New study ties brain tumors to cell phones
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/index.php?p=428
"What needs to happen more, so that the scientific community will come out and annouce that cellular phones are carcinogenic ? Are you waiting for the radiation itself to come out and confess? "
(Kobi Maydan, host of a popular morning programme, 3.4.06, to Dr. Danny Wolf, pediatric physician who was interviewed about prof' Hardell's latest study).
Message from Iris Atzmon
--------
Setting the record straight about Johansen's mindless blather
Johansen's ill-informed comments should be considered in context with Hardell's letter to the editor of the BJC, attached.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/bjc_2006_reply_hardell_hansson.pdf
Cheers
Don Maisch
--------
Comment from Christoffer Johansen from the Danish Cancer Organization: The Cancer organization dismisses the Swedish results and will not issue any new recommendations. We do not think that the data are reliable and therefore we will not change our recommendations concerning use of cell phones. The Swedish study is unreliable because it consists of two studies put together without any new data.
Sianette Kwee
Sensommervej 16
DK-8600 Silkeborg
Denmark
--------
...and his own study which found a protective effect from the cellular phone is very reliable indeed with new data, with 4 countries showing a protective effect (Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark). Why won't he just recommend phones as cancer prevention therapy?
Iris Atzmon
--------
Don
It looks more and more obvious to me that the cancer industry is protecting the wireless industry and the power generating corporations. It would appear that they either hold stock or they are getting heavy funding from these corporations. I believe the time has come for the public to know where the cancer industry is getting their funding. They have people running, jumping, swimming, etc. for funding to find a cure and when ever a possible cause is discovered, they seem to find fault with the scientific methods used.
I feel it is time we all speak out and call for a thorough investigation and accounting. Here in Canada we have CEO's from the cancer industry appearing at protest gathering against power lines and cellphone towers as expert witness for the corporations, where they should be preaching precaution, knowing that science has proven that childhood leukemia can be caused by EMF.
Iris in Isreal discovered that corporate funding for the IARC study was being channeled through the cancer industry so it would not appear as direct corporate funding. This act is, in my opinion, money laundering, which I understand to be an illegal offence. It has also been established that the Cancer Industry holds stock in tobacco corporations.This to me is as low as they can get, knowing full well that smoking causes cancer.
Wendy Mesley on CBC TV, Market Place March 5/06 asked some very interesting questions about cancer and why so much enface is placed on the cure and not on the cause. I am attaching the program transcript .
Regards Robert
Shortcut to: http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/files/health/cancer/index.html
--------
Another important thing, is that the INTERPHONE researchers signed conflict of interests declarations - I attach the declaration form they had to sign. This is also for appearance only: at least several have worked/ work for the industry and/or have an apparent conflict. According to the file conditions, they should be removed or partly removed from the study, but since it's only a show, they are of course not removed. Since the study itself is funded by the industry it's a little funny that they sign a conflict of interest declaration.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/interphone_conflict_of_interest_document.doc
Iris Atzmon
--------
INTERPHONE/REFLEX Reportage
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/le_reportage_de_la_tsr_sur_interphone.htm
--------
Comments on FDA’s interpretation problem
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/index.php?p=432
--------
Increase in brain cancer risk from using a mobile or cordless phone for over 5 years
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1529585/
Chasing the cancer answer
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/1764276/
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=40764
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200604/s1606348.htm
http://www.smh.com.au/news/breaking/mobile-phone-tumour-risk-new-study/2006/04/03/1143916440260.html
"What needs to happen more, so that the scientific community will come out and annouce that cellular phones are carcinogenic ? Are you waiting for the radiation itself to come out and confess? "
(Kobi Maydan, host of a popular morning programme, 3.4.06, to Dr. Danny Wolf, pediatric physician who was interviewed about prof' Hardell's latest study).
Message from Iris Atzmon
--------
Setting the record straight about Johansen's mindless blather
Johansen's ill-informed comments should be considered in context with Hardell's letter to the editor of the BJC, attached.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/bjc_2006_reply_hardell_hansson.pdf
Cheers
Don Maisch
--------
Comment from Christoffer Johansen from the Danish Cancer Organization: The Cancer organization dismisses the Swedish results and will not issue any new recommendations. We do not think that the data are reliable and therefore we will not change our recommendations concerning use of cell phones. The Swedish study is unreliable because it consists of two studies put together without any new data.
Sianette Kwee
Sensommervej 16
DK-8600 Silkeborg
Denmark
--------
...and his own study which found a protective effect from the cellular phone is very reliable indeed with new data, with 4 countries showing a protective effect (Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark). Why won't he just recommend phones as cancer prevention therapy?
Iris Atzmon
--------
Don
It looks more and more obvious to me that the cancer industry is protecting the wireless industry and the power generating corporations. It would appear that they either hold stock or they are getting heavy funding from these corporations. I believe the time has come for the public to know where the cancer industry is getting their funding. They have people running, jumping, swimming, etc. for funding to find a cure and when ever a possible cause is discovered, they seem to find fault with the scientific methods used.
I feel it is time we all speak out and call for a thorough investigation and accounting. Here in Canada we have CEO's from the cancer industry appearing at protest gathering against power lines and cellphone towers as expert witness for the corporations, where they should be preaching precaution, knowing that science has proven that childhood leukemia can be caused by EMF.
Iris in Isreal discovered that corporate funding for the IARC study was being channeled through the cancer industry so it would not appear as direct corporate funding. This act is, in my opinion, money laundering, which I understand to be an illegal offence. It has also been established that the Cancer Industry holds stock in tobacco corporations.This to me is as low as they can get, knowing full well that smoking causes cancer.
Wendy Mesley on CBC TV, Market Place March 5/06 asked some very interesting questions about cancer and why so much enface is placed on the cure and not on the cause. I am attaching the program transcript .
Regards Robert
Shortcut to: http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/files/health/cancer/index.html
--------
Another important thing, is that the INTERPHONE researchers signed conflict of interests declarations - I attach the declaration form they had to sign. This is also for appearance only: at least several have worked/ work for the industry and/or have an apparent conflict. According to the file conditions, they should be removed or partly removed from the study, but since it's only a show, they are of course not removed. Since the study itself is funded by the industry it's a little funny that they sign a conflict of interest declaration.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/interphone_conflict_of_interest_document.doc
Iris Atzmon
--------
INTERPHONE/REFLEX Reportage
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/le_reportage_de_la_tsr_sur_interphone.htm
--------
Comments on FDA’s interpretation problem
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/index.php?p=432
--------
Increase in brain cancer risk from using a mobile or cordless phone for over 5 years
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1529585/
Chasing the cancer answer
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/1764276/
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=40764
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200604/s1606348.htm
http://www.smh.com.au/news/breaking/mobile-phone-tumour-risk-new-study/2006/04/03/1143916440260.html
Starmail - 4. Apr, 11:19
