet-based liberal advocacy group.

Dana Perino, the spokeswoman for the Council on Environmental Quality, which coordinates environmental policy for the White House, said the administration's policies would reduce global warming threats without destroying jobs.

"While they're working on movies," she said, "we are advancing our
scientific knowledge, developing transformational energy technologies and reducing the greenhouse-gas intensity of the American economy."

Early this week Laurie David and Robert Kennedy Jr., vocal anti-Bush environmentalists, said that Fox had withdrawn their invitation to the film's premiere in Manhattan but later called to reconfirm the invitation.

In between, a Fox spokesman said the studio had arranged a special screening for them and Mr. Gore a day before the premiere, and another screening for scientists.

Ultimately Fox chalked the invitation issue up to miscommunication.

Invited or not, Ms. David, a prominent member of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said Fox rejected an offer to have the premiere serve as a fund-raiser for any one of numerous environmental groups. (Studios often use premieres as charitable fund-raisers.)

Before learning from Jim Gianopulos, Fox Studio's chairman, that her invitation to the premiere had been reinstated, Ms. David said: "Fox is completely disinterested in raising any consciousness. In fact they're bending over backward to disassociate themselves from the environmental community."

She continued, "Any connections to anything political they're afraid will hurt the opening."

A Fox spokesman denied any attempt to play down the movie's environmental message or to distance the film from activists. "Clearly the movie is entertainment, but all of this activity creates additional interest, making it more topical," Jeffrey Godsick, the spokesman, said. "It's been wonderful."

Directed by Roland Emmerich, "The Day After Tomorrow" imagines a
catastrophic climate change and the rapid arrival of a new ice age caused by global warming. Massive storms destroy Western Europe, Manhattan is covered in a sheet of ice, and tornadoes blast Los Angeles.

The film's trailer shows Dennis Quaid, who plays a paleoclimatologist, warning the vice president ‹ played by an actor who closely resembles Vice President Dick Cheney ‹ that "if we don't act now, it will be too late."

Fox, which financed the big-budget movie, is part of News Corporation, whose chairman and chief executive, Rupert Murdoch, is a strong supporter of Mr. Bush. Mr. Godsick said he did not know if Mr. Murdoch had seen the film.

Mr. Kennedy, an environmental lawyer, said on Tuesday that Fox's attitude toward environmentalists seemed comparable to other instances of self-censorship by media corporations in a politically charged climate.

"This is part of an unfortunate pattern that fits in with CBS canceling the Reagan mini-series and Disney refusing to distribute Michael Moore's film" "Fahrenheit 9/11," he said in an interview before his invitation to the premiere was reinstated. He was referring to recent controversies over political considerations affecting entertainment decisions.

"This is like back to the 1950's and 60's, where people in Hollywood were scared to death of Joe McCarthy, censoring artists, not distributing films, blackballing people," he said. "It's a classic thing that you're supposed to avoid in democracy, the merger of state and corporate power."

Mr. Godsick said that Fox, which plans to spend about $50 million to market the film, was not keeping any interested party at arm's length. The marketing strategy had no connection to the other recent episodes in Hollywood, he said.

"Look, different groups have different agendas," Mr. Godsick said. "Some are to politicize things, some are to go beyond that. The real power of the movie is to raise consciousness on the issue. That's a win-win for everybody."

The studio's Web site promoting the film, thedayaftertomorrow.com, does not include the words "global warming" in its synopsis of the story. But the site does include a section labeled "What can you do?" with a link to Future Forests, a nonprofit British group that promotes limiting carbon-dioxide emissions.

Mr. Emmerich ensured that the movie production participated in CarbonNeutral, a program that involves buying credits to offset carbon-dioxide emissions created during the movie's filming, Mr. Godsick said.

Fox marketing executives have expressed concern that the movie not be perceived as a scientific "treatise," as one executive put it, emphasizing that its appeal is as an action-adventure, roller-coaster-style experience.

Moveon.org said it planned to have thousands of volunteers handing out leaflets about global warming outside theaters when the movie opens. Meanwhile in Washington a coalition of industry groups, including the National Association of Manufacturers, is working to make sure that the movie does not contribute to the passage of a bill limiting carbon-dioxide emissions.


THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW WEBSITE:
http://www.thedayaftertomorrow.com/index.php

PREVIOUS NHNE ARTICLES:

NASA CURBS COMMENTS ON ICE AGE DISASTER MOVIE (4/26/2004):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/7111

SCIENTISTS RIDICULE ICE AGE CLAIMS (4/17/2004):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/7091

HOLLYWOOD DISASTER FILM SET TO TURN HEAT ON BUSH (3/15/2004):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/6912


Informant: NHNE

Omega-News Collection 13. May 04

Omega-News Collection 12. May 04
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/216995/

RED CROSS: IRAQ ABUSE WIDESPREAD, ROUTINE
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/215861/

A.N.S.W.E.R. FILES FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST FOR THE RELEASE OF THE WITHHELD EVIDENCE OF ABUSE OF PRISONERS
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/217061/

--------

Amnesty Iraq Report in Full
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCAMA-News/files/Amnesty.on.Iraq.pdf

At-a-glance: Amnesty Iraq report
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3703213.stm

Informant: ItalysBadBoy

--------

US forces battle Iraq resistance; children among dead
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/172558_iraq08.html

Rumsfeld: Worst of Iraqi prisoner abuse yet to be seen
http://www.lowellsun.com/Stories/0,1413,105~4746~2135336,00.html

Is the War Party embarrassed yet?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/gregory/gregory8.html

"Sometimes they pretended to kill me"
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/05/08/torture/

Incompetence or sabotage?
http://www.cato.org/dailys/05-08-04.html


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

--------

This torture started at the very top
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1209555,00.html

Beatings and Humiliation Routine
http://tinyurl.com/27sks

A prisoner recalls the abuse
http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?file=518368.html

West's double standards
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1209672,00.html

Iraq Insurgents Defy U.S., Taunt Bush Over Jail Abuse
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=5076284

Soldiers Back in U.S. Tell of More Iraqi Abuses
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=5068071

David Kay, says he warned U.S. officials of Iraqi prisoner abuse
http://tinyurl.com/2u292

Shame at the front line
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/05/06/1083635279507.html

Iraqi inmate: 'Treated like dogs'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3689371.stm

"I am your God”
http://blog.newstandardnews.net/iraqdispatches/archives/000332.html

Delta Force, Navy SEALs involved in abuse?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4917567

More torture at Camp Cropper detention centre at Baghdad airport
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/841A9F40-0DA5-4174-89D5-C8A70C3DAC15.htm

An illegal and immoral war
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6160.htm

Torture Is News But It's Not New
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6161.htm

Freedom Rider: White Supremacy in Iraq
http://www.blackcommentator.com/89/89_freedom_rider_iraq.html

Abuse common in U.S. prisons, activists say
http://tinyurl.com/2lyps
http://archive.aclu.org/news/n081997a.html
http://tinyurl.com/3ba2j
http://www.spr.org/en/news/pre2002/082601.html
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20030226.html
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6158.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1211509,00.html

Doctor Who Treated Thousands of GIs Wounded in Iraq: "Severest Form of Injuries I've Seen in My Career"
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/06/149259

Amnesty: Girl aged eight shot dead by British soldiers
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1214017,00.html
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1214030,00.html
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=520103
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1214021,00.html

I, too, was tortured in Abu Ghraib
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1214079,00.html
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/breaking/051104_vigilantejustice.html

"The Panama Deception"
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4078.htm

Brutality: the home truths
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1213841,00.html

Just Trust Us
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/11/opinion/11KRUG.html

Across America, War Means Jobs
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/washpost/20040511/ts_washpost/a15952_2004may10


From Information Clearing House

--------

Of Rumor and Reality
http://www.fpif.org/commentary/2004/0404rumorreality.html

The Psychology of War: Iraq and Vietnam
http://www.fpif.org/commentary/2004/0404iraq-vietnam.html

Sorry, Mr. President, but Iraq looks a lot like Vietnam
http://www.fpif.org/commentary/2004/0404presidentvietnam.html

Neocons Aim Beyond Baghdad
http://www.fpif.org/commentary/2004/0404neocons.html

--------

Report: U.S. has lost Iraq
http://216.26.163.62/2004/ss_iraq_05_07.html


Informant: kevcross5

--------

USA: Pattern of brutality and cruelty -- war crimes at Abu Ghraib
http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/document.do?id=b04794edfe431d1885256e8d0051a241


Informant: NHNE

--------

Photo evidence exposes 9-11 frameup
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html


Informant: Planttrees

--------

Torture by the book
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1210574,00.html

Informant: Ozzy bin Oswald

Gentechnik: Venezuela will Aussaat transgener Pflanzen verbieten

Der venezolanische Präsident Hugo Chavez Frias hat ein Ausaatverbot gentechnisch veränderten Saatgutes auf venezolanischem Boden angekündigt - als evtl. stärkste Beschränkung für transgene Organismen in der westlichen Hemisphäre. Obwohl die genauen Detaills der künftigen Politik noch nicht veröffentlicht sind, soll es schnellstmöglich zu einem Vertragsabbruch mit Monsanto (Konzernbasis in den USA) kommen.

Die ganze Nachricht im Internet:

http://www.ngo-online.de/ganze_nachricht.php4?Nr=8445

GM maize growing 'needs review'

By Richard Black
BBC science correspondent

A US study reveals new evidence to show how genes from biotech crops can spread to nearby non-GM plant relatives.

The data comes from research on maize engineered to produce powerful toxins in its leaves and stems.

These substances, normally produced by bacteria, and are lethal to
insect pests that try to eat the maize plant.

But an Arizona-Texas team says the way the crop is grown in some
countries may lead to insects becoming resistant to the GM plant and pesticides.

This is the first time that gene flow has been documented in the context of a refuge Professor Bruce Tabashnik, University of Arizona

The research is reported in the journal Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences.

In the study paper, the scientists say guidelines on how to cultivate
some GM crops should now be revised.

Mating success

The work concerns Bt maize (corn). This crop has been modified to
incorporate genetic material from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt).

This makes the plant tissues toxic to insects such as the European corn borer, a significant pest that hides in the stalks of the plant, making it difficult to control with chemical sprays.

In the US and some other nations, Bt maize has to be grown alongside so-called "refuges" of conventional varieties - a strategy aimed at preventing the insects from becoming resistant to Bt.

The logic is simple: if rare, resistant insects do emerge from the GM
fields, their success will be restricted if they are breeding with
non-resistant pests on nearby fields. Their progeny are likely to die if they attack the modified maize.

But the new work shows that the Bt gene is finding its way into those refuge plants through pollen that is spreading tens of metres.

"[The refuge] is supposed to be toxin-free but in fact the seeds, that is the next generation - some produce the Bt toxin," Professor Bruce Tabashnik, from the University of Arizona Department of Entomology, told BBC News Online.

"This may increase the potential for some insects to become resistant." And this tolerance could also extend to Bt sprays as well.

Professor Tabashnik was involved in drawing up the current US guidelines on GM-free refuges, and his latest research is likely to lead to a major review within the US.

A number of other countries have similar regulations; and the finding could be relevant to other crops such as cotton in which the Bt modification has also been introduced.

Impact assessment

"[Contamination of non-GM plants] occurs at high levels near the Bt
maize and it declines as you move away from the Bt maize.

"And that allows us to infer that what's happening is there's pollen
moving from the Bt plants into the nearby refuge, and this is producing Bt toxin in the kernels of the plants in the refuge.

"This is the first time that gene flow has been documented in the
context of a refuge," Professor Tabashnik said.

"The guidelines need to be re-examined in the face of this new insight.

"The current thinking is that the refuges should be as close as possible to the Bt maize; and the reason for that is to encourage gene flow in the insects; in other words, mating between the non-resistant insects that come out of the refuge and the ones in the Bt fields which may have become resistant."

Commenting on the research, the UK campaign group GeneWatch said it demonstrated how little was still known about the environmental impact of GM crops.

"Bruce Tabashnik's work in this area is seminal, and so this study will I think be highly regarded and influential," said GeneWatch's Sue Mayer.

"It exposes how little we do know about the environmental impact of GM crops, and how much monitoring needs to be done. We keep hearing these statements about how it's all completely safe but really we need proper monitoring to find out."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/3703567.stm

Published: 2004/05/11 12:54:29 GMT

© BBC MMIV

For more information go to:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
http://oregon.uoregon.edu/%7Ecsundt/documents.htm
http://oregon.uoregon.edu/~csundt/documents.htm


Informant: Teresa Binstock

GM maize growing 'needs review'

By Richard Black
BBC science correspondent

A US study reveals new evidence to show how genes from biotech crops can spread to nearby non-GM plant relatives.

The data comes from research on maize engineered to produce powerful toxins in its leaves and stems.

These substances, normally produced by bacteria, and are lethal to
insect pests that try to eat the maize plant.

But an Arizona-Texas team says the way the crop is grown in some
countries may lead to insects becoming resistant to the GM plant and pesticides.

This is the first time that gene flow has been documented in the context of a refuge Professor Bruce Tabashnik, University of Arizona

The research is reported in the journal Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences.

In the study paper, the scientists say guidelines on how to cultivate
some GM crops should now be revised.

Mating success

The work concerns Bt maize (corn). This crop has been modified to
incorporate genetic material from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt).

This makes the plant tissues toxic to insects such as the European corn borer, a significant pest that hides in the stalks of the plant, making it difficult to control with chemical sprays.

In the US and some other nations, Bt maize has to be grown alongside so-called "refuges" of conventional varieties - a strategy aimed at preventing the insects from becoming resistant to Bt.

The logic is simple: if rare, resistant insects do emerge from the GM
fields, their success will be restricted if they are breeding with
non-resistant pests on nearby fields. Their progeny are likely to die if they attack the modified maize.

But the new work shows that the Bt gene is finding its way into those refuge plants through pollen that is spreading tens of metres.

"[The refuge] is supposed to be toxin-free but in fact the seeds, that is the next generation - some produce the Bt toxin," Professor Bruce Tabashnik, from the University of Arizona Department of Entomology, told BBC News Online.

"This may increase the potential for some insects to become resistant." And this tolerance could also extend to Bt sprays as well.

Professor Tabashnik was involved in drawing up the current US guidelines on GM-free refuges, and his latest research is likely to lead to a major review within the US.

A number of other countries have similar regulations; and the finding could be relevant to other crops such as cotton in which the Bt modification has also been introduced.

Impact assessment

"[Contamination of non-GM plants] occurs at high levels near the Bt
maize and it declines as you move away from the Bt maize.

"And that allows us to infer that what's happening is there's pollen
moving from the Bt plants into the nearby refuge, and this is producing Bt toxin in the kernels of the plants in the refuge.

"This is the first time that gene flow has been documented in the
context of a refuge," Professor Tabashnik said.

"The guidelines need to be re-examined in the face of this new insight.

"The current thinking is that the refuges should be as close as possible to the Bt maize; and the reason for that is to encourage gene flow in the insects; in other words, mating between the non-resistant insects that come out of the refuge and the ones in the Bt fields which may have become resistant."

Commenting on the research, the UK campaign group GeneWatch said it demonstrated how little was still known about the environmental impact of GM crops.

"Bruce Tabashnik's work in this area is seminal, and so this study will I think be highly regarded and influential," said GeneWatch's Sue Mayer.

"It exposes how little we do know about the environmental impact of GM crops, and how much monitoring needs to be done. We keep hearing these statements about how it's all completely safe but really we need proper monitoring to find out."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/3703567.stm

Published: 2004/05/11 12:54:29 GMT

© BBC MMIV

For more information go to:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
http://oregon.uoregon.edu/%7Ecsundt/documents.htm
http://oregon.uoregon.edu/~csundt/documents.htm

Norway opens whale-hunting season

Norway's whaling policy has attracted condemnation

Whaling vessels have left Norway for the Barents Sea to open this year's whale-hunting season, defying an international moratorium and protests.

The Norwegian government has set a quota of 670 minke whales for the season, which runs until 31 August.

The Scandinavian nation is the only country in the world that authorises whaling for commercial purposes.

Iceland and Japan are the only other nations to fish whales, though they claim to do so for scientific reasons.

National pride

Norway started commercial whaling again in 1993, despite an international ban on the practice seven years earlier.

It argues the hunt is needed to stop the whale population from growing so large that it devours huge stocks of fish. It says the minke whale population levels remain healthy and are not endangered by its annual hunt.

However, environmental group Greenpeace told AFP news agency that demand for whale meat in Norway was diminishing.

It accuses the Norwegian government of persisting with its controversial whaling policy to prop up national pride.

Grenade-tipped harpoons

Controversy has also focused on the manner in which the whales are killed.

Environmentalists say the grenade-tipped harpoons that explode inside the beast are unnecessarily cruel.

Whalers argue it is one of the quickest methods for killing a whale.

The first whaling vessels left Norway to hunt in the North Sea last week. But the main catches are made in the area of the North Atlantic known as the Barents Sea.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3701805.stm


Informant: Teresa Binstock

Marco Camenisch goes on trial for murder & attempted murder

Yesterday Swiss eco-activist Marco Camenisch, who is serving 10 years imprisonment for using explosives to destroy nuclear power station pylons, went on trial accused of murder and attempted murder.

As ELP supporters will be aware, Marco was initially jailed for his anti-nuclear actions in Switzerland in 1980. However in 1981, along with other prisoners, Marco escaped from prison. During the escape there was a shoot out between some of the prisoners and the prison wardens during which one prison warden died and another was injured.

Following his escape, Marco then went on the run for over ten years, carrying out a number of anti-nuclear actions (mainly blowing up electricity pylons) before finally being arrested in Italy in 1992. However after he was arrested it was suggested by the media and police that Marco may have been responsible for a Swiss boarder police officer who was shot dead in 1989.

After his arrest in 1992 Marco was held on remand, by the Italian authorities, before eventually put on trial in 1993 where he was found guilty of carrying out a number of anti-nuclear actions in Italy and was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment.

That sentence came to an end in 2002 and he was immediately extradited to Switzerland to complete the remainder of his 10 year prison sentence.

However after Marco was returned to Switzerland there was a lot of speculation that he might be charged with the murder of the boarder guard in 1989.

Marco has always denied killing the Swiss boarder guard. He has also always denied killing or injuring the prison warders during his escape from prison. However despite his innocence, Marco has been charged with the death of the Swiss boarder guard and the attempted murder of the Swiss prison warder in 1981.

These new charges against Marco can be seen as yet another attempt by the authorities to try and break Marco's spirit and an attempt to damage his international support base.

After all the years in prison, Marco, who defines himself an ecological anarchist, has never let the authorities change his mind about his political convictions. Instead, whilst behind bars, he has remained a political activist and by means of writing letters, he has organized a far-reaching international network of political and personal contacts.

Don't be under any illusion. The authorities want to break Marco. They hate the fact he has remained steadfast to his political identity and they loath his continued refusal to cooperate with the judicial authority. It is therefore no surprise that he has had these new charges laid against him.

It is up to the international prisoner support movement to make sure Marco receives all the support he can get and to remind the authorities that the support for Marco is as strong as ever.

Show your support for Marco by sending letters of support (in either English, German, Italian, Spanish or French) to:

Marco Camenisch
Flughafengefangnis
ZURICH-FLUGHAFEN
Postfach 8058
Zurich
Switzerland

For more information on Marco and his history, check out his prisoner profile on http://www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk or check out the multi-lingual website http://www.freecamenisch.net


In the run up to the run up to the start of Switzerland's political trial against Marco Camenisch a large number of Marco's supporters have carried out various protests, in both Switzerland and Italy, in support of Marco.

According to the British media, the Swiss police alone have revealed that they have made 98 arrests of Marco's supporters, most of whom are eco-anarchists and anti-globalisation activists.

In Italy as a result of one demonstration four people where remanded into custody. Two of whom (both Italians) have now been released. However the other two remain held prisoner by the authorities. One of the two is a woman from Zurich, Switzerland, called Andi, who is believed to be held because she is a known eco-radical and the authorities don't like her politics. The exact charges against her are unknown but her imprisonment can be regarded as political. The identity of the second person is still as yet unknown but it is believed they may be German or French.

Although we don't yet know Andi's prison location, ELP pledges our support to Andi and all of Marco's supporters who have been arrested and we will bring you regular updates about what's going on as and when we receive them ourselves.

In the meantime, we urge everyone to check out the multi-lingual website http://www.freecamenisch.net This website has pages written in English, Italian, Spanish, German and French.

A.N.S.W.E.R. FILES FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST FOR THE RELEASE OF THE WITHHELD EVIDENCE OF ABUSE OF PRISONERS

PRESS RELEASE
May 10, 2004

A.N.S.W.E.R. FILES FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND THE CIA FOR THE RELEASE OF THE WITHHELD EVIDENCE OF ABUSE OF PRISONERS HELD IN IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN AND GUANTANAMO

The antiwar coalition A.N.S.W.E.R. today filed requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) with the Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency seeking the release of photographs, video and other information pertaining to conditions of detention and interrogation by U.S. forces in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo. The request was filed by attorneys Mara Verheyden-Hilliard and Carl Messineo, of the Partnership for Civil Justice.

"We filed this request on behalf of the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition because the government has a legal obligation not to conceal or cover-up criminal action that it has undertaken. The people of the United States have the right to learn the truth about U.S. military operations and the barbaric and criminal treatment of detainees in Iraq and elsewhere," stated Mara Verheyden-Hilliard. "The full release of the information will, we believe, reveal that torture and humiliation of prisoners is not aberrational but rather is an institutionalized mechanism of occupation and conquest."

A.N.S.W.E.R. steering committee member Elias Rashmawi of Free Palestine Alliance, stated, "For many people in the United States the recent disclosures of the murder and torture of Arab and Muslim prisoners held in U.S. detention constitutes a shocking and startling revelation. For the Arab people, however, we recognize in these horrible photos the same horrendous tactics that are routinely employed by the Israeli Defense Forces against Palestinian and other Arab prisoners. These tactics are the tools of occupation, now being exported to Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo.

"These acts are an indication of the sadistic and collective intent to fully dehumanize a people. These were not acts of an interrogation of an occupying army for the purpose of obtaining forced confessions, itself a horrifying crime; these are a pervasive assault against a people in their entirety, their values and their being, in the most offensive and brutal manner. This is what occupation looks like. We are certain that as these practices are exposed to the people in the U.S. they will reject the U.S. government's attempts to carry out this brutality in their names."

The A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition (Act Now to Stop War & End Racism) is preparing to mobilize thousands of people to march from the White House to the Pentagon on June 5, 2004. There will be coordinated demonstrations on June 5 in San Francisco, Los Angeles and other cities.

"We have filed a FOIA request today because it is obvious that the Bush Administration, the Pentagon and the CIA have conducted a massive cover-up over many months to prevent the people of the world from learning the truth about their operations," according to Brian Becker of A.N.S.W.E.R. "This criminal war and occupation must end. As during the Vietnam War, the people are continuing to build the anti-war movement until all foreign troops are removed from Iraq. We are standing in opposition to all colonial occupation and intervention from Haiti to Palestine to Korea, the Philippines, Cuba, Zimbabwe, Venezuela and elsewhere. In each and every instance the occupiers have resorted to murder and torture in their pursuit of conquest and empire."

TO SEE A COPY OF THE FOIA REQUEST, go to:
http://www.internationalanswer.org/pdf/Iraq_FOIA_DoD.pdf
and
http://www.internationalanswer.org/pdf/Iraq_FOIA_CIA.pdf

The economics of EMF guidelines/standards

To All

It seems that most, if not all standard setting bodies uncritically accept differing exposure limits for public / occupational exposures. Taking EMF for example, at 50 Hz the ICNIRP guidelines give 1000mG for residential and 5000 mG for occupational.

As ICNIRP is supposed to be a 'health based' guideline this seems a bit strange - making about as much sense as claiming that one has an increased biological resistance to environmental risks while in the workplace. - BUT the real issue is economics, not health. ICNIRP and its ilk made more sense when viewed as 'economics based' guidelines.

Currently the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear safety Agency (ARPANSA) has taken a responsible position by convening two committees attempting to come up with a revised Australian ELF standard, considering the 4 mG /doubling of the risk of childhood leukaemia evidence. I have presented the case that there is no valid scientific reason to differentiate between public and occupational exposures. Whatever standard limits are agreed upon, the limits should apply for one and all. Hopefully this does not mean that we all get saddled with the old 5000 limit!

As I see it the dual exposure system originates from the old "compensating wage differential" (CWD) which was promoted by Chauncey Starr for the nuclear power industry. Recommended reading is: "RISKY BUSINESS Nuclear Workers, Ethics, and the Market-Efficiency Argument" by Kristin Shrader-Frechette, from Ethics & the Environment Volume 7, Number 1
See: http://www.iupjournals.org/ethics/ee7-1.html

I have copied and pasted a bit from my summary of this paper:

". . . Starr also mentions the concept of "voluntary" risk by individuals as a function of income benefits. In other words the acceptance of an increased risk in the workplace is an exponential function of his/her wage , or known as the compensating wage differential (CWD) originally formulated by Adam Smith. This assumption, with Starr as a main proponent, was to become enshrined in ionizing radiation exposure standards (as well as in other polluting industries) and later carried over to the non-ionizing exposure standards as well, where it is accepted that maximum exposure levels can vary greatly between public (involuntary) and workplace (voluntary) exposures. Starrs view has since been widely accepted among the risk assessment profession.

The compensating wage differential (CWD) has been justified on the grounds that workers in hazardous environments receive, as compared to other workers in less hazardous workplaces, a"hazard-pay premium", or as we call it in Australia "danger money". The theory being that the workers will willingly trade safety for extra wages. We see this enshrined in US legislation where, before 1990, ionizing workplace standards allowed nuclear workers to receive up to 10 times as much radiation in any year as a member of the public. After 1990 the public exposure limit was lowered but not the workers exposure. Thus allowing a workplace limit 50 times greater than the public . Starr (1969) justifies this on the grounds that occupational and public exposures to ionizing radiation are not analogous because environmental risks accepted 'voluntarily", through one's occupation, can be regulated by means of standards less strict than those of public risks, precisely because of the CWD. In other words, a classic economic solution of how to control occupational hazards. However a key ingredient for this assumption to work is that workers must have an adequate knowledge of their particular risk situations. By being aware of the risks involved then can then make decisions based on a wage differential. However, numerous surveys by risk assessors, including Starr have found that most people are generally unaware of the hazards they face, thus making CWD decisions impossible for those people.

Kristin Shrader-Frechette in the paper "RISKY BUSINESS Nuclear Workers, Ethics, and the Market-Efficiency Argument" details reasons for doubting that the CWD can provide an ethical justification for hazardous working environments because it may not even exist at all.

Some surveys have shown that when all workers are lumped together from lowest to highest paid, then risk and salary do increase as the CWD predicts. However when workers are separated into two groups, with white, male, unionized, college-educated, or skilled workers in a primary group, and the other being made up of non-white, female, non-unionized, non-college educated, or non-skilled workers in a secondary group, the CWD theory fails.

So while primary group workers enjoy a CWD, secondary workers do not. Hence, the alleged CWD for the entire grouping appears to me merely an artifact of data aggregation . In fact, the primary group CWD actually may exacerbate unequal treatment of those in the secondary group (non-white, female, non-unionized, etc.), because it covers up the lack of CWD in the secondary group, once the data are aggregated.

Shrader-Frechette points out that some surveys have shown that for non-unionized workers, there is a negative compensating wage differential; as risk increases wages get lower. When one compares wage rates across jobs, not adjusting for skill requirements, one observes that hazardous jobs pay twenty to thirty percent less than safe employment. Thus it is obvious that, even if there is a genuine CWD for some priviliged workers, the CWD may not provide general ethical justification for workplace environmental injustice, and this is especially the case in using CWD theory for standard setting.

Starr and other CWD proponents try to have it both ways when it comes to worker and public perceptions of risk in standard setting. They maintain that. Once employees are adequately educated regarding the risks they face, regulations ought to follow employees' risk preferences. In addition they would also say that regulators have no right to tell workers they cannot follow their preferences for higher risks. However, when these same proponents of the CWD wish to justify government imposition of a standard for public exposure they take the opposite tack. - Arguing, when faced with citizen's demands for stricter regulations on risks, that the public's risk perceptions, even of highly educated laymen, are subjective, intuitive, and generally inaccurate. CWD proponents would then argue that regulators should rely only on risk assessments calculated by the experts because these assessments are "rational" preferences.
. . . SNIP

Regards

Don Maisch


Omega see also:

Russia and RF bioeffects
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/230108/

Taxpayers Losing Millions as Bush OK's Logging in Roadless Forests

May 12, 2004

The Tongass and Chugach National Forests contain some of the largest remaining stands of roadless ancient temperate rainforest in the U.S. They hug the coast of southeast Alaska, providing habitat for numerous wildlife species—river otters, grizzly bears, bald eagles, mountain goats, wolves, salmon, and more. Vital local industries, including commercial fishing and tourism, depend upon the health of the Tongass and Chugach. [1]

The Roadless Area Conservation Rule, enacted in January 2001, protects areas like these from commercial logging. It also protects against oil and gas drilling, as well as extensive off-road vehicle use. [2] In May 2001, Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman expressed support for the Roadless Rule, calling it "the right thing to do." [3]

But when the state of Alaska filed a lawsuit in 2001 the Bush administration chose not defend the rule. [4] Instead, last June it proposed exempting the Tongass from the Roadless Rule's protection.

During the 45-day public comment period, about a quarter of a million citizens sent in comments. Laurie Cooper, manager of the Alaska Rainforest Campaign, told BushGreenwatch that "99 percent of these were in favor of keeping protections on both the Tongass and the Chugach. The public is very much in support of protecting our last wild forests."

Nonetheless, last December the Bush Administration announced the exemption of the Tongass from the Roadless Rule. [5] According to Cooper, the indefinite, supposedly temporary, exemption of the Tongass opens up 9.3 million acres of ancient forest for road development and timber sales. If extended to the 5 million eligible acres of the Chugach, a quarter of the land originally covered by the Roadless Rule will be unprotected.

Cooper sees no economic justification for this level of logging. "Despite what the Forest Service or the Bush administration would like to portray, the decline of the timber industry is not due to the protection of these wild roadless areas," she says. "There was a series of pulp mill closures, as well as an increase in supply from other regions of the world that made it uneconomical to log in the Tongass."

Logging in the Tongass actually costs American taxpayers millions of dollars. According to the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense, "A recent analysis by the Southeastern Alaska Conservation Council estimates that U.S. taxpayers spent $170,000 for every direct timber job created by logging in the Tongass National Forest in 2002--an amount equal to more than four times the average U.S. household income ($42,409) for the same year." The timber program could lose up to $30 million a year through non-competitive and under-valued timber sales. Plus, there is a $900 million backlog of deferred maintenance and capitol improvements to existing Tongass roads. [6]

"For 2001, spending on the planning process, as well as road construction, cost $36 million," says Cooper. "And in return, receipts were $1.2 million. It’s a federal subsidy to keep the timber industry operating in the Tongass."

The Bush administration wants to make the Tongass and Chugach exemptions permanent. It may use them to gut the Roadless Rule, which also protects some 44 million acres of forest in the lower 48 states. The administration is said to be preparing an extensive revision of the rule to give governors options to apply for exemptions in their states. [7]

As Cooper noted, Undersecretary of Agriculture Mark Rey was previously a top lobbyist for the timber industry.


TAKE ACTION
Tell Congress to protect the roadless areas of the Tongass National Forest , and end taxpayer-subsidized logging, with Alaska Rainforest Campaign’s free fax form.


SOURCES:
[1] "The Land and Its People," Alaska Rainforest Campaign.
http://www.akrain.org/rainforest/info/landpeople.asp
[2] "The Rule of the Roadless," Grist Magazine, Jan. 5, 2001.
http://www.gristmagazine.com/daily/daily010501.stm
[3] "An Anniversary Marked By Controversy,", Alaska Rainforest Campaign.
http://www.akrain.org/action/default.asp
[4] "Tongass National Forest Exempted from Roadless Rule By Bush Administration," The Wilderness Society.
http://www.wilderness.org/WhereWeWork/Alaska/WR108-TongassExemption.cfm
[5] Ibid.
[6] "Tongass Roadless Exemption Threatens Taxpayers," Taxpayers for Common Sense.
http://www.taxpayer.net/forest/01_15_TongassBriefing.pdf
[7] The Wilderness Society, op. cit.


http://www.bushgreenwatch.org/mt_archives/000116.php

Omega-News Collection 12. May 04

It was about "regime change" from the get-go
http://www.fff.org/comment/com0405d.asp

Bush policies share blame for prison abuse scandal
http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?news_id=2930

Our own worst enemy
http://www.americannewsreel.com/artman/publish2/cat_index_19.shtml#85

Amnesty: UK troops shot civilians
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/05/10/iraq.british.troops/

Between Iraq and a hard place
http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer69.html

The misunderestimated man
http://slate.msn.com/id/2100064

Power turns good soldiers into "bad apples"
http://tinyurl.com/3938m

Congress toughens war oversight role
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0511/p02s01-usfp.html

To neocons, reality is "treason"
http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=2541

Ruled by force and lies
http://www.libertyforall.net/2004/may23/Ruled.html

A history of maltreatment
http://www.progress.org/2004/fold351.htm

Speaking of liberty
http://babelogue.citypages.com:8080/bsmith/2004/05/11

Cold turkey
http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/cold_turkey/

Sick people -- and no, we don't mean Lynndie England
http://tinyurl.com/2uugv

Cruelty cuts across nationality, gender lines
http://tinyurl.com/26vv7

Beyond apologies
http://tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/10359

Images & abstractions & genitals
http://www.counterpunch.org/christian05102004.html

After Abu Ghraib, is the war still winnable?
http://www.affbrainwash.com/archives/011820.php

A time for truth
http://www.antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=2553

The America we know
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18659

Irrelevant casualties
http://www.libertyforall.net/2004/may23/Casualties.html

The fallout of war
http://www.strike-the-root.com/4/seese/seese5.html

This free speech issue should be a slam dunk
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n706/a09.html?397

Picture this
http://tinyurl.com/2yuqz

The logic of occupation
http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1925


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

--------

Soldier: Foul photos of inmates were prized
http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/democrat/news/nation/8629607.htm

Top brass 'picked man who ordered torture'
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9519057^401,00.html

People Court Pronounces U.S. Guilty
http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=23664

Sadism in war old habit
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Toronto/Eric_Margolis/2004/05/09/452554.html

Outside the law
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1213194,00.html

Sometimes They Pretended to Kill Me
http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/newsArticle.asp?id=1718
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1433692002

What about the other secret U.S. prisons?
http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?file=518058.html

If we see our enemies as inhuman, then we ourselves end up as savages
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6169.htm

Those Who Deny the Crimes of the Past
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=5135

Coalition 'tortured Iraqi POWs'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3034031.stm

How a Pentagon email sought to contain the prison abuse scandal
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,634638,00.html

The Media War against Iraq
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6165.htm

We have met the evildoers... and they are us
http://zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=5496

Failure And Betrayal
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6167.htm

Poll shows majority want UK troops to pull out
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=519735

Blair faces resignation call
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=507187

War tab swamps Bush’s estimate
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/05/09/MNGOU6IK1J1.DTL&type=printable

Bush's failed Mideast policy is creating more terrorism
http://hollings.senate.gov/~hollings/opinion/2004506A17.html

'Poor paying for war on terror'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3696683.stm


From Information Clearing House

--------

Restoring Our Honor
http://mailhost.groundspring.org/cgi-bin/t.pl?id=82967:740526

Washington's Hidden WMD Program
http://mailhost.groundspring.org/cgi-bin/t.pl?id=82970:740526

Press Groups Concerned over US Restrictions on Iraq's Media
http://mailhost.groundspring.org/cgi-bin/t.pl?id=82971:740526

The Empire behind the Bush's Wars
http://mailhost.groundspring.org/cgi-bin/t.pl?id=82972:740526

Omega-News Collection

It was about "regime change" from the get-go
http://www.fff.org/comment/com0405d.asp

Bush policies share blame for prison abuse scandal
http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?news_id=2930

Our own worst enemy
http://www.americannewsreel.com/artman/publish2/cat_index_19.shtml#85

Amnesty: UK troops shot civilians
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/05/10/iraq.british.troops/

Between Iraq and a hard place
http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer69.html

The misunderestimated man
http://slate.msn.com/id/2100064

Power turns good soldiers into "bad apples"
http://tinyurl.com/3938m

Congress toughens war oversight role
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0511/p02s01-usfp.html

To neocons, reality is "treason"
http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=2541

Ruled by force and lies
http://www.libertyforall.net/2004/may23/Ruled.html

A history of maltreatment
http://www.progress.org/2004/fold351.htm

Speaking of liberty
http://babelogue.citypages.com:8080/bsmith/2004/05/11

Cold turkey
http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/cold_turkey/

Sick people -- and no, we don't mean Lynndie England
http://tinyurl.com/2uugv

Cruelty cuts across nationality, gender lines
http://tinyurl.com/26vv7

Beyond apologies
http://tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/10359

Images & abstractions & genitals
http://www.counterpunch.org/christian05102004.html

After Abu Ghraib, is the war still winnable?
http://www.affbrainwash.com/archives/011820.php

A time for truth
http://www.antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=2553

The America we know
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18659

Irrelevant casualties
http://www.libertyforall.net/2004/may23/Casualties.html

The fallout of war
http://www.strike-the-root.com/4/seese/seese5.html

This free speech issue should be a slam dunk
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n706/a09.html?397

Picture this
http://tinyurl.com/2yuqz

The logic of occupation
http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1925





Informant: Thomas L. Knapp


--------

Soldier: Foul photos of inmates were prized
http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/democrat/news/nation/8629607.htm

Top brass 'picked man who ordered torture'
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9519057^401,00.html

People Court Pronounces U.S. Guilty
http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=23664

Sadism in war old habit
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Toronto/Eric_Margolis/2004/05/09/452554.html

Outside the law
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1213194,00.html

Sometimes They Pretended to Kill Me
http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/newsArticle.asp?id=1718
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1433692002

What about the other secret U.S. prisons?
http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?file=518058.html

If we see our enemies as inhuman, then we ourselves end up as savages
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6169.htm

Those Who Deny the Crimes of the Past
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=5135

Coalition 'tortured Iraqi POWs'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3034031.stm

How a Pentagon email sought to contain the prison abuse scandal
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,634638,00.html

The Media War against Iraq
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6165.htm

We have met the evildoers... and they are us
http://zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=5496

Failure And Betrayal
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6167.htm

Poll shows majority want UK troops to pull out
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=519735

Blair faces resignation call
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=507187

War tab swamps Bush’s estimate
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/05/09/MNGOU6IK1J1.DTL&type=printable

Bush's failed Mideast policy is creating more terrorism
http://hollings.senate.gov/~hollings/opinion/2004506A17.html

'Poor paying for war on terror'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3696683.stm


From Information Clearing House

--------

Restoring Our Honor
http://mailhost.groundspring.org/cgi-bin/t.pl?id=82967:740526

Washington's Hidden WMD Program
http://mailhost.groundspring.org/cgi-bin/t.pl?id=82970:740526

Press Groups Concerned over US Restrictions on Iraq's Media
http://mailhost.groundspring.org/cgi-bin/t.pl?id=82971:740526

The Empire behind the Bush's Wars
http://mailhost.groundspring.org/cgi-bin/t.pl?id=82972:740526

Urgent - Greenpeace on Trial

Dear friends,

Greenpeace is going on trial on Monday for protecting the rainforest in the Amazon.

For the first time ever, the US government has decided to prosecute an entire organisation for exercising its right to free speech through non-violent protest.

The trial begins on May 17th, and results from a protest against an illegal shipment of mahogany headed for the Port of Miami in Florida two years ago. Unable to find a suitable law against calling attention to environmental crimes, the Attorney General has charged Greenpeace under an obscure 19th-century law designed to stop prostitutes from boarding sailing vessels.

If we are found guilty, it will mean being branded a criminal organisation.

While Greenpeace is in the dock, those who logged, imported and sold the illegally imported mahogany continue to operate.

Not only is this a wholly unwarranted and politically motivated attack on an organisation that was attempting to prevent a crime, but it also sets a dangerous precedent for the future of free speech and the right to civil protest in the US. It could also be used as an example in other countries to curb non-violent direct action. The case has been attacked in articles and editorials in the New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, and Miami Herald. Senator Patrick Leahy of the US Judiciary Committee wrote to US Attorney General John Ashcroft saying his selective prosecution of Greenpeace could "have a chilling effect on free speech and activism of all kinds." Al Gore called the case "highly disturbing" in a speech to MoveOn members. Fellow environmental and civil rights groups have rallied to demand Ashcroft drop the case. But Ashcroft's not listening.

Now it's your turn to make sure we don't let this case go unchallenged. We need your help. Sign on to our letter demanding Bush and Ashcroft prosecute illegal loggers rather than Greenpeace. To date, 37,000 people have joined this appeal. We want to have 50,000 signatories by Monday. We need to show the US government that people all over the world are watching this trial. We need to remind them they can't silence Greenpeace without silencing everyone who supports Greenpeace.

Don't let Bush and Ashcroft silence you. Take action now:

http://www.greenpeaceusa.org/bin/view.fpl/10048/action_id/195.html

Find out more about the case below:

http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/news/details?item_id=472552

Meet some of the people involved and the history of the action and prosecution:

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/issues/2004-04-29/feature.html/1/index.html

Send this fun animation about the case to your friends:

http://www.greenpeaceusa.org/bin/view.fpl/8035/article/931.html

"Spy chips" raise civil liberties fears

Guardian [UK]

"The introduction of tiny 'spy chips' on shop-bought goods from underwear to crisp packets risks a GM-style consumer backlash unless adequate safeguards are put in place, a leading consumer interest group claimed today. The National Consumer Council (NCC) said government, regulators and businesses needed to work together to make sure that radio frequency identification (RFID) tags were not seen as an invasion of privacy. The tags allow for individual products as common as a can of baked beans to be given a unique identity number which would allow a retailer to monitor the progress of its stock from warehouse to checkout."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1214395,00.html


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Eil-Aktion : Yasuni-Nationalpark in Ecuador gefährdet

Der Yasuni-Nationalpark in Ecuador ist durch eine Ölstraße gefährdet. Rettet den Regenwald beteiligt sich an den internationalen Protesten.
Bitte helfen auch Sie und schicken Sie eine Protestmail unter http://www.regenwald.org

Es gibt auch Lichtblicke: Der ehemalige Umweltminister Emil Salim aus Indonesien hat einen Bericht über die schädlichen Folgen der
Ölförderung für die Weltbank erarbeitet. Nun müssen nur noch die
Konsequenzen daraus gezogen werden. Mehr Infos dazu und eine Aktion unter http://www.regenwald.org

Bitte leiten Sie diese Nachricht an möglichst viele Freunde und
Bekannte weiter! Mit bestem Dank für Ihre Hilfe und Ihr Engagement

Reinhard Behrend

Rettet den Regenwald e. V. Friedhofsweg 28 22337 Hamburg Tel. 040 - 4103804 info@regenwald.ORG http://www.regenwald.ORG

Gen-Weizen erfolgreich zerstört

Gestern gab Monsanto bekannt, Genweizen vom Markt zu nehmen. Auch weil die Absatzchancen bei den Verbrauchern sinken, und weil das Roundup System demnächst den Patentschutz verliert.

Dafür wollen sie auf Soja und Mais setzen, wobei bei Mais festgestellt wurde, dass dieser sich auskreuzt und dann das BT- Gift auch in konventionellen Mais der Nachbarschaft zu finden ist.

Dazu kommt, dass zukünftig erwartet wird, dass nicht Genprodukte durch den doppelten Verfahrensweg massiv teuerer werden, der Verband schätzt bis 60%.

Wer Zeit hat, sollte die Situation der Bauern in Indien genauer untersuchen.. dort ist die Abhängigkeitsspirale durch genmanipuliertes Saatgut schon sichtbar.

Grüsse Bernd


Gen-Weizen erfolgreich zerstört

Was indische Bauern seit Jahren vormachen, übernimmt jetzt Greenpeace in Deutschland: Gen-Weizen, der in Sachsen-Anhalt nach dem Willen der Landesregierung, aber gegen den Mehrheitswillen der Bevölkerung angebaut wurde, haben Umweltaktivisten einfach zerstört. Und wie reagiert die Betreiberfirma auf diesen Selbsthilfeversuch aus der Gesellschaft? Ein Firmensprecher der hessischen Firma Syngenta erklärte, seine Firma ziehe sich zurück. Es sei fraglich, ob ein weiteres Engagement in Deutschland noch Sinn mache.

http://www.sonnenseite.com/fp/archiv/Akt-News/4770.php


Viele Grüße aus Westhausen!

Bernd Schreiner

Anti-chemtrail Commercial im kanadischen Lokal-TV - Anti-chemtrail Commercial on TV

Die Einwohner der kanadischen Kleinstadt Powell River bekommen auf ihrem lokalen TV-Sender etwa alle 20 Minuten einen "Anti-Chemtrail-Werbeclip" vorgeführt.

Die Audiospur des Clips ist auch per Internet abrufbar und eignet sich - so die Eigendefinition - auch dazu, um Chemtails gegenüber "Laien" zu erklären:

http://www.geocities.com/canadianchemtrails/Commercial.html


Quelle/Source: http://ecolog.twoday.net/stories/216754/

Urwaldzerstörung: Indonesisches Tropenholz in EU-Gebäude

Nach Greenpeace-Recherchen stammt das Sperrholz für die Renovierung des Gebäudes des EU-Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses von Firmen, die illegal eingeschlagenes Holz aus den letzten Urwäldern Indonesiens verkaufen. Die Umweltschützer lieferten umweltfreundliches FSC-zertifiziertes Sperrholz ins Gebäude, das die EU statt des Raubbauholzes verwenden soll. Auf einem Transparent steht: "EU: Stop illegal Timber Imports". Greenpeace fordert die EU-Umweltminister auf, bei ihrem Treffen diese Woche im irischen Waterford die gesetzliche Grundlage für ein Importverbot von illegal gefälltem Holz zu schaffen.

Die ganze Nachricht im Internet:
http://www.ngo-online.de/ganze_nachricht.php4?Nr=8423

Muhen gegen Müller

muhen, schreien oder flüstern Sie Müllermilch Ihre Meinung! Ab sofort können Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher ihre Stimme bei uns abgeben und Müller mitteilen, was sie von Gentechnik in Futtermitteln halten.

Die Unternehmensgruppe Theo Müller hatte Greenpeace in einem Schreiben mitgeteilt, dass angeblich alles in ihrer Macht stehende getan wurde, um Gen-Pflanzen im Tierfutter der Kühe auszuschließen. Doch Recherchen von Greenpeace ergaben, dass Müller weder Verträge abschließt noch Kontrollen durchführt. Zu guter Letzt fanden wir erhebliche Anteile von genmanipulierter Soja in Futtermittelproben von vier Müllermilch-Höfen.

Höchste Zeit zu protestieren. Klicken Sie rein in unsere Aktionsseite:

http://www.muell-milch.de

und geben Sie Ihre Stimme ab oder verschicken Sie eine E-Card.

Letzte Woche wurde übrigens das erste gekennzeichnete Produkt gefunden. Wir haben es jetzt selber vorliegen. Es handelt sich um das Produkt "Tofu Mix (Soybean Curd Mix)", hergestellt von House Food Industrial Co. Ltd. in Japan und wird in einem Asia-Markt in Hannover verkauft. Halten Sie danach Ausschau und fordern Sie die Filialleiter auf, das Produkt aus den Regalen zu nehmen, falls Sie eins sichten.

Viel Spaß beim Muhen,
Ihr EinkaufsNetz-Team

11
Mai
2004

West's Snowpack Shrinks

Melt comes sooner, speeded up by hot spring temperatures and soot. Flowers, trees blossom early, but water runs short in summer heat.

By Don Thompson
Associated Press Writer
May 9, 2004

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-adme-snowmelt9may09,1,5690563.story

ECHO SUMMIT, Calif. -- Frank Gehrke skied out on an unseasonably warm March day to take the final Sierra Nevada snowpack measurements of the season near this mountain pass south of Lake Tahoe -- only to be stopped short by a muddy meadow where usually there would be deep snow.

Something is happening to the snowpack, according to measurements Gehrke has collected for 20 winters as chief of California's water survey program.

Near-record snows are melting under record-setting early temperatures this year, a harbinger of the Sierra Nevada spring -- and of a trend that is bringing vast changes across the West.

The snow that piles up in the Sierra, Rockies and Cascades forms an
immense frozen reservoir that drives western power turbines, waters crops and cattle, and flows hundreds of miles to thirsty lawns and throats in desert cities like Las Vegas, Phoenix and Albuquerque.

Snowmelt provides roughly 70% of the West's water flow. But the icy
trickle is becoming a roar earlier as spring creeps into what used to be winter.

Spring temperatures in the Sierra have increased 2 to 3 degrees since 1950, bringing peak snowmelt two to three weeks earlier. Trees and flowers bud one to three weeks sooner.

Western rivers are seeing their peak runoff five to 10 days sooner than 50 years ago. Glaciers are melting from Alaska through the Cascades and east into Montana. And in the Pacific Northwest, snowpack has dropped by as much as 60% over the last four decades.

The trend is consistent with global warming, scientists say, although
they're less sure of the consequences. The Pacific Northwest could
become wetter or drier as weather patterns shift; Northern California could develop the Santa Ana winds that fed Southern California's record wildfires last fall -- or not.

The uncertainty illustrates that scientists still have too little information to conclude that the trend is more than a regional cycle,
said Bonner Cohen, a senior fellow at the National Center for Public
Policy Research.

"Lots of things can happen, and right now it's way beyond what the
computer modelers can even pretend to understand," said Myron Ebell, global warming policy director at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Global or not, if the warming trend continues as projected,
scientists say it means a smaller snowpack no matter if precipitation increases or diminishes.

More moisture will fall as rain instead of snow, endangering ski
resorts as well as alpine meadows that will see encroachment from plants and trees that today grow only at lower elevations.

Two studies last year showed the range of many species has moved north at nearly 4 miles per decade over the last century, while spring
activities like egg-laying, flower blooming and ending hibernation have come three to five days earlier each decade.

"The elevation of the snowpack keeps creeping up. That affects us quite a bit," said Scott Armstrong, whose family has operated All-Outdoors Whitewater Rafting for nearly 40 years.

The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory this spring predicted snowpack reductions of up to 70% in the Sierra and Cascade mountains of California, Oregon and Washington. The 400-mile-long Sierra range supplies water to two-thirds of California's population and much of northern Nevada, irrigates 3 million acres of California farmland, and provides about one-fourth of California's power.

"There are a lot of places in the Cascades and the Northern Sierra where the average winter temperature is above freezing. It's those places that have seen 50% to 80% declines, in some places 100% declines," said Philip Mote, a University of Washington climate researcher.

Climate changes are muted farther inland, where average temperatures are generally colder. But as much as a 30% reduction is predicted for the Rocky Mountains of Colorado and New Mexico over the next 50 years, with snow melting about a month earlier than it does now.

Soot darkens snow and ice, deadening their ability to reflect sunlight, contributing to a near-universal melting and causing as much as a quarter of global warming, the National Aeronautic and Space Administration reported. The process accelerates each spring as soot accumulates on the surface, making the remaining snow darker and speeding the melting cycle.

The economic and social impacts flow downstream along with the earlier snowmelt.

"That's where the river really meets the road," Mote said. "Then you're talking [about] affecting a lot of people's lives, a lot of people's livelihoods."

The changes mean less water flowing down western rivers in the dry
summers when it is needed most. The Columbia and Sacramento rivers could be hardest hit because of warmer temperatures there. Runoff into the Sacramento River has dropped 11% over the last century even as needs have grown exponentially in the nation's most populous state.

A University of Washington study this spring predicted that the Colorado River could see runoff drop 14% to 18%, sparking more water warfare between Southern California and upstream states. But the Colorado's Rocky Mountain headwaters are colder and the basin has more existing storage capacity to mute the effects.

More spring flooding and longer summer droughts mean pressure for
reservoirs to capture more water when it's available. Dams and
reservoirs "are not politically correct to talk about right now both
because of cost and ... environmental impact. But there may be a cost to not building reservoirs as well," said David Kranz of the California Farm Bureau Federation.

Environmentalists say water conservation is the answer, with
desalinization and water transfers between regions.

Copyright 2004 Los Angeles Times

Informant: Teresa Binstock

Bush Giving Away Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry

May 10, 2004

The White House's rush to lease pristine public lands across the Rocky Mountains to the oil and gas industry is showing signs of being little more than a land grab, designed to prevent protection of hundreds of thousands of acres under the Wilderness Act.

A recent study of oil and gas drilling activity by The Wilderness Society found that the gas industry is stockpiling leases and drilling permits on 34 million acres of public lands in the Rockies, but is only producing oil or gas on 32 percent of that land. Over the past 10 years, the industry has received permission from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to drill 25,000 new wells, but has only drilled 19,000. Based on the record pace of drilling over the last few years, it would take several years to finish drilling the wells that have already been approved by the BLM.

While some industry representatives and Republican leaders accuse environmental groups of allegedly causing a slowdown in gas drilling activity, drilling is currently at its physical limit: there aren't enough drilling rigs in the Rockies to satisfy the abundant drilling prospects already made available to the gas industry. Further, some experts suspect that the gas industry is sitting on all that land in order to keep gas prices high -- many firms in the Rockies are posting record profits while families and businesses struggle to pay their energy bills.

"If sensitive areas on public lands were the only places left to drill, the BLM's actions might be explainable," the Denver Post said in a recent editorial. "But they're not. Energy companies have plenty of promising places to drill without invading proposed wildernesses or creating disturbances near parks and monuments."[1]

Meanwhile, the industry continues to push BLM to lease more land in even more remote areas -- many of which had already been nominated in Congress for wilderness protection.

One recent such proposal in Colorado drew the ire of U.S. Rep Diana DeGette, a Colorado Democrat who has legislation pending to protect nearly 19,000 acres of critical habitat and watersheds in her state's high country. Next month the BLM plans to offer all 19,000 acres for lease to the oil and gas industry.

"I realize that it is not a mistake that these particular areas are picked out for drilling, and all of us intend to protect them," DeGette told the Rocky Mountain News.[2] "(The) vast majority of federal land in Colorado already is open for drilling," she added. "Only a small amount is eligible for protection as wilderness, and the Bush administration should respect that."

The reasons behind Bush's push to give away public lands may be less obvious than they appear. The President's industrial backers and business partners are consistent opponents of federally-designated wilderness, because it precludes industrial activity like road building, timber cutting and oil and gas drilling.

But oil and gas industry executives, working from inside the administration, may have a more pressing reason to give away public lands to their once and future employers.

The energy industry, rocked by the Enron scandal and its own dubious business decisions, is saddled with massive amounts of debt. Large gas companies like El Paso have been forced to sell off major assets in order to keep Wall Street off their backs.

But questionable accounting practices common in the industry encourage gas firms to book potential future profits as a way to improve their earnings outlook. By stockpiling leases and drilling permits, the gas industry could be sacrificing America's wilderness heritage in order to pay off its junk debt.


SOURCES:
[1] "Public Lands Under Attack," Denver Post, Apr. 11, 2004.
[2] "Foes seek protection for land Bush plan targets for
drilling," Rocky Mountain News, Apr. 30, 2004.

http://www.bushgreenwatch.org/mt_archives/000114.php

ACT NOW to Protect the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands

We have a rare opportunity to save one of the last wild places on earth! Please act today.

This alert is in response to National Ocean Service call for public comment on a Draft Operations Plan for the NWHI Reserve. This plan is important because it will guide the management of the Reserve and serve as a foundation for future management of a proposed Sanctuary. The Reserve Advisory Council developed a strong conservation-based Operations Plan, which was edited by the NOS in ways that weaken needed protections. Your comments are needed to encourage important measures be reinstated in the plan.

The Northwestern Hawaiian Islands form the most isolated archipelago in the world. These remote and ancient islands, atolls and shoals contain some of the most diverse and pristine reefs on earth. This biologically diverse ecosystem is unique, fragile and magnificent--truly a world treasure. Please visit http://www.kahea.org for more information.

Your letter today will inform the federal government that you truly care about protecting our imperiled marine resources and that you recognize the NWHI as an important and unique region.

Your comments WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE and are vitally important to secure strong protection measures for the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands.

Please act today and help protect this unique place as a true Pu'uhonua (Place of Refuge) for future generations. The deadline for commenting is midnight (HST) May 15, 2004.

See also:

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/nwhi3/i5sxe82pjb3n6m

Monsanto suspends biotech wheat program

OCA & Allies Declare Major Victory as Monsanto Drops GE Wheat
Monsanto suspends biotech wheat program
By Carey Gillam, Reuters

KANSAS CITY, Mo. < Monsanto on Monday said it was suspending plans to introduce what would be the world's first biotech wheat, a product that has generated concerns around the world about scientific tinkering with a key food crop.

Monsanto, whose shares moved lower Monday morning, said it had reached the decision after "extensive consultation" with customers in the wheat industry, and would continue to monitor the desire for crop improvements to determine "if and when" it might be practical to move forward.

St. Louis-based Monsanto has been doing field tests of Roundup Ready wheat for six years. It has already commercialized Roundup Ready corn and soybeans, and had hoped to spread the technology into the vast wheat-growing industry, starting in the United States and Canadian markets.

The company has been under fire from environmentalists, farmer groups and some export trade experts for its plans to introduce a spring wheat variety called Roundup Ready, which is tolerant of Monsanto's Roundup herbicide.

Opponents said the biotech crop would be moderately beneficial to only a small segment of the wheat-growing industry, but could devastate exports of all U.S. and Canadian wheat. Survey after survey done by export officials has shown that foreign buyers were unwilling to risk alienating their own customers by accepting biotech wheat supplies.

U.S. Wheat Associates, which markets American wheat abroad, had warned Monsanto that foreign opposition was strong.

U.S. Wheat Associates President Alan Tracy said he was both disappointed and relieved by Monsanto's move.

"It's a shame when a promising scientific trait is deferred because of nonscientific concerns," Tracy said. "Monsanto is obviously responding to the same concerns that we've seen in the marketplace, and we want to give them credit ... for recognizing the problems we would face."

Just two weeks ago, a group of grain industry players, including the North American Millers' Association, sent a letter to Monsanto Chief Executive Hugh Grant expressing industry concerns and asking that Monsanto tread carefully in its introduction.

Several groups have sought moratoriums on a biotech wheat introduction, and some foreign buyers have threatened to avoid purchasing U.S. wheat if Monsanto's biotech wheat was introduced.

"I think it is a very wise decision," said Louis Kuster, a North Dakota wheat farmer, referring to Monsanto's decision. "Our foreign markets overwhelmingly did not want it and repeatedly had told us they would seek other sources of supply. That would mean ruination of the wheat market."

Monsanto said that so far in fiscal 2004 it had spent less than $5 million on the Roundup Ready wheat project, and the plans to shelve it would not change its forecast for fiscal-year 2004 earnings.

The company said it would stop breeding and field research of Roundup Ready wheat and focus instead on work on Roundup Ready cotton and an improved soybean oil.

National Association of Wheat Growers CEO Daren Coppock said the decision was "a positive outcome" for the industry and for Monsanto. He said two other biotech wheat traits are in development by other organizations and they might be able to help forge an easier path to acceptance.

"If we see a broader-based trait come forward, it helps us all, plus it
gives us time to do our homework on gaining acceptance," Coppock said.

Added Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers
Association, "Monsanto has correctly read the winds of public opinion and farmers and consumers who are opposed to their Roundup Ready wheat."

"I think that the crops that are in the pipeline are not going to be able to be introduced without a tremendous amount of debate and civil strife," Cummins said.

Monsanto shares were down 66 cents or 2% at $32.33 on the New York Stock Exchange Monday morning, off an earlier low at $32.14

http://www.organicconsumers.org/monsanto/wheatwin051004.cfm

and

Embattled Biotech Industry Seeks to Bring Non-Food GMOs to Market
http://www.organicconsumers.org/ge/grasses051004.cfm


Informant: Teresa Binstock

HELP SAVE UNIQUE SPECIES AND CORAL REEF ECOSYSTEM

Dear Friend,

I thought you might be interested in this e-activism campaign to save a critically important coral reef, endangered sea turtles and the last 50 dugongs (a marine mammal related to manatees) in Okinawa from a massive proposed U.S. military base. The base is proposed to be constructed atop a coral reef off the NE coast of Okinawa, Japan.

If you go to the URL below you can check out what is at stake and
send your own message directly to the relevant decision makers

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/dugong_aa?rk=6dq3_wp1jafjW

Thanks for taking action!

Peter Galvin

California and Pacific Director
Center for Biological Diversity
pgalvin@biologicaldiversity.org
http://www.biologicaldiversity.org

The Center for Biological Diversity protects endangered species and wild places through science, policy, education, and environmental law.

Salmon unlikely to tip balance in election

The onslaught is coming at us and everything from so many angles we must bend together our movements against war, against environmental destruction, against the destruction of what social fabric we have left to cover ourselves--flags don't count.

They have us so on our heels keeping us in reactionary mode, but we still must take those most needed steps beyond and can only do this with the resources of the larger movements already in place. Merging these movements can be done so it causes a media event that keeps us in the media. A voice strong and concerted enough it can no longer be ignored, because we adamantly push it into the mainstream.


May 8, 2004

Salmon unlikely to tip balance in election

By Blaine Harden
The Washington Post

SEATTLE - The Pacific Northwest woke up last week to what Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., called a ``bombshell.'' The Bush administration had abruptly changed the rules on protecting wild salmon, the semi-sacred indicators of regional identity.

As outlined in a leaked document, the administration would count hatchery salmon, bred in concrete tanks and pumped into rivers by the hundreds of millions, when deciding whether endangered wild salmon deserve federal protection.

``The president's men are plotting a brazen flanking move around the Endangered Species Act,'' wrote Joel Connelly, a columnist for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, in an overwhelmingly negative assessment that was echoed by editorials and politicians across the Northwest.

Suddenly, it seemed, there was an environmental issue with political legs in Oregon and Washington, both regarded as swing states in the presidential race. Pollsters see a tight contest, especially in Oregon, with Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., the presumptive Democratic nominee, narrowly ahead but President Bush within striking distance.

Had Bush tripped over a fish? Might an environmental issue make a significant difference in the presidential race? The realpolitik answer, from two longtime independent pollsters in Oregon and Washington, is an emphatic no.

``There are only so many issues people can be fretful about, and right now salmon is not one of them,'' said Tim Hibbits, a pollster in Portland. ``There are these monster issues out on the table: the economy and the war. The environment is not an issue in any major way. If people don't have a job, they are not going to worry as much about salmon.''

Oregon has the country's highest unemployment rate.

A decade ago, a regional poll found that three-quarters of those questioned agreed that if wild salmon were lost, an important part of the identity of the Pacific Northwest would also disappear.

But now, according to Stuart Elway, a Seattle pollster whose firm asked that salmon question, the economy and the war monopolize public attention, pushing environmental issues - salmon included - into the political shadows. ``Too many things are crowding that issue out,'' he said. ``It has been a long time since people thought the environment was enough in peril to raise it to the level of a real campaign issue.''

The Pacific Northwest, for all its avowed greenness, is not unlike the rest of the country. Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the percentage of Americans who say protecting the environment should be a top priority for Bush and Congress has fallen sharply, according to the Pew Research Center. It was 63 percent in January 2001, but slid to 39 percent in 2003 before rising to 49 percent in January of this year.

``Environmental issues play much better when the economy is good, and people aren't worried about war,'' Hibbits said. ``In a more benign climate, this salmon decision would be an issue.''

The Bush administration decision on salmon appears likely to cause multiple secondary eruptions of environmentalist rage throughout the summer. Courts have ordered federal officials to decide by then whether they will remove a dozen or so salmon species from protection under the Endangered Species Act.

Many salmon biologists say the federal government has tipped its hand on this decision by announcing it will count genetically similar hatchery fish in assessing the survival chances of wild fish. They expect that a number of salmon species will be moved from the endangered or threatened list - moves that will certainly infuriate many environmentalists.

``This will give people who don't like George Bush another reason not to like him,'' Hibbits said. ``Bush supporters will probably like it, as they tend to be on the resource-extraction side of these issues. But it won't make any difference to swing voters, who are the key to the election. They won't decide based on salmon.''

The Sierra Club's executive director, Carl Pope, agrees that the administration's new salmon policy is unlikely to tip the balance for undecided voters. But he said the policy will rile up the Democratic base in Oregon and Washington and make it more likely to vote. ``This decision is the most compelling example we have to demonstrate to Northwest residents that Bush is using his imperial power to take your identity away from you,'' Pope said.

In a normal presidential election year, Pope said the environmental community expects that about 10 percent of the strongly pro-environment electorate would not bother to vote. But thanks to this decision, he said, ``we can bring them out.''

That is a prediction that Bob Moore, a Portland pollster who works for GOP candidates in the West, finds improbable. He said his polls show that while most voters do care about salmon, they do not see a distinction between fish bred in hatcheries and fish bred in the wild.

http://www.registerguard.com/news/2004/05/08/b3.cr.salmon.0508.html

Informant: Let's Make Change

SUMMER HEAT WILL CAUSE DEADLY OZONE

By Robin McKie
The Observer
Sunday, May 9, 2004

Thousands of Britons may be forced to wear charcoal masks and stay indoors this summer to avoid deadly fogs of ozone that will pollute the country during heatwaves, scientists have warned.

They have discovered that last August's heatwave caused plants and trees to release waves of a chemical called isoprene, which contributes to the production of ozone in the air. Scientists now believe ozone killed up to 600 people last summer.

'Temperatures topped 100F (37.7C) last summer for the first time since UK records began, and similarly intense heatwaves will become increasingly frequent as global warming intensifies. Current projections suggest they could happen ten times more often,' said Professor Alan Thorpe, of the Centres of Atmospheric Science. 'Among all our other problems, we are going to deal with severe ozone pollution.'

Ozone, which is particularly dangerous for children, old people and asthmatics, is produced when strong sunlight breaks up the nitrogen oxides released by car exhausts. In recent years Britain has made major improvements in reducing these oxide levels in the air, and hopes rose that the problem was under control.

But the latest ozone study, carried out by a team led by Alastair Lewis, of York University and funded by the Natural Environment Research Council, has discovered that a dangerous new factor arises when temperatures soar into the high 30s.

'We went to Chelmsford to study ozone and isoprene levels last year,' said Lewis. 'By chance, we picked the two weeks of the heatwave. What we discovered was startling. When the temperature reached the high 90s and topped 100, plants and trees ... start to produce greatly increased amounts.'

It is thought that isoprene acts as a kind of heat-shock molecule, protecting leaves from damage when temperatures rise above 35C. When plants are short of water, they produce even more.

However, in the atmosphere isoprene acts as a catalyst driving the rate at which sunlight breaks down nitrogen oxide and turns it into ozone. The more isoprene there is, the more ozone is generated, effectively wiping out the moderate success the government has had in reducing levels.

Britain's new midsummer heatwaves are therefore likely to have severe consequences. European law states that governments must inform the public when hourly concentrations of ozone rise above 180 microgrammes per cubic metre. On 6 August last year, ozone levels over London peaked at 300 microgrammes. Other high spots were found in East Anglia and the Midlands.

The impact on the public was dramatic. One study by the Office of National Statistics indicated that 2,000 more people died in August 2003 compared with the same month in previous years. But calculations by John Stedman, at the National Environmental Technology Centre, indicate that these deaths were not all caused by heat stress and deyhdration, as was initially supposed.

Between 225 and 593 were caused by ozone, Stedman estimated. Many thousands of others suffered extreme distress, such as museum clerk Alison Bottomley, of Nottingham, who suffers from asthma. 'I had to stay indoors last summer to get away from the ozone. It was awful. I could hardly breathe. I tried a charcoal mask but it restricted my breathing. I had to lie or sit down till the heatwave went away.'

While most advice for dealing with the heat involves staying in the shade and drinking plenty of water, the response to pollution by ozone, which irritates the lining of the lung, is more draconian. Vulnerable individuals are told to avoid major road junctions (where car exhaust levels are high), stay indoors and wear masks.

The team's discovery will intensify calls for Britain to introduce even tougher new regulations to reduce emissions of car exhaust gases, the basic ingredient that fuels ozone production.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1212727,00.html


Informant: NHNE

Climate Change Out of the Blue

By Douglas Page

02:00 AM May. 10, 2004 PT

Those wispy streams of vapor that follow jetliners across the sky may not be as innocuous as they appear.

A new NASA study claims man-made cirrus clouds formed by commercial jet engine exhaust may be responsible for the increased surface temperatures detected in the United States between 1975 and 1994.

Climate data shows there has been a 1 percent per decade increase in cirrus cloud cover over the United States, which the NASA paper says is likely due to commercial air traffic.

Cirrus clouds, whether natural or artificial, play an important climatological role because they trap heat in the atmosphere by reflecting infrared radiation emitted from the Earth's surface.

The study, which appeared in the April 15 issue of the Journal of Climate, estimates that cirrus clouds from jet engine condensation trails, or contrails, increased the temperature of the lower atmosphere by anywhere from 0.36 to 0.54 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. These findings tend to agree with National Weather Service data that shows temperatures at the surface and lower atmosphere rising by almost 0.5 degrees per decade between 1975 and 1994.

Using 25 years of global surface observations of cirrus clouds, temperature and humidity from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction, the researchers confirmed the cirrus trends with 13 years of satellite data from NASA's International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project.

"Both air traffic and cirrus coverage increased during the period of warming, despite no changes in the NCEP humidity at jet-cruise altitudes over the United States," said Patrick Minnis, senior research scientist at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia.

By contrast, humidity at flight altitudes decreased over other land areas, such as Asia, and was accompanied by less cirrus coverage, except over Western Europe, where air traffic is very heavy, Minnis said.

The trends in cirrus cover and warming over the United States were greatest during winter and spring, when contrails are most frequent. These results led to the conclusion that contrails caused the increase in cirrus clouds.

Exhaust from aircraft engines is hot and moist, the water vapor in them coming mostly from combustion of hydrogen in the aircraft's fuel. The exhaust takes a moment to cool and mix with the surrounding air, so there is normally a 50- to 100-meter gap behind an aircraft before the contrail appears.

Once formed, contrails are distorted and spread by upper winds. Curtains of ice crystals can sometimes be seen falling from them.

Humidity in the air determines how long contrails remain in the atmosphere. Persistent trails sometimes form large patches of fibrous clouds indistinguishable from natural cirrus, cirrocumulus or cirrostratus clouds, according to Malcolm Walker, of England's Royal Meteorological Society.

Contrails that persist for an extended period of time are most likely to affect the climate. Minnis has estimated that a contrail that begins as a thin gossamer line across the sky can spread to cover more than 20,000 square kilometers in just a few hours.

Not everyone was immediately convinced by Minnis' contrail conclusions.

"The idea that the Earth is warming and high cloudiness is increasing and therefore part of the warming is due to increasing high cloudiness is not logically valid, if one is considering observations only," said Andy Detwiler, a professor of atmospheric sciences at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology.

Correlation does not equate to causation, he said.

"So many processes affect the temperature of the Earth that contrails could easily be acting to cool the Earth, and yet the overall temperature trend could be increasing," Detwiler said.

Still, this is not the first study to connect contrails to the issue of global warming. In 1999, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimated that contrails from the world fleet of 12,000 civilian jetliners contribute as much to global warming as the carbon dioxide their engines emit burning jet fuel.

Source:

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,63365,00.html


Informant: NHNE

RED CROSS: IRAQ ABUSE WIDESPREAD, ROUTINE

By Alexander G. Higgins
Associated press
May 10, 2004

GENEVA - Up to 90 percent of Iraqi detainees were arrested "by mistake," according to coalition intelligence officers cited in a Red Cross report disclosed Monday. It also says U.S. officers mistreated inmates at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison by keeping them naked in dark, empty cells.

Abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American soldiers was widespread and routine, the report finds -- contrary to President Bush's contention that the mistreatment "was the wrongdoing of a few."

While many detainees were quickly released, high-ranking officials in Saddam Hussein's government, including those listed on the U.S. military's deck of cards, were held for months in solitary confinement.

Red Cross delegates saw U.S. military intelligence officers mistreating prisoners under interrogation at Abu Ghraib and collected allegations of abuse at more than 10 other detention facilities, including the military intelligence section at Camp Cropper at Baghdad International Airport and the Tikrit holding area, according to the report.

The 24-page document cites abuses -- some "tantamount to torture" -- including brutality, hooding, humiliation and threats of "imminent
execution."

"These methods of physical and psychological coercion were used by the military intelligence in a systematic way to gain confessions and extract information and other forms of cooperation from persons who had been arrested in connection with suspected security offenses or deemed to have an 'intelligence value.'"

High-ranking officials were singled out for special treatment, according to the report, which the International Committee of the Red Cross confirmed as authentic after it was published by The Wall Street Journal on Monday.

"Since June 2003 over a hundred 'high value detainees' have been held for nearly 23 hours a day in strict solitary confinement in small concrete cells devoid of daylight," says the report. "Their continued internment several months after their arrest in strict solitary confinement constituted a serious violation of the third and fourth Geneva Conventions."

It did not say who the detainees were, but an official who discussed the report with the Red Cross told The Associated Press they include some of the 55 top officials in Saddam's regime named in the deck of cards given to troops.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said detainees held at Baghdad International Airport include many of the 44 "deck of cards" suspects already captured. It was not clear if Saddam was at the airport, but the Red Cross has said it visited him in coalition detention somewhere in Iraq last month.

The high-value detainees were deprived of any contact with other inmates, "guards, family members (except through Red Cross messages) and the rest of the outside world," the report says.

Those whose investigations were near an end were said to be allowed to exercise together outside the cells for 20 minutes twice a day.

The report says some coalition military intelligence officers estimated "between 70 percent and 90 percent" of the detainees in Iraq "had been arrested by mistake. They also attributed the brutality of some arrests to the lack of proper supervision of battle group units."

The agency said arrests tended to follow a pattern.

"Authorities entered houses usually after dark, breaking down doors, waking up residents roughly, yelling orders, forcing family members into one room under military guard while searching the rest of the house and further breaking doors, cabinets and other property," the report says.

"Sometimes they arrested all adult males present in a house, including elderly, handicapped or sick people," it says. "Treatment often included pushing people around, insulting, taking aim with rifles, punching and kicking and striking with rifles."

It was unclear what the Red Cross meant by "mistake." However, many Iraqis have claimed U.S. forces arrested them because of misunderstandings, bogus claims by personal enemies, mistaken identity or simply for being at the wrong place at the wrong time.

One former detainee who claims he was abused, Haider Sabbar Abed, said he was arrested in July when the driver of the car he was in was unable to produce proper papers at a U.S. checkpoint. He was not released until April 15.

In one operation, U.S. special operations troops detained nearly the entire male population of the village of Habbariyah, ranging in age from 81 to 13, apparently to prevent terrorists from slipping across the border from Saudi Arabia. The 79 men were held for weeks.

Language problems sometimes led to detainees'"being slapped, roughed up, pushed around or pushed to the ground," according to the Red Cross report. "A failure to understand or a misunderstanding of orders given in English was construed by guards as resistance or disobedience."

The report says that in coalition prisons "ICRC delegates directly witnessed and documented a variety of methods used to secure the cooperation" of the inmates "with their interrogators." The delegates saw detainees kept "completely naked in totally empty concrete cells and in total darkness."

"Upon witnessing such cases, the ICRC interrupted its visits and requested an explanation from the authorities," the report says. "The military intelligence officer in charge of the interrogation explained that this practice was 'part of the process.'"

This apparently meant detainees were progressively given clothing, bedding, lighting and other items in exchange for cooperation, it says.

The report says the Red Cross found evidence supporting prisoners' allegations of other forms of abuse during arrest, initial detention and interrogation -- including burns, bruises and other injuries.

Once detainees were moved to regular prison facilities, the abuses typically stopped, it says.

The report also cites widespread abuse of power and ill-treatment by Iraqi law enforcement officers under the coalition, including extorting money from people in their custody by threatening to hand them over to coalition authorities. Under the Geneva Conventions, the coalition is responsible for the Iraqi officers' behavior, the report says.

The Red Cross has emphasized that the report was only a summary of its repeated attempts in person and in writing from March to November 2003 to get U.S. officials to stop abuses. Those earlier interventions by the Red Cross far preceded the Pentagon's decision to investigate after a low-ranking U.S. soldier stepped forward in January.

The Geneva-based organization gave its report to coalition forces in February. The prisoner abuse erupted into an international scandal in recent days after the publication of disturbing photographs from Abu Ghraib.

The Red Cross said it wanted to keep the report confidential because it saw U.S. officials making progress in responding to their complaints. Still, the American reaction was far slower than that of British officials, according to the report.

It says the Red Cross informed the commander of British forces in April 2003 of "ill-treatment" by military intelligence personnel in interrogating Iraqis at Umm Qasr in southern Iraq. "This intervention had the immediate effect to stop the systematic use of hoods and flexi-cuffs in the interrogation section of Umm Qasr."


Informant: NHNE

Omega see also

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0510042icrc1.html

Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
logo

Omega-News

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Archiv

April 2025
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Wenn das Telefon krank...
http://groups.google.com/g roup/mobilfunk_newsletter/ t/6f73cb93cafc5207   htt p://omega.twoday.net/searc h?q=elektromagnetische+Str ahlen http://omega.twoday. net/search?q=Strahlenschut z https://omega.twoday.net/ search?q=elektrosensibel h ttp://omega.twoday.net/sea rch?q=Funkloch https://omeg a.twoday.net/search?q=Alzh eimer http://freepage.twod ay.net/search?q=Alzheimer https://omega.twoday.net/se arch?q=Joachim+Mutter
Starmail - 8. Apr, 08:39
Familie Lange aus Bonn...
http://twitter.com/WILABon n/status/97313783480574361 6
Starmail - 15. Mär, 14:10
Dänische Studie findet...
https://omega.twoday.net/st ories/3035537/ -------- HLV...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:48
Schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen ...
Bitte schenken Sie uns Beachtung: Interessengemeinschaft...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:01
Effects of cellular phone...
http://www.buergerwelle.de /pdf/effects_of_cellular_p hone_emissions_on_sperm_mo tility_in_rats.htm [...
Starmail - 27. Nov, 11:08

Status

Online seit 7723 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 8. Apr, 08:39

Credits