September 11th

10
Okt
2005

The Controlled Collapse of WTC 7

(excerpt)

MPEGS of 9/11 Videos - That Prove the Controlled Collapse of WTC 7

(These are MPEGS of videos that show puffs of smoke coming out of every floor of WTC #7 all at once just seconds before it collapsed straight down as only a professionally demolished building does. This is also proof that All of 9/11 was engineered...)

If you only have one minute -- Look at the MPEG URL directly below

#1 squibview.mpg //st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibview.mpg

If you have the time to see more proof look at these three websites - Below & pass this on especially to news media !

9/11 Videos - The Controlled Collapse of WTC 7
//www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html

Silverstein, Giuliani, WTC 7 and 20-20 Hindsight - Forums powered by Reason and Principle
//www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=consp_911&Number=293499967

Squibs along southwest corner of WTC-7
//st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibs_along_southwest_corner.htm


Informant: ranger116

24
Sep
2005

23
Sep
2005

20
Sep
2005

9/11 IN PLANE SITE

Den grössten teil des enthüllenden 9/11-VIDEOS von POWER HOUR mit frühen, unzensierten aufnahmen davon, was am 9/11 in manhattan und beim pentagon WIRKLICH geschah, kann man sich nun erstmals gratis herunterladen, und zwar hier:

//tinyurl.com/5v3rz

dieses video räumt mit so ziemlich allen spekulationen auf, bei 9/11 sei es "mit rechten dingen" zugegangen. getrost kann man die bush`sche verschwörungsTHEORIE dann ad acta legen. bitte seht selbst. SEHR ZU EMPFEHLEN.

liebe grüsse

gabriel stetter

DIE SCHWEIZER CHEMTRAIL WEBSITE THE SWISS CHEMTRAIL WEBSITE

//www.chemtrails.ch


Nachricht von Ruth Gill

15
Sep
2005

14
Sep
2005

Confronting the Evidence: A Call To Reopen the 9/11 Investigation

//www.reopen911.org/freedvd.php

Offizielle 9/11-Version aus Washington ist eine Fälschung

Hiermit möchte ich Sie auf einen hochinteressanten Link aufmerksam machen, der vielleicht auf den ersten Blick nicht unbedingt etwas mit e-smog zu tun hat - dafür allerdings sehr viel mit der Vortäuschung falscher Tatsachen in politischer und folglich wirtschaftlicher Hinsicht sowie der globalen Völkerverdummung.

//www.reopen911.org/freedvd.php

Jedem, dem das Wohl Aller aufrichtig am Herzen liegt und der sich in seinem (großen oder kleinen) Betätigungsfeld aktiv einbringen möchte - und sei es nur in einem bescheidenen Rahmen - wird es ein Bedürfnis sein, diese wichtige und dringliche Aufklärungsarbeit zu unterstützen. Das Losungswort lautet: grass-roots.

Vielen Dank für die Veröffentlichung des nachfolgenden Textes.

Beste Grüße

ora james


Vier Jahre nach den Geschehnissen des 11.9.2001 spielen wir öffentlich die sensationelle, dreistündige Aufklärungs-DVD des amerikanischen Millionärs Jimmy Walter vor, der die Herstellung der DVD aus eigenen Mitteln finanzierte und sie bisher in einer Auflage von 350.000 Stück unter die Menschen brachte.

Es gibt sensationelle neue Fakten und immer mehr mutige Menschen - hochkarätige, freie Journalisten, Fernsehreporter, Buchautoren und sogar Politiker, die nicht mehr schweigen!!

Die DVD bietet aber nicht nur für hart gesottene Insider Neues, sondern stellt derart fundiert recherchierte Fakten zur Verfügung, so dass sie das ideale Medium darstellt, um auch Neueinsteiger mit den Fakten des 11.9. zu konfrontieren. Es ist jetzt BEWIESEN: Die offizielle 9/11-Version aus Washington ist eine Fälschung. Konfrontieren auch Sie sich mit den Fakten.

Dies wird eine Veränderung in Deutschland einläuten und dazu beitragen, dass das Scheinargument des Terrorismus nicht weiterer zur Abschaffung bürgerlicher Freiheiten missbraucht werden kann! Wir freuen uns über jede Spendenbeteiligung!! Für z.B. nur 10,-- Euro, können 20 DVDs hergestellt und verschickt werden - DVDs, die von den Empfängern dann wiederum frei kopiert oder öffentlich vorgespielt werden dürfen!! Spenden an den gemeinnützigen Verein "Neue Impulse" sind steuerlich abzugsfähig.

Spendenkonto Neue Impulse e.V.:
LB-BW Landesbank Baden-Württemberg
Bankleitzahl 600 501 01
Kontonummer: 126 725 1
Kennwort: 911-DVD

Hier, was Markus Seppelt von "Neue Impulse Nord" zu dieser DVD sagt:

»Ich habe mir gestern die DVD "Confronting the Evidence" (mit deutschen Untertiteln) über den 11.9.01 angeschaut. Ich muss sagen, seitdem ich mich zum ersten Mal mit dem Thema beschäftigt habe, habe ich auf so eine DVD gewartet! Einfach mal eine seriöse Bildanalyse, die ganz klar die Fälschungen belegt, Interviews mit Experten, die genau erklären können, warum die offizielle Theorie technisch unmöglich ist, gut gemachte, computeranimierte Rekonstruktionen, eine Aufdeckung der widersprüchlichen Aussagen der Politiker und, und, und. Es ist einfach alles Wichtige dabei. Und es ist so eindeutig. Wer diesen Film gesehen hat, der kann nicht mehr glauben, der weiß einfach, dass die ganze offizielle Darstellung eine Lüge ist.

So, und jetzt möchte ich euch sagen, dass ihr euch diese DVD auf der Webseite von Jimmy Walter auch kostenlos bestellen könnt. Sie hat Untertitel in vielen auszuwählenden Sprachen. Unter dem folgenden Link kann man sich den Film oder einzelne Kapitel davon auch herunter laden. Organisiert einen Videoabend mit euren Kollegen, Freunden, Verwandten - sie werden es euch danken.

//www.reopen911.org/freedvd.php

Weblink Zur Seite von Jimmy Walter www.reopen911.org

Wir freuen uns auf Dein/Euer/Ihr Dabeisein.

Veröffentlicht von Sabine Hinz Verlag

7
Sep
2005

31
Aug
2005

Los Angeles Times Questions 9/11 Official Story in Revealing Interview

This message is available on the Internet at //www.WantToKnow.info/911conspiracy

"Anyone who types the words '9/11' and 'conspiracy' into an online search engine soon learns that not everybody buys the official narrative of what took place on Sept. 11, 2001.

A professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology,
66-year-old David Ray Griffin...compiled a summary of material against the accepted story... 'The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions,' a critique of the Kean commission document in which he suggests that a chunk of the blame for the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil lies closer to home than the caves of Afghanistan."

-- Los Angeles Times, 8/28/05

August 31, 2005 Hello from my heart!

An eye-opening article recently published in the Los Angeles Times raises questions of a 9/11 conspiracy. The below Times article presents an interview with distinguished theologian David Ray Griffin, who has become a major proponent of a 9/11 conspiracy based on glaring inconsistencies and omissions in the 9/11 Commission Report. For more excellent information suggesting a 9/11 conspiracy, see Wikipedia's 9/11 conspiracy page: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories

See also the abundance of reliable, verifiable information available at our 9/11 Information Center

We are convinced that once more media give substantial coverage to the verifiable facts revealing a 9/11 conspiracy, concerned citizens around the world will join in demanding a real investigation.

This will lead to major reforms designed to strengthen democracy and assure that our elected governments work together for the good of all.

You can help by spreading this vital information to your friends and colleagues. And to help us move from a heartfelt place of compassion in this, see the "Hello From My Heart" movement at //www.hellofrommyheart.com/pages/main.htm for an inspiring 9/11 message.

Take care and have a wonderful day!

With best wishes, Fred Burks for the WantToKnow.info Team

P.S To watch a revealing C-SPAN program covering a recent 9/11 hearing held by Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney on August 31 and September 2 at 8:00 PM (Eastern time), click here.

//www.latimes.com/features/printedition/magazine/la-tm-crgriffin35aug28,1,3835884.story //www.WantToKnow.info/050828latimes911conspiracy

Copy of LA Times 9/11 Conspiracy Article

Getting Agnostic About 9/11

A society of nonbelievers questions the official version

MARK EHRMAN

Anyone who types the words "9/11" and "conspiracy" into an online search engine soon learns that not everybody buys the official narrative of what took place on Sept. 11, 2001.

As a professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology,
66-year-old David Ray Griffin would seem to have more affinity for leather elbow patches than tin hats, yet after friends and colleagues prodded him into sifting through the evidence, he experienced a conversion.

Now he's spreading the bad news. Griffin compiled a summary of material arguing against the accepted story that 19 hijackers sent by Osama bin Laden took the aviation system and the U.S. military by surprise that awful day in his 2004 book "The New Pearl Harbor"
(published by Interlink, a Massachusetts-based independent publisher covering areas including travel, cooking, world fiction, current events, politics, children's literature and other subjects).

He recently followed up with the book "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions" (Interlink), a critique of the Kean commission document in which he suggests that a chunk of the blame for the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil lies closer to home than the caves of Afghanistan.

We contacted him at his Santa Barbara-area home for a report on his journey from mild-mannered scholar to doubting Thomas.

How did you join the ranks of those questioning the official account of the 9/11 events?

I was rather slow getting on board.

For the first year and a half I just accepted the conventional view, really the blowback thesis, that this was blowback for our foreign policy.

When a colleague suggested to me about a year after 9/11 that he was convinced our own government or forces within our own government had arranged it, I didn't accept that.

Then several months later another colleague sent me [a link to] a website that had a timeline.

Once I started reading that and saw all those stories drawn from mainstream sources that contradicted the official account, I decided I needed to look into it more carefully, and the more I looked, the worse it got.

I considered it an obligation to kind of organize, compile the evidence and put it out there for the public.

The Internet is full of 9/11 conspiracy theories.

What have you contributed to the discussion?

My main contribution has been the second book, [showing] that the 9/11 commission report is not worthy of belief, and the implication of that is that they were covering up the government's own guilt.

What would constitute a "smoking gun" against the official 9/11 account?

There are many. By just ignoring them, the 9/11 commission implicitly admitted they couldn't answer them.

The towers coming down into a pile only a few stories high is a smoking gun.

Many laws of physics had to be violated if the official story about the collapses is true.

[The collapses] had all the earmarks of a controlled demolition by explosives.

One of those is total collapse into a small pile of rubble. The fact that Building 7 [a skyscraper near the towers] collapsed when it had not been hit by an airplane, and collapsed in seven or eight seconds, that's a smoking gun.

The fact that standard operating procedures were not followed that morning, and we've gotten three different stories now by the U.S. military as to why they did not intercept the planes, that's a smoking gun.

The Secret Service leaving the president and themselves wide open to being attacked by [not responding immediately], that's a smoking gun.

I can't say one is bigger than the other. You've got six or seven that are equally big.

Critics of the official 9/11 account seem to draw sinister inferences from instances where people, buildings or physical objects didn't react or behave as one might expect in theory.

For example, if the hijackers were devout Muslims, why were some drinking, eating pork chops and cavorting with lap dancers?

Doesn't real life unfold inconsistently, even bizarrely?

That's true, but the 9/11 commission simply ignored those questions.

They're creating this image of fanatics who were so devout and convinced of the truth of their religion that they were ready to meet their maker, yet here's all this evidence that suggests they were not devout at all. [The commission] simply ignored evidence.

Dissenters also seem to find it suspect that in a dire emergency, individuals and agencies bumbled, fumbled, delayed, dropped the ball or choked.

Won't that occur in any emergency?

Well, of course, that is the official theory.

It's a coincidence theory that just happened to be that on those days, everybody became terribly incompetent.

Take the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration]. They've got these standard procedures: If a plane goes off course, if you lose radio contact or lose the transponder, you call the military.

On this day we're told these FAA officials hit the trifecta. They got all three of these things, and yet they would stand around debating, "Should we call the military? No, I don't think so."

And when they finally call, the people at headquarters won't accept their calls because they were in conference or wouldn't pass the call on.

They have roughly about 100 hijack warnings a year where planes have to be scrambled, but suddenly they become just all thumbs.

The whole thing is just implausible.

The other thing is, if you've got accidents, screw-ups, some ought to go one way and the others the other way.

Here everything goes the same way.

Everybody fails to do their jobs in relation to something to do with
9/11.

With others, you have alleged that inconsistencies, omissions or lies in the 9/11 record point to a cover-up, or even collusion or orchestration, by the American government. What would motivate such a scenario?

You've got liberal Democrats and Republicans and Independents who are appalled by what Andrew Bacevich [a professor of international relations at Boston University] called "the new American militarism" in the book "American Empire."

New meaning, qualitatively different than before.

This post-9/11 push to a new level has made the world an enormously more dangerous place.

Many people apart from thinking about 9/11 as an inside job have decided that the United States is doing what [Princeton University emeritus international law professor] Richard Falk calls a "global domination project."

Chalmers Johnson [Japan Policy Research Institute president], a previous conservative, now says that we have become a military juggernaut intent on world domination.

Have you followed polls on what the public believes about 9/11?

There was a Zogby poll in New York. The question asked was, do you believe the government had advance knowledge of the attacks and consciously let them happen?

Forty-nine percent in New York City said yes. I believe it was 43% statewide.

That is a pretty remarkable figure.

In this country there has not been a poll that asked, do you believe the government actually planned and orchestrated the attacks? The question has been raised in Europe and Canada and has gotten to somewhere around 20%.

It would be interesting to have such a poll in the United States.

Conspiracy theorists are often dismissed as marginal types. Where do your views on 9/11 place you in the eyes of your peers in academia?

One thing to point out is, the official account itself is a conspiracy theory.

It says that 19 Arab Muslims under the influence of Osama bin Laden conspired to pull off this operation.

The question is not whether one is a conspiracy theorist about 9/11.

It's which conspiracy theory do you find most supported by the evidence?

Does your role as a 9/11 dissenter depart from your life's work as a scholar and theologian?

At first glance it may seem strange, but the task of a theologian is to look at the world from what we would imagine the divine perspective, [which] would care about the good of the whole and would love all the parts. [So] 9/11, if it was brought about by forces within our own government for imperial reasons, is antithetical to the general good.

Evil has been a subject of your academic writing. It's also been a recurring theme in administration rhetoric. Is that strange?

In these politicians' mouths, it's used to describe certain groups and organizations when it's politically convenient to do so, and then to overlook even greater evil when it's politically convenient to do so.

If you understand the divine as an all-powerful and wrathful creator who seeks vengeance, and uses overwhelming power to destroy its enemies, why then, if you've got the political power, you're probably going to think you're acting like God if you do that.

The [Christian] church during the early centuries was anti-empire. Rome was the enemy.

With Constantine, the empire accepted Christianity, and Christianity started accepting empire and all that entailed.

There has been a long history of support for militarism, so from that perspective, it's not so strange.

Prior to your 9/11 work, did you have an anti-establishment streak?

I never burned my bra. I was fairly critical like a lot of Americans are, but I don't think people would have looked at me and said, "There's an anti-establishment guy."

Do you get hate mail?

I've had a few people suggest I need to see a psychiatrist, and one psychiatrist in L.A. even kindly offered his services.

For more reliable 9/11 information: //www.WantToKnow.info/911information


Informant: Friends

18
Aug
2005

logo

Omega-News

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Archiv

Juni 2022
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
 
 
 
 
 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Wenn das Telefon krank...
//groups.google.com/g roup/mobilfunk_newsletter/ t/6f73cb93cafc5207   htt p://omega.twoday.net/searc h?q=elektromagnetische+Str ahlen //omega.twoday. net/search?q=Strahlenschut z //omega.twoday.net/ search?q=elektrosensibel h ttp://omega.twoday.net/sea rch?q=Funkloch //omeg a.twoday.net/search?q=Alzh eimer //freepage.twod ay.net/search?q=Alzheimer //omega.twoday.net/se arch?q=Joachim+Mutter
Starmail - 8. Apr, 08:39
Familie Lange aus Bonn...
//twitter.com/WILABon n/status/97313783480574361 6
Starmail - 15. Mär, 14:10
Dänische Studie findet...
//omega.twoday.net/st ories/3035537/ -------- HLV...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:48
Schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen ...
Bitte schenken Sie uns Beachtung: Interessengemeinschaft...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:01
Effects of cellular phone...
//www.buergerwelle.de /pdf/effects_of_cellular_p hone_emissions_on_sperm_mo tility_in_rats.htm [...
Starmail - 27. Nov, 11:08

Status

Online seit 6697 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 8. Apr, 08:39

Credits