Ethik - Ethics

20
Apr
2005

Das Leitbild der Gleichwertigkeit aller Menschen gerät ins Wanken

Seit Jahren ist ein Anstieg menschenfeindlicher Einstellungen zu verzeichnen, nicht allein in Deutschland, sondern europaweit.

http://www.telepolis.de/tp/r4/artikel/19/19927/1.html

18
Apr
2005

Stalking: Zypries will Straftatbestand gegen Telefonterror, Auflauern und Bedrohung

18.04.05

Mit einer Änderung des Strafgesetzbuches möchte die Bundesregierung bestimmte häufige "Stalking-Handlungen" wie Auflauern vor der Wohnung, Telefonterror und Bedrohung unter Strafe stellen. Dazu solle ein neuer Tatbestand Nachstellung in das Strafgesetzbuch eingefügt werden, sagte Bundesjustizministerin Brigitte Zypries am Freitag in Berlin bei der Vorstellung eines entsprechenden Gesetzentwurfs. Gegen Täter könnten Freiheitsstrafen bis zu drei Jahren oder Geldstrafen verhängt werden. Fälle, die durch den neuen Paragrafen nicht abgedeckt werden, könnten über das bestehende Gewaltschutzgesetz aufgefangen werden.

Die ganze Nachricht im Internet:

http://www.ngo-online.de/ganze_nachricht.php?Nr=10894

6
Apr
2005

21
Mrz
2005

20
Mrz
2005

On the falsity of much 'Corporate Social Responsibility'

The Ecologist - March 05, Editorial - on the falsity of much 'Corporate Social Responsibility' ..........

http://www.theecologist.co.uk/article.html?article=491

.........But that’s hypocritical nonsense. Governments do not operate from a position of neutrality. On the contrary, decades of very intensive lobbying, of infiltrating the regulatory process, of purchasing policy and supporting compliant politicians have reaped enormous benefits for big business. In the US, according to former president Bill Clinton’s labour secretary, ‘there’s no longer any countervailing power in Washington. Business is in complete control of the machinery of government. It’s payback time and every industry and trade association is busily cashing in’.

The regulatory system has been on overdrive for many years. Only it has adopted a dual purpose whereby the operations of big business have been globally deregulated and the operations of small businesses have been regulated to the point at which many cannot hope to survive. If you’re a large GM firm, the world is your laboratory, its inhabitants your guinea pigs. But a small firm selling vitamin supplements is subjected to a regulatory system that demands absolute adherence to the precautionary principle. It’s been said many times that you could render the biosphere non-viable without breaking a single law, but woe-betide you if you want to sell unpasteurised cider.

This isn’t free-market capitalism. The economy has been rigged. And not just through the regulatory system. Goods whose production may have caused untold ecological damage can be sold cheaply – because the economy fails to recognise the real value of the natural world and its resources. Pollution, illness, local economic collapse… These are merely ‘externalities’. But add them to the cost, as would necessarily happen in an unsubsidised economy, and the story is very different.

The economy is shaped and controlled by human decisions. We could just as easily make different decisions. We can demand through effective campaigns an economy in which the ‘externalities’ are internalised. We can demand fairness in the regulatory system. We can insist that corporate crimes are adequately punished.

artjar

From Mast Network

16
Mrz
2005

Coerced altruism's ruinous popularity

03/15/05

In a truly free human community, what measure of generosity, charity, philanthropy is to be forthcoming from people may not be forced upon them and the beneficiaries may not use the force of laws and regulations to elicit what they need and want from others. This is true in the case of all so called civil rights laws, too, be it for the benefit of members of any type of minorities, be they of some race, gender or disabled group. ... It is far more unjust to initiate force against people so as to help one -- a point that should be easy to appreciate in simple personal relations in which it is plain common sense that morally no one may coerce another to be helpful, even in cases of dire straits...

http://www.freemarketnews.com/pview/5834/1140/html/index.php

from Free Market News Network, by Tibor R. Machan


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

9
Mrz
2005

24
Feb
2005

Why liberty is necessary for morality

by Tibor R. Machan

Free Market News Network

02/23/05

A sad result of so explaining the merits of a free society is that it begins to look like liberty is the enemy of morality. And it is just this way that a good many people have understood the Western tradition of liberalism. They have come to believe that if you accept the Western idea of a free society, you must not care about morality at all. Indeed, arguably a great many enemies of the West hold such a view. Love the West, reject morality; love morality, reject the West. Yet this is completely wrong. In point of fact precisely the opposite is true. The reason the Western idea of a free society makes a great deal of sense is that unless people make their moral choices and act on them freely, there cannot be anything morally praiseworthy in what they do...

http://www.freemarketnews.com/pview/5834/958/html/index.php


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

28
Jan
2005

Free trade and the future of furniture

by Rob Sligh

Acton Institute

01/26/05

History teaches us that free trade brings prosperity, growth, and higher living standards, benefiting both rich and poor. The adjustments forced by economic freedom, though gut-wrenching for those of us directly involved, result in the most efficient and effective use of time, talent, and capital in the long run. That may be, but it's hard to keep in mind when we're rolling through a wringer!

Sometimes, a commitment to economic freedom may not seem to be in our own short-term self-interest. Our moral responsibility, though, is not only to look out for our own interests but also to consider the good of our fellow human beings around us and around the world...

http://www.acton.org/ppolicy/comment/article.php?id=244


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

8
Jan
2005

Will We Survive Our Technologies?

"Will We Survive Our Technologies? We are being propelled into this new century with no plan, no control, no brakes."

Why The Future Doesn't Need Us
http://www.stevequayle.com/News.alert/Technology/0004.future.doesnt.need.0.html
http://www.primitivism.com/future.htm


Informant: Friends
logo

Omega-News

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Archiv

April 2024
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Wenn das Telefon krank...
http://groups.google.com/g roup/mobilfunk_newsletter/ t/6f73cb93cafc5207   htt p://omega.twoday.net/searc h?q=elektromagnetische+Str ahlen http://omega.twoday. net/search?q=Strahlenschut z https://omega.twoday.net/ search?q=elektrosensibel h ttp://omega.twoday.net/sea rch?q=Funkloch https://omeg a.twoday.net/search?q=Alzh eimer http://freepage.twod ay.net/search?q=Alzheimer https://omega.twoday.net/se arch?q=Joachim+Mutter
Starmail - 8. Apr, 08:39
Familie Lange aus Bonn...
http://twitter.com/WILABon n/status/97313783480574361 6
Starmail - 15. Mär, 14:10
Dänische Studie findet...
https://omega.twoday.net/st ories/3035537/ -------- HLV...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:48
Schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen ...
Bitte schenken Sie uns Beachtung: Interessengemeinschaft...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:01
Effects of cellular phone...
http://www.buergerwelle.de /pdf/effects_of_cellular_p hone_emissions_on_sperm_mo tility_in_rats.htm [...
Starmail - 27. Nov, 11:08

Status

Online seit 7361 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 8. Apr, 08:39

Credits