Prosecutors Urged to Investigate Ralph Reed's Covert Lobbying
Starmail - 2. Dez, 18:00
Vote USA 2004
2
Dez
2005
War Profiteer Knows How to Party
Starmail - 2. Dez, 17:57
Bush: The Unpopular in Pursuit of the Unwinnable?
Starmail - 2. Dez, 17:56
Flight Logs Reveal Hundreds of CIA Flights to Europe
Starmail - 2. Dez, 17:52
The Bush Administration war on the independent media: lies and manipulation of news
http://www.freepress.net
A host of recent developments have made it clear that the Bush White House is doing battle against the journalistic standards and practices that underpin of our democracy. With its unprecedented campaign to undermine and stifle independent journalism, Bush & Co. have demonstrated brazen contempt for the Constitution and considerable fear of an informed public.
Free Press has launched a campaign to chronicle and combat Bush's war on the press. Today, we published a new report
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=59353558&url_num=2&url=http://www.freepress.net/presswar showing the scope and intensity of the administration's assault on press freedoms. The growing list of attacks on the press is truly astonishing:
Infiltrating Public Broadcasting
White House loyalists inside the Corporation for Public Broadcasting have launched a crusade to remake PBS, NPR and other public media into official mouthpieces. Kenneth Tomlinson's tenure at the CPB was characterized by targeting journalists like Bill Moyers who dared to air dissenting voices or prepare investigative reports on the administration.
Tomlinson's goal was clearly to fire a shot across the bow of all public stations so managers would shy away from the sort of investigative journalism that might expose Bush administration malfeasance. Tomlinson resigned in disgrace but left behind a cast of cronies to carry out his partisan crusade. And we still don't know the extent to which Karl Rove and others at the White House orchestrated his efforts.
Manufacturing Fake News
Under Bush administration directives, at least 20 federal agencies have produced and distributed scores of "video news releases" out of a $254 million slush fund set up to manufacture taxpayer-funded propaganda. These bogus and deceptive stories have been broadcast on TV stations nationwide without any acknowledgment that they were prepared by the government rather than local journalists.
The segments - which trumpeted administration "successes," promoted its controversial line on issues like overhauling Medicare, and featured Americans "thanking" Bush - have been repeatedly labeled "covert propaganda" by investigators at the Government Accountability Office.
Bribing Journalists
The administration has paid pundits to sing its praises. Earlier this year, TV commentator Armstrong Williams pocketed $240,000 in taxpayer money to laud Bush's education policies. Three other journalists have since been discovered on the government dole; and Williams admits that he has "no doubt" that other paid Bush shills are still on the loose.
The administration has even exported these tactics. According to the Los Angeles Times, the U.S. military is now secretly paying Iraqi newspapers to publish stories written by American troops.
Lying about the Iraq War
The White House saw the battle for domestic popular opinion as one of the main fronts in the war in Iraq. With the help of a compliant media, truth became the first casualty in their campaign to whip up support. But rather than admit to their lies and misinformation, the administration continues to attack those reporting the truth.
As Frank Rich recently wrote in the New York Times, the administration's "web of half-truths and falsehoods used to sell the war did not happen by accident; it was woven by design and then foisted on the public by a P.R. operation built expressly for that purpose in the White House."
Eliminating Dissent in the Mainstream Media
Bush has all but avoided traditional press conferences, closing down a prime venue for holding the executive accountable. On those rare occasions when he deigned to meet reporters, presidential aides turned the press conferences into parodies by seating a friendly right-wing "journalist," former male escort Jeff Gannon, amid the reporters and then steering questions to him when tough issues arose.
They have effectively silenced serious questioners, like veteran journalist Helen Thomas, by refusing to have the president or his aides call on reporters who challenge them. And they have established a hierarchy for journalists seeking interviews with administration officials, which favors networks that give the White House favorable coverage.
Gutting the Freedom of Information Act
The administration has scrapped enforcement of the Freedom of Information Act and has made it harder for reporters to do their jobs by refusing to cooperate with even the most basic requests for comment and data from government agencies. This is part of a broader clampdown on access to information that has made it virtually impossible for journalists to cover vast areas of government activity.
Consolidating Media Control
The administration continues to make common cause with the most powerful broadcast corporations in an effort to rewrite ownership laws in a manner that favors monopoly control of information. The Federal Communications Commission will announce plans to rewrite the ownership rules soon - it could happen as early as February - with aims of unleashing a new wave of media consolidation. The administration's desired rules changes would strike a mortal blow to local reporting and further squeeze journalists.
In a famous 1945 opinion, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black said that "the First Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society." In other words, a free press is the sine qua non of the entire American Constitution and republican experiment.
We started Free Press because our democracy demands a diverse and independent media. The Bush administration's attack on the foundations of self-government requires a response of similar caliber. I hope you'll join me in the year ahead as Free Press works to hold the administration accountable for all its attacks on journalism and see that such abuses will not be repeated in the future.
Please take a moment to visit our online campaign
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=59353558&url_num=3&url=http://www.freepress.net/presswar to defend democracy from the White House assault on the media.
Onward,
Robert W. McChesney
President Free Press
http://www.freepress.net
P.S. Know more people who would like to keep updated on this and other media reform issues? Urge them to join our e-activist list. The more people you enlist in the movement for media reform, the better our chances of success.
Protect PBS Stop News Fraud Save Community Internet Defend Local Access Save Our Spectrum Tune Out Radio Payola LPFM: Reclaim Radio Ownership Rules Download Activist Tools
Media Ownership Internet and Broadband Television and Cable Radio Journalism Noncommercial Media Intellectual Property Commercialism
In Washington Global State and Local
Beginner's Guide Who Owns the Media? Organization Directory Free Press Library Useful Links Media Minutes
America's leadership is waging a war against the journalistic standards and practices that underpin not only a free press but our democracy. The Fourth Estate is withering under an unprecedented White House assault designed to intimidate, smear and discredit investigative journalism - and allow the president and his political cronies to lie with impunity. If left unchecked, this and future administrations will continue to:
a.. manipulate the media "message" by producing propaganda, putting journalists on the government payroll and tightly scripting all public events;
b.. dismiss all dissenting views in the media as biased and politically motivated;
c.. undermine public trust in journalism using the right-wing "echo chamber" to sow hostility toward reporters who challenge the official line; and
d.. eliminate access to information making it nearly impossible for journalists to investigate vast swathes of the federal government.
Bush's Media Agenda
The current administration is more inhospitable to truth and an informed citizenry than any before it. In fact, the administration seeks the opposite: a public that buys a carefully constructed myth over reality. This deception has manifest in seven lines of attack:
a.. Infiltrating public broadcasting with party loyalists b.. Manufacturing fake news and propaganda c.. Bribing journalists to flack for the administration d.. Gutting the Freedom of Information Act e.. Deceiving media (and the U.S. public) about Iraq f.. Stifling dissent within mainstream media g.. Consolidating media control into the hands of the elite
Defending Our Press
The damage already done is reflected in plummeting public faith in reporters and the unrelenting stream of lies flowing from the White House into mainstream news. This crisis can be attributed in part to the failure of big media corporations and some journalists to meet the basic responsibilities of the press in a democratic society. But the Bush administration's wholesale assault on a free press is also to blame. This White House has gone well beyond the cynical maneuvers of past administrations and implemented a scheme to tear down journalism and erode civil liberties.
Free Press has launched a nonpartisan campaign to defend democracy from the war on diverse and independent media. The campaign will exert grassroots and lobbying pressure to implement policies that hold our leadership accountable and ensure that abuses of press freedom are not repeated by this and future administrations.
Join the fight for a free press
Join our campaign for free and independent media.
Stop the White House from using hundreds of millions of tax dollars to manipulate news.
From InfoNature.Org
A host of recent developments have made it clear that the Bush White House is doing battle against the journalistic standards and practices that underpin of our democracy. With its unprecedented campaign to undermine and stifle independent journalism, Bush & Co. have demonstrated brazen contempt for the Constitution and considerable fear of an informed public.
Free Press has launched a campaign to chronicle and combat Bush's war on the press. Today, we published a new report
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=59353558&url_num=2&url=http://www.freepress.net/presswar showing the scope and intensity of the administration's assault on press freedoms. The growing list of attacks on the press is truly astonishing:
Infiltrating Public Broadcasting
White House loyalists inside the Corporation for Public Broadcasting have launched a crusade to remake PBS, NPR and other public media into official mouthpieces. Kenneth Tomlinson's tenure at the CPB was characterized by targeting journalists like Bill Moyers who dared to air dissenting voices or prepare investigative reports on the administration.
Tomlinson's goal was clearly to fire a shot across the bow of all public stations so managers would shy away from the sort of investigative journalism that might expose Bush administration malfeasance. Tomlinson resigned in disgrace but left behind a cast of cronies to carry out his partisan crusade. And we still don't know the extent to which Karl Rove and others at the White House orchestrated his efforts.
Manufacturing Fake News
Under Bush administration directives, at least 20 federal agencies have produced and distributed scores of "video news releases" out of a $254 million slush fund set up to manufacture taxpayer-funded propaganda. These bogus and deceptive stories have been broadcast on TV stations nationwide without any acknowledgment that they were prepared by the government rather than local journalists.
The segments - which trumpeted administration "successes," promoted its controversial line on issues like overhauling Medicare, and featured Americans "thanking" Bush - have been repeatedly labeled "covert propaganda" by investigators at the Government Accountability Office.
Bribing Journalists
The administration has paid pundits to sing its praises. Earlier this year, TV commentator Armstrong Williams pocketed $240,000 in taxpayer money to laud Bush's education policies. Three other journalists have since been discovered on the government dole; and Williams admits that he has "no doubt" that other paid Bush shills are still on the loose.
The administration has even exported these tactics. According to the Los Angeles Times, the U.S. military is now secretly paying Iraqi newspapers to publish stories written by American troops.
Lying about the Iraq War
The White House saw the battle for domestic popular opinion as one of the main fronts in the war in Iraq. With the help of a compliant media, truth became the first casualty in their campaign to whip up support. But rather than admit to their lies and misinformation, the administration continues to attack those reporting the truth.
As Frank Rich recently wrote in the New York Times, the administration's "web of half-truths and falsehoods used to sell the war did not happen by accident; it was woven by design and then foisted on the public by a P.R. operation built expressly for that purpose in the White House."
Eliminating Dissent in the Mainstream Media
Bush has all but avoided traditional press conferences, closing down a prime venue for holding the executive accountable. On those rare occasions when he deigned to meet reporters, presidential aides turned the press conferences into parodies by seating a friendly right-wing "journalist," former male escort Jeff Gannon, amid the reporters and then steering questions to him when tough issues arose.
They have effectively silenced serious questioners, like veteran journalist Helen Thomas, by refusing to have the president or his aides call on reporters who challenge them. And they have established a hierarchy for journalists seeking interviews with administration officials, which favors networks that give the White House favorable coverage.
Gutting the Freedom of Information Act
The administration has scrapped enforcement of the Freedom of Information Act and has made it harder for reporters to do their jobs by refusing to cooperate with even the most basic requests for comment and data from government agencies. This is part of a broader clampdown on access to information that has made it virtually impossible for journalists to cover vast areas of government activity.
Consolidating Media Control
The administration continues to make common cause with the most powerful broadcast corporations in an effort to rewrite ownership laws in a manner that favors monopoly control of information. The Federal Communications Commission will announce plans to rewrite the ownership rules soon - it could happen as early as February - with aims of unleashing a new wave of media consolidation. The administration's desired rules changes would strike a mortal blow to local reporting and further squeeze journalists.
In a famous 1945 opinion, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black said that "the First Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society." In other words, a free press is the sine qua non of the entire American Constitution and republican experiment.
We started Free Press because our democracy demands a diverse and independent media. The Bush administration's attack on the foundations of self-government requires a response of similar caliber. I hope you'll join me in the year ahead as Free Press works to hold the administration accountable for all its attacks on journalism and see that such abuses will not be repeated in the future.
Please take a moment to visit our online campaign
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?key=59353558&url_num=3&url=http://www.freepress.net/presswar to defend democracy from the White House assault on the media.
Onward,
Robert W. McChesney
President Free Press
http://www.freepress.net
P.S. Know more people who would like to keep updated on this and other media reform issues? Urge them to join our e-activist list. The more people you enlist in the movement for media reform, the better our chances of success.
Protect PBS Stop News Fraud Save Community Internet Defend Local Access Save Our Spectrum Tune Out Radio Payola LPFM: Reclaim Radio Ownership Rules Download Activist Tools
Media Ownership Internet and Broadband Television and Cable Radio Journalism Noncommercial Media Intellectual Property Commercialism
In Washington Global State and Local
Beginner's Guide Who Owns the Media? Organization Directory Free Press Library Useful Links Media Minutes
America's leadership is waging a war against the journalistic standards and practices that underpin not only a free press but our democracy. The Fourth Estate is withering under an unprecedented White House assault designed to intimidate, smear and discredit investigative journalism - and allow the president and his political cronies to lie with impunity. If left unchecked, this and future administrations will continue to:
a.. manipulate the media "message" by producing propaganda, putting journalists on the government payroll and tightly scripting all public events;
b.. dismiss all dissenting views in the media as biased and politically motivated;
c.. undermine public trust in journalism using the right-wing "echo chamber" to sow hostility toward reporters who challenge the official line; and
d.. eliminate access to information making it nearly impossible for journalists to investigate vast swathes of the federal government.
Bush's Media Agenda
The current administration is more inhospitable to truth and an informed citizenry than any before it. In fact, the administration seeks the opposite: a public that buys a carefully constructed myth over reality. This deception has manifest in seven lines of attack:
a.. Infiltrating public broadcasting with party loyalists b.. Manufacturing fake news and propaganda c.. Bribing journalists to flack for the administration d.. Gutting the Freedom of Information Act e.. Deceiving media (and the U.S. public) about Iraq f.. Stifling dissent within mainstream media g.. Consolidating media control into the hands of the elite
Defending Our Press
The damage already done is reflected in plummeting public faith in reporters and the unrelenting stream of lies flowing from the White House into mainstream news. This crisis can be attributed in part to the failure of big media corporations and some journalists to meet the basic responsibilities of the press in a democratic society. But the Bush administration's wholesale assault on a free press is also to blame. This White House has gone well beyond the cynical maneuvers of past administrations and implemented a scheme to tear down journalism and erode civil liberties.
Free Press has launched a nonpartisan campaign to defend democracy from the war on diverse and independent media. The campaign will exert grassroots and lobbying pressure to implement policies that hold our leadership accountable and ensure that abuses of press freedom are not repeated by this and future administrations.
Join the fight for a free press
Join our campaign for free and independent media.
Stop the White House from using hundreds of millions of tax dollars to manipulate news.
From InfoNature.Org
Starmail - 2. Dez, 17:49
Bring the troops home: a majority of Americans want troops home in 2006
In a speech today, President Bush tried to answer the majority of Americans who believe we need to change course in Iraq. But he offered no plans to bring troops home—just flashy public relations.
Bush's public relations push comes at a tipping point in the Iraq debate. A majority of Americans want troops home in 2006 and former supporters of the war in Congress like Rep. John P. Murtha (D-PA) agree.
Members of Congress are changing and examining their position on Iraq right now. It is critical that they hear from all of us. For the next two weeks we're circulating a petition calling on Congress to insist on an exit strategy to bring the troops home in 2006. Will you sign? Click below.
http://political.moveon.org/iraq/
We’re planning a nation-wide round of deliveries two weeks from now, when MoveOn members will deliver local petition signatures to Congresspeople across the country. The more people who sign, the more clear the message will be: we expect Congress to act.
Members of Congress are trying to figure out whether the national concern about the war is reflected in their home district. And things are changing fast: just in the last weeks, Senators Obama, Clinton, and Biden have indicated that they're more open to a quicker exit strategy. A strong showing of support for a plan to bring the troops home will send an important message that our representatives need to do their job.
It hasn't always been clear over the last two years when Congressional leaders might come around on Iraq. But this might be that moment. Two thirds of Americans want a plan to bring the troops home and, as Congressman John Murtha and a growing group of military generals argue, that is the best course we have. That is why signing the petition is so important.
Two weeks ago Congressman Murtha, a long-time supporter of the war, kick-started a debate on Iraq by proposing a plan to bring our troops home from Iraq starting immediately and taking about six months. Rep. Murtha's case is simple.
* U.S. troop presence is driving the insurgency, making things worse. Iraq can't stabilize with U.S. troops there.
* Iraqis want us to leave—more than 80% of Iraqis in one survey.
* The war in Iraq is making America less safe—hurting our preparedness and global alliances.
* The challenges that remain in Iraq can only be resolved politically—not with the military.
We need to push our elected leaders to stand firm and insist on a real plan to bring the troops home—a responsible exit strategy with a timeline that starts now and brings the troops home in 2006.
Please sign our petition so we can deliver it to representatives before they leave for the holiday break.
http://political.moveon.org/iraq/
http://www.thesoapboxroadshow.com
Informant: R Hubble
Bush's public relations push comes at a tipping point in the Iraq debate. A majority of Americans want troops home in 2006 and former supporters of the war in Congress like Rep. John P. Murtha (D-PA) agree.
Members of Congress are changing and examining their position on Iraq right now. It is critical that they hear from all of us. For the next two weeks we're circulating a petition calling on Congress to insist on an exit strategy to bring the troops home in 2006. Will you sign? Click below.
http://political.moveon.org/iraq/
We’re planning a nation-wide round of deliveries two weeks from now, when MoveOn members will deliver local petition signatures to Congresspeople across the country. The more people who sign, the more clear the message will be: we expect Congress to act.
Members of Congress are trying to figure out whether the national concern about the war is reflected in their home district. And things are changing fast: just in the last weeks, Senators Obama, Clinton, and Biden have indicated that they're more open to a quicker exit strategy. A strong showing of support for a plan to bring the troops home will send an important message that our representatives need to do their job.
It hasn't always been clear over the last two years when Congressional leaders might come around on Iraq. But this might be that moment. Two thirds of Americans want a plan to bring the troops home and, as Congressman John Murtha and a growing group of military generals argue, that is the best course we have. That is why signing the petition is so important.
Two weeks ago Congressman Murtha, a long-time supporter of the war, kick-started a debate on Iraq by proposing a plan to bring our troops home from Iraq starting immediately and taking about six months. Rep. Murtha's case is simple.
* U.S. troop presence is driving the insurgency, making things worse. Iraq can't stabilize with U.S. troops there.
* Iraqis want us to leave—more than 80% of Iraqis in one survey.
* The war in Iraq is making America less safe—hurting our preparedness and global alliances.
* The challenges that remain in Iraq can only be resolved politically—not with the military.
We need to push our elected leaders to stand firm and insist on a real plan to bring the troops home—a responsible exit strategy with a timeline that starts now and brings the troops home in 2006.
Please sign our petition so we can deliver it to representatives before they leave for the holiday break.
http://political.moveon.org/iraq/
http://www.thesoapboxroadshow.com
Informant: R Hubble
Starmail - 2. Dez, 17:40
Bullet Points over Baghdad
Paul Krugman writes: The National Security Council document released this week under the grandiose title "National Strategy for Victory in Iraq" is neither an analytical report nor a policy statement. It's simply the same old talking points - "victory in Iraq is a vital US interest;" "failure is not an option" - repackaged in the style of a slide presentation for a business meeting.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/120205Z.shtml
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/120205Z.shtml
Starmail - 2. Dez, 17:24
