No doubt: UMTS much more dangerous than GSM
http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/c3cd8f1031c38056
http://www.next-up.org/pdf/PressReleaseConcernPrFranzAdelkoferVerumFoundation06102007.pdf
--------
Here's a copy of my recent email to the Daily Telegraph.
Gill (Tadpole)
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Please find below a copy of my email to the Daily Telegraph.
Dear Sir, With the threat of Wi-fi invading our lives and the actual effects upon human health found near masts or in their beams; protective agencies should be investigating the ruination of peoples lives in the presence of pulsed radio frequency beams.
Michael Repacholi (of the WHO and the ICNIRP) should be informing us of the scientific basis for his posited 'safe' levels of emissions (450uW/cm2 accepted by the NRPB now the HPA's 'Center for Radiation, Chemical and Envoronmental Hazards in the 1990s), which only takes into account the thermal aspect of emissions and completely ignores the non-thermal pulsed emissions which cause all the problems.
The Canadian BioInitiative, formed by Canadians who are trying to find somewhere to live away from emissions, has made Europe aware of the problems and the European Union is questioning Repacholi's scientific proof. The German Government has warned its people not to use mobile phones and to use landlines only - it has also told them to have nothing to do with Wi-fi!
It is rather difficult to avoid a wireless miasma which will invade every area of our lives if it is imposed upon us!
This website points out the extreme danger from 3G - I should think Wi-fi is going to be even worse than this!
http://www.next-up.org/pdf/PressReleaseConcernPrFranzAdelkoferVerumFoundation06102007
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Adlkofer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=BioInitiative
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=non-thermal
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi
http://www.next-up.org/pdf/PressReleaseConcernPrFranzAdelkoferVerumFoundation06102007.pdf
--------
Here's a copy of my recent email to the Daily Telegraph.
Gill (Tadpole)
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Please find below a copy of my email to the Daily Telegraph.
Dear Sir, With the threat of Wi-fi invading our lives and the actual effects upon human health found near masts or in their beams; protective agencies should be investigating the ruination of peoples lives in the presence of pulsed radio frequency beams.
Michael Repacholi (of the WHO and the ICNIRP) should be informing us of the scientific basis for his posited 'safe' levels of emissions (450uW/cm2 accepted by the NRPB now the HPA's 'Center for Radiation, Chemical and Envoronmental Hazards in the 1990s), which only takes into account the thermal aspect of emissions and completely ignores the non-thermal pulsed emissions which cause all the problems.
The Canadian BioInitiative, formed by Canadians who are trying to find somewhere to live away from emissions, has made Europe aware of the problems and the European Union is questioning Repacholi's scientific proof. The German Government has warned its people not to use mobile phones and to use landlines only - it has also told them to have nothing to do with Wi-fi!
It is rather difficult to avoid a wireless miasma which will invade every area of our lives if it is imposed upon us!
This website points out the extreme danger from 3G - I should think Wi-fi is going to be even worse than this!
http://www.next-up.org/pdf/PressReleaseConcernPrFranzAdelkoferVerumFoundation06102007
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Adlkofer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=BioInitiative
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=non-thermal
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi
Starmail - 7. Okt, 08:17
