California election officials have told one of the country's largest makers of voting machines to repair its software after problems with vote counts and verification surfaced in the state's special election in November.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122605O.shtml

Pepe Escobar writes that Iraq is a giant, messy albatross hanging from President George W. Bush's neck. The faith-based American president believes that "we are winning the war in Iraq." The reality-based global public opinion - not to mention 59% of Americans, and counting - know this is not true.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122605N.shtml

Conservative columnist Steve Chapman writes that what we have now is not a robust executive but a reckless one. At times like this, it's apparent that Cheney and Bush want more power not because they need it to protect the nation, but because they want more power. Another paradox: In their conduct of the war on terror, they expect our trust, but they can't be bothered to earn it.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122605M.shtml

President Bush has been summoning newspaper editors lately in an effort to prevent publication of stories he considers damaging to national security. The efforts have failed, but the rare White House sessions with the executive editors of the Washington Post and the New York Times are an indication of how seriously the president takes the recent reporting that has raised questions about the administration's anti-terror tactics.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122605K.shtml

Despite White House claims that war powers authorize domestic spying and the special detention of terror suspects, Congress may well settle the issue. It looks like Congress - not the courts - will examine the legality of the eavesdropping episode, which some are calling "Spookgate."

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122605J.shtml

Marjorie Cohn writes that in an assertion of executive power that rivals the excesses of the McCarthy era of the late 1940's and 1950's, and the dreaded COINTELPRO (counter-intelligence program) of the 1950's and 1960's, George W. Bush's National Security Agency has been secretly spying on United States citizens without warrants for the last three years.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122605I.shtml

Polen will den Untersuchungsbericht über die mögliche Existenz eines CIA-Gefängnisses nicht veröffentlichen, für Berlusconi handelt die CIA legitim und ansonsten bedeckt die feiertägliche Ruhe das Schlamassel.

http://www.telepolis.de/tp/r4/artikel/21/21652/1.html

Das Konto wird gesperrt, die Versicherung gekündigt, die Bewegungsfreiheit eingeschränkt und das alles mit dem Hinweis, man stehe auf einer Liste für Terrorverdächtige. Doch aus Sicherheitsgründen seien weitere Auskünfte nicht möglich.

http://www.telepolis.de/tp/r4/artikel/21/21658/1.html

Authors: Abelin, Theodor; Altpeter, Ekkehardt; Röösli, Martin

Source: Somnologie, Volume 9, Number 4, November 2005, pp. 203-209(7)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Abstract:

Summary Objectives 

The studies reported here investigated the association between health complaints and the vicinity to the short wave transmitter Schwarzenburg, and looked for evidence for a relationship between magnetic field exposure and sleep disturbances.

Subjects and Methods 

Between 1992 and 1998 two cross-sectional and two panel studies were performed in the area of Schwarzenburg. In each cross-sectional survey about 400 adults living in differently exposed areas were asked about somatic and psycho-vegetative symptoms including sleep disturbances as well as possible confounding factors. Exposure was estimated based on 2621 measurements of magnetic field strength made in 56 locations. In the panel studies, sleep quality and melatonin excretion was studied when the transmission was interrupted or definitively shut down, respectively.

Results 

In both surveys, prevalence of difficulties of falling asleep and in particular, maintaining sleep, increased with increasing radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure (RF-EMF). Sleep quality improved after interruption of exposure. A chronic change of melatonin excretion following RF-EMF exposure could not be shown, but a parallel study of salivary samples in cows showed a temporary increase after a short latency period following interruption of exposure.

Conclusions 

The series of studies gives strong evidence of a causal relationship between operation of a short-wave radio transmitter and sleep disturbances in the surrounding population, but there is insufficient evidence to distinguish clearly between a biological and a psychological effect.

Keywords: radio frequency; sleep disturbance; insomnia; melatonin; psycho-vegetative symptoms; field study; epidemiology; Hochfrequenzstrahlung; Schlafstörung; Insomnie; Melatonin; Psycho-vegetative Beschwerden; Feldstudie; Epidemiologie

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-054X.2005.00072.x

http://tinyurl.com/br29c

--------

Bioelectromagnetics. 2005 Dec 8; [Epub ahead of print]

Effect of short-wave (6-22 MHz) magnetic fields on sleep quality and melatonin cycle in humans: the Schwarzenburg shut-down study.

Altpeter ES, Roosli M, Battaglia M, Pfluger D, Minder CE, Abelin T.

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.

This paper describes the results of a unique "natural experiment" of the operation and cessation of a broadcast transmitter with its short-wave electromagnetic fields (6-22 MHz) on sleep quality and melatonin cycle in a general human population sample. In 1998, 54 volunteers (21 men, 33 women) were followed for 1 week each before and after shut-down of the short-wave radio transmitter at Schwarzenburg (Switzerland). Salivary melatonin was sampled five times a day and total daily excretion and acrophase were estimated using complex cosinor analysis. Sleep quality was recorded daily using a visual analogue scale. Before shut down, self-rated sleep quality was reduced by 3.9 units (95% CI: 1.7-6.0) per mA/m increase in magnetic field exposure. The corresponding decrease in melatonin excretion was 10% (95% CI: -32 to 20%). After shutdown, sleep quality improved by 1.7 units (95% CI: 0.1-3.4) per mA/m decrease in magnetic field exposure. Melatonin excretion increased by 15% (95% CI: -3 to 36%) compared to baseline values suggesting a rebound effect. Stratified analyses showed an exposure effect on melatonin excretion in poor sleepers (26% increase; 95% CI: 8-47%) but not in good sleepers. Change in sleep quality and melatonin excretion was related to the extent of magnetic field reduction after the transmitter's shut down in poor but not good sleepers. However, blinding of exposure was not possible in this observational study and this may have affected the outcome measurements in a direct or indirect (psychological) way. Bioelectromagnetics (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

PMID: 16342198 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=16342198&dopt=Abstract

Related articles:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Display&dopt=pubmed_pubmed&from_uid=16342198

--------

The Scandal of Schwarzenburg
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/350607/

Martin Greenhut wrote:

From: Halbert Katzen

There are important unresolved issues related to 9-11. Below is a link to a website that will play a recent documentary about 9-11. (You may need to hit your refresh button if it doesn't come up the first time.) If you care about bringing to justice the people who were responsible for 9-11, if you care about honoring the living and the dead by getting to the truth of the matter, then the information in this documentary will be very important to you. I think most people will find the first five minutes of it sufficiently impressive to want to watch another ten minutes. After fifteen minutes the quality and importance of this documentary will be obvious. Please watch it and pass it along.

Peace,

Halbert

http://www.911busters.com/911_new_video_productions/MOV/Painful_Deceptions.html

http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn12242005.html


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Christian Science Monitor
by Daniel Schorr

12/23/05

President Bush is taking on an issue of presidential powers over which presidents have stumbled before. ... Historians have said that President Lincoln freed the slaves, blockaded Southern ports, and instituted a draft all without constitutional authority. President Reagan invoked 'inherent powers' to justify the illegal sale of missiles to Iran and the illegal financing of the civil war in Nicaragua. Short of impeachment, the Congress has no way of stopping a willful president except to deny him funds. That, of course, is unlikely, especially with a Republican-controlled Congress...

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1223/p09s01-cods.html


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Human Events
by Pat Buchanan

12/25/05

How long ago was it that you last heard some pundit blather on about America being 'the greatest empire since Rome?' Quite a while, I imagine. For if the Iraqi insurgency has done nothing else, it has induced a sense of humility, and of the limits of American power. Surely, all Americans hope the Iraqi elections will usher in a coalition that will let us depart. But it is time we stood back and took a hard look at what this war tells us, not only about our ability, but about the wisdom of trying to remake the world in our own image. Is this generation of Americans really up to the task? Is it really willing to pay indefinitely in blood and treasure to realize the ambitious agenda George W. Bush has set out?

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=11076


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Las Vegas Review-Journal
by Vin Suprynowicz

12/25/05

A couple of loyal readers asked me, in response to my recent evisceration of the discredited 'militia clause' argument, 'But Vin, do you think the Founders would have written the Second Amendment that way if they'd known we'd have Uzis?' Leaving aside the fact that it takes extraordinary dedication and commitment (and loot) for a 'civilian' of average means to legally acquire a fully automatic Israeli machine pistol in America today, the answer is, 'Yes.' ... It doesn't matter whether you 'think this is a good idea.' If you want to contend we now have a form of government in which our rulers start with all rights and powers, and allow to the peasantry only those lesser included liberties as they see fit, say so out loud now, please. And tell me when the original Constitution was voided, and by what legal process...

http://tinyurl.com/dzrhz


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Slate
by Bruce Reed

12/23/05

Hell hath no fury like a branch of government scorned. The Republican Congress didn't mind rolling over for a popular president, but now that the Bush White House is a heavy burden, Hill Republicans are eager to put him in a lockbox. As Sen. Lindsey Graham tells the Washington Post, 'What you have seen is a Congress, which has been AWOL through intimidation or lack of unity, get off the sidelines and jump in with both feet.' Some Hill Republicans are calling for a congressional investigation into Bush's domestic spy scandal, while Hill Democrats float words they used to hate, like 'special prosecutor' and 'impeachment.' The irony of this congressional resurgence is that Bush could have had all the rubber stamps he wanted if he'd been more careful to stay between the lines...

http://www.slate.com/id/2132890/


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

AntiWar.Com
by Justin Raimondo

12/26/05

The idea that this election was going to be a milestone on the road to genuine democracy in Iraq never made much sense, and in view of the results it makes even less. Iraq is on a path to full-scale civil war, and the election, instead of papering over ethnic and religious divisions, has only underscored them. The insurgency, instead of being tamped down, now has a new grievance to rally its forces around and make new recruits: allegations of massive election fraud. The Iranians, for their part, have consolidated and even extended their growing influence, virtually ensuring, through the victory of Tehran-backed parties like SCIRI and Da'wa, that 'democratic' Iraq will soon be an 'Islamic republic.' No wonder the Iranians are now crowing that the elections were a victory for 'Khomeini-ism.' Thanks to the US invasion, and the subsequent triumph of SCIRI, Da'wa, and the more radical Sadrists, Iran is now effectively in control of the Iraqi government...

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8307


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Dec 26, 2005, 12:45 GMT

Amsterdam - Dozens of Dutch local authorities are resisting the erection of masts to carry voice and data for the new third generation of mobile phones (3G), citing health concerns.

The decision by community councils not to accept the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) masts is motivated by worries among the general population that the radiation generated by them could be harmful.

In the week ahead of Christmas residents of Terneuzen in Zeeland in the southwest of the country prevented workers of the large mobile phone company Vodafone from erecting a mast on a block of flats.

They blocked the neighbouring streets with their cars, forcing a meeting the next day between residents, Vodafone, council officials and the owners of the flats.

The meeting resolved to hold further discussions at an unspecified date.

According to the Dutch daily Trouw, a Protestant-funded newspaper, 40 local authorities have denied permission to companies wanting to erect masts.

In Spijkenisse near Rotterdam, a well-organized team of activists calling themselves 'Spijkenisse against Radiation' have gone around the town distributing pamphlets and measuring radiation with meters.

The activists have also resorted to direct action, such as chaining themselves to existing masts.

The fears are largely non-specific, with many saying they fear an increased incidence of cancer in years to come. Some believe radiation from the masts affects cognitive function and disrupts sleep.

Many local authorities are awaiting the outcome of a Swiss study that is expected to be published early next year.

'I have never seen so much social disquiet,' said K. Loohuis, mayor of Haaksbergen, a town in the eastern province of Zwolle.

'There is real anxiety and anger in the people,' he said after leading a delegation to the relevant central government ministries.

But a spokesman for MoNet, the association of mobile phone operators, said there was no reason for concern.

The radiation from a transmission mast was no more than 20 watts, he told Trouw.

'This is about as much as from a lightbulb on the ceiling. The technology is similar to that of radio and television antennas.

'This is simply fear of the unknown,' he said, noting that the Swiss study was expected in January.

The Dutch cabinet and a majority in parliament has decided that the potential radiation risks are minimal.

Omega this is not true. See under:
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Wissenschaft+zu+Mobilfunk/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cancer+Cluster
http://www.buergerwelle.de/body_science.html

© 2005 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur

http://news.monstersandcritics.com/health/article_1071482.php/Widespread_concern_in_Netherlands_over_3G_mobile_phone_masts

http://openpr.de/news/73102

In der neuesten Ausgabe von Raum und Zeit erscheint ein Artikel von mir. Thema: Wahnsinn Mobilfunk, Betroffene berichten. Neben einer Auswertung der Melatoninstudie des Münchner Umweltmediziners Dr. Scheiner melden sich hier erstmals Betroffene zu Wort, die in der Nähe eines Mobilfunkmastens wohnen oder arbeiten mussten und medizinisch nachprüfbare, massive Gesundheitsprobleme entwickelten. Die Veröffentlichung solcher Fallgeschichten soll bei genügend Rückmeldung fortgesetzt werden. Ich bitte sie daher um Weitergabe nebenstehenden Aufrufes

Beste Grüße
Karl Trischberger

*Information und Aufruf* In der Ausgabe Nr. 140 (Januar/Februar 2006) und Nr. 141 (März/April 2006) der Wissenschaftszeitschrift Raum&Zeit erscheint ein Artikel von Karl Trischberger, Dipl. Betriebswirt und Mobilfunkopfer. Titel: “Wahnsinn Mobilfunk, Betroffene berichten“.* Darin schildert er seinen Fall und interviewt sieben weitere Personen die vom Mobilfunk schwerstens geschädigt wurden. Die meisten Fälle wurden dabei hinreichend medizinisch dokumentiert, so dass an der Ursache der Erkrankung wenig Zweifel besteht! Es handelt sich dabei um:

* Franz Fellner, 23 Jahre, Lenggries, * Abbruch des Studiums an der TU nach zwei Semestern, wegen neurologischen Ausfallserscheinungen. Sehr sportlich, klettert bis zum 10. Schwierigkeitsgrad. Eigene Web-Seite mit künstlerischer Bergfotografie. Werte in der TU bis 1300 nW/cm²!

*Paul Günther, 21 Jahre, München, * drei Wochen nach Bezug einer Wohnung unter einem Mobilfunkmasten in München massivste neurologische Probleme. Konnte dann das Studium im Herbst 2003 nicht antreten. Seither therapeutische Versuche zur Wiederherstellung der Gesundheit. Arbeitet zur Zeit im Keller einer Firma strahlungsfrei als Systemadministrator. Technikfreak. Mit 16 Jahren eine kleine Firma als IT-Dienstleister gegründet. Will im Jahr 2006 Studium der Wirtschaftsinformatik mit Strahlenschutzanzug beginnen und hat eine umfangreiche Korrespondenz mit der Gleichstellungsbeauftragten der TU wegen seiner Elektrosensibilität begonnen.

*Ulrich Weiner, 28 Jahre, Augsburg* absolvierte Lehre als Kommunikationselektroniker. Gründete 1993 seine eigene Firma, die zwischenzeitlich bis zu 20 Mitarbeiter beschäftigte. Beruflich bedingt musste er viel mit dem Handy telefonieren. 2001 mehrere Zusammenbrüche. U.a. Aufenthalt im Krankenhaus, nach Zusammenbruch am Flughafen Frankfurt. Musste sämtliche Mitarbeiter krankheitsbedingt entlassen. Lebt in Funklöchern, die er mit dem Wohnwagen aufsucht und will ein Erholungszentrum für Elektrosensible in einem strahlungsarmen Gebiet in Sachsen schaffen.

*Suzanne S., 46 Jahre, Halblech,* tätig beim Deutschen Wetterdienst. 1996 Umzug von Hamburg zum neuen Arbeitsplatz am Hohenpeißenberg 100 Meter vom Sendeturm entfernt. Nach drei Monaten kamen die ersten gesundheitlichen Probleme. Inzwischen extrem elektrosensibel, kann sie nur noch mit Schutzanzug in die Öffentlichkeit. Zur Zeit kämpft sie vor dem Sozialgericht in Augsburg um ihren Arbeitsplatz.

*Veronika S. 50 Jahre Baden-Baden* arbeitete 24 Jahre lang gesund und beschwerdefrei in der gleichen Firma. 2001 zog die Firma in ein neues Gebäude mit Mobilfunkmasten und DECT- Telefonen um. Einige Monate danach begannen die ersten Beschwerden. Konzentrationsstörungen, starkes Brennen am ganzen Körper, Herzrhythmusstörungen usw., Immunabwehr geschwächt. Die Elektorsensibilität wurde von zwei Ärzten und einer Spezialklinik bestätigt. Anbringung von Schutzvorrichtungen wurden vom Arbeitgeber abgelehnt. Zur Zeit auf der Suche nach einem neuen Arbeitsplatz. Mehrere Umzüge auf der Flucht vor Mobilfunksendeanlagen in der Nähe der Wohnung. Nur noch im Wald frei von Schmerzen. Hat einen Schutzbaldachin zum Schlafen. Krankheit von BFA nicht anerkannt. Ärger mit dem Arbeitsamt, da Frau S. Wegen eingebildeter Schmerzen den Arbeitsplatz aufgegeben hat.

* Monika Frielinghaus 54 Jahre, 91077 Neunkirchen*, erste Symptome Herbst 2003 nach sechs Monaten Arbeit unter Mobilfunkmasten. Strahlenbelastung am Arbeitsplatz: 5000 Mikrowatt pro m². Melatonin und Serotoninwerte stark erniedrigt. Zur Zeit arbeitsunfähig. An Parkinson erkrankt. Viele Allergien.

* Stephan Rau, 40 Jahre, Stahlbetonbauer, Wiesbaden * hatte 2001 bedingt durch einen Verkehrsunfall eine Schädelfraktur, die mit einer Metallplatte versorgt wurde. Diese wirkt wie eine Empfangsantenne für Hochfrequenz. Im Jahr 2004 ging fünfzehn Meter gegenüber seiner Dachwohnung eine UMTS Anlage der Firma T-Mobile in Betrieb. Gesundheitliche Störungen massivster Art stellten sich sehr bald ein. Messungen ergaben eine starke Beeinträchtigung der Herz- und Gehirnaktivitäten. Trotz Auszug aus der Wohnung blieb eine hochgradige Elektrosensibilität.

*Karl Trischberger, 45, Lenggries, Dipl. Betriebswirt* seit 1996 Arbeitsplatz unter Mobilfunkmasten ( im Frachtpostzentrum Aschheim bei München). Belastung 4nW/cm² Ab 2000 massivste Schlafstörungen und Infektanfälligkeit. Trotz der Vorlage mehrerer Atteste war der Arbeitgeber nicht bereit einer Versetzung zuzustimmen. 2003 aufgrund zunehmender gesundheitlicher Schwierigkeiten frühpensioniert.

Diesen Fällen voran geht eine Darstellung der Pilot-Studie des Umweltmediziners Dr. Scheiner, München. Er hat in circa 100 Fällen die Melatoninwerte von Betroffenen vor und nach Inbetriebnahme einer Mobilfunkanlage gemessen. Die Reduktion der Werte war dabei teilweise dramatisch!

Omega siehe dazu auch „Bundesweite Melatoninstudie“ unter:
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1328188/

In Vogt sanken die Werte zum Beispiel in einem Zeitraum von vier Monaten um 87 Prozent! Dieses Phänomen könnte natürlich beliebig oft mit relativ einfachen Mitteln reproduziert werden! Die Behauptung von Mobilfunkbetreibern und Politikern, die Mobilfunkbestrahlung ließe sich nicht beweisen, ist somit eine bewusste Irreführung der Öffentlichkeit.

Mit der Artikelserie in Raum&Zeit ist der Aufruf an Betroffene verbunden sich bei ähnlicher oder gleicher Kasuistik und Symptomatik zu melden. Es sollen möglichst viele Fälle von beglaubigter Mobilfunksensibilität dokumentiert werden. Nach wie vor wird von gewisser Seite behauptet, dass von der Problematik der Esmog-Sensibilität nur eine verschwindende Minderheit betroffen sei. Der Autor des Artikel ist dagegen der Auffassung, dass die geschilderten Fälle nur die Spitze des sprichwörtlichen Eisberges darstellen. Wir bitten daher um zahlreiche Meldungen und Zuschriften von Betroffenen. Verbunden mit der Artikelserie ist auch der Versuch der Hilfestellung für Mobilfunkopfer. In den folgenden Raum&Zeit Ausgaben werden auch die derzeit möglichen medizinischen Hilfestellungen für Esmog Opfer dargestellt.

Kontaktadresse:
Karl Trischberger
Langeneck 14
83661 Lenggries
Tel.: 08042/503139
email: karl.trischberger@freenet.de

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/wahnsinn_mobilfunk_betroffene_berichten.pdf



http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Victims/

The Parliamentarians and Civil Society Appeal on Iran and Nuclear Weapons, now endorsed by Abolition2000 and Mayors for Peace, is available on the following urls:

In french:

Tu le trouveras sur le site d'ACDN:
http://www.acdn.net en français et en anglais.

PNND website at the following url:
http://www.gsinstitute.org/pnnd/ParliamentariansIranNukes.htm

It is also on the GANA website of Ak Malten at:
http://www.cornnet.nl/~akmalten/Iran_Nuclear_letter.html


From FoE Sydney - Nuclear Campaign

The pursuit of terrorism does not authorize the president to make up new laws

By THOMAS G. DONLAN

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB113538491760731012.html

AS THE YEAR WAS DRAWING TO A CLOSE, we picked up our New York Times and learned that the Bush administration has been fighting terrorism by intercepting communications in America without warrants. It was worrisome on its face, but in justifying their actions, officials have made a bad situation much worse: Administration lawyers and the president himself have tortured the Constitution and extracted a suspension of the separation of powers.

It was not a shock to learn that shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush authorized the National Security Agency to conduct intercepts of international phone calls to and from the United States. The 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits the government to gather the foreign communications of people in the U.S. -- without a warrant if quick action is important. But the law requires that, within 72 hours, investigators must go to a special secret court for a retroactive warrant.

The USA Patriot Act permits some exceptions to its general rules about warrants for wiretaps and searches, including a 15-day exception for searches in time of war. And there may be a controlling legal authority in the Sept. 14, 2001, congressional resolution that authorized the president to go after terrorists and use all necessary and appropriate force. It was not a declaration of war in a constitutional sense, but it may have been close enough for government work.

Certainly, there was an emergency need after the Sept. 11 attacks to sweep up as much information as possible about the chances of another terrorist attack. But a 72-hour emergency or a 15-day emergency doesn't last four years.

In that time, Congress has extensively debated the rules on wiretaps and other forms of domestic surveillance. Administration officials have spent many hours before many committees urging lawmakers to provide them with great latitude. Congress acted, and the president signed. Now the president and his lawyers are claiming that they have greater latitude. They say that neither the USA Patriot Act nor the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act actually sets the real boundary. The administration is saying the president has unlimited authority to order wiretaps in the pursuit of foreign terrorists, and that the Congress has no power to overrule him.

"We also believe the president has the inherent authority under the Constitution, as commander-in-chief, to engage in this kind of activity," said Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. The Department of Justice made a similar assertion as far back as 2002, saying in a legal brief: "The Constitution vests in the president inherent authority to conduct warrantless intelligence surveillance (electronic or otherwise) of foreign powers or their agents, and Congress cannot by statute extinguish that Constitutional authority." Gonzales last week declined to declassify relevant legal reviews made by the Department of Justice.

Perhaps they were researched in a Star Chamber? Putting the president above the Congress is an invitation to tyranny. The president has no powers except those specified in the Constitution and those enacted by law. President Bush is stretching the power of commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy by indicating that he can order the military and its agencies, such as the National Security Agency, to do whatever furthers the defense of the country from terrorists, regardless of whether actual force is involved.

Surely the "strict constructionists" on the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary eventually will point out what a stretch this is. The most important presidential responsibility under Article II is that he must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." That includes following the requirements of laws that limit executive power. There's not much fidelity in an executive who debates and lobbies Congress to shape a law to his liking and then goes beyond its writ.

Willful disregard of a law is potentially an impeachable offense. It is at least as impeachable as having a sexual escapade under the Oval Office desk and lying about it later. The members of the House Judiciary Committee who staged the impeachment of President Clinton ought to be as outraged at this situation. They ought to investigate it, consider it carefully and report either a bill that would change the wiretap laws to suit the president or a bill of impeachment. It is important to be clear that an impeachment case, if it comes to that, would not be about wiretapping, or about a possible Constitutional right not to be wiretapped. It would be about the power of Congress to set wiretapping rules by law, and it is about the obligation of the president to follow the rules in the Acts that he and his predecessors signed into law. Some ancillary responsibility, however, must be attached to those members of the House and Senate who were informed, inadequately, about the wiretapping and did nothing to regulate it.

Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV, Democrat of West Virginia, told Vice President Dick Cheney in 2003 that he was "unable to fully evaluate, much less endorse these activities." But the senator was so respectful of the administration's injunction of secrecy that he wrote it out in longhand rather than give it to someone to type. Only last week, after the cat was out of the bag, did he do what he should have done in 2003 -- make his misgivings public and demand more information.

Published reports quote sources saying that 14 members of Congress were notified of the wiretapping. If some had misgivings, apparently they were scared of being called names, as the president did last week when he said: "It was a shameful act for someone to disclose this very important program in a time of war. The fact that we're discussing this program is helping the enemy."

Wrong. If we don't discuss the program and the lack of authority for it, we are meeting the enemy -- in the mirror.

Editorial Page Editor THOMAS G. DONLAN receives e-mail at tg.donlan@barrons.com.

URL for this article:
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB113538491760731012.html


Informant: Diana Davies



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=impeach
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Downing+Street+Memo

http://www.globalnewsmatrix.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3143


Informant: beefree

http://www.uruknet.info/?p=18993


Informant: Neo Mulder

See the Limits set in The Constitution for the Powers of a President.

Click Below Scroll down two screens to "Presidential Powers".

U.S. Constitution Article two. These 100 words tell the Only Powers a Decent Law Abiding US President has - See if you think George Bush has overstepped his Presidential powers ?

And notice nothing is mentioned about wiretapping Americans (;^))

Article Two of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution


Informant: ranger116

http://www.ufppc.org/content/view/3841/


Informant: jensenmk

From ufpj-news

David Sirota writes that how each party answers its big questions will not only decide the 2006 or 2008 elections but whether America will still have a political system that represents our country's people. Polls consistently show that Americans want a vastly more progressive economic policy, are concerned about Big Money's influence on our government and support bringing the troops home from Iraq within a year. In other words, what the public wants is very clear despite the political establishment's efforts to muddle the issues.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122505X.shtml

The massive US effort will leave behind this legacy: Iraqis will actually have, on average, fewer hours per day of electricity in their homes than they did before the US-led invasion in March 2003.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122505G.shtml

The White House decision to order surveillance of international phone calls by US citizens without a warrant violated longstanding practices and could undermine a key US intelligence agency that's critical in the struggle against terrorists, former senior intelligence officials and other experts said this week.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122505F.shtml

George Bush has no doubt had his share of difficult years before, but in political terms 2005 must go down as his worst year in office. His approval ratings had plummeted and are only now inching their way up the ladder. The political capital he sought to spend after his re-election has been squandered.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122505E.shtml

Deep in a remote, fog-layered hollow near Sugar Grove, W.Va., hidden by fortress-like mountains, sits the country's largest eavesdropping bug. Located in a "radio quiet" zone, the station's large parabolic dishes secretly and silently sweep in millions of private telephone calls and e-mail messages an hour.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122505Y.shtml

Lieber Herr Dr.Hingst,

mit freundlichen Grüßen und besten Dank für die Zusendung der Chronik von Frau Mag.Veronika Örge. Diese habe ich auf meiner Homepage unter dem Titel: "Bürger wehren sich erfolgreich" link http://www.mikrowellensmog.info/Chronik.html

online gestellt.

Univ.-Doz.Dr.Ferdinand Ruzicka
http://www.mikrowellensmog.info

US airstrikes in Iraq have surged this fall, jumping to nearly five times the average monthly rate earlier in the year, according to US military figures. Until the end of August, US warplanes were conducting about 25 strikes a month. The number rose to 62 in September, then to 122 in October and 120 in November.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/122505Z.shtml

NEDA is still working on our Ohio exit poll analysis which shows clearly that Ohio's exit polls are more than consistent with vote miscounts - if Ohio's exit poll discrepancies were caused by vote miscounts, they look very much like they were outcome-altering.

In other words, Ohio exit poll data is SCREAMING outcome-altering vote miscounts. However, the Ohio analysis is time consuming and tedious because

1. there is not one complete data set because Mitofsky did not release sample sizes with the Election Science Institute (ESI) data set, and the raw survey data he released to the U of Michigan does not include vote counts, so our data has to be hobbled together from two sources, and the analysis tried and tested in several ways, and

2. we are doing it manually in spreadsheets rather than with programs. this type of analysis is not easy to accomplish using spreadsheets.

In the future, now that we've devised the analysis, it could be programmed automatically and we recommend, and I believe candidates will agree after seeing the Ohio exit poll analysis, that no candidate should concede or be sworn into office without first obtaining and analyzing their election and exit poll data.

ANNOUNCEMENT - NEW! NEDA is today releasing a brief paper in rebuttal to Mark Lindeman of Bard College who wrote a recent essay supporting the shoddy invalid exit poll analyses of the Election Science Institute (ESI) and Mitofsky that were released in June and presented at the American Statistical Association conference in October.

This is YOUR little Xmas present from me, so don't say I never gave you anything. ;-)

http://www.electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/exit-polls/ESI/Mark-Lindeman-Response.pdf

Please read this interesting paper (to me at least ;-) and pass it on, to any reputable mathematical department, or to a press person who would be willing to ask any reputable math department to evaluate it, including Bard's mathematics department, who can correctly evaluate their professor Lindeman's essay, ESI/Mitofsky's analysis, and NEDA's mathematical logic proof and inform us who is correct. If only we could get the press to cover this, it would correctly set the stage for our scientifically sound Ohio exit poll analysis that will be released soon.

NEDA has mathematically disproven Mitofsky's exit poll analysis! You'd think that the press might find that interesting, but then the media (NEP) is Mitofsky's biggest client, so perhaps that causes issues?

Kathy Dopp
http://uscountvotes.org

Originally Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression

by David Martin, author of America's Dreyfus Affair

Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring down a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based defense, other techniques must be employed. The success of these techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token opposition party.

1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors." (If they tend to believe the "rumors" it must be because they are simply "paranoid" or "hysterical.")
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the "more reasonable" government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own "skeptics" to shoot down.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money (compared to over-compensated adherents to the government line who, presumably, are not).
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hangout route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken. With effective damage control, the fall-back position need only be peddled by stooge skeptics to carefully limited markets.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report the leak.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely. For example: If Vince Foster was murdered, who did it and why?
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or publicizing distractions.
14. Scantly report incriminating facts, and then make nothing of them. This is sometimes referred to as "bump and run" reporting.
15. Baldly and brazenly lie. A favorite way of doing this is to attribute the "facts" furnished the public to a plausible-sounding, but anonymous, source.
16. Expanding further on numbers 4 and 5, have your own stooges "expose" scandals and champion popular causes. Their job is to pre-empt real opponents and to play 99-yard football. A variation is to pay rich people for the job who will pretend to spend their own money.
17. Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, "What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?" Don't the authorities have defenders enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television? One would think refusing to print critical letters and screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously, it is not.
18. http://www.dabney.com/wacomuseum/library/martin1.html


Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
ICIS-Institute for Cooperation in Space
3339 West 41 Avenue
Vancouver, BC V6N3E5 CANADA
Tel: 604-733-8134
Fax: 604-733-8135
Email: peace@peaceinspace.org
Campaign: http://www.peaceinspace.org
Exopolitics: http://www.exopolitics.com
ICIS: http://www.peaceinspace.com
Click here to send a letter to the Canadian Parliamentary Leaders for public ET Hearings
http://www.peaceinspace.net

Roxanne Stapleton
rstapleton@trinidadexpress.com

Sunday, December 25th 2005

Part One

THERE is a growing number of well-reputed professors and scientists around the world, who are raising the alarm about mobile phone base transmitter masts.

They are cautioning that there is an increased incidence of cancer in people working or residing in the vicinity of the masts.

But the global telecoms industry is sticking to its guns, purporting that people in close proximity to the masts are safe and they (providers) are heeding industry standards for radiation emissions.

However, scientific experts counter that those very industry standards are not stringent enough and should be reviewed.

Researcher, Steve Gamble notes that the US, Australian and New Zealand Governments take the transmitter mast issue "seriously enough at both the national and local levels to adopt the precautionary principle and introduced policies of prudent avoidance, which have effectively banned the erection of these masts from school buildings and residential areas and in other densely populated locations".

Mark Townsend in a story carried in The Observer also gave a rather grim take on what was transpiring in Britain.

He wrote: "Schools and hospitals in Britain are making millions of pounds from deals to site mobile phone masts on their premises despite health concerns.

"More than 1,000 schools and hospitals have accepted offers from telecom companies averaging £10,000 to house masts and antennae on their premises."

Townsend reports that campaigners claimed they had identified 15 cancer clusters among people living close to the masts.

The campaigners used special meters which detect microwave emissions from nearby masts.

He wrote that although there is no direct evidence linking microwave radiation from masts to ill health, the campaigners findings ignited calls for a fresh inquiry into the biological effects of mobile phone masts.

Townsend noted that Phil Willis, Liberal Democrat MP, chairman of the all-party Parliamentary group on Mobile Telecommunications, said: "When you examine some of these clusters there are patterns that clearly give credence to the biological effects being looked at in association with these stations."

He also wrote that pressure groups Mast Action UK and Mast Sanity gathered research using complaints from residents living near mobile phone masts who reported a high incidence of cancer and other adverse health effects.

"The clusters include one at Crediton, near Exeter, where residents reported four cancers and three leukemias cases within 300 metres of a mast.

"Another at Gainsborough, Lincolnshire involves four brain haemorrhages-three among next-door neighbours, in residents living within 100 metres of a mast," he said.

Another cluster was identified at Milford Haven, Wales where six people had been diagnosed with cancer since a mast was erected.

At a family home which was described by Townsend as being "sandwiched between two masts, one at a hospital and the other on the roof of an office block", the wife was diagnosed with skin cancer, her husband with throat cancer and their 13 year-old daughter complained of a rash.

http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_news?id=124397534

--------

SERIOUS CONGLOMERATES OF CANCER AND OTHER PATHOLOGIES THAT HAVE BEEN TIE BY THE POPULATION NEXT TO ANTENNAS OF TELEPHONY http://omega.twoday.net/stories/466717/

Cancer Clusters in Vicinity to Cell-Phone Transmitter Stations
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/580224/

Cancer Cluster in Spain 2000-2005
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1319986/

Ausgegrenzt und unsichtbar

UNICEF-Jahresbericht „Zur Situation der Kinder in der Welt 2006“ - „Armutsbekämpfung und Kinderschutz gehören zusammen“.

http://www.sonnenseite.com/index.php?pageID=6&news:oid=n4292

Im Norden Chinas fällt der Grundwasserspiegel jedes Jahr um 1,50 Meter. Das Gleiche gilt für weite Teile Indiens - hauptsächlich im Punjab, dem Brotkorb des Landes. Auch im Süden der USA geht es langsam aber sicher an die Wassersubstanz - vor allem wegen Bewässerung für die Landwirtschaft. Spanien und Portugal hatten im letzten Sommer große Wasserprobleme.

http://www.sonnenseite.com/index.php?pageID=18&article:oid=a4272

David Sirota
Sirotablog
12.20.05
WorkingforChange.com blog

Oh, you've been hearing it everytime you tune into politics: Democrats in Washington saying they are serious about taking back the House. And yes, we would all like to believe them. But there is, after all, one essential, minimal, base-level indicator to seriousness - whether Democrats will even bother to show up to vote on the most critical legislation. And all you had to do was look at the most critical vote of the year early yesterday morning to suddenly realize that Democrats might still be oh-so-comfy in the minority.

The vote was on the GOP budget bill - you remember, the one that newspapers note "cuts $39.7 billion from social-welfare programs like Medicare, Medicaid and child-support collection." It passed by 6 votes. Why should we be asking Democrats questions about this vote when the House is controlled by Republicans? Well take a look at the official roll call and you'll see that 6 Democrats didn't show up to vote. They are:

Rep. Joe Baca (D-CA)
Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL)
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL)
Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA)
Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX)
Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA)

Yes, you read that right - one of those missing six was Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) - the guy who heads up the Democrat's House campaign committee. You know, the committee that is supposed to be most seriously focused on developing a message and a record that helps Democrats win back the House in 2006. [...] Read the rest at Workingforchange.com: http://tinyurl.com/cye2x


© Virginia Metze

By JAMES RISEN and ERIC LICHTBLAU
Published: December 21, 2005
The New York Times

WASHINGTON, Dec. 20 - A surveillance program approved by President Bush to conduct eavesdropping without warrants has captured what are purely domestic communications in some cases, despite a requirement by the White House that one end of the intercepted conversations take place on foreign soil, officials say.

The officials say the National Security Agency's interception of a small number of communications between people within the United States was apparently accidental, and was caused by technical glitches at the National Security Agency in determining whether a communication was in fact "international."

Telecommunications experts say the issue points up troubling logistical questions about the program. At a time when communications networks are increasingly globalized, it is sometimes difficult even for the N.S.A. to determine whether someone is inside or outside the United States when making a cellphone call or sending an e-mail message. As a result, people that the security agency may think are outside the United States are actually on American soil.

Vice President Dick Cheney entered the debate over the legality of the program on Tuesday, casting the program as part of the administration's efforts to assert broader presidential powers. [...] Read more at: http://tinyurl.com/e36fn


© Virginia Metze

The Democratic Party Blog
Posted by Tim Tagaris on December 20, 2005 at 09:12 AM
Anchorage Daily News:

The official vote results from the 2004 general election are riddled with mistakes and discrepancies, are impossible for the public to make sense of, and should be corrected as soon as possible, the Alaska Democratic Party says.

To most Alaskans, the election may seem like a long-done deal, something that concerns only political junkies, candidates and analysts. But questions have been swirling ever since the polls closed about how the results were tabulated and the reliability of the electronic voting machines, said Kay Brown, spokeswoman for the Democratic Party.

For instance, when district-by-district vote counts are totaled, President Bush received 292,267 votes, according to an analysis by the Democrats. But his official total was 190,889, a difference of more than 100,000 votes, according to the state Web site.
[...] Read more at http://tinyurl.com/72jkd


© Virginia Metze

AMERICAblog.com
by John in DC - 12/21/2005 10:01:00 AM

Bush said Democratic leaders endorsed his domestic spying program, and we're now finding out that those very same Dem leaders either weren't briefed at all on the program OR expressed their grave concern about it at the time. That hardly counts as "the Dems endorsed it."

Go Nancy! The following is Pelosi's press release:

Pelosi Requests Declassification of Her Letter on NSA Activities
Washington, D.C. -- House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today on her request to the Director of National Intelligence to declassify a letter she wrote several years ago to the Bush Administration expressing concerns about the activities of the National Security Agency.

"When I learned several years ago that the National Security Agency had been authorized to conduct the activities that President Bush referred to in his December 17 radio address, I expressed my strong concerns in a classified letter to the Administration and later verbally.

"Today, in an effort to shed light on my concerns, I requested that the Director of National Intelligence quickly declassify my letter and the Administration's response to it and make them both available to the public. [...] Read the rest of her press release at http://tinyurl.com/9j7h9


© Virginia Metze

By Carol D. Leonnig and Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, December 22, 2005; Page A01

The presiding judge of a secret court that oversees government surveillance in espionage and terrorism cases is arranging a classified briefing for her fellow judges to address their concerns about the legality of President Bush's domestic spying program, according to several intelligence and government sources.

Several members of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court said in interviews that they want to know why the administration believed secretly listening in on telephone calls and reading e-mails of U.S. citizens without court authorization was legal. Some of the judges said they are particularly concerned that information gleaned from the president's eavesdropping program may have been improperly used to gain authorized wiretaps from their court

"The questions are obvious," said U.S. District Judge Dee Benson of Utah. "What have you been doing, and how might it affect the reliability and credibility of the information we're getting in our court?" [...] Read it in the Washington Post: http://tinyurl.com/adnxf Also reprinted in TruthOut: http://tinyurl.com/dfb5h


© Virginia Metze

Bush on the defensive after revelations on domestic spying

Updated: 5:36 a.m. ET Dec. 20, 2005
Associated Press, MSNBC

WASHINGTON - Some Democrats say they never approved a domestic wiretapping program, undermining suggestions by President Bush and his senior advisers that the plan was fully vetted in a series of congressional briefings.

“I feel unable to fully evaluate, much less endorse, these activities,” West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, the Senate Intelligence Committee’s top Democrat, said in a handwritten letter to Vice President Dick Cheney in July 2003. “As you know, I am neither a technician nor an attorney.”

Rockefeller is among a small group of congressional leaders who have received briefings on the administration’s four-year-old program to eavesdrop — without warrants — on international calls and e-mails of Americans and others inside the United States with suspected ties to al-Qaida. [...] Read more at http://msnbc.msn.com/id/10542545/


© Virginia Metze

Compromises on key bills in the Senate force GOP to face hard issues in an election year.

By Gail Russell Chaddock | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

from the December 23, 2005 edition

WASHINGTON – In the gray-suited halls of the US Senate, few days have produced more high drama than the one this Wednesday - which yielded no fewer than five major pieces of legislation, 11th-hour wheeling and dealing, and sober messages to some powerful senators that it is no longer politics as usual in terms of party solidarity.

Wrapping up work for the year, the Senate passed two key defense bills - dropping a plan in one of them to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to drilling - and a six-month extension of the USA Patriot Act. Senators also approved a $601.6 billion social spending bill, and identified nearly $40 billion in spending cuts.

But before the final curtain, Democrats and a handful of moderate Republicans managed to ensure that some especially divisive issues, ranging from privacy rights to the fairness of the US tax code, come up early in 2006 - an election year. For Democrats, it's the high-water mark for minority clout since Republicans took control of both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue. [...] Read the rest at: http://tinyurl.com/8ug25


© Virginia Metze

Shhhh! They Could Be Listening In On This Column!

by Steve Young
Dec. 22, 2005
American Politics Journal

Dec. 22, 2005 -- HOLLYWOOD (apj.us) -- Is there anything richer or more important a lesson for our children than to learn from one's failures? And has there been a year more filled with opportunities for one man to learn from than the failures that have has befallen one man's legacy than President Bush's 2005? Katrina, FEMA and Michael Brown... continued war... administration-connected indictments... social security reform... Veterans Administration deficit... torture revelations... paying for positive columns in Iraqi papers... Terry Schiavo... Harriet Miers... 9/11 Commission "F"s... plummeting popularity... and so much more!

But, wowzers -- talk about blundering!

This past week is one for the history (of "How To Crush The Bill of Rights") books. Or was it that with time running out on '05, George Bush wanted to put a lock on TIME's Man-of- the-Year cover (and this should not be perceived as a reminiscence of Hitler's TIME cover boy days -- though you have every right to do so).

It seems that for the past few years, the President secretly authorized National Security Agency taps into the homes and businesses of American citizens without court-approved warrants. [...] Read the rest of this article at http://tinyurl.com/89yvc


© Virginia Metze

RAW STORY
Originally published on Thursday December 22, 2005
Last Updated: 12/22/3905

John Conyers, Jr., (D - MI) ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, and 26 other Congressmen today submitted a resolution of inquiry into warrantless wiretapping of citizens on U.S. soil.

The resolution would demand that Attorney General Gonzales turn over documents believed to be in his possession authorizing the National Security Agency to conduct warrantless electronic surveillance. It would also request documents detailing any legal recommendations regarding the order.

Deadline for the hand-over would be 14 days. [...] Conyer's statement appears next. Here are some statements from the Conyer memo:

"These revelations raise some of the most serious legal and constitutional questions conceivable in our democracy - whether our own government is able to intercept our most private conversations without establishing to any independent party that such eavesdropping is in any way necessary or related to a possible crime. For 25 years under FISA we have created special procedures for obtaining intelligence information on U.S. soil. The standard for getting a wiretap warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court is so low that only 5 out of the 19,000 applications have been denied since 1978. We even allow FISA orders to be obtained on a retroactive basis for the first 72 hours, in case the government needs to move with great speed. [...] Read it at http://tinyurl.com/da34v


© Virginia Metze