http://www.computerwoche.de/knowledge_center/rfid/589138



http://omega.twoday.net/topics/RFID/

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/microwave_syndrome_syndrome_des_micro_ondes.htm

--------

This is very good but quite disturbing as it confirms what I have suspected for a very long time which is that mobile use causes aggressive & violent behaviour in large numbers of people. The reports of violence in my regional paper the Argus have grown and grown and grown recently. I am not exaggerating when I say that at least a third of the items in current Argus issues are to do with violent crimes. Today there was a feature about 60 schoolkids who had organised a mass fight via their mobiles. Lots turned up and the police stopped it but it still would have happened otherwise.

Gary


From Mast Sanity/Mast Network



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=microwave+syndrome

Dear Mr Weatherall

I should just like to make a comment on Repacholi and on myself.

I met Repacholi a few times in WHO. It is certainly true that he was not convinced of the dangers of EMF. His expertise is in classic ionising radiation - and he did a good job in WHO promulgating the Internationally accepted standards for radiation protection.

As a cancer epidemiologist, who seems to have got on your distribution list because I directed some studies of EMF which showed significant hazards from high dose occupational exposure and poor wiring in homes, I require good evidence before I recommend action at a national or provincial level, though I endorse the precautionary principle, and have urged its application with regard to pesticide exposure. I am adamantly opposed to the citing of schools and homes within 50 meters of a power line. I also worry about transformers too near a home. I agree that the latest study on mobile phones, though negative overall, does suggest an excess risk of brain cancer on the side mobile phone users normally use. However, this does need confirmation from other studies, as a single study is not definitive. As an example in my own research career, we published, about 25 years ago, the results of study that suggested an excess risk of bladder cancer in men, but not in women, from saccharin use. This seemed to be compatible with some experiments in animals, and led to a great deal of dicussion with Health Canada and in the US. However, a second, larger study that I directed in Canada did not find any indication of excess risk of bladder cancer from artificial sweetener use, nor did an even larger study of bladder cancer in the United States.

So I worry when you distribute unbuttressed claims for major hazards from an ex-employee of a telecommunications company (I believe that was where he worked) which seemed to be producing the most extravagant claims of hazard.


Sincerely

Anthony B Miller, MD, FRCP
Professor Emeritus, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto


Dear Prof. Miller

Thank you for your message. As a victim who also knows many other victims of electro magnetic radiation, I find it easier to comment on the problem than most academics. I have not been able to live in my own home for more than two years because of microwave and radiofrequency exposure. I developed prostate cancer during the time I was being exposed to high levels of EMR, I suffer the effects from EMR virtually each day and I try to assist others who are suffering. My Father and Step Mother lived with massive electrical distribution lines running over their back yard (twenty meters away from the bedroom) in England and they both died of stomach tumours. They should have been warned of the dangers they faced and I should have been warned and helped when I reported my situation to the government

The worst situation involving EMFs Electrical Fields and EMR exposure is that the people who should be warning us, the WHO and our Governments are not doing their job. From your message, I do not think that you realize the extreme danger that the world's population faces from electro magnetic radiation. If you did, I am sure that you would also be trying your best to raise the alarm.

There are masses of very strong evidence of health harm being caused by EMR, yet it is virtually ignored by the WHO and Health Canada. I believe that in time, Rapacholi may be found to have indirectly hurt and killed a massive number of people by his failure to warn and to protect innocent citizens of the world.

Because of your studies, you must ask yourself, how many people have "poor wiring" in their homes and are becoming sick every day because the government has never bothered to advise Canadians about the danger you identified years ago? I know for a fact that inspectors from the Electrical Safety Association do not carry gauss meters and other meters to detect EMFs and high frequencies on home wiring systems. I also still see big housing developments being built on either side of large electrical distribution lines, even today.

I wish that your colleagues would conduct meaningful research on the amount of harm that is occurring to people who live near to powerful antennas and other strong sources of electro magnetic radiation in Canada. I cannot understand why the academics of Canada are not reading the strong and extensive research and evidence of health harm from EMR, and why they are not giving very strong warnings of the danger to the public. Universities of Canada (with the exception of Lakehead) are failing to notice what is probably the most dangerous environmental problem that we have ever faced, overexposure to electro magnetic radiation. Your colleagues are failing to see the 'big picture' while they are engrossed in their 'own worlds'.

In closing I wish to thank you for the important studies that you did on powerlines, showing the dangers of EMFs and also for supporting the precautionary principal. I believe that if you did the same research today you would find considerably worse dangers because powerlines and house wiring appear to be acting as giant antennas and delivering strong amounts of broadcasted radiofrequency and microwave energy.

Regards

Martin Weatherall
L.S.A.F.(Left School At Fifteen)



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=WHO
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi

http://www.newswithviews.com/public_comm/public_commentary47.htm


Informant: ranger116



http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Chemtrails/

Well would you believe it?

People are not becoming addicted, they already are, and have been for two or three years.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online/6411495.stm

Peter
w-a-r-t

--------

There is a clear case for saying that the addiction is not only psychological, social but physiological; EM fields interfere with dopamine transport via altered nitric oxide release.

Andy

--------

Four in ten young adults are mobile-phone addicts
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/index.php?p=666



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=addicted
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=nitric+oxide
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=dopamine

Es sind ernstzunehmende Fragen darüber aufgekommen, ob die WHO Patientengruppen als Verbindung benutzt, um verbotene Gelder der Pharmaindustrie anzunehmen. Korrespondenzen via E-Mail mit der medizinischen...

http://www.diagnose-funk.ch/politik/000000988f07dab0b/033ea298e0126c509.html



Anfrage im Bundestag zu ICNIRP

14. Wahlperiode 18. 12. 2001 Die Antwort wurde namens der Bundesregierung mit Schreiben des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit vom 13. Dezember 2001 übermittelt...

http://www.diagnose-funk.ch/politik/033ea298e000adb06/033ea298e000ba708.html



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=WHO
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=ICNIRP

Akrotiri ist eine Halbinsel auf Zypern und ein Naturreservat der Kategorie 1, denn es besitzt einen Salzsee, liegt auf der Hauptroute von Zugvögeln und dient wissenschaftlichen Zwecken für Vogelbeobachtung...

http://www.diagnose-funk.ch/politik/033ea298dd0279c01/033ea298e601d802b.html



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Akrotiri

http://www.diagnose-funk.ch/aktuell/00000097f40c6132a/00000097ed02c2f0b.html

Mit dieser Tabelle, soll veranschaulicht werden, in welchen Studien oder Versuchen man gesundheitliche Effekte schon weit unterhalb der gültigen Grenzwerte fand.

--------

"Salzburger" Grenzwert-Empfehlung realisierbar

Wien (OTS) - "Kein Hodenkrebs durch Handys und Schnurlostelefone": dieses von Dr. Hardell und Kollegen zum Jahreswechsel publizierte Ergebnis kommentiert der Jurist und Epidemiologe Dr. George Carlo...

http://www.diagnose-funk.ch/politik/000000988f076cb03/033ea298e6020d02d.html

--------

HLV INFO 24/AT

8-03-2007

Leserbrief von Herrn Kampschulte an Neue Presse 7-03-07

Zum Artikel Grenzwerte

Am 07.03.2007 09:25 von Gerhard Kampschulte

Es gibt keine Grenzwerte in Deutschland die der Vorsorge dienen. Alle Grenzwerte werden zum Schutz für die Industrie und für die Planungssicherheit aufgestellt. Sie sollen die Hersteller und Betreiber von Technik und Produkten vor Regress schützen. Beste Beispiele Rauchen und Holzschutzmittel sowie Asbest. Hier wurde klar nach gewiesen das auch unterhalb der Grenzwerte etwas passieren kann. Das gleich gilt für die Mobilfunkstrahlen, die Mikrowellen sind. Es ist nur eine Frage der Dauer wann Schäden auftreten, aber nicht die Höhe der Strahlen. Es ist auch das politische und wirtschaftliche Gezerre um die Deutung was ist ein Hinweis und was ist ein Beweis in der Forschung. Hier legt sich der wirtschaftlich Stärkerer seine Sichtweise zu recht und die wird dann auch von der Politik vertreten hat aber mit der Wahrheit nichts zu tun.

--------

Offizielles Messprogramm: verwirrende Verharmlosung
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3471032/

--------

HLV INFO 36/AT

3-01-2007

Grenzwerte sind zu hoch

Die Mobilfunkindustrie hat bekanntlich zusammen mit Behörden thermische, aber keine athermischen Grenzwerte nach § 26, Bundesimmissionsschutzgesetz, selbst aufgestellt. Diese wurden so hoch angesiedelt, dass sie wohl nie erreicht werden können. Die gleiche Industrie prüft jetzt ihre eigenen Vorgaben. Daher ist die Grenzwert-Messerei eine reine Augenwischerei, um auch den letzten Zweiflern in Deutschland etwas vorzuspielen.

Wenn die Mobilfunkindustrie zu ihren Grenzwerten stehen würde, dann sollte sie einmal ihre Mitarbeiter nur zehn Minuten der Hälfte der Strahlungs-Grenzwerte aussetzen. Das wäre zwar glaubwürdig, aber viel zu gefährlich. Daher die berechtigte und interessante Frage: Warum tragen eigentlich Mitarbeiter der Mobilfunkindustrie bei Wartungsarbeiten an Mobilfunkanlagen immer Strahlenschutzanzüge? Auch Schornsteinfeger sind angewiesen, sich in Mobilfunkanlagen-Nähe so zu verhalten. Was allen bekannt ist, die deutschen Grenzwerte sind die höchsten in der ganzen Welt. Selbst die alte Sowjetunion hat wegen der möglichen Gefahren viel kleinere Grenzwerte vorgeschrieben. Italien und viele europäische Länder haben sich wegen der Utopien der deutschen Grenzwerte bei der EU mit Grausen abgewendet.

Carl-Heinz Distler, Hanau

--------

Der faule Zauber mit den Grenzwerten
http://www.diagnose-funk.ch/technik/000000988f062b906/033ea2990314e1501.html

Mobilfunk und Strahlenschutz
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3805398/



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Grenzwerte+sch%C3%BCtzen
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Hardell
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Carlo

Mehr über die Prämisse, dass nicht alle Studien gleich sind

1. Seit Veröffentlichung der Ergebnisse der 28,5 Millionen Dollar teuren WTR-Studie, die auf die Gesundheitsrisiken des Mobilfunks hinwies...

http://tinyurl.com/39mofv



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Carlo