Omega-News: Wissenschaft zu Mobilfunk

Wissenschaft zu Mobilfunk

Starmail - 18. Feb, 08:50

17
Feb
2009

Warning Against Adverse Health Effects from the Operation of Digital Broadcast Television Stations (DVB‐T)

The Digital TV will start operating in the USA in these days. Many people are worrying about this new technology which has not been tested yet. People in USA will be the Guinea pigs and, what a chance for the industry, there is so much radiation everywhere without DVBT that you will probably see no difference to other RF. (Perhaps more exhaustion, more tiredness, the feeling of being paralyzed??)

Please see the letter in the attachment. You may forward it to your friends and to the press.

Dr. Christine Aschermann

Warning Against Adverse Health Effects From the Operation of Digital Broadcast

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Research digital broadcast DVBT

--------

Adverse Health Effects from the Operation of Digital Broadcast Television Stations (DVB‐T)

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12596

http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=digital+broadcast
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Christine+Aschermann
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Selsam
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Markus+Kern

Starmail - 17. Feb, 22:21

15
Feb
2009

Electromagnetic radiation: a ticking time bomb?

- The BioInitiative Report and changes to the statutory limits for exposure to electromagnetic radiation: interview with Dr Emilie van Deventer on the position of the WHO.

- Translation of the news report from RTBF (Belgium), extract: "Electromagnetic radiation: a ticking time bomb?"

Electromagnetic radiation: a ticking time bomb?

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Health & Medicine Research time bomb Electromagnetic Radi

--------

Dr Emilie van Deventer, Repacholi's clone

Unfortunately nothing has changed at WHO and van Deventer reads like a female clone of Repacholi. Note where she is quoted as saying: "No, no, I didn't say that the limits should be reduced, but that the studies that have been carried out already should be reviewed in depth to see if we should reduce the limits that are in force at present. So we are going to review them all, and we are going to assess them in the way the WHO assesses things."

This is pure Repacholian double speak.

My paper at http://www.emfacts.com/papers/who_conflict.pdf explains exactly how WHO, or more accurately its International EMF project (IEMFP) assesses things. van Deventer will be true to form and follow Repacholi's lead and call in industry representatives to help with the assessment. And remember Repacholi is now an Industry consultant. Nothing will change at IEMFP until the entire corrupt band of industry apologists are kicked out and replaced by people more concerned with the public interest.

Don Maisch

News from EU Conference on "EMF and Health", Expressions of Concern from Scientists

http://www.stralingsrisicos.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23&Itemid=6

From Mast Sanity/Mast Network

Conflict of Interest and Bias in Health Advisory Committees: a case study of the WHO’s EMF Task Group