Quite often the Essex EHS study is quoted by persons who wish to disprove that electro hyper sensitivity exists. Unfortunately the Essex researchers appear to have 'screwed up' in more ways than one. Other serious problems with this research were previously reported. The link below explains what one of the EHS participants recently discovered about the research.

The research appears to be a very shoddy piece of work that should be withdrawn. Why have the researchers not been brought to task by their academic bosses, for their poor performance?

Electro hypersensitive victims world wide are still feeling the effects of this false and misleading paper.


Martin Weatherall
http://www.weepinitiative.org


The Essex EHS Study: they got the results wrong

The data shows how 70% of EHS participants actually got the "ON" signals correct and how Essex researchers redefined the concept of "chance".

For some reason, Essex researchers assumed that electrohypersensitivity symptoms act like a perfect on/off switch so that symptoms would onset and disappear at exactly the same time as the signal.

So, the Essex researchers assumed that EHS had to detect both "ON" (signal) and "OFF" (no signal) equally well in order for the results to count. Problem with that was that insufficient "washout" time was allowed in a shielded area for EHS participants to normalize after the journey to the study facilities.

http://www.mast-victims.org/index.php?content=news&action=view&type=newsitem&id=4229


Agnes

--------

Calling on all essex study volenteers

We are asking for peoples personal results from the Essex Study, we believe that the results (from Essex) do not show the true picture, please contact me at http://www.es-uk/info go to contact us, any e-mails will come directly to me.


Phillip Watts
Trustee ES-UK

--------

Essex study fraud
http://www.mast-victims.org/index.php?content=news&action=view&type=newsitem&id=4382


Informant: Iris Atzmon



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=sensitiv
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=EHS
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Essex

Your Cell Phone and Brain Tumors

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/08/06/Your-Cell-Phone-and-Brain-Tumors.aspx

--------

Owning a cell phone: Is it really all that necessary?

SunJournal.com

Electromagnetic radiation emitted from the headsets of cell phones, collected from the towers themselves, have been shown, in a number of scientific tests, ...

http://www.sunjournal.com/node/52947



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=brain+tumor
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Mercola

Note: from two years ago!

Last Updated: Monday, December 10, 2007 | 12:11 PM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2007/12/10/qc-hydrosmart1210.html


Hydro’s smart meters are not too smart

Posted 2 months ago
http://www.elliotlakestandard.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1566872


Informant: Martin Weatherall



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=smart+meter

Thursday August 6, 2009

Parties object to placement of 280-mile line across West Virginia

by George Hohmann

Daily Mail Business Editor

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- The state Public Service Commission has granted 285 county commissions, communities, companies, groups and individuals the right to participate in a case that will decide whether two utilities will be allowed to build a 280-mile electric transmission line across West Virginia.

The Barbour, Braxton, Jefferson, Lewis, Tucker and Upshur county commissions were granted permission to intervene, or participate, in the case, as were the Jefferson County Board of Education, the city of Charles Town, the Sierra Club, the West Virginia Nature Conservancy, the West Virginia State Building and Construction Trades Council, the commission's own Consumer Advocate Division, and the West Virginia Energy Users Group, which represents large industrial electricity customers.

Read More...
http://www.dailymail.com/Business/200908050744



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=transmission+line
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Power+Lines/