Temple of Death
Starmail - 1. Jan, 14:00
Naturkatastrophen
1
Jan
2005
UCD Team: We Predicted Quake
Starmail - 1. Jan, 11:05
Pacific coast's tsunami threat
Starmail - 1. Jan, 11:03
Did Animals Have Quake Warning?
Starmail - 1. Jan, 10:55
An amateur geophysicist's opinion of what caused the Tsunami
Posted on one of my groups. FYI - Anna Webb
Begin forwarded message:
On Dec. 23, 2004 an 8.1 quake struck off the SW coast of New Zealand. The epicenter of this quake was very close to an area of maximum intensity in the earth's magnetic field - see map F at
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/WMM/image.shtml
The quake was also located along the perimeter of the Indo-Australian Tectonic Plate. This in itself was a "Great Quake". Only an average of 1 occurs worldwide per year (prior to this, only 13 quakes greater than 8.0 had occurred since 1990).
This quake would have set up reverberations around the "Ring of Fire", especially along the perimeter of the Indo-Australian Plate.
Two days and 10 hours go by and the earth, sun and moon align. It's a full moon and the earth is being pulled in one direction by sun and another direction by moon. It's like tripping a mouse trap - all of sudden a tremendous amount of energy is released by a small gravitational tug, and a 9.0 earthquake strikes off Sumatra - also along the perimeter of the Indo-Australian Plate. The rest is history, in fact it is history still in the making.
But it's my opinion that the pre-existing conditions I've described set up conditions that caused Mega-Quake and the massive Tsunami that followed.
Zy.
Begin forwarded message:
On Dec. 23, 2004 an 8.1 quake struck off the SW coast of New Zealand. The epicenter of this quake was very close to an area of maximum intensity in the earth's magnetic field - see map F at
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/WMM/image.shtml
The quake was also located along the perimeter of the Indo-Australian Tectonic Plate. This in itself was a "Great Quake". Only an average of 1 occurs worldwide per year (prior to this, only 13 quakes greater than 8.0 had occurred since 1990).
This quake would have set up reverberations around the "Ring of Fire", especially along the perimeter of the Indo-Australian Plate.
Two days and 10 hours go by and the earth, sun and moon align. It's a full moon and the earth is being pulled in one direction by sun and another direction by moon. It's like tripping a mouse trap - all of sudden a tremendous amount of energy is released by a small gravitational tug, and a 9.0 earthquake strikes off Sumatra - also along the perimeter of the Indo-Australian Plate. The rest is history, in fact it is history still in the making.
But it's my opinion that the pre-existing conditions I've described set up conditions that caused Mega-Quake and the massive Tsunami that followed.
Zy.
Starmail - 1. Jan, 10:52
Sea Change
by William Thomas
http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Tsunami.htm
http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Tsunami.htm
Starmail - 1. Jan, 10:42
Washington Foreknowledge of A Natural Disaster
Starmail - 1. Jan, 10:26
31
Dez
2004
Six questions that don’t go away
On Sunday, India failed as a nation
PRASAD PARUCHURI
Posted online: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 at 0000 hours IST
Here are six questions that arise in the wake of the tsunami tragedy which don’t go away.
Question 1: Once the tsunami hit the Andaman and Nicobar islands, the government should have sprung into action and warned the people on the mainland. Southern India could then have been better prepared to face the disaster. Once the tsunami hit the Andamans, we had at least 60 minutes to do this. Why was this not done?
Question 2: Why do we have all that government paraphernalia in the Andamans if we cannot keep an eye on developments in Southeast Asia?
Question 3: What were ISRO’s numerous satellites doing at the time?
Question 4: If the US, Australia and other Pacific nations knew about the tsunami within 15-30 minutes, why did they not warn India and the others? It is unimaginable that they allowed the disaster to happen just because Sri Lanka and India were not ‘members’ in a Pacific watch scheme. If, on the other hand, they did not know, then all the research and money being spent on observing the Pacific watch is a waste. After all, the same tsunami could have travelled south to the western coast of Australia. If they did know that the tsunami was traveling west towards the Indian subcontinent and did not warn the nations concerned, then they have failed humanity.
Question 5: Today it is a tsunami, tomorrow it could be something else. What we know from this tsunami is that India, as a nation, failed. Indian scientists failed. Indian managers failed. Indian politicians failed. Indian administrators failed. The Indian media failed — by wasting time and energy on trivial issues rather than focusing on issues of importance. Why did the nation fail?
Question 6: Finally, if the people cannot be warned about a tsunami, can we trust the government of the day and/or bureaucracy to warn people of nuclear strikes — by rogue states or otherwise?
© 2004: Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights reserved throughout the world.
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=61684
Informant: Shanti Renfrew
PRASAD PARUCHURI
Posted online: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 at 0000 hours IST
Here are six questions that arise in the wake of the tsunami tragedy which don’t go away.
Question 1: Once the tsunami hit the Andaman and Nicobar islands, the government should have sprung into action and warned the people on the mainland. Southern India could then have been better prepared to face the disaster. Once the tsunami hit the Andamans, we had at least 60 minutes to do this. Why was this not done?
Question 2: Why do we have all that government paraphernalia in the Andamans if we cannot keep an eye on developments in Southeast Asia?
Question 3: What were ISRO’s numerous satellites doing at the time?
Question 4: If the US, Australia and other Pacific nations knew about the tsunami within 15-30 minutes, why did they not warn India and the others? It is unimaginable that they allowed the disaster to happen just because Sri Lanka and India were not ‘members’ in a Pacific watch scheme. If, on the other hand, they did not know, then all the research and money being spent on observing the Pacific watch is a waste. After all, the same tsunami could have travelled south to the western coast of Australia. If they did know that the tsunami was traveling west towards the Indian subcontinent and did not warn the nations concerned, then they have failed humanity.
Question 5: Today it is a tsunami, tomorrow it could be something else. What we know from this tsunami is that India, as a nation, failed. Indian scientists failed. Indian managers failed. Indian politicians failed. Indian administrators failed. The Indian media failed — by wasting time and energy on trivial issues rather than focusing on issues of importance. Why did the nation fail?
Question 6: Finally, if the people cannot be warned about a tsunami, can we trust the government of the day and/or bureaucracy to warn people of nuclear strikes — by rogue states or otherwise?
© 2004: Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights reserved throughout the world.
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=61684
Informant: Shanti Renfrew
Starmail - 31. Dez, 18:36
Putting a Disaster in Context
A Wave of Questions: Putting a Disaster in Context
by Mickey Z.
How does one comprehend the magnitude, impact, and context of a disaster that may claim more than 100,000 lives? But enough about the U.S. occupation of Iraq. The recent earthquake/tsunami in Asia raises more questions than answers. Here's a start:....
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Dec2004/MickeyZ1230.htm
by Mickey Z.
How does one comprehend the magnitude, impact, and context of a disaster that may claim more than 100,000 lives? But enough about the U.S. occupation of Iraq. The recent earthquake/tsunami in Asia raises more questions than answers. Here's a start:....
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Dec2004/MickeyZ1230.htm
Starmail - 31. Dez, 13:28
