You can read scientific reports about climate change and global warming till your eyes blur, but sometimes, good old-fashioned photos still tell the story best.

Check out this BBC photo essay documenting climate change:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/picture_gallery/05/sci_nat_how_the_world_is_changing/html/1.stm

Source: http://www.tompaine.com/index.php#passiton

Excellent glossary and links for the subject of climate change:

http://www.greenfacts.org/studies/climate_change/toolboxes/glossary.htm#anthropogenic

And I too wonder about the validity of the climate change scenario regarding CO2 and Ozone. It seems the UV ray situation plays a larger role than the overall presented picture of climate change would have us know, which concentrates mainly on CO2. I know CO2 is important, but considering the biosphere, I wonder if its secondary to its endangering effects compared to the Ozone depletion and the consequent admittance of UV ray absorption. The DNA of plankton and other life forms seems particularly susceptible to disruption due to UV exposure.

Whenever you see something hyped to such a great degree, you simply have to wonder, what is missing? What is actually behind the scenes that they're not telling you about?

Laurel

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1540&ncid=1540&e=9&u=/afp/20050217/sc_afp/climateantarcticoceanaustralia_050217073318


Informant: NHNE

The strongest evidence yet that global warming has been triggered by human activity has emerged from a major study of rising temperatures in the world’s oceans.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1489955,00.html


From Information Clearing House

http://www.ipsnews.net/africa/interna.asp?idnews=27451


Informant: NHNE