Depleted Uranium, Diabetes, Cancer And You
Starmail - 22. Jan, 22:52
22
Jan
2007
Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/mobile_phone_use_and_risk_of_glioma.htm
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/intern_j_cancer_2007.doc
--------
Large Cell Phone Study Points to Long-Term Brain Tumor Risk
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/large_cell_phone_study_points_to_long_term_brain_tumor_risk.htm
--------
The latest Interphone findings pointing to a link between brain tumors and long-term use of a mobile phone should not be dismissed
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/fda_had_no_time_to_read_the_new_study.htm
--------
Could these be the cigarettes of the 21st century? 'Absolutely'
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3209694/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=glioma
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Hardell
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/intern_j_cancer_2007.doc
--------
Large Cell Phone Study Points to Long-Term Brain Tumor Risk
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/large_cell_phone_study_points_to_long_term_brain_tumor_risk.htm
--------
The latest Interphone findings pointing to a link between brain tumors and long-term use of a mobile phone should not be dismissed
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/fda_had_no_time_to_read_the_new_study.htm
--------
Could these be the cigarettes of the 21st century? 'Absolutely'
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3209694/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=glioma
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Hardell
Starmail - 22. Jan, 18:10
WiFi and Electrosensitivity
Starmail - 22. Jan, 13:39
Meeting at the World Health HQ
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/meeting_at_the_world_health_hq.htm
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/base_station_emissions_and_health_concerns_3.pdf
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/carlo_eileenoconnor_response.pdf
Please find enclosed details with regards to the recent meeting held at the World Health Organisation, Geneva.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/who_meeting_geneva_(2).doc
Enclosed photograph of the group taken outside the World Health Headquarters.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/who_meeting_008.jpg
Mobile Phone/Masts Concerned Groups from the UK and Ireland meet the World Health Organisation (WHO)
A landmark meeting was held with leaders from the World Health Organisation and a small group of people from the UK and Ireland. The meeting was to discuss the groups concerns about mobile phones/masts and wireless technology.
The meeting took place on Tuesday 16th January 2007 at the WHO Headquarters in Geneva.
The meeting was attended by nine representatives of voluntary groups including, Better Environment and Safer Telecommunications (B.E.S.T), Irish Doctors Environmental Association (IDEA), The EM- Radiation Research Trust (RRT), Northern Ireland Opposing Masts (NIOM) and EHS victims suffering from electromagnetic radiation. The informal meeting took place in the offices of Dr Maria Neira, Director for Protection of Human Environment and was attended by Dr Emily Perkins Van Deventer, World Health Coordinator for Radiation and Environmental Health, Dr Chiyoji Ohkubo, WHO Scientist for Radiation and Environmental Health Department of Public Health and Environment. This meeting was particularly special to the Group as it was the first occasion that an international organisation of the stature of WHO has afforded the group an opportunity to present their views and concerns. It is also noteworthy that the nine delegates were so keen to express their concerns in person that they incurred all the travel and accommodation expenses and loss of a couple of days work personally. Many of the Group also have unfortunate personal experience of the ill effects of masts placed in inappropriate locations i.e. close to schools and residential dwellings.
The concerned group had a very positive exchange of views and are appreciative of the interest in and the opportunity afforded to them to bring this important issue to such a high level platform for discussion. The group particularly welcomes the willingness of WHO representatives to afford them an open line of communication and an invitation to share information, which may be relevant to their further research.
The Group proposed that Dr Van Deventer should consider speaking at a two day conference in the UK which is hopefully due to take place in London in November 2007. A workshop/scientific forum on the issue of ‘individual sensitivity’ is currently being considered by the UK EMF Discussion Group which is chaired by Sir William Stewart, Chairman for the UK Health Protection Agency. Dr Van Deventer agreed that it is important to gather all sides together, including WHO, Government, Industry, Media, HPA, Concerned Groups and Independent scientists and would consider accepting an invitation providing she was sent a formal invitation.
An open letter addressed to Dr Emily Perkins Van Deventer written by Jean-Luc Guilmot, Bio-Engineer was also presented as the letter details eight published epidemiological studies on phone masts.
All have been published in peer-review journals and are referenced on the WHO database and are all reporting POSITIVE results. Several of the studies provide accurate RF exposure measurements.
Meanwhile hundreds of thousands (1,4 million in May 2006) phone masts have already been deployed worldwide and new sources of low level RF chronic exposure are continuously being added with the development of new wireless technologies.
It was pointed out that this is a conflict with regards to the message given out on the WHO website which claims “the weight of scientific opinion is that there is no substantiated evidence that living near a mobile phone mast station causes adverse health effects” this is clearly incorrect and misleading, as 80% published peer reviewed studies point towards POSITIVE results: microwave syndrome, increased risk of cancer, absence of psychological factors etc. the misleading WHO statement allows Government and Industry to incorrectly quote from the WHO website as a seal of approval with regards to safety.
The groups encouraged the WHO to take emergency action and also tried to persuade them to reject the current ICNIRP guidelines as they only protect the body from heating and are meant for short term exposure only.
As a result the groups plan to allow WHO representatives time to reflect on the research and information presented at the meeting and intend on following up by writing and asking for their plan of action as all agencies refer back to the WHO, this needs to be examined from a legal perspective as they may ultimately be held responsible.
They also pointed out the lack of political will and support for change to make this technology safer and as a result the groups urgently request that the WHO inform Government and Authority to take action to adopt the precautionary principle for mobile phones/ phone masts, DECT phones, microwave baby and security alarms and not to install wireless computers networks until safety is ‘proved.’
At the conclusion of the meeting it was agreed to build on the contact established between the Group and WHO at an informal level. It was felt by the Group that this would facilitate the exchange of views and information and enables them to continue with their research. This is an important issue which should be investigated immediately.
The Group would like to thank the representatives of WHO for enabling the meeting and thereby acknowledge the groups valuable work in their countries.
PARTICIPANTS TO THE MEETING.
WHO representatives
Dr Maria Neira, Director for Protection of Human Environment
Dr Emily Perkins Van Deventer, WHO, Coordinator for Radiation and Environmental Health
Dr Chiyoji Ohkubo, WHO, Scientist for Radiation & Environmental Health Department of Public Health and Environment
Group representatives
Con Colbert (IDEA)
John Cummins, Tipperary, Chairman of B.E.S.T
Walter Graham, Chairman NIOM
Pauline Keely (B.E.S.T, Dublin)
Clara Leahy Breen – Co. Kerry.
Noreen Murphy, (B.E.S.T member) Cork
Eileen O’Connor – Ireland
Eileen O’Connor – England, Trustee – EM Radiation Research Trust http://www.radiationresearch.org
John Ryan, Co. Tipperary.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/base_station_emissions_and_health_concerns_3.pdf
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/carlo_eileenoconnor_response.pdf
Please find enclosed details with regards to the recent meeting held at the World Health Organisation, Geneva.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/who_meeting_geneva_(2).doc
Enclosed photograph of the group taken outside the World Health Headquarters.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/who_meeting_008.jpg
Mobile Phone/Masts Concerned Groups from the UK and Ireland meet the World Health Organisation (WHO)
A landmark meeting was held with leaders from the World Health Organisation and a small group of people from the UK and Ireland. The meeting was to discuss the groups concerns about mobile phones/masts and wireless technology.
The meeting took place on Tuesday 16th January 2007 at the WHO Headquarters in Geneva.
The meeting was attended by nine representatives of voluntary groups including, Better Environment and Safer Telecommunications (B.E.S.T), Irish Doctors Environmental Association (IDEA), The EM- Radiation Research Trust (RRT), Northern Ireland Opposing Masts (NIOM) and EHS victims suffering from electromagnetic radiation. The informal meeting took place in the offices of Dr Maria Neira, Director for Protection of Human Environment and was attended by Dr Emily Perkins Van Deventer, World Health Coordinator for Radiation and Environmental Health, Dr Chiyoji Ohkubo, WHO Scientist for Radiation and Environmental Health Department of Public Health and Environment. This meeting was particularly special to the Group as it was the first occasion that an international organisation of the stature of WHO has afforded the group an opportunity to present their views and concerns. It is also noteworthy that the nine delegates were so keen to express their concerns in person that they incurred all the travel and accommodation expenses and loss of a couple of days work personally. Many of the Group also have unfortunate personal experience of the ill effects of masts placed in inappropriate locations i.e. close to schools and residential dwellings.
The concerned group had a very positive exchange of views and are appreciative of the interest in and the opportunity afforded to them to bring this important issue to such a high level platform for discussion. The group particularly welcomes the willingness of WHO representatives to afford them an open line of communication and an invitation to share information, which may be relevant to their further research.
The Group proposed that Dr Van Deventer should consider speaking at a two day conference in the UK which is hopefully due to take place in London in November 2007. A workshop/scientific forum on the issue of ‘individual sensitivity’ is currently being considered by the UK EMF Discussion Group which is chaired by Sir William Stewart, Chairman for the UK Health Protection Agency. Dr Van Deventer agreed that it is important to gather all sides together, including WHO, Government, Industry, Media, HPA, Concerned Groups and Independent scientists and would consider accepting an invitation providing she was sent a formal invitation.
An open letter addressed to Dr Emily Perkins Van Deventer written by Jean-Luc Guilmot, Bio-Engineer was also presented as the letter details eight published epidemiological studies on phone masts.
All have been published in peer-review journals and are referenced on the WHO database and are all reporting POSITIVE results. Several of the studies provide accurate RF exposure measurements.
Meanwhile hundreds of thousands (1,4 million in May 2006) phone masts have already been deployed worldwide and new sources of low level RF chronic exposure are continuously being added with the development of new wireless technologies.
It was pointed out that this is a conflict with regards to the message given out on the WHO website which claims “the weight of scientific opinion is that there is no substantiated evidence that living near a mobile phone mast station causes adverse health effects” this is clearly incorrect and misleading, as 80% published peer reviewed studies point towards POSITIVE results: microwave syndrome, increased risk of cancer, absence of psychological factors etc. the misleading WHO statement allows Government and Industry to incorrectly quote from the WHO website as a seal of approval with regards to safety.
The groups encouraged the WHO to take emergency action and also tried to persuade them to reject the current ICNIRP guidelines as they only protect the body from heating and are meant for short term exposure only.
As a result the groups plan to allow WHO representatives time to reflect on the research and information presented at the meeting and intend on following up by writing and asking for their plan of action as all agencies refer back to the WHO, this needs to be examined from a legal perspective as they may ultimately be held responsible.
They also pointed out the lack of political will and support for change to make this technology safer and as a result the groups urgently request that the WHO inform Government and Authority to take action to adopt the precautionary principle for mobile phones/ phone masts, DECT phones, microwave baby and security alarms and not to install wireless computers networks until safety is ‘proved.’
At the conclusion of the meeting it was agreed to build on the contact established between the Group and WHO at an informal level. It was felt by the Group that this would facilitate the exchange of views and information and enables them to continue with their research. This is an important issue which should be investigated immediately.
The Group would like to thank the representatives of WHO for enabling the meeting and thereby acknowledge the groups valuable work in their countries.
PARTICIPANTS TO THE MEETING.
WHO representatives
Dr Maria Neira, Director for Protection of Human Environment
Dr Emily Perkins Van Deventer, WHO, Coordinator for Radiation and Environmental Health
Dr Chiyoji Ohkubo, WHO, Scientist for Radiation & Environmental Health Department of Public Health and Environment
Group representatives
Con Colbert (IDEA)
John Cummins, Tipperary, Chairman of B.E.S.T
Walter Graham, Chairman NIOM
Pauline Keely (B.E.S.T, Dublin)
Clara Leahy Breen – Co. Kerry.
Noreen Murphy, (B.E.S.T member) Cork
Eileen O’Connor – Ireland
Eileen O’Connor – England, Trustee – EM Radiation Research Trust http://www.radiationresearch.org
John Ryan, Co. Tipperary.
Starmail - 22. Jan, 11:57
Fachgespräch: Gesundheitliche Auswirkungen des Mobilfunks
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/fachgespraech_gesundheitliche_auswirkungen_des_mobilfunks.htm
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Selsam
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Scheiner
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Eger
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Kleilein
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Schorpp
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Selsam
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Scheiner
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Eger
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Kleilein
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Schorpp
Starmail - 22. Jan, 11:01
21
Jan
2007
Computer and TV-CRT high frequency emissions are received in the head, and modulated into irregular patterns
Recently I studied, by a spectrum analyzer and oscilloscope, how PC and TV screen emissions, were absorbed at 'safe' distance, in human head and modulated to irregular patterns.
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/computer_high_frequency_emissions_are_received_in_the_head.htm
Zamir P. Shalita
--------
EMF's....oscilloscope readings...brain absorp and modulation...2007
Dear Dr. Shalita:
Your study { http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3215357/ -- see complete Omega intro above) is interesting and very important!!!
Now, if only we can obtain funding for Assoc. Prof. Olle Johansson (Karolinska Institute) so a study such as yours can be combined with changes in histamine levels, accumulations of mast cells, and markers such as chymase and tryptase, this will be a great contribution toward dispelling the myth that EMF/EMR is safe and by doing so, will help put pressure on industry and government that concerns about close, chronic, prolonged EMF/EMR "is real" -- confirmed by measurements showing the brain acts as "an antenna" with the additional explanation re "biological changes" that explain how the combined information transfers to "confirmation of adverse health effects."
You may be interested in an interview titled "Mystery in Skin" which will further explain the sort of evaluations I am referring to. Access: http://www.feb.se/ARTICLES/OlleJ.html -- Dr. Johansson and colleagues have done countless studies that confirm adverse biological changes and why they induce various adverse syptoms BUT, he has had to "walk a carefully controlled path" for many reasons not the least of which have been personal threats on many levels. He simply can not do the sort of blood studies re "markers for irradiation" or even more specific studies re markers mentioned above, without financial support dedicated to his work and "under his control."
There are of course, many biological changes that could be included and/or evaluated in expanded studies such as EEG recordings, MRI evaluations re "white matter hyperintensities".and more..... Dr. Lai's work re DNA and a hair dryer should be "proof enough!!!" Soon the "brick wall" of "..no mechanisms to explain......" will fall down.......
Dr. George Carlo, along with many others, are working hard to challenge "the greedy status-quo...."
All of this and more is needed to thwart "ongoing cover-up" by pharmaceutical industry. "They," as you most likely know, are working hard to develop drugs that will halt formation of amyloid. "They" are doing nothing toward informing the public that EMF/EMR exposures DO promote inflammation that leads to the formation of fibrils and plaque.
I am not implying that you have access to sources of the sort of funding I suggest but by sharing and commenting on ceretain studies as to how and why they can help stop the rapid progression of "brain deterioriation" (including brain cancer, Alzheimers, Lou Gehrig's Disease -- and really "all health problems"), it is my hope that soon it will become obvious to even the universities, charities, industry and government that no one can afford to continue going forward without funding honest, meaningful studies.
In the meantime, thanks again for your efforts to clarify that "mechanisms" continue to be apparent!!!
Take care - Joanne
Joanne C. Mueller
Guinea Pigs R Us
731 - 123rd Avenue N.W.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55448-2127 USA
Phone: 763-755-6114
Email: jcmpelican @aol.com (1-26-07)
"The things that will destroy us are: politics without principle; pleasure without conscience; wealth without work; knowledge without character; business without morality; science without humanity...."
--Mahatma Gandhi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Shalita
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Johansson
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Carlo
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/computer_high_frequency_emissions_are_received_in_the_head.htm
Zamir P. Shalita
--------
EMF's....oscilloscope readings...brain absorp and modulation...2007
Dear Dr. Shalita:
Your study { http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3215357/ -- see complete Omega intro above) is interesting and very important!!!
Now, if only we can obtain funding for Assoc. Prof. Olle Johansson (Karolinska Institute) so a study such as yours can be combined with changes in histamine levels, accumulations of mast cells, and markers such as chymase and tryptase, this will be a great contribution toward dispelling the myth that EMF/EMR is safe and by doing so, will help put pressure on industry and government that concerns about close, chronic, prolonged EMF/EMR "is real" -- confirmed by measurements showing the brain acts as "an antenna" with the additional explanation re "biological changes" that explain how the combined information transfers to "confirmation of adverse health effects."
You may be interested in an interview titled "Mystery in Skin" which will further explain the sort of evaluations I am referring to. Access: http://www.feb.se/ARTICLES/OlleJ.html -- Dr. Johansson and colleagues have done countless studies that confirm adverse biological changes and why they induce various adverse syptoms BUT, he has had to "walk a carefully controlled path" for many reasons not the least of which have been personal threats on many levels. He simply can not do the sort of blood studies re "markers for irradiation" or even more specific studies re markers mentioned above, without financial support dedicated to his work and "under his control."
There are of course, many biological changes that could be included and/or evaluated in expanded studies such as EEG recordings, MRI evaluations re "white matter hyperintensities".and more..... Dr. Lai's work re DNA and a hair dryer should be "proof enough!!!" Soon the "brick wall" of "..no mechanisms to explain......" will fall down.......
Dr. George Carlo, along with many others, are working hard to challenge "the greedy status-quo...."
All of this and more is needed to thwart "ongoing cover-up" by pharmaceutical industry. "They," as you most likely know, are working hard to develop drugs that will halt formation of amyloid. "They" are doing nothing toward informing the public that EMF/EMR exposures DO promote inflammation that leads to the formation of fibrils and plaque.
I am not implying that you have access to sources of the sort of funding I suggest but by sharing and commenting on ceretain studies as to how and why they can help stop the rapid progression of "brain deterioriation" (including brain cancer, Alzheimers, Lou Gehrig's Disease -- and really "all health problems"), it is my hope that soon it will become obvious to even the universities, charities, industry and government that no one can afford to continue going forward without funding honest, meaningful studies.
In the meantime, thanks again for your efforts to clarify that "mechanisms" continue to be apparent!!!
Take care - Joanne
Joanne C. Mueller
Guinea Pigs R Us
731 - 123rd Avenue N.W.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55448-2127 USA
Phone: 763-755-6114
Email: jcmpelican @aol.com (1-26-07)
"The things that will destroy us are: politics without principle; pleasure without conscience; wealth without work; knowledge without character; business without morality; science without humanity...."
--Mahatma Gandhi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Shalita
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Johansson
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Carlo
Starmail - 21. Jan, 22:12
