(von Eileen O'Connor, publiziert am 24.1.06)

Washington, D.C.: In seiner Februar-Ausgabe 2006 veröffentlicht das Internationale Journal für Onkologie eine neue Analyse von Dr. Lennart Hardell und Kollegen, die eine statistisch bedeutsame Zunahme des Risikos aufzeigt, infolge von Mobiltelefonnutzung an gutartigen Gehirntumoren zu erkranken (besonders Akustikusneurinome). Die Analyse basiert auf der zusammenfassenden Auswertung zweier Fall-Kontrollstudien, die zwischen 1997 und 2003 in Schweden diagnostizierte gutartige Gehirntumore in Zusammenhang mit dem Gebrauch von Mobil- und Schnurlostelefonen bringen.

Die neue Analyse ist besonders wichtig, weil Akustikusneurinome als "Signaltumore" für andere Typen bösartiger und gutartiger Gehirnerkrankungen gelten. Diese Tumore treten auf in Gebieten, die während des Telefonierens die höchste Funkfrequenzbestrahlung aufweisen. Von größter Bedeutung ist die Erkenntnis, dass vor allem Personen, die vor dem 21. Lebensjahr der Strahlung ausgesetzt waren, das größte Risiko tragen, an solchen Tumoren zu erkranken. Somit ist das die erste veröffentlichte Studie, die direkt darauf hinweist, dass Teenager, die Mobilfunktelefone verwenden, ein höheres Risiko tragen, einen Tumor zu bekommen.

Weitere wichtige Punkte in dieser Analyse sind: Die Analyse umfasst die bisher umfangreichste Untersuchung gutartiger Tumore und sie schließt auch Tumore ein, die bereits im Jahre 2003 diagnostiziert wurden.

Die Analyse zeigt auch eine dosisabhängige Wirkung (Dosis-Wirkung-Beziehung), wobei eine größere Anzahl von am Telefon verbrachten Stunden zu einem immer größeren Tumorerkrankungs-Risiko führt. Das ist besonders bedeutsam, weil die Ungenauigkeit in der Messung der tatsächlichen Strahlenbelastung eine Verschleierung der Risiken nach sich zieht. Somit ist die Zunahme des Risikos, welches in der Analyse angegeben ist, wahrscheinlich als zu gering angegeben. Es ist anzunehmen, dass das tatsächliche (wirkliche/reale) Risiko höher sein wird.

Ein wesentlich größeres Risiko, an einem Tumor zu erkranken hat man, wenn ein Mobiltelefon länger als 15 Jahre genutzt worden ist. Dabei handelt es sich um ein Ergebnis, das auch in anderen Studien auftaucht, die zeigen, dass sich das Risiko nach 6- bzw. 10-jähriger Nutzung dramatisch erhöht.


Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on the use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk of benign brain tumours diagnosed during 1997-2003.

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K.

Department of Oncology, University Hospital, SE-701 85 Orebro, Sweden. lennart.hardell@orebroll.se

The use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk of brain tumours is of concern since the brain is a high exposure area. We present the results of a pooled analysis of two case-control studies on benign brain tumours diagnosed during 1997-2003 including answers from 1,254 (88%) cases and 2,162 (89%) controls aged 20-80 years. For acoustic neuroma, the use of analogue cellular phones gave an odds ratio (OR) of 2.9 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.0-4.3; for digital cellular phones, OR=1.5; 95% CI=1.1-2.1; and for cordless telephones, OR=1.5, 95% CI=1.04-2.0. The highest OR was found for analogue phones with a latency period of >15 years; OR=3.8, 95% CI=1.4-10. Regarding meningioma, the results were as follows: for analogue phones, OR=1.3, 95% CI=0.99-1.7; for digital phones, OR=1.1, 95% CI=0.9-1.3; and for cordless phones, OR=1.1, 95% CI=0.9-1.4. In the multivariate analysis, a significantly increased risk of acoustic neuroma was found with the use of analogue phones.

Int J Oncol. 2006 Feb;28(2):509-18.


Newsletter von Volker Hartenstein
Quelle: Don Maisch, Australien


Nachricht von Michael Meyer
michael_meyer@aon.at
Risiko Mobilfunk Österreich
Plattform Sozialstaat Österreich - Netzwerk Zivilcourage
A - 5165 Berndorf, Stadl 4
Tel/Fax 0043 - 6217 - 8576



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Akustikusneurinom

Dr. med. Wolf Bergmann Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin / Homöopathie

Elektrosensibilität –Wie erkennen? Wie behandeln?
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/elektrosensibilitaet.doc


Nachricht von Michael Meyer
michael_meyer@aon.at
Risiko Mobilfunk Österreich
Plattform Sozialstaat Österreich - Netzwerk Zivilcourage
A - 5165 Berndorf, Stadl 4
Tel/Fax 0043 - 6217 - 8576

http://www.iddd.de/umtsno/recht.htm#gruhl

Arme Staatsanwaltschaft Konstanz
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/1816256/

To Whom It May Concern

In the summer of 2003 I installed a wireless modem for Broadband in my home. Over the following weeks I and my family showed a variety of symptoms, which only vanished when the modem was removed. In my case, lethargy was predominant. Returning to school in September 2003 I discussed the issue of wireless transmitters with my Headmaster. At this point the school had no wireless network installed. At the beginning of 2004 plans were announced to introduce this into different parts of the school. When my Headmaster asked me to move my teaching room into a block designated for maths and computing, he reassured me that all computer connections would be hardwired to prevent any adverse affects on me.

On this understanding I began to teach in the block from September 2004. Within three weeks I began to feel tired, my concentration was poor and after five weeks I felt as though I was losing my mind. My wife bluntly told me that she thought the computer department were using wireless transmitters. Next day I confronted the computer technician, who told me that the wireless transmitters had been switched on at the start of the school year. Unbeknownst to me I was working for 8 hours a day bathed in the same radiation that had made me ill the previous summer. When I brought this to the attention of my Headmaster, he was stunned. I don¹t think that he had believed me up to that point. He kept saying to me, ³But you couldn¹t have known it was switched on, could you?² No, I didn¹t. That¹s precisely my point. On his orders the transmitters were switched off, my fatigue passed and concentration was restored.

I am a teacher with 32 years experience, having obtained a First Class Honours Degree in both mathematics and physics from Cambridge. I am in excellent health. I do not even know the name of my current GPs, it¹s been so long since I had to call on their services. I am not a Luddite, but I do not ignore the evidence of my own experience, or that of others. This is disparagingly referred to as ³anecdotal², by those with a vested interest in promoting the sale of these technologies. I prefer to call it commonsense. Mobile phone technology and wireless modems damage the health and well being of some members of our community. I do not believe it is fair to students, or employees, in a school to expose them to such risks. The only people, who will suffer from not using wireless connections are the manufacturers and educational establishment which promote them.

If the precautionary principle had been followed in the last century, many of our countrymen would not be suffering the crippling effects of asbestos related illness. Doubtless any questions about the safety of asbestos were also dismissed as unfounded.

Yours Sincerely

John Fox
Wireless_feedback@yahoo.co.uk

--------

4th November 2003

Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs)

Here is a personal story from a UK medical doctor (we have full contact details and she is very happy for anyone to phone/e-mail her):

"Last July, out of the blue I developed a disruption to my heart rhythm. As a qualified Doctor I considered possible causes, such as caffeine intake, tiredness, high blood pressure, or the onset of menopausal symptoms. Being slight of frame, with normal to low blood pressure and excellent general health, I reasoned the ectopic beats and variable pulse rate would probably go away with a reduction in my tea and coffee, and a little rest. Over the next 6 weeks, the arrhythmia continued to the point where I was aware of it for the majority of the day. I also experienced disturbance to my sleep, waking in the early hours and then being unable to fall asleep again. From the tightness of my upper chest I knew I was not getting enough oxygen. I was very reluctant to consult my GP, aware of the investigations it would initiate, and also of the many drugs in the armoury for treating arrhythmias with their multitude of side effects. There was no precipitating factor I could identify that would afflict a fit 49 year old, with no pre-existing heart or respiratory problems, in this way. On the verge of making an appointment with my GP, I linked the onset of my symptoms to our acquisition of a laptop with a wireless modem (NET GEAR and is a Wireless ADSL Modem Gateway DG824M) situated in the hallway. This "base station" had been transmitting microwaves 24 hours/day at a frequency of 2.4GHz, extending to a radius of 150 feet. These (and similar) are being placed in the foyers of airports, and hotels, in GP's surgeries, coffee shops and student halls of residence, so individuals can use their laptops with the minimum of fuss. We disconnected the wireless base station, replacing it with a fixed line. Within 3 weeks I was totally free of any abnormality as detected by pulse or symptoms, my sleep settled back to normal, as did my energy.

On consideration, during the summer others in my family of 5 have been abnormally fatigued with disturbed sleep patterns. My 18 year old daughter had an episode of extreme dizziness lasting a whole day after close contact with the transmitter. My 22 year old son similarly experienced vomiting and vertigo, disabling him for a day after spending 2 hours within feet of the apparatus.

If this is how it affects a healthy family of adults over a short period of time, what will be the consequences on a cross-section of the general population, let alone those with heart problems or pacemakers, the pregnant and the young? What is the real price of convenience?

F.Fox. MB ChB"
Wireless_feedback@yahoo.co.uk

--------

I had similar symptoms, and insisted my husband replace the wireless connection...and now I am comfy again...this doctor needs to circulate her very lucid description of her experience to all GPs everywhere...just so they have another weapon in their armory of suggestions for those who present with diverse inexplicable symptoms...I wonder if DECT phones can give similar symptoms?

Ruth

--------

Yes, DECT phones can produce exactly the same symptoms since they use the same technology. In fact, they are a double whammy since the base station emits pulsed microwaves 24/7 and when you are on a call the handset is just as bad a a regular mobile.

Andrea

--------

I had most severe symptoms from my wireless connection...I have got rid of all culprits and my mobile has died in anticipation!! just trying to see if i can stop the bills!!

Ruth

--------

Health risks of Wi-Fi and WLAN on our health
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1122031/

WLAN Sickness: Rubbish or Reasonable?
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1692101/

WLAN, DECT in Schools and Kindergardens
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1579030/