http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1130

Cindy Sage comments on Dariusz Leszczynski's blog
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1131

Perhaps ICNIRP's epidemiology has it terribly wrong
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1132

Dariusz's Leszczynski response to Cindy Sage's comments
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1135

ICNIRP's latest ELF guidelines in the making
http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1137

--------

First, prof' Richter's study on soldiers exposed to microwave radiation in the army showed shortened latency period for brain tumors - <10 years only in young workers. Int J Occup and Env Health 6 page 187-193, 2000. He predicted this would happened with cell phone users. Second, we must not forget that most works on cell phones are simply biased in their methods, most of them were industry funded and it was felt in the way they were done. When studies are biased anything can be underestimation, both long and short term risk. That Rothman relied and agreed with their assumption which is already biased, is what can drive nuts anyone who looks for an objective view from leading people in the field.


Iris Atzmon



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=microwave+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=cancer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=ICNIRP
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Interphone
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=STUK
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=guidelines
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Leszczynski
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cindy+Sage
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Ziegelberger