Wissenschaft zu Mobilfunk

10
Jul
2009

Mobile phone use associated with increased risk of brain tumours

Posted on 22 September 2008

I don't have a brilliant memory, but occasionally something someone tells me does somehow stick in my mind. One such memory I have concerns a patient I saw some years ago. He had had a brain tumour (I forget what sort) removed, and was interested in supporting his convalescence and general health through nutrition. During our consultation he remarked that he had a son that also had had a brain tumour. I asked if his doctors thought there was any genetic link. He replied in the negative, and told me it was his opinion that mobile phones were the cause. This man went on to tell me that both he and his son were early adopters of this technology, and by their own admission were heavy users too.

He went on to tell me a story about an experience he had after he had had his operation. He was sitting in a packed waiting room full of post-surgical patients. Nearly all the patients in the room had had brain tumours removed and the scars to prove it. A conversation about mobile phones started in the waiting room, so my patients decided to take a straw poll there and then. All the patients who had had brain tumours turned out to be mobile phone users. Now, there's nothing particularly telling here I think, because mobile phone use is so common. However, my patients went one better in his poll by then asking each individual which ear they habitually held their mobile phone to. He reported to me that the side they indicated matched the side of their tumour in every case.

This is all purely anecdotal observation and all that, and doesn't prove a thing, but this memory came back to me this morning after reading about some research which was announced recently at the Royal Society during a conference held by the Radiation Research Trust. The research was conducted by a team led by Professor Lennart Hardell of the University Hospital in Orebro in Sweden. It has not been formally published yet, though from what I can make out, the data has come from a previously published piece of research from Professor Hardell [1].

The research focused on the risk of specific tumours in individuals who started to use mobile phones before the age of 20. Younger people were the target for this research because they are believed to be more susceptible to the electromagnetic radiation that emanates from mobile phones, partly because their skulls are thinner and may allow the radiation to penetrate deeper into the brain.

The research found that individuals who started mobile phone use before the age of 20 were at very significantly increased (more than 5-fold) risk of brain tumours known as ‘gliomas’ as well as benign (non-cancerous) tumours on the main nerve responsible for hearing known as ‘acoustic neuromas’. According to reports, use of cordless home phones were at significantly elevated risk of glioma too.

Individuals who started to use mobile handsets in their 20s were also at increased risk of glioma and acoustic neuroma, though the enhanced risk was smaller than that seen in the earlier users: risk of glioma and acoustic neuroma was up about 50 and 100 per cent respectively. Professor Hardell is quoted as saying: “This is a warning sign. It is very worrying. We should be taking precautions.”

It is perhaps interesting to note Professor Hardell's previous work in this area, specifically a meta-analysis of studies looking at the relationship between mobile phone use and brain tumour risk [1]. Individuals using mobile phones in the long term (10 or more years) were found to be at an increased risk of glioma and acoustic neuroma on the side of phone use (risk was increased by 200 and 240 per cent respectively. Mobile phone use was not associated with increased risk of these tumours on the opposite side of the head to the one on which the phone is habitually held. The evidence as it hands supports the idea that long term mobile phone use is indeed associated with an increased risk of brain tumours, just like my patient thought it was all those years ago.

References:

1. Hardell L, et al. Meta-analysis of long-term mobile phone use and the association with brain tumours. Int J Oncol. 2008;32(5):1097-103

http://tinyurl.com/lex545


From Mast Sanity/Mast Network



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=brain+tumour
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=glioma
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=acoustic+neuroma
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Hardell

9
Jul
2009

8
Jul
2009

SOS der öffentlichen Gesundheit: Die Schattenseite der drahtlosen Revolution

Wieder einmal eine offizielle Stelle, die warnt: das amerikanische Nationale Institut für Wissenschaft und Politik (?) schrieb einen Bericht über die Gesundheitsrisiken der drahtlosen Technologie an Gouverneure, Kongressmitglieder und Präsident Obama und seine Verwaltung ebenso wie an Tausende von Journalisten für Gesundheits- und Umweltfragen. (Washington,30.6.09).

Aufgezählt werden: Mobiltelefone, Antennen in der Nachbarschaft, Drahtlos-Netzwerke, Funk-Router, DECT-Schnurlostelefone. Gesetzgeber und Journalisten sollen sich kundig machen über die gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen der Mikrowellenstrahlung dieser Anwendungen und die weitere chronische Exposition durch drahtlose Breitbandtechnik (z.B. WiMAX) und neue drahtlose Nutzanwendungen. Das Nationale Institut ermutigt alle, sich zu engagieren bei dieser wichtigen Angelegenheit für die öffentliche Gesundheit, die Erwachsene und Kinder sowie Tiere und die Natur belastet. Unter der Mitautorenschaft von Magda Havas, ass. Professorin für Umwelt- und Nachhaltigkeits-(?)Studien an der Universität von Trent, Canada, und Camilla Rees, Gründerin von http://www.ElectromagneticHealth.org , gibt "SOS der öffentlichen Gesundheit: Die Schattenseite der drahtlosen Revolution" einen Überblick über die unabhängigen wissenschaftlichen Forschungen zu Gesundheitsrisiken der Funkstrahlung und gibt Empfehlungen, wie die Öffentlichkeit sicherer leben kann in einer drahtlosen Welt.... Mehr unter: siehe unten. Soweit die Nachricht aus Washington.

In Deutschland die Verurteilung des Verhaltens der Atomindustrie durch unseren Gabriel- mag ihn mal wieder jemand stupfen in Richtung Mobilfunk?? Auch hier Lug und Trug über Jahre hinweg!

Ich kann nur immer wieder den Satz von Albert Schweitzer zitieren: dass das Volk auf die Straße gehen muss... Damals (1959) ging es um die Atomwaffenversuche. Solange es aber noch Mitkämpfer gibt, die öffentlich oder heimlich ihr Handy aus der Tasche holen, machen wir auf die Handy-Süchtigen nicht so viel Eindruck.

Bitte an Interessierte weiterleiten!


Dr. Christine Aschermann


Wireless Technologies Cause Harm to Children and Adults, Legislators and Journalists Are Told
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/5795914/



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Mikrowellenstrahlung
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=DECT
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=DECT
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Wimax
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Wimax
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Magda+Havas
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Camilla+Rees
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Christine+Aschermann

Nature Abhors a Vacuum

Nature Abhors a Vacuum



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Grahame+Blackwell

7
Jul
2009

5
Jul
2009

3
Jul
2009

1
Jul
2009

Wireless Technologies Cause Harm to Children and Adults, Legislators and Journalists Are Told

Public Health SOS: The Shadow Side of the Wireless Revolution

Wireless Technologies Cause Harm to Children and Adults, Legislators and Journalists Are Told

Wireless Technologies Cause Harm to Children and Adults, Legislators and Journalists Are Told

http://electromagnetichealth.org/pdf/NISLAPP-FINAL-PRESS-RELEASE-PUBLIC_HEALTH_SOS.pdf

--------

Public Health SOS

Camilla Rees and I have written a book called "Public Health SOS: The Shadow Side of the Wireless Revolution". The National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy (NISLAPP) has just sent this book to all US Senators and Congressmen and thousands of environmental journalists. We hope this will go a long way in helping to raise awareness.

www.amazon,com carries copies of this book for $20. Proceeds will go to fund research and to help NGOs/charitable groups dealing with electrosmog and EHS.

Here is the press release from Trent University. Please note that the link at the end of the pdf is flawed but you can connect at: http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/wireless-technologies-cause-harm-to-children-and-adults-legislators-and-journalists-are-told/

Feel free to forward to others as you see fit.

Magda Havas


Obama, Congress, Governors and Journalists Warned on Hazards of Wireless Technologies

Exchange Morning Post - Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

... where she teaches and does research on the biological effects of environmental contaminants, including radiofrequency radiation, electromagnetic fields, ...

http://www.exchangemagazine.com/morningpost/2009/week27/Friday/070305.htm


Informant: Martin Weatherall

--------

‘Electrosmog’ is an Emerging Public Health Issue

The Public News Service distributed a report stating that "Electrosmog is an Emerging Public Health Issue" to newspapers, radio and TV stations across the US this past week.

To read or listen to the report go to:
http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/9625-1

The audio version is in the top right corner, click arrow to play.

Ironically the U.S. FDA has revamped its Web site which advises consumers about the safety of cell phones. The FDA's message is very clear: There is no radiation risk.

Read all about it at:
http://www.microwavenews.com

[ "most" studies: - the FDA has responsibility for the non-majority studies if they show risk. "If there is a risk from being exposed to radiofrequency energy (RF) from cell phones it is probably very small" - there is no small risk for 300 millions citizens. How does the FDA refer to industry funded studies, do they receive the same weight as non industry funded? This is insane, it's worse than their drugs policy, because with drugs they do warn of side effects.

Iris Atzmon ]

Who is right?

Is it the FDA who state that they do "not review the safety of radiation-emitting consumer products such as cell phones and similar wireless devices before they can be sold, as it does with new drugs or medical devices" or it is the hundreds of scientists, public health and medical professionals who are documenting the adverse biological and health effects of electromagnetic exposure at levels well below the existing federal guidelines?

Feel free to distribute this email to those who many be interested.


Magda Havas

--------

- Dr. Magda Havas: Open Letter to Parents, Teachers, School Boards. Regarding Wi-Fi Networks in Schools.

http://www.next-up.org/Newsoftheworld/Wifi_2009.php#1

--------

Comments on FDA cell phone spin
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1119

What the FDA should have done
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1120



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=microwave+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electrosmog
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=exposure
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=DECT
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=DECT
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=guidelines
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=biological+effects
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=health+effect
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=health+hazard
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=EHS
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Magda+Havas
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cindy+Sage
logo

Omega-News

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Archiv

Juli 2009
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
 
 
 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Cell phone poses great...
Media waters down concern again http://www.msnbc.msn .com/id/22425001/vp/238842 48#23884248 Doctor...
Starmail - 10. Jul, 22:19
'Electrosmog' is an Emerging...
http://www.emfacts.com/web log/?p=1118 http://omeg a.twoday.net/search?q=elec trosmog http://omega.twoda y.net/search?q=health+issu e
Starmail - 10. Jul, 10:45
Mobile phone use associated...
Posted on 22 September 2008 I don't have a brilliant...
Starmail - 10. Jul, 10:29
Get informed about cell...
RIKI OTT July 09, 2009 at 11:08AM AKST On June 24,...
Starmail - 10. Jul, 10:15
Government response to...
http://groups.google.com/g roup/mobilfunk_newsletter/ t/fc9c5398a9c925ee   htt p://omega.twoday.net/searc h?q=electromagnetic+radiat ion http://omega.twoday.ne t/search?q=exposure http:/ /omega.twoday.net/search?q =guideline http://omega.tw oday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi ht tp://freepage.twoday.net/s earch?q=Wi-Fi http://omega .twoday.net/search?q=healt h+effect http://omega.twod ay.net/search?q=sensitiv h ttp://omega.twoday.net/sea rch?q=cancer http://omega. twoday.net/search?q=tumour http://omega.twoday.net/s earch?q=ICNIRP http://omeg a.twoday.net/search?q=Will iam+Stewart http://omega.t woday.net/search?q=Andrew+ Goldsworthy  
Starmail - 10. Jul, 10:02

Status

Online seit 1959 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 10. Jul, 22:19

Credits

Knallgrau New Media Solutions - Web Agentur für neue Medien

powered by Antville powered by Helma


xml version of this page
xml version of this page (summary)
xml version of this topic

twoday.net AGB