27
Mai
2007

Link between exposure to microwave and other EMR and brain tumors

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/microwave_emr_and_brain_tumors.htm



Rising Incidence of Brain Tumors Is Drawing Attention and Concern

Now this was published 17 years ago so now it seems that the government agencies - tied to corporate interests - are perhaps trying to confuse by planting disinformation regarding a non- increase in Brain Tumors. I know so many people now that know someone who has, has had, or has died of a brain tumor. And the insanity continues...

paul


Rising Incidence of Brain Tumors Is Drawing Attention and Concern
By NATALIE ANGIER
Published: July 31, 1990

LEAD: A BRAIN tumor has long been the most terrifying of malignancies, feared for its lethality and its position at the source of all thought and emotion. And now experts say the incidence of brain cancer may be on the rise.

A BRAIN tumor has long been the most terrifying of malignancies, feared for its lethality and its position at the source of all thought and emotion. And now experts say the incidence of brain cancer may be on the rise.

New studies of epidemiological data from this country and abroad indicate that the rise is especially dramatic among the elderly, but scientists say that even among the young, the rate of at least one rare form of brain cancer is surging.

Other studies suggest that certain jobs may predispose workers or their children to brain cancer, and some researchers believe electromagnetic fields from power lines and power stations can help promote the growth of brain tumors, although many experts fiercely dispute the theory.

Experts Are Concerned

''Wherever I go, people ask me whether there's an increase in brain tumors,'' said Dr. Paul L. Kornblith, chairman of the neurosurgery department at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center in New York. ''And an awful lot of people in my field have the impression that there is a greater incidence than there was before. They are concerned about it.''

Scientists emphasize that there is by no means an epidemic of brain cancer. They say the incidence of brain cancer remains very low for the population as a whole, accounting for about 1.5 percent of all malignancies. For most age groups, the rate of the two most common and deadly brain tumors, the gliomas and the astrocytomas, has been relatively stable for at least 20 years.

Experts stress that trends in brain cancer are especially difficult to sort out, largely because the technology for diagnosing brain tumors has sharply improved over the last 15 years. With the aid of advanced imaging methods like CAT scans and magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, doctors are now able to diagnose brain cancers that in the past might have mistakenly been described as strokes, senile dementia or other neurological disorders.

''If we agree that we are diagnosing a greater number of patients with brain tumors than before, a lot of that could be explained by the increased sensitivity of diagnostic tools,'' said Dr. Edward H. Oldfield, chief of surgical neurology at the National Institute of Neurolgical Disorders and Stroke. ''When the CAT scan was introduced in the early 70's there was a big jump in the detection of brain tumors, and the MRI has an even greater sensitivity for detecting small tumors.''

Studies Track Increase

Yet recent studies indicate that certain patterns in brain cancer trends cannot be dismissed as a result superior diagnosis.

In one study, a new analysis of data collected by the National Cancer Institute's nationwide cancer surveillance program, researchers at the National Institute on Aging in Bethesda, Md., have determined that among people over the age of 75, the incidence of brain tumorsmore than doubled from 1968 to 1985, the last year for which statistics are available. For people over 80, the rate of increase was even more shocking, soaring by 300 percent to 400 percent over the 17-year period, or by as much as 23 percent a year. ''Better diagnosis can explain some of the rise,'' said Dr. Stanley I. Rapoport, chief of the laboratory of neuroscience at the Institute and the main author of the new report, which is to be published in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ''But something else is going on as well. Brain cancer in the elderly deserves more attention.''

Further confirming the Rapoport results, scientists at the National Research Council in Washington, the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm and other institutions recently compared mortality figures from about 1968 to 1987 for the United States, Britain, Italy, France, West Germany and Japan. They found that among people 65 and older, deaths from brain tumors rose in all nations at up to 200 percent for the period.

''There's a stunning increase in mortality'' from brain tumors, said Dr. Devra Lee Davis, an author of the paper, which is to appear in the December issue of The American Journal of Industrial Medicine. ''It holds true for all countries, a very sharp increase in a relatively short period of time.''

Dr. Davis said the increases in the six countries have continued long after the introduction of better imaging technology, indicating that improved diagnosis alone cannot explain the persistent rise.

Another Possible Cause

Among all age groups, the rate of a rare type of tumor, central nervous system lymphoma, which accounts for less than 5 percent of brain malignancies, has climbed 300 percent in 10 years. Experts say some of the rise is a result of AIDS, which makes people more susceptible to the malignancy. But others speculate that Epstein-Barr virus, which is becoming increasingly prevalent in the general population, may also be a cause.

Beyond the risk of primary tumors originating in brain tissue, malignancies that have spread to the brain from elsewhere in the body are rising rapidly. ''The longer people are surviving from cancers of the breast, lungs and other organs, the more chance they have that some of their tumor cells will metastasize to the brain,'' said Dr. William R. Shapiro, chairman of neurology at the Barrow Neurological Institute of St. Joseph's Hospital in Phoenix. Doctors emphasize that even among the elderly, the risk of brain cancer is low, and that any rise in occurrence is modest compared, for example, with the steep climb in malignant melanoma and lung cancer among women.

But they say brain cancer merits attention as an especially virulent disease for which there often is no treatment. The most prevalent types of brain tumors grow rapidly, spreading tumorous fingers into surrounding tissue and often killing within a year of diagnosis.

''Brain cancer is an awful, depressing cancer,'' said Nigel H. Greig of the National Institute on Aging, a co-author of the Rapoport paper. ''It has one of the worst prognoses of all cancers. It's almost invariably fatal. It's lagged behind other cancers in chemotherapy and treatment, and survival time has not improved.''

For that reason, experts say, it is worth trying to determine why brain cancer seems to be rising among older groups, and to eliminate whatever risk factors can be identified. Dr. Davis says that to understand why brain tumors are on the rise in the elderly, researchers must consider the past.

''You must look at those aspects of the world that changed 30 or 40 yers ago, because the latency period for brain cancer is that long,'' she said.

Speculating on such aspects, she points out that several decades ago, many more people worked in industrial, blue-collar jobs than do now, and that factories are often full of hazardous chemicals, running the gamut of the periodic table. ''There's no question that proportionally more people used to work in dirtier places,'' she said.

The high proportion of factory workers may partly explain why brain tumors are now showing up in many industrial nations. Assuming the workplace is now cleaner than it was, Dr. Davis said, the incidence of brain cancer may begin to drop in the future. But she believes that other chemicals in the environment, like pesticides, will compensate for any improvements in the workplace.

Dr. Davis believes that poor diet may be part of the reason for the rise in brain cancer. In the past, she said, people tended to pickle their meats and fish with suspected carcinogens like nitrites, and they ate few fresh vegetables and fruits, which contain anti-oxidants and other compounds thought to act as anti-cancer agents. Other researchers note that in the past, doctors and dentists were more cavalier in using X-rays and other forms of high-energy, or ionizing, radiation, now known to mutate DNA and wreak destruction in cells.

A number of researchers are now investigating the possibility that even low-energy, or non-ionizing, radiation, may somehow promote the growth of brain tumors. They contend that electromagnetic fields from power lines, power stations and even common household appliances can be a health hazard. But many experts dispute those assertions. They say that, unlike ionizing radiation, which strips apart atoms and damages DNA, electricity is non-ionizing and is not thought to mutate genetic material. Nevertheless, some experts suggest electromagnetic fields could subtly increase the risk of cancer, particularly high-voltage currents and alternating currents generated by large power stations and substations.

Writing in a recent issue of The New Yorker, the journalist Paul Brodeur discussed an apparent cluster of brain tumors on a street in Guilford, Conn., near a power substation. In a report in May, the Environmental Protection Agency said that there was a possible link between cancer and low-level electromagnetic fields, but that there still was not enough evidence to conclude that the fields directly caused cancer. In one study, Dr. David A. Savitz, an epidemiologist at the School of Public Health at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, and colleagues considered all cases of childhood cancer from 1976 to 1983 in the Denver area.

Samples Are Small They concluded that children who live near power lines that expose them to powerful electromagnetic fields had a 50 percent greater chance of developing brain tumors than those who did not live near power lines. But they said the samples were small and other potential health hazards in the environments considered had not been ruled out. Many experts insist the studies are inconclusive and contradictory. ''People are being very much alarmed over something for which there is no real evidence whatsoever,'' said Dr. Eleanor R. Adair of the John B. Pierce Laboratory at the Center for Research in Health and the Environment, an affiliate of Yale University. ''Electricity has been around for a long, long time, and people's life expectancy has nearly doubled since the invention of the light bulb.''


Art Kab

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

--------

Brain tumor and role of β-carotene, a- tocopherol, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17998669

Brain Tumor Statistics: Now (as of 2002) Leading Cause of Death in Children Surpassing Leukemia
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/brain_tumor_statistics.htm



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Antonietti
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=brain+tumors
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=brain+cancer

WHO Ignored Evidence in Guidelines

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/5/8/155851.shtml


Informant: Helmut Breunig



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=World+Health+Organisation

Decomposition of thymidine by low energy electrons. Implications for the molecular mechanisms of single strand breaks in DNA

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/112467780/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=16506258&dopt=Abstract
http://homepage.uibk.ac.at/~c72225/research.html



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=single+strand+breaks


Informant: Helmut Breunig

Phone mast locations kept from public

http://news.independent.co.uk/health/article2586675.ece

--------

Re: Phone mast locations kept from public

There's also a good letter on wi-fi from Sandi Lawrence - sorry I have no link.

I was surprised to see only one letter. I gave the address to write to last week: sundayletters@independent.co.uk

Gary


From Mast Sanity/Mast Network



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi

26
Mai
2007

The REAL Concern Unveiled With RFID e-Passports

http://chapelure.com/The_REAL_Concern_Unveiled_With_RFID_ePassports.pdf


Informant: freespeaknow



http://omega.twoday.net/topics/RFID/

Argue the science or suffer the consequences of a rising tide of health objectors

In the UK and at prime time on BBC1 their flagship serious documentary programme PANORAMA recently (May 21 8.30) raised the issue of health risks from information carrying radiowaves. More specifically it focused on WiFi being installed in schools where children are compulsorily exposed to levels far in excess of spending hours in the main beam of a transmitting mast.

Full acknowledgement was made that it was still well below the ICNIRP international, but industry set, guidelines, and the power levels required for thermal heating of the body with the known damage that causes. Unusually in this debate this programme went a further step and examined whether there was any cause for concern at these lower than thermal (the only safety) levels. Distinguished researchers and scientists from Austria (Oberfeld) Sweden (Johansson) and the USA (Lai) were wheeled on and though some admitted there was science illustrating both sides of the debate, all agreed there were serious effects already sufficiently well established to properly mean a proportionate precautionary response.

In Austria not only are masts banned from proximity to schools but the mini-masts, which is effectively what WiFi is, were banned from use inside schools as threatening children’s health. More damningly still, chief UK government scientific advisor on this issue, author of the MTHR safety report 2000 on mobile phones, and head of the UK Health Protection Agency Sir William Stewart, with a careful choice of words, judiciously considered it was "timely" for a delay in the rush for WiFi while investigations were made.

Future health possibilities were a major concern for him, for children have special vulnerabilities due to skull size and thickness, not fully formed immune systems and anticipating much higher life-long exposures due to starting earlier and spending much more time in more highly charged electrospheres than previous generations.

All in all this programme, only the tip of the iceberg of a blizzard of complaints and criticisms of variable scientific provenance, (such as anti-mast groups) deserves a measured and level-headed response worthy of the issue and the millions now tied up in the industry. It cannot be brushed aside, and especially not by the near hysterical OTT mouthings on blog spaces such as that of Badscience knocker Dr Ben Goldacre. Perusal of internet sites such as his and others with their alarming array of ranting and raving irrationality is guaranteed to send any neutrally objective observer into the arms of the ‘precautioners’. This Panorama programme is already arousing interest from US news organisations and must be met with a rational measured non-emotional response as it goes international.

Now is the time solid research should be brought forward for examination, in the past, the cellphone industry at least has claimed “there are thousands of studies” showing microwave technology is safe (see Dr George Carlo) but this was exposed as foolish wishful thinking and only damaged credibility. So without boastfulness, but as is now required, a responsible technology using industry concerned about legitimate questioning on safety grounds, at the very least a public relations and PR disaster potentially, must produce its evidence that there is no cause for concern.

As the support charity ES-UK for those who describe themselves as specially sensitive to the health effects of these wonderfully useful new communications we have no wish to make unjustified or unwarranted mere assertions about health risks. We would enjoy the opportunity to examine any science and present it for consideration by our sufferers. It might disabuse them of some of their beliefs and fears.

Further, we would welcome a more considered response to their ‘personal stories’ or case studies. When these are presented to supposedly scientific commentators, like the columnist mentioned above among others, they are ignored. This is distressing and painful, devaluing the individual's real life experience.

So often is the word ‘only’ inserted in front of ‘anecdotal’ evidence, sight is lost of the fact it is still evidence. It occupies a special place in scientific reasoning right at the commencement of an inquiry. First problems are raised, and questions become formulated out of these anomalous situations demanding explanation, and which won’t go away. It might be the genius of Newton asking “But why does the apple fall downwards?” or Maxwell pursuing where his mathematical questions were leading him and showing the modern possibilities for harnessing electromagnetism for human endeavours. It can also be Brian Stein with the personal experience of fourteen trouble-free years of mobile phone use before his world changed for ever. It ill behoves so-called scientific commentators like Goldacre to ignore this primary, first level of science, there are facts here to be reckoned with, put under their noses, no good scientist worthy of the name ignores any evidence, not properly first person anecdotal, nor when we have 400 cases, 50 published on our website. In Sweden their 400 'anecdotal' cases, also published on our site, as 'Black and White' inspired official recognition of EHS as a 'functional impairment'.

What has the industry to be afraid of? We are confident of its harmlessness say many in it, so now is the time for it to meet the questions raised by Panorama head on. Argue the science or suffer the consequences of a rising tide of health objectors while out marketing, plus the ignominy of recklessly endangering children's health.

Rod Read
http://www.es-uk.org.uk

ElectroSensitivity-UK (registered charity 1103018) helping the vulnerable minority with ‘radiation sickness’, and reacting with health problems to electromagnetic fields, microwaves, RF etc. all 'electrosmog'.

Rod Read M.Phil.,(Cantab), Dip Psych Couns., Cert.Ed.director. Please support us with a donation, (£15 p.a. min.) our only income, to ES-UK as below. We welcome help from scientists, doctors and health experts in understanding causes and links, diagnosis and treatments. Also all media inquiries, personal accounts of ES in your life, info on what helps and e-mail addresses where possible. ES-UK Office, Bury Lane, Sutton, Ely, Cambs, CB6 2BB. Tel: 01353-778151 or at http://www.electrosensitivity.org.uk also by e-mail at electrosensitivity @hotmail.com

Trustees: Professor of Human Radiation Effects Dr Denis Henshaw, Dr David Dowson MD., ChB, Jean Philips BA. Scientific advice from: http://www.powerwatch.org.uk, Keith Jamieson Dip.AAS. Bsc(Hons) RIBA. Inst.Ph., Environmental Consultant and others. Visit http://www.tetrawatch.net and http://www.hese-project.org/hese-uk/en/main/index.php



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Panorama
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Henry+Lai
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Johansson
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Carlo
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Oberfeld
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=radiation+sickness
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electrosmog
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electrosensitivity
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Brian+Stein
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Brian+Stein

Omega-News Collection 26. May 2007

Global Carbon Emissions in Overdrive
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3758630/

Increase in Carbon Emissions Seen Tripling Since '90s
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3758706/

Evidence of global warming is here, regulators say
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3764457/

Africa Feels the Warming It Didn't Cause
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3766863/

Climate change threatens range of British species
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3756444/

Human Activities Wiping Out Three Species Every Hour
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3763717/

The Future of Food: What Every Person Should Know
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3766624/

USA
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Vote+USA+2004/
http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/USA/

Iraq War
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Irak-Krieg/
http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Iraq+War+-+Irak+Krieg/

Is Iran next?
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/
http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/

RFID
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/RFID/

EMF-Omega-News 26. May 2007
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3770374/

EMF-Omega-News 26. May 2007

Cancer Risks from Microwaves Confirmed
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3762355/

The Latest Reassurance About Cell Phones and Cancer
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3768702/

Electromagnetic fields linked to cancers in railway workers
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3769661/

Neurophysiological effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on humans: a comprehensive review
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3749022/

Environmental risk factors for brain tumors
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3749047/

Skin cancer not just a sunshine story?
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3762849/

Drug delivery system: a proof that the blood-brain barrier can be permeated by certain electrical devices that use pulsed energy
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3754184/

The Research: Current INDEPENDENT Scientific Research Proves That Mobile Phone Masts Are NOT Safe
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3748225/

The Danish Cancer registry, again
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3752044/

Radiation from baby monitors 'poses risk': Infants being harmed by safety devices, say scientists
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3748032/

Immune system 'attacked by mobile phones'
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3744660/

A Possible Association Between Fetal/neonatal Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation and the Increased Incidence of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) (Update)
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/224062/

Radiation Injury: EMF effects on cells
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3770161/

Real People with EMS
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3744678/

INCLINE VILLAGE and Microwave Antennas
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3744649/

Wi-Fi: A Warning Signal
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3754101/

The classroom 'cancer risk' of wi-fi internet
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3749748/

Wi-Fi risks in schools 'must be reviewed'
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3749736/

Wi-Fi safety concerns slammed as melodramatic
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3761883/

We'll fight plans for mast in church
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3746448/

Invisible danger
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3750475/

Celling ourselves short
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3754226/

Radiation warning on school computers
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3754375/

Families' triple phone mast fears
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3755753/

Mobile mast plan to receive clear 'no' signal
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3756046/

Row over 40ft mast reignites
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3756078/

Phone mast fear
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3756117/

Phone mast plea falls on deaf ears
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3756383/

Pub's phone mast battle
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3759584/

Phone mast is third for hillside
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3759615/

Mast petition attracts 272 names
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3760515/

Banham phone mast plan rejected
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3761636/

Phone mast wait
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3761662/

Marching against masts
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3761687/

Brighton protest
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3762676/

Villagers victory over phone mast plan
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3763597/

Mast plan angers residents
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3764518/

Residents to fight phone giant's mast appeal
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3764542/

Go-ahead for phone mast near railways
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3764563/

Understanding the Territory of Toxicity
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3753208/

No escape from mobiles, even on Everest
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3758298/

The Canadian Human Rights Commission Report (CHRC) on The Medical Perspectives on Environmental Sensitivities
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3753976/

State senator rear-ends Vallejo woman while talking on cell phone
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3750132/

News from Mast Sanity
http://tinyurl.com/aotw3

Omega-News Collection 26. May 2007
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3770378/

Radiation Injury: EMF effects on cells

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/radiation_injury.htm



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=radiation+injury
logo

Omega-News

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Archiv

Dezember 2025
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Wenn das Telefon krank...
http://groups.google.com/g roup/mobilfunk_newsletter/ t/6f73cb93cafc5207   htt p://omega.twoday.net/searc h?q=elektromagnetische+Str ahlen http://omega.twoday. net/search?q=Strahlenschut z https://omega.twoday.net/ search?q=elektrosensibel h ttp://omega.twoday.net/sea rch?q=Funkloch https://omeg a.twoday.net/search?q=Alzh eimer http://freepage.twod ay.net/search?q=Alzheimer https://omega.twoday.net/se arch?q=Joachim+Mutter
Starmail - 8. Apr, 08:39
Familie Lange aus Bonn...
http://twitter.com/WILABon n/status/97313783480574361 6
Starmail - 15. Mär, 14:10
Dänische Studie findet...
https://omega.twoday.net/st ories/3035537/ -------- HLV...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:48
Schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen ...
Bitte schenken Sie uns Beachtung: Interessengemeinschaft...
Starmail - 12. Mär, 22:01
Effects of cellular phone...
http://www.buergerwelle.de /pdf/effects_of_cellular_p hone_emissions_on_sperm_mo tility_in_rats.htm [...
Starmail - 27. Nov, 11:08

Status

Online seit 7971 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 8. Apr, 08:39

Credits